Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Jan 21-29, 2014

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92872 From: Denise Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92873 From: vitelliantraders Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92874 From: vitelliantraders Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92875 From: vitelliantraders Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Triarius' email
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92876 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Rome's birthday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92877 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: translation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92878 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92879 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92880 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92881 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: translation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92882 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92883 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Triarius' email
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92884 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92885 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92886 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92887 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92888 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92889 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92890 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92891 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92892 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92893 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: translation
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92894 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92895 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Insipientia redux et verissima Re: [Nova-Roma] Foolishness - NOT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92896 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Foolishness - NOT!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92897 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92898 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92899 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Insipientia redux et verissima Re: [Nova-Roma] Foolishness - NOT
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92900 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92901 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92902 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92903 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92904 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92905 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92906 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92907 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92908 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92909 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92910 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday Dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92911 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: NR Birthday dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92912 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92913 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92914 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92915 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92916 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Canada Citerior Activity
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92917 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92918 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday Dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92919 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday Dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92920 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92921 From: scipiosecond Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92922 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92923 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Canada Citerior Activity
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92924 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: 12 years and counting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92925 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92926 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Canada Citerior Activity
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92927 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92928 From: Scipio Second Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92929 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92930 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: 12 years and counting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92931 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92932 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92933 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92934 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92935 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92936 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92937 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: 12 years and counting
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92938 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92939 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92940 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92941 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92942 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: A Billion Minutes Ago
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92943 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92944 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92945 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: A Billion Minutes Ago
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92946 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92947 From: Scipio Second Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92948 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92949 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92950 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92951 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92952 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92953 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92954 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: musical interlude
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92955 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92956 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92957 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: A Billion Minutes Ago
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92958 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92959 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92960 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92961 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92962 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92963 From: James V Hooper Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92964 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92965 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: musical interlude redux
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92966 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92967 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: What class am I in?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92968 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92969 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92970 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92971 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92972 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92973 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92974 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92975 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92976 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92977 From: anotheruranian Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92978 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92979 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Discussion of Intercessio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92980 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92982 From: l_ulpius_atellus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92983 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92984 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Concerning the intercessio against SCU on creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92985 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92986 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92987 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92988 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92989 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Away
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92990 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92991 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Away
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92992 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92993 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92994 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92995 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92996 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92997 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92998 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92999 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93000 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93001 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93002 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93003 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93004 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93005 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93006 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93007 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93008 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93009 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93010 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93011 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93012 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Convening the Comitia Curiata.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93013 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Convening the Comitia Curiata.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93014 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93015 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93016 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93017 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93018 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93019 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93020 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93021 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93022 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93023 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93024 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 16.41
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93025 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93026 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93027 From: Scipio Second Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93028 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93029 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93030 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93031 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93032 From: Teleri Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: (no subject)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93033 From: Q Caecilius Metellus Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93034 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93035 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93036 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: PANNONIA - ITALIA - VENEDIA: Provincial Reports for 2013
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93037 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: Convening the Comitia Curiata.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93038 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Convening the Comitia Curiata.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93039 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Convening the Comitia Curiata.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93040 From: l_ulpius_atellus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Connectivity Issues
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93041 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Awesome A Capella Song in Latin
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93042 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: PANNONIA - ITALIA - VENEDIA: Provincial Reports for 2013
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93043 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: PANNONIA - ITALIA - VENEDIA: Provincial Reports for 2013 (Edictum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93044 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Connectivity Issues
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93045 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93046 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: The Collegium Pontificum January session report.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93047 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Weather on the East coast
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93048 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92872 From: Denise Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Salve!

I just followed @NovaRoma (Crazy4Crochet, @SoCalDeni)! I might get a separate Nova Roma Twitter account, because my "SoCalDeni" account is pretty busy with lots of different things

Vale,
F. Martiania
(Fausta Martiania Gangalia Minervalis)
 
Changing yourself is the first step in changing the world.


On Monday, January 20, 2014 12:56 PM, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92873 From: vitelliantraders Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page

Salvete Aeternia et omnes,

 

Thanks! Glad you approve of the MS page. Also, if there are citizens that have any type of social media venues related to NR that they would like to connect everyone with, please feel free to send me the link and we will get it posted to the page. This also includes any other venues that are not currently listed on the page. It is a growing work in process. 

 

Also, there was a citizen that mentioned back several months ago about a JustinTV channel for NR. I also think that this would be a great opportunity to proceed with, and especially when integrating it into to Lentulus proposal of contacting other Roman related groups.  The channel could continually run programming with recruitment and sponsorship commercials about NR between the programs. Plus, I haven't had experience with the software required (it's free from the site), but it does not seem that complicated.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92874 From: vitelliantraders Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page

AND NOW, to finish the rest of the post after smacking my new sensitive laptop for sending the message early...

 

 

If there is anyone who is interested in assisting with this, look over their site, then let me know:

 

www.justin.tv

 

Vale et valete,

 

L. VITELLIVS TRIARIVS

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92875 From: vitelliantraders Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Triarius' email

I have set up an alternative NR email until Yahoo can get mine back up and running. I would prefer everyone use the following, rather than the gmail account I posted yesterday:

 

vitelliantraders AT yahoo DOT com

 

Valete,

 

L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92876 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Rome's birthday
Salvete
 
April 21 753 BCE
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: remarq777@...
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:57:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: 12 years and counting

 
Salutem plurimam dicit,
Quod cum Nova Roma natalis?
When is Nova Roma's birthday?

Ita; ego sentio sumus Romae sint circa DCXLII B.C.
Yes; I feel like we are back in Rome around 617 B.C.
Valete,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 
 


On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:16 AM, GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS <jbshr1pwa@...  
Salve Pauline!

Many congratulations.

It was a great pleasure for me, a mere novice, to meet you on your trip to Britannia, and to have been your friend since. You have made a great difference to many of us by your example.

Vale optime!
Crispus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92877 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: translation
Salvete
 
From little things big things grow
 
What is the Latin translation of this.
 
Thanks
 
Paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92878 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page

Salvete Omnes!

 

I just took a look at this page, and it’s awesome!  I really like it because it’s straightforward and simple enough that even *I* can navigate it easily, and find what I want.  I do have just one question, though.  The Facebook Nova Roma page is mentioned, but the Facebook Nova Roma group isn’t.  Is that because the page will take you there, or should a direct link to the group be added?  Also, Paulinus has just created a Nova Roma Book Club group, so I hope he’ll be sending the link to our Curule soon. 

 

My sincere congratulations to the Curule Aedilicia for this, and my thanks to all the individuals who provide these social media options.

 

Valete Bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92879 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Salve!

Quadra was asking about Nova Roma, not Roma Antiqua.  It's a good question and the date should be added to the calendar.  

Vale!
Quadratus 


To: nova-roma@yahoogroups.com
From: spqr753@...
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:23:30 -0500
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Rome's birthday

 

Salvete
 
April 21 753 BCE
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: remarq777@...
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:57:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: 12 years and counting

 
Salutem plurimam dicit,
Quod cum Nova Roma natalis?
When is Nova Roma's birthday?

Ita; ego sentio sumus Romae sint circa DCXLII B.C.
Yes; I feel like we are back in Rome around 617 B.C.
Valete,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 
 


On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:16 AM, GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS <jbshr1pwa@...  
Salve Pauline!

Many congratulations.

It was a great pleasure for me, a mere novice, to meet you on your trip to Britannia, and to have been your friend since. You have made a great difference to many of us by your example.

Vale optime!
Crispus






Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92880 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Ave,

March 1, 1998.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92881 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: translation
"From little things big things grow" 
 
Ummm, I would make the Latin translation out to be:
"Debatum inum Novum Romanum?"

Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:46 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...  
Salvete
 
From little things big things grow
 
What is the Latin translation of this.
 
Thanks
 
Paulinus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92882 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Ave Caeca!
 
Send me the links when you get a chance and I'll add in the FB Group and Book Club links as well.
 


Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:06 PM, cmc <c.mariacaeca@...  
Salvete Omnes!
 
I just took a look at this page, and it’s awesome!  I really like it because it’s straightforward and simple enough that even *I* can navigate it easily, and find what I want.  I do have just one question, though.  The Facebook Nova Roma page is mentioned, but the Facebook Nova Roma group isn’t.  Is that because the page will take you there, or should a direct link to the group be added?  Also, Paulinus has just created a Nova Roma Book Club group, so I hope he’ll be sending the link to our Curule soon. 
 
My sincere congratulations to the Curule Aedilicia for this, and my thanks to all the individuals who provide these social media options.
 
Valete Bene!
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92883 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Triarius' email
WOOHOO! Yahoo finally got my email fixed!

Valete,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:17 PM, "vitelliantraders@..." <vitelliantraders@...  
I have set up an alternative NR email until Yahoo can get mine back up and running. I would prefer everyone use the following, rather than the gmail account I posted yesterday:
 
vitelliantraders AT yahoo DOT com
 
Valete,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92884 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page

Salve Triari!

 

Sure, glad to.  BTW from your use of your old email address, looks like you are do a cyber Triumph!

 

Vale bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92885 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-21
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
The last 48 hours have not been pretty. As I stated before, Yahoo is composed of Carthagenians and now this confirms it! LOL 
 


Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:33 PM, cmc <c.mariacaeca@...  
Salve Triari!
 
Sure, glad to.  BTW from your use of your old email address, looks like you are do a cyber Triumph!
 
Vale bene!
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92886 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Salvete
 
Have people type in Nova Roma Book Club to search on FB
 
Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: lvtriarius@...
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:28:15 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Media Services Page

 
Ave Caeca!
 
Send me the links when you get a chance and I'll add in the FB Group and Book Club links as well.
 


Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:06 PM, cmc <c.mariacaeca@...  
Salvete Omnes!
 
I just took a look at this page, and it’s awesome!  I really like it because it’s straightforward and simple enough that even *I* can navigate it easily, and find what I want.  I do have just one question, though.  The Facebook Nova Roma page is mentioned, but the Facebook Nova Roma group isn’t.  Is that because the page will take you there, or should a direct link to the group be added?  Also, Paulinus has just created a Nova Roma Book Club group, so I hope he’ll be sending the link to our Curule soon. 
 
My sincere congratulations to the Curule Aedilicia for this, and my thanks to all the individuals who provide these social media options.
 
Valete Bene!
C. Maria Caeca



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92887 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Ave Paulinus,
 
I did and it's not showing up.

Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:40 AM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...  
Salvete
 
Have people type in Nova Roma Book Club to search on FB
 
Paulinus
 
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: lvtriarius@...
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:28:15 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Media Services Page

 
Ave Caeca!
 
Send me the links when you get a chance and I'll add in the FB Group and Book Club links as well.
 


Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:06 PM, cmc <c.mariacaeca@...  
Salvete Omnes!
 
I just took a look at this page, and it’s awesome!  I really like it because it’s straightforward and simple enough that even *I* can navigate it easily, and find what I want.  I do have just one question, though.  The Facebook Nova Roma page is mentioned, but the Facebook Nova Roma group isn’t.  Is that because the page will take you there, or should a direct link to the group be added?  Also, Paulinus has just created a Nova Roma Book Club group, so I hope he’ll be sending the link to our Curule soon. 
 
My sincere congratulations to the Curule Aedilicia for this, and my thanks to all the individuals who provide these social media options.
 
Valete Bene!
C. Maria Caeca





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92888 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Salvete!

The date should be noted on the calendar - Kalendis Martiis - and it is the start date of the Ludi Novi Romani and the Feriae Marti. However, the perpetual calendar, this year's calendar and last year's calendar do not list the Ludi Novi Romani. That needs to be fixed as it is an important festival for us. One issue with listing the Ludi Novi Romani is that its length has varied and in recent years the ludi has been run with one day for each year of Nova Roma's existance. Now that we are entering the 16th year it is time to set a fixed length and make sure the perpetual calendar is updated. 

Bene valete!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92889 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page

Salvete!

 

Um … I was just on the Facebook book site to grab the link for Triarius (that does work, doesn’t it?) and I notice that the name of the group is Nova Roman Book Club.  So perhaps if you add the n and do another search, you’ll find it.

 

Valete Bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92890 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
SALVETE!

Yes, you are correct. It is: Nova Roman Book Club

VALETE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92891 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
A-ha!

Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:36 AM, cmc <c.mariacaeca@...  
Salvete!
 
Um … I was just on the Facebook book site to grab the link for Triarius (that does work, doesn’t it?) and I notice that the name of the group is Nova Roman Book Club.  So perhaps if you add the n and do another search, you’ll find it.
 
Valete Bene!
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92892 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Avete omnes in foro,

I have a major bone to pick. Be it known that I will not herein speak to the *conservatio* of policies, law, or religious procedure. I am a NR citizen of 2 years, and I am still very inexperienced in magisterial matters and uneducated in the practice of the cultus deorum. Therefore, I will instead speak to the conduct, tone, and presentation of those who have been participating in the debate/argument over the removal of PM Dexter, and appointment of new pontifices, that has so recently flowered into a grand, gnarly basket of crap:

Wow. I believe a revisitation of the principles of basic decency is in order!

Although I do not address everyone who has posted comments out of frustration about this mess, I am sincerely disappointed in so many strong members of this organization--and leaders, too--managing to forget their civilitas and humanitas in communicating and "taking care of business" with each other.

I have come to know several of you much better recently, and I feel honored to know you. I am, in a sense, surrounded by great examples here in Nova Roma, and am saddened to see such free use of sarcasm, insult, and snide jabs by the same. Now I totally get that maybe a couple of you may have been really tired over the last couple days, or you're just stressed out about other personal stuff and you're just more irritable than usual... But trust me, you're not all worn out and stressed like that at the same time. This is a good example of the natural faults of people.

Admittedly, having read thoroughly through the messages here on the ML, I agree with many of the points and positions established; it's just that the attitudes carried with them suck hardcore! Lighten up, I say! Take a deep breath and decide that being in a good mood is worth more than forfeiting it to uselessly retort at a smarmy diatribe!

It's obvious on ALL counts for those heavily involved in this, that nobody's mind has been changed, and absolutely no resolution is being reached any quicker to the problems at hand. Please, brethren and sisters of Nova Roma, take up your nobility; wear it and exercise it as you seek to further the dream and vision of NR. Be exemplars of the virtues that made Rome great. As has been pointed out, the Mos Maiorum is of the utmost importance, especially now. Stick with it, people! I don't condemn any of you, because I know that we are not our quarrels.

Each of you owes it to yourself to deal in kindness and wisdom. Wisdom does not produce heartache. I would love to work alongside all of you in moving the work of NR forward--matter of fact, I will, once this matter is cleared up and Triarius gets his imperium. :)

By the way, Dexter, I know we would all appreciate it if you call the comitia together. Thank you for all the good you've done for our little nation.

My best wishes to all of you, and may this all get sorted out quickly. Floreat Nova Roma!

Valete optime.

Ti. Cassius Atellus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92893 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: translation

A. Tullia Scholastica Ti. Galerio Paulino s.p.d. 
 

Salvete
 
From little things big things grow
 
What is the Latin translation of this.

Perhaps, e minimis magna crescunt.  This means 'from very little things, big things grow.'  If you really want 'little things,' then 'parvis' should do.  If you want something more on the order of 'come into being,' however, a different verb should be used, such as nascor.  

 
Thanks

Flocci est.  

 
Paulinus

Vale.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92894 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Media Services Page
Salve Maria, et salvete omnes!

Yes - it is Nova Roman, and I have found it and applied for membership, so thanks.

Vale, et valete omnes!
Crispus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92895 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Insipientia redux et verissima Re: [Nova-Roma] Foolishness - NOT
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Pompejo Canino S.D. 

 

Caninus Scholasticae sal

Actually, Lentulus has asked me in the past to not write dense sentences. You might want to get out of your ivory tower once in a while.

Haven't been in it lately--or ever.  Sentences packed with teenage slang (such as a recent one) are more likely to cause difficulties for non-English speakers than are complex ones.  Lentulus is way beyond the 'see Spot run' stage with English.  Of course you may not have been around when an Italian consul whose English was not fluent was regularly insulted by the assorted members of the conservative faction formerly known as the Boni, and when others met similar fates, so may have been unaware of this sort of thing--or impervious to it and similar remarks degrading fine and honorable former members of this organization for the sole reason that they do not share the political views of Caesar and Sulla.  Or you, apparently.

You are the poster child of patronization.

Nonsense.  

At least until you have some proof of one's academic degrees. 

What, pray, do you mean by that?  I have adequate proof that Lentulus has said academic degree, if he (or that) is the target of your remarks.  Needless to say, I have proof of my own, too.  You see, Canine, classicists aren't into it for the money or power or any of those things that make the hearts of the rock ribs beat fast and loud.  There are some very fine sayings in Greek which point to more appropriate pursuits, and Tully has some items for contemplation along similar lines.  We don't inflate our résumés or anything similar.  That may well happen in the B school, and in many other domains; there was a quack "doctor" in the student health department of one of the universities at which I was a student, and fake "priests" are not unknown, either--especially after Latin was dropped as a requirement for med school and for seminary.  Kinda hard to fake Latin.  

Where you and some of the others come up with your opinions is a deep mystery; ascribing motives and such to persons one does not know, and has not even met, is not always a good idea, especially if one has not been schooled in the relevant social sciences and is by nature insufficiently talented at the skills necessary for such matters.  As is the case with almost everything, some of us have such abilities and such background, and a lot of us do not.  The motives ascribed to me and to Lentulus arise solely by projection from the perspective of the writers whose temperaments and views are very different from ours rather than from any basis in fact.   Indeed, they are so far off base that they would otherwise be worthy of prolonged laughter.  Unfortunately that is a luxury in which we cannot indulge in the present circumstances.  

Valete!

 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 

Vale. 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92896 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Foolishness - NOT!
 
 
In a message dated 1/22/2014 1:26:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, fororom@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92897 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Salvete,
Going on 16 years!

Habeo request. Daily, for the next few months say until June 30, 2013, can an expert of dates list the days date Roman way of dating.

For example:
January 22, 2014
Ides of February (this is just for example. I don't know how to do those "backward counting" dating*).
Jan. 23, 2014
*Ides less 1; etc.
Gratia tibi ago,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 


On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 4:02 PM, M. Pompeius Caninus <caninus@...  
Salvete!

The date should be noted on the calendar - Kalendis Martiis - and it is the start date of the Ludi Novi Romani and the Feriae Marti. However, the perpetual calendar, this year's calendar and last year's calendar do not list the Ludi Novi Romani. That needs to be fixed as it is an important festival for us. One issue with listing the Ludi Novi Romani is that its length has varied and in recent years the ludi has been run with one day for each year of Nova Roma's existance. Now that we are entering the 16th year it is time to set a fixed length and make sure the perpetual calendar is updated. 

Bene valete!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92898 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
What Italian consul? 

Vale,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: QFabiusMaxmi@...
Date:01/22/2014 4:18 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Foolishness - NOT!

 

 
 
In a message dated 1/22/2014 1:26:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, fororom@... writes:

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92899 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Insipientia redux et verissima Re: [Nova-Roma] Foolishness - NOT
Caninus Scholasticae sal.

You do not understand the issue here. You simply jumped to a conclusion. This is not a concern for anyone's English skills, it is about how much time is required to read and parse the text. I am worried about taking up too much of their time. Plain and simple. Really, Scholasta, when have you read anything I have written in the past that would suggest I do not appreciate the English skills of anyone? These men have busy lives outside of Nova Roma. Sabinus has a business. Lentulus has classes to teach. Dexter is so busy he cannot even write a simple email to summon the comitia curiata. 

And again, in this message you revisit the civil war. Is it ever going to be over for you? Please understand, I am not a Boni. Although I enjoy spending time with Sulla and Caesar, my political leanings do differ from theirs both inside and outside Nova Roma. Really, there is no need to lump me in with them. My differences with you have nothing to do with politics. I simply do not like the devisive, deceptive and devious tactics you have used to try to recruit new citizens to your faction - even though the war is over. You have tried it on me and you have tried it on others. You are still under a nota and removed from the Senate. What was the reason for that nota? I am not a Boni. I just don't like you. You tried to fill my head with your politics and untruths when I was a new citizen. How dare you complain about the politics of others?

Bene vale!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92900 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
Is that why he left?

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92901 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!

Doubt it.  He was the consul.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92902 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92903 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Ave,

Here's the thing...This idealized view of the ancients that they were somehow better behaved than us....and that every time we argue, let out emotions run away with ourselves we show ourselves to be passionate. 

If you don't think the ancients were just as passionate then with all due respect you might have a one dimensional view of history.

Let's be real, we haven't assassinated anyone, yet the ancients did that many times over, do you think that happens with no emotional motivation?

Do you think that Cicero, crap doesn't stink like the rest of ours?  Let me explain to you there is probably no greater liar than cicero...why do I say that?  Dude, he was a defense attorney....The lowest of lawyers...If ancient Rome had ambulance chasers cicero would have had commercials on TV like Larry Parker who won his clients over a billion dollars.  Cicero defended the cream of the crop of villains and won most of the time...If beanie madoff had cicero as his attorney he might be a free man today.

Do you think the pornographic vandalism at Pompeii was made by our modern day crips and bloods?  No way.  They were made thousands of years ago.  

Seriously, I suggest you crack open catullus and read his slams of caesar..read Ovid and how he wrote about seducing married women....Open your mind to the reality that the ancients could be not only as vulgar as we are....but in reality much more vulgar because they did not have the constraints of 2000 years of judeo-christian morality chaining their words with the same condemnation that we have in our society.

Sure the ancients might have thrown up a Cato the censor who would throw out a senator from the senate from kissing his wife in public...but you would also have phallic symbols in every crossroads..vulgar displays of pornographic and whore houses on nearly every street.

I have always argued that the back alley is the truest and most authentic list that best replicates ancient roman life....The lecture we had to endure is the ultimate reason I come to this conclusion. ...let's be real and let's not give a false impression of how ancient Rome really was.  Let's accept reality both of the ancients and our closeness to them.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: ti.cassius.atellus@...
Date:01/22/2014 12:39 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 

Avete omnes in foro,

I have a major bone to pick. Be it known that I will not herein speak to the *conservatio* of policies, law, or religious procedure. I am a NR citizen of 2 years, and I am still very inexperienced in magisterial matters and uneducated in the practice of the cultus deorum. Therefore, I will instead speak to the conduct, tone, and presentation of those who have been participating in the debate/argument over the removal of PM Dexter, and appointment of new pontifices, that has so recently flowered into a grand, gnarly basket of crap:

Wow. I believe a revisitation of the principles of basic decency is in order!

Although I do not address everyone who has posted comments out of frustration about this mess, I am sincerely disappointed in so many strong members of this organization--and leaders, too--managing to forget their civilitas and humanitas in communicating and "taking care of business" with each other.

I have come to know several of you much better recently, and I feel honored to know you. I am, in a sense, surrounded by great examples here in Nova Roma, and am saddened to see such free use of sarcasm, insult, and snide jabs by the same. Now I totally get that maybe a couple of you may have been really tired over the last couple days, or you're just stressed out about other personal stuff and you're just more irritable than usual... But trust me, you're not all worn out and stressed like that at the same time. This is a good example of the natural faults of people.

Admittedly, having read thoroughly through the messages here on the ML, I agree with many of the points and positions established; it's just that the attitudes carried with them suck hardcore! Lighten up, I say! Take a deep breath and decide that being in a good mood is worth more than forfeiting it to uselessly retort at a smarmy diatribe!

It's obvious on ALL counts for those heavily involved in this, that nobody's mind has been changed, and absolutely no resolution is being reached any quicker to the problems at hand. Please, brethren and sisters of Nova Roma, take up your nobility; wear it and exercise it as you seek to further the dream and vision of NR. Be exemplars of the virtues that made Rome great. As has been pointed out, the Mos Maiorum is of the utmost importance, especially now. Stick with it, people! I don't condemn any of you, because I know that we are not our quarrels.

Each of you owes it to yourself to deal in kindness and wisdom. Wisdom does not produce heartache. I would love to work alongside all of you in moving the work of NR forward--matter of fact, I will, once this matter is cleared up and Triarius gets his imperium. :)

By the way, Dexter, I know we would all appreciate it if you call the comitia together. Thank you for all the good you've done for our little nation.

My best wishes to all of you, and may this all get sorted out quickly. Floreat Nova Roma!

Valete optime.

Ti. Cassius Atellus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92904 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Stupid spell checker it was supposed to be Bernie Madoff. 


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: robert.woolwine@...
Date:01/22/2014 8:32 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave,

Here's the thing...This idealized view of the ancients that they were somehow better behaved than us....and that every time we argue, let out emotions run away with ourselves we show ourselves to be passionate. 

If you don't think the ancients were just as passionate then with all due respect you might have a one dimensional view of history.

Let's be real, we haven't assassinated anyone, yet the ancients did that many times over, do you think that happens with no emotional motivation?

Do you think that Cicero, crap doesn't stink like the rest of ours?  Let me explain to you there is probably no greater liar than cicero...why do I say that?  Dude, he was a defense attorney....The lowest of lawyers...If ancient Rome had ambulance chasers cicero would have had commercials on TV like Larry Parker who won his clients over a billion dollars.  Cicero defended the cream of the crop of villains and won most of the time...If beanie madoff had cicero as his attorney he might be a free man today.

Do you think the pornographic vandalism at Pompeii was made by our modern day crips and bloods?  No way.  They were made thousands of years ago.  

Seriously, I suggest you crack open catullus and read his slams of caesar..read Ovid and how he wrote about seducing married women....Open your mind to the reality that the ancients could be not only as vulgar as we are....but in reality much more vulgar because they did not have the constraints of 2000 years of judeo-christian morality chaining their words with the same condemnation that we have in our society.

Sure the ancients might have thrown up a Cato the censor who would throw out a senator from the senate from kissing his wife in public...but you would also have phallic symbols in every crossroads..vulgar displays of pornographic and whore houses on nearly every street.

I have always argued that the back alley is the truest and most authentic list that best replicates ancient roman life....The lecture we had to endure is the ultimate reason I come to this conclusion. ...let's be real and let's not give a false impression of how ancient Rome really was.  Let's accept reality both of the ancients and our closeness to them.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: ti.cassius.atellus@...
Date:01/22/2014 12:39 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 

Avete omnes in foro,

I have a major bone to pick. Be it known that I will not herein speak to the *conservatio* of policies, law, or religious procedure. I am a NR citizen of 2 years, and I am still very inexperienced in magisterial matters and uneducated in the practice of the cultus deorum. Therefore, I will instead speak to the conduct, tone, and presentation of those who have been participating in the debate/argument over the removal of PM Dexter, and appointment of new pontifices, that has so recently flowered into a grand, gnarly basket of crap:

Wow. I believe a revisitation of the principles of basic decency is in order!

Although I do not address everyone who has posted comments out of frustration about this mess, I am sincerely disappointed in so many strong members of this organization--and leaders, too--managing to forget their civilitas and humanitas in communicating and "taking care of business" with each other.

I have come to know several of you much better recently, and I feel honored to know you. I am, in a sense, surrounded by great examples here in Nova Roma, and am saddened to see such free use of sarcasm, insult, and snide jabs by the same. Now I totally get that maybe a couple of you may have been really tired over the last couple days, or you're just stressed out about other personal stuff and you're just more irritable than usual... But trust me, you're not all worn out and stressed like that at the same time. This is a good example of the natural faults of people.

Admittedly, having read thoroughly through the messages here on the ML, I agree with many of the points and positions established; it's just that the attitudes carried with them suck hardcore! Lighten up, I say! Take a deep breath and decide that being in a good mood is worth more than forfeiting it to uselessly retort at a smarmy diatribe!

It's obvious on ALL counts for those heavily involved in this, that nobody's mind has been changed, and absolutely no resolution is being reached any quicker to the problems at hand. Please, brethren and sisters of Nova Roma, take up your nobility; wear it and exercise it as you seek to further the dream and vision of NR. Be exemplars of the virtues that made Rome great. As has been pointed out, the Mos Maiorum is of the utmost importance, especially now. Stick with it, people! I don't condemn any of you, because I know that we are not our quarrels.

Each of you owes it to yourself to deal in kindness and wisdom. Wisdom does not produce heartache. I would love to work alongside all of you in moving the work of NR forward--matter of fact, I will, once this matter is cleared up and Triarius gets his imperium. :)

By the way, Dexter, I know we would all appreciate it if you call the comitia together. Thank you for all the good you've done for our little nation.

My best wishes to all of you, and may this all get sorted out quickly. Floreat Nova Roma!

Valete optime.

Ti. Cassius Atellus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92905 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

C. Decius Laterensis L. Cornelio Sullae omnibusque S.P.D.

I don't think anyone's fooled into thinking that the ancients were better behaved than us. Even the most romanticized vision of Roma Antiqua includes it's negative aspects. A while back, you and I discussed this very topic in a chat on Facebook. When I said that we at least reconstructed that part of Roman society, you pointed out that it was the easiest, lowest hanging fruit there was. And you're exactly right. The question is, are those negative aspects of Roman society really integral to a modern reconstruction? Do we really need to be less civil to one another, simply because the ancients weren't always polite to one another?

For my part, I think that's one low-hanging fruit we can leave on the tree. To me, Nova Roma is about reconstructing the very best of Roma Antiqua and bringing it into the modern age. I'd like to think that's one vision we can all agree on. Otherwise, why are we here? The specifics of that vision are something that we'll never entirely agree on, but no matter how we may disagree on the details, we all share the same basic vision. Though our debates may be vigorous, and though we may never change our opponent's mind, we can still respect each other as allies in the mission to restore the best of Rome. Not all of us will get along, and some of us may actively dislike one another, but that doesn't mean we can't show respect to one another.

At the end of the day, we just need to decide what's more important, and whether we should allow the baser parts of human nature to prevent us from achieving something greater.

Di vos incolumes custodiant!

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android



From: robert.woolwine@... <robert.woolwine@... To: <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Sent: Wed, Jan 22, 2014 3:32:08 PM

 

Ave,

Here's the thing...This idealized view of the ancients that they were somehow better behaved than us....and that every time we argue, let out emotions run away with ourselves we show ourselves to be passionate. 

If you don't think the ancients were just as passionate then with all due respect you might have a one dimensional view of history.

Let's be real, we haven't assassinated anyone, yet the ancients did that many times over, do you think that happens with no emotional motivation?

Do you think that Cicero, crap doesn't stink like the rest of ours?  Let me explain to you there is probably no greater liar than cicero...why do I say that?  Dude, he was a defense attorney....The lowest of lawyers...If ancient Rome had ambulance chasers cicero would have had commercials on TV like Larry Parker who won his clients over a billion dollars.  Cicero defended the cream of the crop of villains and won most of the time...If beanie madoff had cicero as his attorney he might be a free man today.

Do you think the pornographic vandalism at Pompeii was made by our modern day crips and bloods?  No way.  They were made thousands of years ago.  

Seriously, I suggest you crack open catullus and read his slams of caesar..read Ovid and how he wrote about seducing married women....Open your mind to the reality that the ancients could be not only as vulgar as we are....but in reality much more vulgar because they did not have the constraints of 2000 years of judeo-christian morality chaining their words with the same condemnation that we have in our society.

Sure the ancients might have thrown up a Cato the censor who would throw out a senator from the senate from kissing his wife in public...but you would also have phallic symbols in every crossroads..vulgar displays of pornographic and whore houses on nearly every street.

I have always argued that the back alley is the truest and most authentic list that best replicates ancient roman life....The lecture we had to endure is the ultimate reason I come to this conclusion. ...let's be real and let's not give a false impression of how ancient Rome really was.  Let's accept reality both of the ancients and our closeness to them.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: ti.cassius.atellus@...
Date:01/22/2014 12:39 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 

Avete omnes in foro,

I have a major bone to pick. Be it known that I will not herein speak to the *conservatio* of policies, law, or religious procedure. I am a NR citizen of 2 years, and I am still very inexperienced in magisterial matters and uneducated in the practice of the cultus deorum. Therefore, I will instead speak to the conduct, tone, and presentation of those who have been participating in the debate/argument over the removal of PM Dexter, and appointment of new pontifices, that has so recently flowered into a grand, gnarly basket of crap:

Wow. I believe a revisitation of the principles of basic decency is in order!

Although I do not address everyone who has posted comments out of frustration about this mess, I am sincerely disappointed in so many strong members of this organization--and leaders, too--managing to forget their civilitas and humanitas in communicating and "taking care of business" with each other.

I have come to know several of you much better recently, and I feel honored to know you. I am, in a sense, surrounded by great examples here in Nova Roma, and am saddened to see such free use of sarcasm, insult, and snide jabs by the same. Now I totally get that maybe a couple of you may have been really tired over the last couple days, or you're just stressed out about other personal stuff and you're just more irritable than usual... But trust me, you're not all worn out and stressed like that at the same time. This is a good example of the natural faults of people.

Admittedly, having read thoroughly through the messages here on the ML, I agree with many of the points and positions established; it's just that the attitudes carried with them suck hardcore! Lighten up, I say! Take a deep breath and decide that being in a good mood is worth more than forfeiting it to uselessly retort at a smarmy diatribe!

It's obvious on ALL counts for those heavily involved in this, that nobody's mind has been changed, and absolutely no resolution is being reached any quicker to the problems at hand. Please, brethren and sisters of Nova Roma, take up your nobility; wear it and exercise it as you seek to further the dream and vision of NR. Be exemplars of the virtues that made Rome great. As has been pointed out, the Mos Maiorum is of the utmost importance, especially now. Stick with it, people! I don't condemn any of you, because I know that we are not our quarrels.

Each of you owes it to yourself to deal in kindness and wisdom. Wisdom does not produce heartache. I would love to work alongside all of you in moving the work of NR forward--matter of fact, I will, once this matter is cleared up and Triarius gets his imperium. :)

By the way, Dexter, I know we would all appreciate it if you call the comitia together. Thank you for all the good you've done for our little nation.

My best wishes to all of you, and may this all get sorted out quickly. Floreat Nova Roma!

Valete optime.

Ti. Cassius Atellus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92906 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

LOL, I liked the first choice better, I think!  CMC

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92907 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Cassius Atellus Sullae sal.

You are very, very right: Roma Antiqua was full of sin, vice, and debauchery. I've been acutely aware of this since I started studying those, our forebears. I have seen the lecherous frescoes, the crass graffiti; I've happened across Ovid's smutty poetry, I've read accounts of many a wacked-out, base, perverted leader of Rome, be they consuls, senators, or emperors. The Rome I know and love was not a spotless, rosy paradise of sherry and giggles. You are very right.

My point is not that I believe that we should emulate a false notion of what Rome was; I'm talking about continuing to employ the higher values they esteemed so greatly. Also, passion is not an issue. I understand the passion that went into the dealings of the Romans: They were a military nation! Most of those in power had either shed blood for the republic/empire, watched their friends and comrades die for it, or at least were willing to have people killed to either obtain or maintain their vision for Rome. Passion is not something I have a problem with. The main thing for me is that respect has kinda just gone out the window for most of this back-and-forth.


Vale optime.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92908 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
 
 
In a message dated 1/22/2014 7:32:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, robert.woolwine@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92909 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave

What is the best of ancient Rome is in the eye of the beholder.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92910 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday Dating
 
 
In a message dated 1/22/2014 5:16:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, remarq777@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92911 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: NR Birthday dating
In a message dated 1/22/2014 5:16:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, remarq777@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92912 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave,

We are doing exactly that.

In Nova roma's past we had magisterial abuses.  The faction in power used their power to Silence their opponents from being able to speak and criticize.  Threaten to expel citizens.  Throw their "power" around with the similar intent of having lictors remove rods and axes to punish citizens. 

That is abuse.  That is what we should criticize.  That is what we should stop from ever happening again.  Citizens voicing opinions with passion, to the point of having meltdowns does not rise to the level of abuse.  The best thing we all can do is to remember....Remember and if that person runs for officr...remember. 

Those times of using imperium sticks to punish critics ended in the last civil war....it would do us well to remember just how bad the past really got in Nova roma.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92913 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating

My citizenship was dated March 1, 1998. :)

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92914 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
Salvete!

If I recall correctly, Cassius and Vedius had the basic micronation laid out a few days before March 1, 1998 but set the formal founding at March 1, 1998 to match the start of the old Roman new year date. I believe incorporation did not take place until 2002.

Valete! 

Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92915 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating

Ave,

That's true.  My application was surface mailed into the censors office  way back then.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92916 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Canada Citerior Activity
Salvete, omnibus in foro!

One month from today, on Saturday, February 22, 2014, at the provincial office in Montreal, Roman coins will be exhibited and there will be a program on the subject "An Introduction to the Numismatics of Ancient Rome."  This is a repeat of the presentation given last October at Concordia University.  All citizens, prospective citizens, and their guests are invited.  As space is limited, please contact me privately if you wish to attend.  The event will start at 10:30 a.m. and end around Noon.  Those citizens attending will each receive an identifiable Roman coin.

Valete!

C. Claudius Quadratus
Procurator, Canada Citerior


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92917 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
 
 
In a message dated 1/22/2014 10:33:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, robert.woolwine@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92918 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday Dating
Salutem plurimam dicit,
I don't know who's response it is above; gratias tibi ago.

With those guides, may I suggest, you (?) write to us in Nova Roma daily and put the dates in this order:
1/23/14Th
(e.g.) pridie Idus Martias (to state the actual Roman date, in this case for 1/23...)
(e.g.) pr.Id. (to state the actual abbreviation of the Roman date, in this case for 1/23...)

These three dates, listed day-to-day will help me, and others, get how to date in proper Roman (Latin).
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 
 


On Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:26 AM, "QFabiusMaxmi@..." <QFabiusMaxmi@...  
 
 
In a message dated 1/22/2014 5:16:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, remarq777@... writes:


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92919 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Rome's birthday Dating
Caninus Quadrae sal.

That message was from Senator Q. Fabius Maximus

What you should do to get the date emailed to you is sign up here:

http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/fasti/info?v=1&t=directory&ch=web&pub=groups&sec=dir&slk=10


This Yahoo Group sends out a message every day giving the date for the
following day in Roman notation.


I will also remind you that you can see the date each day on the Nova
Roma main page. This line in the banner heading:

Hodié a.d. XI Kal. Feb. St. Cornelia C. Aemilio cos. MMDCCLXVII a.u.c.
est. "F"

gives the date in Rome at the time the page is loaded. At the moment,
the date in Rome is a.d. XI Kal. Feb. 2767 auc or

ante diem xi Kalendas Februarias MMDCCLXVII A.U.C. without the usual
abbreviations.

Bene vale!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus





-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Rome's birthday Dating
From: Robin Marquardt <remarq777@... Date: Wed, January 22, 2014 12:28 pm
To: "Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com

Salutem plurimam dicit,
I don't know who's response it is above; gratias tibi ago.


With those guides, may I suggest, you (?) write to us in Nova Roma daily
and put the dates in this order:
1/23/14Th
(e.g.) pridie Idus Martias (to state the actual Roman date, in this case
for 1/23...)

(e.g.) pr.Id. (to state the actual abbreviation of the Roman date, in
this case for 1/23...)


These three dates, listed day-to-day will help me, and others, get how
to date in proper Roman (Latin).
Tiberius Marcius Quadra





On Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:26 AM, "QFabiusMaxmi@..."
<QFabiusMaxmi@...



In a message dated 1/22/2014 5:16:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
remarq777@... writes:
Ides of February (this is just for example. I don't know how to do those
"backward counting" dating*).
Roman dates are inclusive. You don't count backward. I believe our
true birthdate is 3 days before Ides of Martius. (Vedius lists March 13
in several correspondence)

Only three days of each month in the Roman calendar had specific names.
The first of the month was called the Kalends. The Kalends were always
on the first, but the other two days (Nones & Ides) depended on what
month it was. For the months of March, May, July, and October, the Ides
fell on the 15th and the Nones were on the 7th. For all other months,
the Ides were the 13th and the Nones the 5th.
If it was not one of these named days, a Roman would say it was so many
days before the next named day. The Nones always came 9 days before the
Ides of a month, and 15 - 9 + 1 = 7. They always said that it was so
many days before a specific date, never after, so June 14 would be the
eighteenth day before the Kalends of July (ante diem duodevicesimum
Kalendas Quintiles). This in Latin abbreviated a.d.XVIII Kal.Quin.

The months are adjectives. They are Ianuarius, Februarius, Martius,
Aprilis, Maius, Iunius, Quintilis (later Iulius), Sextilis (later
Augustus), September, October, November, December, and Mercedonius (also
known as Intercalaris, a month inserted when the 355 day calendar was
not in synchronization with the seasons).

Of course these being Romans, several days in a month does not do what
you would expect. March 13 is described as 3 days before the Ides of
March (normal), but March 14 is the day before the Ides of March (pridie
Idus Martias). The abbreviations for these are pr.Kal., pr.Non., and
pr.Id.
Another name occurs only in a leap year when February 24 is counted
twice. The first day, is a.d.VI Kal.Mart., but the repeated day is
a.d.VI Kal.Mart.bis.

Source: Cassius Dio
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92920 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Ave Marte!!
Well put Sulla!

Let me remind, Rome's god Mars, the Roman god of war, lead our ancestors. Everything Sulla said +++ emphasize the bordelli/lupanaris et fierceness. Conventionally, "survival of the fittest."

Now and relatively speaking... life is safe, boring with learning as the norm (as opposed to "killing" to get ahead) - though there are still places in the world (any country where you hear of 20 +/- murders a day) that killing is still the norm. I blame their governments for not being able to control and stop such ancient means (talk about "behind the learning curve!").

If America is the new Rome, I'm glad it is the way it is - not so bad; relatively safe (and as boring and or exciting as legally allowed).
Valete,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 


On Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:32 AM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
We are doing exactly that.
In Nova roma's past we had magisterial abuses.  The faction in power used their power to Silence their opponents from being able to speak and criticize.  Threaten to expel citizens.  Throw their "power" around with the similar intent of having lictors remove rods and axes to punish citizens. 
That is abuse.  That is what we should criticize.  That is what we should stop from ever happening again.  Citizens voicing opinions with passion, to the point of having meltdowns does not rise to the level of abuse.  The best thing we all can do is to remember....Remember and if that person runs for officr...remember. 
Those times of using imperium sticks to punish critics ended in the last civil war....it would do us well to remember just how bad the past really got in Nova roma.
Vale,
Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92921 From: scipiosecond Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Avete,


To idealize any culture always leads to disillusion.   Neither the Roman Republic nor the Roman Empire was populated by saints, nor were citizens all sinners.  To the contrary, both patrician and plebian included good and bad.   To that extent, Roman culture has much in common with most other cultures, ancient and modern.   As a culture, it reflected the foibles suffered by most.


I do find it interesting that Cicero is singled out as particularly offensive because he was a defense lawyer.   This bias has always struck me as a bit curious.   Lawyers, especially criminal defense lawyers, are often the object of derision, that is until an individual needs such services.  I have been a lawyer for over forty years, and consider it an honorable profession.   Early in my career, I had the honor of serving both as a prosecutor and defense attorney.   I make no apologies for my experiences, nor is any necessary.


Valete,


Petrus Augustinus 


 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92922 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave,

I picked on Marcus Tullis because it's an easy example.  It would be similar to a mafia attorney.  

Sure there are good lawyers and bad ones.  It's just the bad ones get better press.  Cicero illustrates that example.

I could have easily used josepheus as an example.  While his work is invaluable...His life is well questionable.  Ask just about any jew about him and one of the adjectives that will be used to describe him is traitor.  His conduct as a leader in the revolt does don't display any noble virtue...If anything his conduct reminds me of a cockroach.   All self preservation.  Yet what he has left us with his work is priceless.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92923 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Canada Citerior Activity
Salvete Omnes,

I think I'm a bit jealous right now.  Wishing you success in the venture..  Will this also be a recruiting exercise Quadrate?

Valete bene,
Aeternia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92924 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: 12 years and counting
Salvete,

Congratulations Paulinus!  I just celebrated my official 14th anniversary last week.

Valete bene,
Aeternia



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92925 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: NR Birthday dating
Ave,

From my recollection there were about 8 people ahead of me:

Cassius, Founder
Vedius Germanicus, Founder
Palladius
Cassia
Q. Caecilius Metellus, the Original and ex consul
Flavia Claudia
Cincinnatus
and I believe the Ambrosius or Octavius guy.
Then me.

I was the first one outside of New England States to join NR.

I know when Octavius revamped the Citizen rolls to convert them from Excel to online/web based I was Number 8.  I know in the Album I am still #8.  But since we there was about 10-12 of us who were in NR as of March 1st 1998 when Nova Roma went "live."  the exact number sequence has been lost.  I am perfectly fine with being #8.   :)

Respectfully,

Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92926 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-22
Subject: Re: Canada Citerior Activity
Salve, Aeternia!

Thanks for your good wishes.  I'll be trying to recruit and also suggesting some other possible activities.  Later on this year I'd like to conduct games in commemoration of the 2000th anniversary of the death of Augustus.  I'm planning to have quizzes based upon the themes of his coinage with a couple of his coins as prizes.

Vale!
Quadratus


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
CC: nova_roma_@yahoogroups.com; backalley@yahoogroups.com
From: syrenslullaby@...
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:19:46 -0700
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Canada Citerior Activity

 

Salvete Omnes,

I think I'm a bit jealous right now.  Wishing you success in the venture..  Will this also be a recruiting exercise Quadrate?

Valete bene,
Aeternia



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92927 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
TM.Quadra Sulla P.Augustinus Heus!
We got an attorney in our midst. I pro-attorney. I also understand from the non-attorney POV why there is derision; summed: jealousy. Long reason: lawyers tend not to make lasting childhood friends. I have two classmates that became attorneys. One don't give advice, and the other is snob married into one of Guam's billionaire family.

Other than that, I am a law student prospect, have practiced In Pro Se, an attorney-in-fact (2x) with aspirations of opening Guam's first law school and reaching LL.D among other Doctorates as well as an MBA.

My mom wanted me to become an attorney since I was 8-y.o. Now at 45 y.o I know why - of our multi-million dollar estate, since 1970 to 1988 we've lost 44% of it, totaling no less than $27 million,  to the powers that be: attorneys, judges, senators... and what do their kids do now... haul trash hahaha ahh this life ifs great.

Generally speaking & to concur with Petrus (J.D.), I find that every culture, worldwide, has every degree of person, and at relatively the same frequency of the population.
Valete,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra



 
 


On Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:03 PM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
I picked on Marcus Tullis because it's an easy example.  It would be similar to a mafia attorney.  
Sure there are good lawyers and bad ones.  It's just the bad ones get better press.  Cicero illustrates that example.
I could have easily used josepheus as an example.  While his work is invaluable...His life is well questionable.  Ask just about any jew about him and one of the adjectives that will be used to describe him is traitor.  His conduct as a leader in the revolt does don't display any noble virtue...If anything his conduct reminds me of a cockroach.   All self preservation.  Yet what he has left us with his work is priceless.
Respectfully,
Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92928 From: Scipio Second Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Ave Sulla,

I suppose we must agree to disagree on Cicero.   His soliloquys are revered by the literati, attorneys, and thespians.   True, he represented unpopular defendants, but that is what the profession demands.   It further demands that the defense attorney strive within ethical bounds for a verdict favorable to his client.   Indeed that is what Cicero did.   In his time as now, defending unpopular defendants brings criticism from without the profession.   But within the profession competent defense attorneys are admired.   Simply being an attorney subjects one to popular, while inaccurate and unfair, caricature.   It is a hazard of the profession.

As an aside, my mother once told me that all attorneys were dishonest, including me.   At least she was smiling.        

I am fully aware that there are unethical attorneys; just as there are unethical doctors, architects, engineers, and merchants.   In my experience, and as numerous statistical studies have shown, these individuals are a small minority.   In the legal profession, such individuals are disciplined.

So in my opinion your assessment of Cicero is inaccurate.   But as an attorney, I will fight for your right to hold that opinion and enunciate it.     

Vale,

Petrus Augustinus 
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:03 PM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
I picked on Marcus Tullis because it's an easy example.  It would be similar to a mafia attorney.  
Sure there are good lawyers and bad ones.  It's just the bad ones get better press.  Cicero illustrates that example.
I could have easily used josepheus as an example.  While his work is invaluable...His life is well questionable.  Ask just about any jew about him and one of the adjectives that will be used to describe him is traitor.  His conduct as a leader in the revolt does don't display any noble virtue...If anything his conduct reminds me of a cockroach.   All self preservation.  Yet what he has left us with his work is priceless.
Respectfully,
Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92929 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Cn. Lentulus L. Sullae omnibusque s. d.

This discussion, in my opinion, is very important because it touches fundamental questions. Why are we here, what do we want to do by being Roman, and how do we want to achieve our goals? 

L. Sulla has emphasized that the Romans themselves were not like marble statues, but obnoxious behavior, cruelty, verbal and physical atrocity, murder and crime were part of their daily lives, in fact, this was how Rome grew to an empire and this was part of being Roman.

Others objected and raised the argument that even if the Romans committed various crimes and were a brutal gang of atrocious infighters, when we build our new Roman community in our modern age, we ought not to imitate their mistakes, but we should follow only their virtues. Not only because this is much more sensible to do, but because a friendly, civilized and polite community, with a sense of unity and cohesion, has more chance to keep its members and to attract others, to achieve its goals.

I would like to add another perspective which might change the picture a little bit. 

Sulla mentioned that we should not think the Romans were better behaved than us. I don't know who thinks this, at all. Did anyone say that the Romans behaved better than us? I have never heard this argument from anybody. No rational person can believe or say this. Old historical periods, medieval and ancient ages, always tend to be more cruel than our present world. Human life, especially the life of the poor, was very cheap back then, and basic concepts of universal human rights and brotherly love of mankind were not a common place in those times, rather the eye for an eye, or even two eyes or hundred eyes for an eye was the normal way of thinking. So it's no wonder that ancient Roman society must have been much more cruel than our modern western world.

So I didn't think, nor did I read, here or elsewhere, anyone suggesting, that the Romans were better than us. What I have heard, however, though not in NR but in lectures at the university and in conferences, and read in books, it was an entirely different argument. One can read about this in excellent books like "Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research" (2010), by Karl-J. Holkeskamp; "Being a Roman Magistrate: Office-Holding and Roman Identity in Late Antique Gaul" (2006), by P. Sivonen; "Form and Function in Roman Oratory" (2010) by D. H. Berry; or "Roman Manliness: "Virtus" and the Roman Republic" (2006), by M. McDonnell.

This argument does not say the Romans were better behaved than us, in general, but it is about an ideal, which was universal among the educated Romans, and which was expected from a Roman public figure. This ideal has more than one names, most frequently called dignitas, pietas or urbanitas, but all refer to different aspects of this same expected behavior: gravitas. All Romans, even the dirty mob who barely could read and write, and which was delighted only by gladiatorial combats and prostitutes, expected gravitas from a public figure, and, although for short periods, like in the case of Catilina or Clodius, the mob idolized a filthy, funny, drunkard who was similar to them, eventually these simple men always turned away from such a figure and, like little children, guiltily ran back to a Cato, a Scipio or a Cicero, to men of gravitas, to make vows to never again support the wrong person. 

The population of Rome expected a behavior of gravitas from its public figures, but, of course, not all public figures of Rome displayed such an expected behavior. Nothing could be done about that, as nothing can be done about bad politicians or annoying public figures of today. Or yes, one thing could be, and was often, if not always, done with them: such improper persons were condemned by the educated classes, and historians made it sure that only the worst memory survives of them. And even if the masses were not so sensitive of this matter than the educated classes, as I have written above, usually at the end they, too, turned away from these despised characters.

So yes, Romans had ideals about an expected behavior, they were very vocal about it, they spoke about good Romans and bad Romans, and it was the expected norm to follow the good behavior, and we, who assembled here in Nova Roma in order to reconstruct and revive the "classical Roman religion, culture and virtues" (as out motto says), are obliged to consider the Roman ideal to be our ideal as well.

Of what, then, does this good Roman behavior consist, for a public speaker or public figure? What is gravitas? Like the English word suggests, it has to do something with gravity, graveness, ponderousness. It means exactly what has been said here the Romans weren't: the marble statue-like immobility, solemn, ceremonious, impressing seriousness and utmost dignity.

The Romans weren't like marble statues? Of course, but they WANTED to be, they TRIED to be: this was their ideal, and all public figures (except the ones who consciously tried to shock and scandalize) aspired to meet this expectation of the Roman populace. People like the two Catones, both the Elder and the Younger, or Cincinnatus the dictator, were the embodiment of this gravitas. 

We speak about an attitude and characteristics that resemble strongly the expected behavior of men in the Japanese culture. This statue-like immobility, severe seriousness and ceremoniously formal politeness, the very high expectations, puritanism and desire for immortal glory and virtue at the same time, the proneness to suicide rather than shame, the expectation of utmost dignity and impeccable behavior, all these things are shockingly similar. But, as I wrote about to Nova Roman friend some days ago, it's no wonder if we think of the fact how Shinto religion, too, resembles Roman religion, and religions do leave a trace on people's character. It's still very exciting and striking to see how two cultures so far from each other can share so many similarities.

But what does the Roman gravitas exactly include? A Roman public figure was expected to display always the highest form of "dignitas" (dignity), he had to follow the principles of "pietas" (to revere the sacred things, honor the family and almost worship the elders). A man of gravitas was expected to be educated (not to be a scholar, but to be wise and learned), and to express himself with decorum, in a dignified way, in a way of behavior and speaking worthy of a cultured city's inhabitant: this was called "urbanitas" (from "city", Latin "urbs", civility, politeness). Incredible, isn't it? The Romans expected polite tone from their public figures, and exception was only made in cases when the targets of rudeness and insults were well-known debauchees, carousers, scandalous drunkard, otherwise the elite excommunicated the orators who were known to throw their insults on their publicly well behaving peers. It was said that a public figure can only be who is a "vir bonus, dicendi peritus", in English: "a decent/good man who is an expert of speaking". It wasn't considered a honorable person who fulfilled only one half of this axiom. It was not enough to be a "good man", one also had to speak in a decent and educated way. Likewise, it was not enough to speak well, one had to be a good willing and polite person.

So Romans had expectations of decent and polite behavior, and these expectations were high, exception was allowed only in especially scandalous cases. Were the Romans all like this? Of course they weren't, they were just humans like us, in a much more brutal world than ours. Does it mean they didn't try to be men of gravitas? No, on the contrary, this was their ideal and they endeavored to impress their peers and the mob as well with their gravitas, dignitas, pietas and urbanitas, in order that historians make mention of them as exemplary Romans, and they may live forever in their books.

When we are here in Nova Roma to revive the Roman virtues and restore Romanitas, we aren't here to idolize and imitate the uneducated, filthy, wild and childlike mob of Rome. We, in the modern Nova Roma, all are educated and enlightened people compared to the Roman mob, our way of thinking and personalities have little to do with those wild and rough people, instead we can be better compared to the learned classes of the Roman society. Sure, the naive masses were also part of the picture and they, too, embodied, in an unconscious way, some virtues of the age. But Romanitas as a model concept, which we can re-build here and, more importantly, which IS WORTH re-building, not only for us but also in our modern world, it is that ideal held up as an example by the Roman educated classes, the "gravitas", which sets Roman culture apart from the less notable and less valuable cultures that emerged and disappeared through the ages.

If we come here to Nova Roma to restore Romanitas, we come here for those conscious and learned ideas.

Because if this behavior of gravitas, the values of pietas, dignitas and urbanitas, were the ideal for the educated Romans, then this shall be the ideal for the Nova Romans, as well.

Valete!

Lentulus


 

Da: "robert.woolwine@..." <robert.woolwine@... Mercoledì 22 Gennaio 2014 16:32
Oggetto: RE: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 
Ave,

Here's the thing...This idealized view of the ancients that they were somehow better behaved than us....and that every time we argue, let out emotions run away with ourselves we show ourselves to be passionate. 

If you don't think the ancients were just as passionate then with all due respect you might have a one dimensional view of history.

Let's be real, we haven't assassinated anyone, yet the ancients did that many times over, do you think that happens with no emotional motivation?

Do you think that Cicero, crap doesn't stink like the rest of ours?  Let me explain to you there is probably no greater liar than cicero...why do I say that?  Dude, he was a defense attorney....The lowest of lawyers...If ancient Rome had ambulance chasers cicero would have had commercials on TV like Larry Parker who won his clients over a billion dollars.  Cicero defended the cream of the crop of villains and won most of the time...If beanie madoff had cicero as his attorney he might be a free man today.

Do you think the pornographic vandalism at Pompeii was made by our modern day crips and bloods?  No way.  They were made thousands of years ago.  

Seriously, I suggest you crack open catullus and read his slams of caesar..read Ovid and how he wrote about seducing married women....Open your mind to the reality that the ancients could be not only as vulgar as we are....but in reality much more vulgar because they did not have the constraints of 2000 years of judeo-christian morality chaining their words with the same condemnation that we have in our society.

Sure the ancients might have thrown up a Cato the censor who would throw out a senator from the senate from kissing his wife in public...but you would also have phallic symbols in every crossroads..vulgar displays of pornographic and whore houses on nearly every street.

I have always argued that the back alley is the truest and most authentic list that best replicates ancient roman life....The lecture we had to endure is the ultimate reason I come to this conclusion. ...let's be real and let's not give a false impression of how ancient Rome really was.  Let's accept reality both of the ancients and our closeness to them.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: ti.cassius.atellus@...
Date:01/22/2014 12:39 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 
Avete omnes in foro,

I have a major bone to pick. Be it known that I will not herein speak to the *conservatio* of policies, law, or religious procedure. I am a NR citizen of 2 years, and I am still very inexperienced in magisterial matters and uneducated in the practice of the cultus deorum. Therefore, I will instead speak to the conduct, tone, and presentation of those who have been participating in the debate/argument over the removal of PM Dexter, and appointment of new pontifices, that has so recently flowered into a grand, gnarly basket of crap:

Wow. I believe a revisitation of the principles of basic decency is in order!

Although I do not address everyone who has posted comments out of frustration about this mess, I am sincerely disappointed in so many strong members of this organization--and leaders, too--managing to forget their civilitas and humanitas in communicating and "taking care of business" with each other.

I have come to know several of you much better recently, and I feel honored to know you. I am, in a sense, surrounded by great examples here in Nova Roma, and am saddened to see such free use of sarcasm, insult, and snide jabs by the same. Now I totally get that maybe a couple of you may have been really tired over the last couple days, or you're just stressed out about other personal stuff and you're just more irritable than usual... But trust me, you're not all worn out and stressed like that at the same time. This is a good example of the natural faults of people.

Admittedly, having read thoroughly through the messages here on the ML, I agree with many of the points and positions established; it's just that the attitudes carried with them suck hardcore! Lighten up, I say! Take a deep breath and decide that being in a good mood is worth more than forfeiting it to uselessly retort at a smarmy diatribe!

It's obvious on ALL counts for those heavily involved in this, that nobody's mind has been changed, and absolutely no resolution is being reached any quicker to the problems at hand. Please, brethren and sisters of Nova Roma, take up your nobility; wear it and exercise it as you seek to further the dream and vision of NR. Be exemplars of the virtues that made Rome great. As has been pointed out, the Mos Maiorum is of the utmost importance, especially now. Stick with it, people! I don't condemn any of you, because I know that we are not our quarrels.

Each of you owes it to yourself to deal in kindness and wisdom. Wisdom does not produce heartache. I would love to work alongside all of you in moving the work of NR forward--matter of fact, I will, once this matter is cleared up and Triarius gets his imperium. :)

By the way, Dexter, I know we would all appreciate it if you call the comitia together. Thank you for all the good you've done for our little nation.

My best wishes to all of you, and may this all get sorted out quickly. Floreat Nova Roma!

Valete optime.

Ti. Cassius Atellus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92930 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: 12 years and counting
Salvete,
 
Nine years in two more days. What's up with Ianuarius?

Valete,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:22 PM, Belle Morte Statia <syrenslullaby@...  
Salvete,

Congratulations Paulinus!  I just celebrated my official 14th anniversary last week.

Valete bene,
Aeternia





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92931 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus omnibus in foro S.P.D.
 
     I would like to concur with the wise words of my good friend Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus. I would say that what made the Romans of old worthy of emulation, what makes Rome worthy of reconstruction, was precisely their sense of civilization, of civility, of the idea (enshrined in English words like "civility") that there is such a thing as the decorous behavior befitting a civis - a citizen of Rome, as opposed to barbaric behavior.
 
      It is true, of course, that the Romans did not always live up to their own high ideals. No civilization ever does. But they strove to live with virtue, and considered shameful - an embarrassment -  those Romans who failed to do so. It is fitting that we in Nova Roma emulate this example, praising behavior that is praiseworthy, and scorning to behave in shameful ways.
 
     Even if we can list many ways in which the Romans in general, or certain particular Romans with whom we may be familiar, failed to live virtuously, we ought not to take this as license to fail to act with decorum. We do not have slaves, we do not tolerate misogyny, we do not fall prey to these massive failings of Roman virtue. Should we then say, that because some Romans acted abominably towards one another, we ought to do likewise?
 
     Remember, the ancient Romans considered proper language and behavior so important that they created the position of Censor. If one wishes to contend that one may always speak as one wishes and act as one wishes without regard to civility or propriety . . . well, that is equivalent to a motion to abolish the position of censor . . . or if a censor were to earnestly argue thus, is that the equivalent of resigning from office? Surely, the censor must acknowledge the role a sense of propriety had in Roman affairs of state, if nothing else.
 
     Nova Roma has, from the very beginning, always held the importance of virtue in Roman life. Let us hear no more arguments justifying cruelty, brutality, and vice as the "Roman way"!
 
Valete omnes,
~ Valerianus
 

Gaius Tullius Valerianus
 
Augur of Nova Roma
Lictor Curiatus of Nova Roma
Proconsul
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92932 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
A. Tullia Scholastica Q. Fabio Maximo S.D. 

 

 
 
In a message dated 1/22/2014 1:26:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, fororom@... writes:

Fabi, as you ought to know, Babelfish (and similar programs, such as Google Translate) are not very good. I have heard that Google Translate is considerably better than Babelfish, but it still is not anywhere nearly as good as the human brain.   It is particularly incompetent with heavily-inflected languages such as Latin, which it turns into mincemeat, completely destroying the intended meaning.  It cannot handle the noun and adjective inflections, and I doubt it can handle the verb ones.  I have used it with Spanish, as I must, for our Sermo classes are taught in both English and Spanish and we have to rely on student interpreters who may not always be available.  One of my students complained about how terrible it was, how badly it mangled Spanish--and Spanish does not have declensions or many of those other interesting features of Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, German, the Slavic languages, etc.  If even a translation program better than Babelfish mutilates a modern language, I don't want to think what a worse one does, or what either does to an ancient and heavily inflected one.  Italian seems less conservative than Spanish, but is endowed with many grammatical forms absent in English (face it, most grammatical forms are absent in English, which probably is on its way to becoming an isolating language similar to Chinese).  There is no one to one correspondence between Italian and English, or between any two languages.  At best these translation programs can identify and translate the roots of the words, but assembling any sort of meaningful sentence is not likely to be within their cybernetic capabilities.  


 And English was the linga of Nova Roma.   He had several Italian aides who spoke better English then he, yet he refused to use them.  I thought for years it was simple pride, but later I found out he believed that Italian should be the national language of Nova Roma and the HQ should be in Italy.  This explained his total indifference to improve his skills.  He didn't care.

In our courses we find similar attitudes among some of the students:  the Spanish speakers are willing to learn French, but refuse to learn English.  Some of the Portuguese speakers are willing to learn English, but refuse to learn Spanish.  They may resent the dominant position of English / Spanish, and want nothing to do with those languages.   One finds a similar situation in South India; the languages there are all in the Dravidian group, and the residents are happy enough to learn the utterly unrelated English language, although Hindi, also unrelated, but dominant in the country as a whole, is eschewed.  

Now one would think that if one had assistants who were more competent at a language than one was, that one would make use of them when needed, but that depends on the individual.  I know I would have been happy for such assistance, but if he was not, well, he wasn't.  That doesn't merit the sorts of insults he received.  In any case, I suspect that several of the Italian citizens think NR ought to reside in Rome, but it happens that it was not founded there.  It might be good to have a presence there, but unless and until Scotty returns and gets that transporter online, travel thither will remain costly and at least somewhat difficult.  If we had trouble with the MMP, too, consider what might greet us if we tried to set up a headquarters there…

 
Q. Fabius Maximus 

Vale.  
      

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92933 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Ave,

Lentulus you do realize that I was defending your right to have your meltdown?  While you may have insulted quite a number of citizens with your diatribe...you had every right to say it as well as face the consequences that result of taking such a stands.

Good evening,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus"
Date:01/23/2014 1:11 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 

Cn. Lentulus L. Sullae omnibusque s. d.

This discussion, in my opinion, is very important because it touches fundamental questions. Why are we here, what do we want to do by being Roman, and how do we want to achieve our goals? 

L. Sulla has emphasized that the Romans themselves were not like marble statues, but obnoxious behavior, cruelty, verbal and physical atrocity, murder and crime were part of their daily lives, in fact, this was how Rome grew to an empire and this was part of being Roman.

Others objected and raised the argument that even if the Romans committed various crimes and were a brutal gang of atrocious infighters, when we build our new Roman community in our modern age, we ought not to imitate their mistakes, but we should follow only their virtues. Not only because this is much more sensible to do, but because a friendly, civilized and polite community, with a sense of unity and cohesion, has more chance to keep its members and to attract others, to achieve its goals.

I would like to add another perspective which might change the picture a little bit. 

Sulla mentioned that we should not think the Romans were better behaved than us. I don't know who thinks this, at all. Did anyone say that the Romans behaved better than us? I have never heard this argument from anybody. No rational person can believe or say this. Old historical periods, medieval and ancient ages, always tend to be more cruel than our present world. Human life, especially the life of the poor, was very cheap back then, and basic concepts of universal human rights and brotherly love of mankind were not a common place in those times, rather the eye for an eye, or even two eyes or hundred eyes for an eye was the normal way of thinking. So it's no wonder that ancient Roman society must have been much more cruel than our modern western world.

So I didn't think, nor did I read, here or elsewhere, anyone suggesting, that the Romans were better than us. What I have heard, however, though not in NR but in lectures at the university and in conferences, and read in books, it was an entirely different argument. One can read about this in excellent books like "Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research" (2010), by Karl-J. Holkeskamp; "Being a Roman Magistrate: Office-Holding and Roman Identity in Late Antique Gaul" (2006), by P. Sivonen; "Form and Function in Roman Oratory" (2010) by D. H. Berry; or "Roman Manliness: "Virtus" and the Roman Republic" (2006), by M. McDonnell.

This argument does not say the Romans were better behaved than us, in general, but it is about an ideal, which was universal among the educated Romans, and which was expected from a Roman public figure. This ideal has more than one names, most frequently called dignitas, pietas or urbanitas, but all refer to different aspects of this same expected behavior: gravitas. All Romans, even the dirty mob who barely could read and write, and which was delighted only by gladiatorial combats and prostitutes, expected gravitas from a public figure, and, although for short periods, like in the case of Catilina or Clodius, the mob idolized a filthy, funny, drunkard who was similar to them, eventually these simple men always turned away from such a figure and, like little children, guiltily ran back to a Cato, a Scipio or a Cicero, to men of gravitas, to make vows to never again support the wrong person. 

The population of Rome expected a behavior of gravitas from its public figures, but, of course, not all public figures of Rome displayed such an expected behavior. Nothing could be done about that, as nothing can be done about bad politicians or annoying public figures of today. Or yes, one thing could be, and was often, if not always, done with them: such improper persons were condemned by the educated classes, and historians made it sure that only the worst memory survives of them. And even if the masses were not so sensitive of this matter than the educated classes, as I have written above, usually at the end they, too, turned away from these despised characters.

So yes, Romans had ideals about an expected behavior, they were very vocal about it, they spoke about good Romans and bad Romans, and it was the expected norm to follow the good behavior, and we, who assembled here in Nova Roma in order to reconstruct and revive the "classical Roman religion, culture and virtues" (as out motto says), are obliged to consider the Roman ideal to be our ideal as well.

Of what, then, does this good Roman behavior consist, for a public speaker or public figure? What is gravitas? Like the English word suggests, it has to do something with gravity, graveness, ponderousness. It means exactly what has been said here the Romans weren't: the marble statue-like immobility, solemn, ceremonious, impressing seriousness and utmost dignity.

The Romans weren't like marble statues? Of course, but they WANTED to be, they TRIED to be: this was their ideal, and all public figures (except the ones who consciously tried to shock and scandalize) aspired to meet this expectation of the Roman populace. People like the two Catones, both the Elder and the Younger, or Cincinnatus the dictator, were the embodiment of this gravitas. 

We speak about an attitude and characteristics that resemble strongly the expected behavior of men in the Japanese culture. This statue-like immobility, severe seriousness and ceremoniously formal politeness, the very high expectations, puritanism and desire for immortal glory and virtue at the same time, the proneness to suicide rather than shame, the expectation of utmost dignity and impeccable behavior, all these things are shockingly similar. But, as I wrote about to Nova Roman friend some days ago, it's no wonder if we think of the fact how Shinto religion, too, resembles Roman religion, and religions do leave a trace on people's character. It's still very exciting and striking to see how two cultures so far from each other can share so many similarities.

But what does the Roman gravitas exactly include? A Roman public figure was expected to display always the highest form of "dignitas" (dignity), he had to follow the principles of "pietas" (to revere the sacred things, honor the family and almost worship the elders). A man of gravitas was expected to be educated (not to be a scholar, but to be wise and learned), and to express himself with decorum, in a dignified way, in a way of behavior and speaking worthy of a cultured city's inhabitant: this was called "urbanitas" (from "city", Latin "urbs", civility, politeness). Incredible, isn't it? The Romans expected polite tone from their public figures, and exception was only made in cases when the targets of rudeness and insults were well-known debauchees, carousers, scandalous drunkard, otherwise the elite excommunicated the orators who were known to throw their insults on their publicly well behaving peers. It was said that a public figure can only be who is a "vir bonus, dicendi peritus", in English: "a decent/good man who is an expert of speaking". It wasn't considered a honorable person who fulfilled only one half of this axiom. It was not enough to be a "good man", one also had to speak in a decent and educated way. Likewise, it was not enough to speak well, one had to be a good willing and polite person.

So Romans had expectations of decent and polite behavior, and these expectations were high, exception was allowed only in especially scandalous cases. Were the Romans all like this? Of course they weren't, they were just humans like us, in a much more brutal world than ours. Does it mean they didn't try to be men of gravitas? No, on the contrary, this was their ideal and they endeavored to impress their peers and the mob as well with their gravitas, dignitas, pietas and urbanitas, in order that historians make mention of them as exemplary Romans, and they may live forever in their books.

When we are here in Nova Roma to revive the Roman virtues and restore Romanitas, we aren't here to idolize and imitate the uneducated, filthy, wild and childlike mob of Rome. We, in the modern Nova Roma, all are educated and enlightened people compared to the Roman mob, our way of thinking and personalities have little to do with those wild and rough people, instead we can be better compared to the learned classes of the Roman society. Sure, the naive masses were also part of the picture and they, too, embodied, in an unconscious way, some virtues of the age. But Romanitas as a model concept, which we can re-build here and, more importantly, which IS WORTH re-building, not only for us but also in our modern world, it is that ideal held up as an example by the Roman educated classes, the "gravitas", which sets Roman culture apart from the less notable and less valuable cultures that emerged and disappeared through the ages.

If we come here to Nova Roma to restore Romanitas, we come here for those conscious and learned ideas.

Because if this behavior of gravitas, the values of pietas, dignitas and urbanitas, were the ideal for the educated Romans, then this shall be the ideal for the Nova Romans, as well.

Valete!

Lentulus


 

Da: "robert.woolwine@..." <robert.woolwine@... Mercoledì 22 Gennaio 2014 16:32
Oggetto: RE: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 
Ave,

Here's the thing...This idealized view of the ancients that they were somehow better behaved than us....and that every time we argue, let out emotions run away with ourselves we show ourselves to be passionate. 

If you don't think the ancients were just as passionate then with all due respect you might have a one dimensional view of history.

Let's be real, we haven't assassinated anyone, yet the ancients did that many times over, do you think that happens with no emotional motivation?

Do you think that Cicero, crap doesn't stink like the rest of ours?  Let me explain to you there is probably no greater liar than cicero...why do I say that?  Dude, he was a defense attorney....The lowest of lawyers...If ancient Rome had ambulance chasers cicero would have had commercials on TV like Larry Parker who won his clients over a billion dollars.  Cicero defended the cream of the crop of villains and won most of the time...If beanie madoff had cicero as his attorney he might be a free man today.

Do you think the pornographic vandalism at Pompeii was made by our modern day crips and bloods?  No way.  They were made thousands of years ago.  

Seriously, I suggest you crack open catullus and read his slams of caesar..read Ovid and how he wrote about seducing married women....Open your mind to the reality that the ancients could be not only as vulgar as we are....but in reality much more vulgar because they did not have the constraints of 2000 years of judeo-christian morality chaining their words with the same condemnation that we have in our society.

Sure the ancients might have thrown up a Cato the censor who would throw out a senator from the senate from kissing his wife in public...but you would also have phallic symbols in every crossroads..vulgar displays of pornographic and whore houses on nearly every street.

I have always argued that the back alley is the truest and most authentic list that best replicates ancient roman life....The lecture we had to endure is the ultimate reason I come to this conclusion. ...let's be real and let's not give a false impression of how ancient Rome really was.  Let's accept reality both of the ancients and our closeness to them.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: ti.cassius.atellus@...
Date:01/22/2014 12:39 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 
Avete omnes in foro,

I have a major bone to pick. Be it known that I will not herein speak to the *conservatio* of policies, law, or religious procedure. I am a NR citizen of 2 years, and I am still very inexperienced in magisterial matters and uneducated in the practice of the cultus deorum. Therefore, I will instead speak to the conduct, tone, and presentation of those who have been participating in the debate/argument over the removal of PM Dexter, and appointment of new pontifices, that has so recently flowered into a grand, gnarly basket of crap:

Wow. I believe a revisitation of the principles of basic decency is in order!

Although I do not address everyone who has posted comments out of frustration about this mess, I am sincerely disappointed in so many strong members of this organization--and leaders, too--managing to forget their civilitas and humanitas in communicating and "taking care of business" with each other.

I have come to know several of you much better recently, and I feel honored to know you. I am, in a sense, surrounded by great examples here in Nova Roma, and am saddened to see such free use of sarcasm, insult, and snide jabs by the same. Now I totally get that maybe a couple of you may have been really tired over the last couple days, or you're just stressed out about other personal stuff and you're just more irritable than usual... But trust me, you're not all worn out and stressed like that at the same time. This is a good example of the natural faults of people.

Admittedly, having read thoroughly through the messages here on the ML, I agree with many of the points and positions established; it's just that the attitudes carried with them suck hardcore! Lighten up, I say! Take a deep breath and decide that being in a good mood is worth more than forfeiting it to uselessly retort at a smarmy diatribe!

It's obvious on ALL counts for those heavily involved in this, that nobody's mind has been changed, and absolutely no resolution is being reached any quicker to the problems at hand. Please, brethren and sisters of Nova Roma, take up your nobility; wear it and exercise it as you seek to further the dream and vision of NR. Be exemplars of the virtues that made Rome great. As has been pointed out, the Mos Maiorum is of the utmost importance, especially now. Stick with it, people! I don't condemn any of you, because I know that we are not our quarrels.

Each of you owes it to yourself to deal in kindness and wisdom. Wisdom does not produce heartache. I would love to work alongside all of you in moving the work of NR forward--matter of fact, I will, once this matter is cleared up and Triarius gets his imperium. :)

By the way, Dexter, I know we would all appreciate it if you call the comitia together. Thank you for all the good you've done for our little nation.

My best wishes to all of you, and may this all get sorted out quickly. Floreat Nova Roma!

Valete optime.

Ti. Cassius Atellus


Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (15)
Recent Activity:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92934 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Ave,

Which post of lentulus do you agree with?  The meltdown message where he insulted nearly everyone in Nova roma?  Or his last message?  I am unclear.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus
Date:01/23/2014 1:56 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma Main List
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 

Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus omnibus in foro S.P.D.
 
     I would like to concur with the wise words of my good friend Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus. I would say that what made the Romans of old worthy of emulation, what makes Rome worthy of reconstruction, was precisely their sense of civilization, of civility, of the idea (enshrined in English words like "civility") that there is such a thing as the decorous behavior befitting a civis - a citizen of Rome, as opposed to barbaric behavior.
 
      It is true, of course, that the Romans did not always live up to their own high ideals. No civilization ever does. But they strove to live with virtue, and considered shameful - an embarrassment -  those Romans who failed to do so. It is fitting that we in Nova Roma emulate this example, praising behavior that is praiseworthy, and scorning to behave in shameful ways.
 
     Even if we can list many ways in which the Romans in general, or certain particular Romans with whom we may be familiar, failed to live virtuously, we ought not to take this as license to fail to act with decorum. We do not have slaves, we do not tolerate misogyny, we do not fall prey to these massive failings of Roman virtue. Should we then say, that because some Romans acted abominably towards one another, we ought to do likewise?
 
     Remember, the ancient Romans considered proper language and behavior so important that they created the position of Censor. If one wishes to contend that one may always speak as one wishes and act as one wishes without regard to civility or propriety . . . well, that is equivalent to a motion to abolish the position of censor . . . or if a censor were to earnestly argue thus, is that the equivalent of resigning from office? Surely, the censor must acknowledge the role a sense of propriety had in Roman affairs of state, if nothing else.
 
     Nova Roma has, from the very beginning, always held the importance of virtue in Roman life. Let us hear no more arguments justifying cruelty, brutality, and vice as the "Roman way"!
 
Valete omnes,
~ Valerianus
 

Gaius Tullius Valerianus
 
Augur of Nova Roma
Lictor Curiatus of Nova Roma
Proconsul
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92935 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Salve Sulla,
 
His last message before I posted . . . I didn't see a meltdown . . . I may have to dig a bit to find it. The thought of Lentulus *having* a meltdown . . . I cannot picture it!
 
Vale,
~Valerianus
 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92936 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave,

Oh it's there.  Our senior consul responded to it.

It's in the foolishness thread.

He used a wide paint brush in that post.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92937 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: 12 years and counting
Avete,

Yeah, I know! I celebrated my 2nd last week as well. Hmm...


Valete


Ti. Cassius Atellus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92938 From: ti_cassius_atellus Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave Sulla,

One thing that is abundantly apparent to me is that none of this talk about decorum and honorable conduct is challenging the points you were making. Not from me, not from Lentulus, and not from Valerianus. The whole basic idea here is that the attitudes and ways of speaking can (and should) be changed for the better, and yet the opinions and stances can remain the same. I think at least several of us are pretty well agreed on that.

Vale.

Ti. Cassius Atellus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92939 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-23
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave,

That's cool.  I just don't believe anyone has crossed the line to the point of needing improvement, unless it's ones own personal evaluation.

For me talk is cheap.  Always has been and always will.  What is always most important for me is the conduct of the person.  The dedication of the person.  The consistency of the person.  The drive and activity of the person.

Nova roma has lots of talkers.  That's good for what that is worth.  What nova roma needs are idea makers like Triarius, who despite bumps comes up with outside the box ideas....and movers of mountains like caesar.  Who as a talker is as blunt as a 2x4...but in action is a genius and there are very few, if any in nr!

I hope we all are in agreement.  :)

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92940 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
 


Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:54 PM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
That's cool.  I just don't believe anyone has crossed the line to the point of needing improvement, unless it's ones own personal evaluation.
For me talk is cheap.  Always has been and always will.  What is always most important for me is the conduct of the person.  The dedication of the person.  The consistency of the person.  The drive and activity of the person.
Nova roma has lots of talkers.  That's good for what that is worth.  What nova roma needs are idea makers like Triarius, who despite bumps comes up with outside the box ideas....and movers of mountains like caesar.  Who as a talker is as blunt as a 2x4...but in action is a genius and there are very few, if any in nr!
I hope we all are in agreement.  :)
Respectfully,
Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92941 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
 
 
 
Salvete omnes,
“And I would lay this charge on his daughter and his wife—so to reverence the memory of their father, and husband, that they revolve within them all that he said and did, and to cherish the form and fashion of his soul, rather than of his body; it is not that I would forbid the making of statues, shaped in marble or bronze, but that as the human face, so is its copy—futile and perishing, while the form of the mind is eternal, to be expressed, not through the alien medium of art and its material, but severally by each man in the fashion of his own life.”
Tacitus, Life of Agricola
Man is judged in history by his works, and in life by his reputation.
Optime valete,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS
 


On Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:54 PM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
That's cool.  I just don't believe anyone has crossed the line to the point of needing improvement, unless it's ones own personal evaluation.
For me talk is cheap.  Always has been and always will.  What is always most important for me is the conduct of the person.  The dedication of the person.  The consistency of the person.  The drive and activity of the person.
Nova roma has lots of talkers.  That's good for what that is worth.  What nova roma needs are idea makers like Triarius, who despite bumps comes up with outside the box ideas....and movers of mountains like caesar.  Who as a talker is as blunt as a 2x4...but in action is a genius and there are very few, if any in nr!
I hope we all are in agreement.  :)
Respectfully,
Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92942 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: A Billion Minutes Ago
Avete!

A billion minutes ago it was DCCCLXVII A.U.C. (114 AD) and Trajan was in power.

Valete!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92943 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)


A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D.  
I truly hope I'm not stepping out of line... but can I say.. I'm getting fed up! We are bickering more than the US Congress and getting the same amount of work done! It seems like when one thread gets exhausted by this topic, someone brings up a new one. 

This is part and parcel of Nova Roma, for better or for worse.  The Forum Hospitum list forbids such discussion in an effort to shield the prospective citizens from this perfectly normal activity, although the earlier NewRoman one did not utterly forbid discussion of Nova Roman politics as Hospitum does.  Some would prefer that we sit quietly and accept whatever is thrown at us, however abominable--but that sort of thing is more characteristic of a dictatorship in the modern world than a true democracy or republic.  Democracy is messy, and there will be arguments--or rather, debates some turn into arguments.  

I hope I'm wrong, but the five people who keep stepping up to the argument are either right, left, or just making jokes about everything.

First of all, there is no 'left' as such in Nova Roma.  We used to have a moderate faction and a conservative one, but nearly all of the former have left, or been driven out.  Most of the magistrates in recent years have been / are various flavors of the conservative faction, once known as the Boni.  Sulla is among them, and being blessed with boundless keyboard energy and a vociferous nature, has been talking a lot and giving you newer citizens his take on Nova Roma politics--but it is only HIS take, and that of his political allies.  Reality looks quite different to the rest of us.  

Some people do joke, but a lot of us are more serious when dealing with serious matters. This is a very serious matter, and with the possible exception of Triarius, I don't think anyone is joking about it.  

 I've put my two cents in before with a previous thread with the Honorable Sulla (please don't turn like the press and think I'm taking sides because I used "the Honorable" as far as I know, since no new Consuls have been granted imperium... he remains Consul, thus deserving the respect of the office no matter your position in this matter). 

My personal feelings on this matter is with the "Opposition Pontiffs." I feel it is sacrilegious for the Senate to supersede the CP in these matters. 

Those far more knowledgeable than I about such matters have concluded as much.  It is also extremely foolish to appoint pontifices who have not been trained, who have not held even a minor religious post, such as that of sacerdos.  Kindly note that all of the prospective appointees belong to the conservative faction, and will pack the Collegium.  Even a former citizen from that faction, and that, too, one with certain apparently disqualifying health issues, was proposed until that error was corrected.  All are going to start not at the bottom, as is proper, but at the top.  Instead of having altar boys, we will have cardinals.  

Sulla's term as consul is over.  The new magistrates have taken their oaths and entered office, but have not yet been granted imperium.  They are able to perform many of their duties with potestas, which is inherent.  


While, trust me, I REALLY want to start my training as a Fetialis…

As far as I am aware, Metellus is our sole fetialis; perhaps he could assist you.  

 it's very annoying. The only thing I am doing to train for the priesthood is study the Constitution.. which infuriates me more when I read people debating sentences and try to twist meanings from clearly stated lines.

Pontifex Lentulus and I often encounter this difficulty.  We are not understood, and our words get twisted and all 'bent out of shape,' as someone I knew long ago used to say.  Could be because we don't belong to the conservative faction…and are perceived as fair game for such nonsense.  We could state that it snows in Minnesota in the winter, and that would be denied, even ridiculed.  If one of them said that Quadratus (in Montreal) had a pineapple plantation and an orange grove (maybe a rice paddy, too) in his yard, why, that would believed.  Of course they will deny this…but we know better.  


I also feel that those arguing that the Senate has *no* authority in religious matters is just stupid.. The Senate and (in fact) every elected body in the Roman State is Sacrosanct. My previous post (four threads back) had an option that would make everyone happy.. except those out for blood.

On the matter of the Pontifix Maximus.. yes, he failed in his annual duty. No, this shouldn't be made light of. No, someone elected to a position for life shouldn't be removed by an outside body. 

Although this has occurred more than once in NR history.  The pontifex maximus is politically independent and perhaps has gotten tired of being insulted for using two words of his well-known and academically-mandatory native language (French) in the presence of those who refuse to learn any language their respective mothers didn't teach them in the cradle, for being less than Shakespearean or Churcillian in his English, and for being other than a member of the conservative faction.  


Yes, when it comes to the PM and the CP.. the Catholic Church is one of the best examples. Considering that, a Pope can be removed from office (before death) either by resignation or a majority vote of the College of Cardinals when there has been a situation that would taint the office. 

Lastly, there is a lot of talk about auspices being taken.. I have read that they were favorable about the subject of the vote, but can we have them taken for the actual enforcement of the vote? If they are favorable, then the arguments people are making against it or for it are now invalid in the eyes of the Divine. No more argument, no more mess, the government can continue, and forgiveness of the extra commas and grammatical errors here. :)

As I am not a practitioner of the RR, I may be wrong about this, but I believe that the auspices referred to the actual session of the Senate, NOT the outcome of its votes.  

I hope this hasn't offended anyone, but when people are saying that Nova Roma looks idiotic in the eyes of the World.. it infuriates me. 

Unfortunately, there are things that Nova Roma has done which have indeed made it a laughingstock.  There are many people who misunderstand Nova Roma, including in my own field (classics), and some who look upon the lack of interest in the language of the Romans, the mutilations thereof in the titles of various laws, etc., the bizarre names once allowed and now apparently back in favor despite our efforts to bring our names into keeping with genuine Roman practice, certain matters relating to the religio, the presence of only one consul and one praetor last year, a situation which in the past would have brought a riot of complaints from the conservatives had that consul and praetor been of a different political stripe (it did some years ago when a consul had to act for his colleague and both praetors, all of whom were missing.  I have been here over ten years, and have seen a lot).  And so it goes. 


Call me narcissistic, but that makes *me* foolish in the eyes of the World. I don't like to look foolish. I don't like my friends to look foolish. I don't like my Gods to look foolish.

Most of us don't.  Some, however, can't see, or don't care, how they look to the outside world. They simply cannot take another's perspective.  In reality, there are organizations opposed to Nova Roma, some formed by former citizens after one or another mass exodus (which Sulla and friends prefer to term 'civil wars,' though the second at least was not really a war, but a reaction to senate paralysis and other matters); there are independent people who hate Nova Roma, and will nit pick anything they can find.  That is reality.  It may not be pleasant, but it is there.  So are hurricanes, tornados, forest fires, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, blizzards…and political chicanery, inter alia.  

Please forgive my temper.

Et in rebus difficilibus aequum animum serva; even in difficult situations, maintain a calm temperament.  

Sincerely,
Titus Iulius Nix

Vale.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92944 From: robert.woolwine@gmail.com Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Ave,

Oh man reading your post is like reading piscinus.  

You just don't like us because you got hoisted by your own actions....got nota'd.  And your standing in Nova roma ranks up there as hortensia, in other word, it's lower than the Dead Sea.

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: "A. Tullia Scholastica"
Date:01/24/2014 2:04 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Nova-Roma] insipientia (non, suis sententiis)

 



A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D.  
I truly hope I'm not stepping out of line... but can I say.. I'm getting fed up! We are bickering more than the US Congress and getting the same amount of work done! It seems like when one thread gets exhausted by this topic, someone brings up a new one. 

This is part and parcel of Nova Roma, for better or for worse.  The Forum Hospitum list forbids such discussion in an effort to shield the prospective citizens from this perfectly normal activity, although the earlier NewRoman one did not utterly forbid discussion of Nova Roman politics as Hospitum does.  Some would prefer that we sit quietly and accept whatever is thrown at us, however abominable--but that sort of thing is more characteristic of a dictatorship in the modern world than a true democracy or republic.  Democracy is messy, and there will be arguments--or rather, debates some turn into arguments.  

I hope I'm wrong, but the five people who keep stepping up to the argument are either right, left, or just making jokes about everything.

First of all, there is no 'left' as such in Nova Roma.  We used to have a moderate faction and a conservative one, but nearly all of the former have left, or been driven out.  Most of the magistrates in recent years have been / are various flavors of the conservative faction, once known as the Boni.  Sulla is among them, and being blessed with boundless keyboard energy and a vociferous nature, has been talking a lot and giving you newer citizens his take on Nova Roma politics--but it is only HIS take, and that of his political allies.  Reality looks quite different to the rest of us.  

Some people do joke, but a lot of us are more serious when dealing with serious matters. This is a very serious matter, and with the possible exception of Triarius, I don't think anyone is joking about it.  

 I've put my two cents in before with a previous thread with the Honorable Sulla (please don't turn like the press and think I'm taking sides because I used "the Honorable" as far as I know, since no new Consuls have been granted imperium... he remains Consul, thus deserving the respect of the office no matter your position in this matter). 

My personal feelings on this matter is with the "Opposition Pontiffs." I feel it is sacrilegious for the Senate to supersede the CP in these matters. 

Those far more knowledgeable than I about such matters have concluded as much.  It is also extremely foolish to appoint pontifices who have not been trained, who have not held even a minor religious post, such as that of sacerdos.  Kindly note that all of the prospective appointees belong to the conservative faction, and will pack the Collegium.  Even a former citizen from that faction, and that, too, one with certain apparently disqualifying health issues, was proposed until that error was corrected.  All are going to start not at the bottom, as is proper, but at the top.  Instead of having altar boys, we will have cardinals.  

Sulla's term as consul is over.  The new magistrates have taken their oaths and entered office, but have not yet been granted imperium.  They are able to perform many of their duties with potestas, which is inherent.  


While, trust me, I REALLY want to start my training as a Fetialis…

As far as I am aware, Metellus is our sole fetialis; perhaps he could assist you.  

 it's very annoying. The only thing I am doing to train for the priesthood is study the Constitution.. which infuriates me more when I read people debating sentences and try to twist meanings from clearly stated lines.

Pontifex Lentulus and I often encounter this difficulty.  We are not understood, and our words get twisted and all 'bent out of shape,' as someone I knew long ago used to say.  Could be because we don't belong to the conservative faction…and are perceived as fair game for such nonsense.  We could state that it snows in Minnesota in the winter, and that would be denied, even ridiculed.  If one of them said that Quadratus (in Montreal) had a pineapple plantation and an orange grove (maybe a rice paddy, too) in his yard, why, that would believed.  Of course they will deny this…but we know better.  


I also feel that those arguing that the Senate has *no* authority in religious matters is just stupid.. The Senate and (in fact) every elected body in the Roman State is Sacrosanct. My previous post (four threads back) had an option that would make everyone happy.. except those out for blood.

On the matter of the Pontifix Maximus.. yes, he failed in his annual duty. No, this shouldn't be made light of. No, someone elected to a position for life shouldn't be removed by an outside body. 

Although this has occurred more than once in NR history.  The pontifex maximus is politically independent and perhaps has gotten tired of being insulted for using two words of his well-known and academically-mandatory native language (French) in the presence of those who refuse to learn any language their respective mothers didn't teach them in the cradle, for being less than Shakespearean or Churcillian in his English, and for being other than a member of the conservative faction.  


Yes, when it comes to the PM and the CP.. the Catholic Church is one of the best examples. Considering that, a Pope can be removed from office (before death) either by resignation or a majority vote of the College of Cardinals when there has been a situation that would taint the office. 

Lastly, there is a lot of talk about auspices being taken.. I have read that they were favorable about the subject of the vote, but can we have them taken for the actual enforcement of the vote? If they are favorable, then the arguments people are making against it or for it are now invalid in the eyes of the Divine. No more argument, no more mess, the government can continue, and forgiveness of the extra commas and grammatical errors here. :)

As I am not a practitioner of the RR, I may be wrong about this, but I believe that the auspices referred to the actual session of the Senate, NOT the outcome of its votes.  

I hope this hasn't offended anyone, but when people are saying that Nova Roma looks idiotic in the eyes of the World.. it infuriates me. 

Unfortunately, there are things that Nova Roma has done which have indeed made it a laughingstock.  There are many people who misunderstand Nova Roma, including in my own field (classics), and some who look upon the lack of interest in the language of the Romans, the mutilations thereof in the titles of various laws, etc., the bizarre names once allowed and now apparently back in favor despite our efforts to bring our names into keeping with genuine Roman practice, certain matters relating to the religio, the presence of only one consul and one praetor last year, a situation which in the past would have brought a riot of complaints from the conservatives had that consul and praetor been of a different political stripe (it did some years ago when a consul had to act for his colleague and both praetors, all of whom were missing.  I have been here over ten years, and have seen a lot).  And so it goes. 


Call me narcissistic, but that makes *me* foolish in the eyes of the World. I don't like to look foolish. I don't like my friends to look foolish. I don't like my Gods to look foolish.

Most of us don't.  Some, however, can't see, or don't care, how they look to the outside world. They simply cannot take another's perspective.  In reality, there are organizations opposed to Nova Roma, some formed by former citizens after one or another mass exodus (which Sulla and friends prefer to term 'civil wars,' though the second at least was not really a war, but a reaction to senate paralysis and other matters); there are independent people who hate Nova Roma, and will nit pick anything they can find.  That is reality.  It may not be pleasant, but it is there.  So are hurricanes, tornados, forest fires, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, blizzards…and political chicanery, inter alia.  

Please forgive my temper.

Et in rebus difficilibus aequum animum serva; even in difficult situations, maintain a calm temperament.  

Sincerely,
Titus Iulius Nix

Vale.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92945 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: A Billion Minutes Ago
Salvete!

Something to think about!  Thus, a trillion minutes ago the human race was at the very beginning of its evolutionary climb.  The U.S. national debt exceeds $17 trillion and has been increased by the better part of a trillion dollars recently each and every year.

Valete!

Quadratus


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: caninus@...
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 02:02:27 -0700
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A Billion Minutes Ago

 

Avete!

A billion minutes ago it was DCCCLXVII A.U.C. (114 AD) and Trajan was in power.

Valete!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92946 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Salve, L. Sulla!

I did not have a "meltdown", nor did I insult anyone (if it superficially appeared so I have already apoligized), but I pointed out the very serious failures of the organization of Nova Roma as a whole, the almost complete lack of real, tangible, far-seeing achievements, projects or services from the government.

This is a fact, sadly, not an insult, and, while some individual cives or magistrates work indeed very hard, the overall outcome is very poor, and isn't attractive at all. This is something that no one can deny. We can find ways to explain why this is so, but this *IS* so, and the collegium pontificum is only part of this larger big picture. In my criticisms I intended to point it out that the issue is not "Why does the CP work slowly and passively?", but that "Why is NR, as a whole, the same? Why doesn't NR offer something valuable to its citizens, why doesn't it produce something, after all these 16 years?"...

Vale!
Lentulus


Da: "robert.woolwine@..." <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,

Which post of lentulus do you agree with?  The meltdown message where he insulted nearly everyone in Nova roma?  Or his last message?  I am unclear.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus
Date:01/23/2014 1:56 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: Nova-Roma Main List
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

 
Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus omnibus in foro S.P.D.
 
     I would like to concur with the wise words of my good friend Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus. I would say that what made the Romans of old worthy of emulation, what makes Rome worthy of reconstruction, was precisely their sense of civilization, of civility, of the idea (enshrined in English words like "civility") that there is such a thing as the decorous behavior befitting a civis - a citizen of Rome, as opposed to barbaric behavior.
 
      It is true, of course, that the Romans did not always live up to their own high ideals. No civilization ever does. But they strove to live with virtue, and considered shameful - an embarrassment -  those Romans who failed to do so. It is fitting that we in Nova Roma emulate this example, praising behavior that is praiseworthy, and scorning to behave in shameful ways.
 
     Even if we can list many ways in which the Romans in general, or certain particular Romans with whom we may be familiar, failed to live virtuously, we ought not to take this as license to fail to act with decorum. We do not have slaves, we do not tolerate misogyny, we do not fall prey to these massive failings of Roman virtue. Should we then say, that because some Romans acted abominably towards one another, we ought to do likewise?
 
     Remember, the ancient Romans considered proper language and behavior so important that they created the position of Censor. If one wishes to contend that one may always speak as one wishes and act as one wishes without regard to civility or propriety . . . well, that is equivalent to a motion to abolish the position of censor . . . or if a censor were to earnestly argue thus, is that the equivalent of resigning from office? Surely, the censor must acknowledge the role a sense of propriety had in Roman affairs of state, if nothing else.
 
     Nova Roma has, from the very beginning, always held the importance of virtue in Roman life. Let us hear no more arguments justifying cruelty, brutality, and vice as the "Roman way"!
 
Valete omnes,
~ Valerianus
 

Gaius Tullius Valerianus
 
Augur of Nova Roma
Lictor Curiatus of Nova Roma
Proconsul
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92947 From: Scipio Second Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Ave,

When I read epistles such as this I find myself appreciative of the often boring readings required of me as an ancient graduate student.    (I know it's crazy at my age, but despite having a doctorate I am half way thru obtaining another graduate degree (MA) - history/political science).   Anyway, it occurs to me that indeed if the current magistrates are "conservatives" with whom you disagree, then the proper course of action is to conduct a campaign to elect others to such positions more to your liking.  Constant carping lacks dignity.

I must question one response by Titus Iulius Nix.   He stated, "... a Pope can be removed from office (before death) either by resignation or a majority vote of the College of Cardinals when there has been a situation that would taint the office."   I would challenge him to provide any Canon law which would permit the College of Cardinals to remove a Pope from office.

It seems to me that disputes should be aired when the subject is of serious concern.   For example, the apparent failure of the Pontifex Maximus to perform a duty.   But may I suggest that these discussions should be conducted with some gravitas.   I must admit the reduction of exchanges to ad hominem attacks is disturbing.   Perhaps if there are some who view Nova Roma with derision, this practice may be in part the cause.

I note that Sulla is often vigorously criticized.   I attribute that to two reasons.   First, anyone serving as Consul no matter the effectiveness of his/her term will attract criticism.    Second, sometimes Sulla is his worst own enemy because he often tends to react emotionally to personal attacks.   This is rarely effective.   While I  sometimes find myself in disagreement with Sulla, I admire him because he is unafraid to join the fray.  One may be fastidious in assessing Sulla's performance, it must be kept in mind that he was elected by the citizens of Nova Roma and performed his duties as he felt appropriate.   It is easy to be overly critical when but an observer with no responsibility.

Vale,

Petrus Augustinus    


On Friday, January 24, 2014 3:04 AM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...  


A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D.  
I truly hope I'm not stepping out of line... but can I say.. I'm getting fed up! We are bickering more than the US Congress and getting the same amount of work done! It seems like when one thread gets exhausted by this topic, someone brings up a new one. 

This is part and parcel of Nova Roma, for better or for worse.  The Forum Hospitum list forbids such discussion in an effort to shield the prospective citizens from this perfectly normal activity, although the earlier NewRoman one did not utterly forbid discussion of Nova Roman politics as Hospitum does.  Some would prefer that we sit quietly and accept whatever is thrown at us, however abominable--but that sort of thing is more characteristic of a dictatorship in the modern world than a true democracy or republic.  Democracy is messy, and there will be arguments--or rather, debates some turn into arguments.  

I hope I'm wrong, but the five people who keep stepping up to the argument are either right, left, or just making jokes about everything.

First of all, there is no 'left' as such in Nova Roma.  We used to have a moderate faction and a conservative one, but nearly all of the former have left, or been driven out.  Most of the magistrates in recent years have been / are various flavors of the conservative faction, once known as the Boni.  Sulla is among them, and being blessed with boundless keyboard energy and a vociferous nature, has been talking a lot and giving you newer citizens his take on Nova Roma politics--but it is only HIS take, and that of his political allies.  Reality looks quite different to the rest of us.  

Some people do joke, but a lot of us are more serious when dealing with serious matters. This is a very serious matter, and with the possible exception of Triarius, I don't think anyone is joking about it.  

 I've put my two cents in before with a previous thread with the Honorable Sulla (please don't turn like the press and think I'm taking sides because I used "the Honorable" as far as I know, since no new Consuls have been granted imperium... he remains Consul, thus deserving the respect of the office no matter your position in this matter). 

My personal feelings on this matter is with the "Opposition Pontiffs." I feel it is sacrilegious for the Senate to supersede the CP in these matters. 

Those far more knowledgeable than I about such matters have concluded as much.  It is also extremely foolish to appoint pontifices who have not been trained, who have not held even a minor religious post, such as that of sacerdos.  Kindly note that all of the prospective appointees belong to the conservative faction, and will pack the Collegium.  Even a former citizen from that faction, and that, too, one with certain apparently disqualifying health issues, was proposed until that error was corrected.  All are going to start not at the bottom, as is proper, but at the top.  Instead of having altar boys, we will have cardinals.  

Sulla's term as consul is over.  The new magistrates have taken their oaths and entered office, but have not yet been granted imperium.  They are able to perform many of their duties with potestas, which is inherent.  


While, trust me, I REALLY want to start my training as a Fetialis…

As far as I am aware, Metellus is our sole fetialis; perhaps he could assist you.  

 it's very annoying. The only thing I am doing to train for the priesthood is study the Constitution.. which infuriates me more when I read people debating sentences and try to twist meanings from clearly stated lines.

Pontifex Lentulus and I often encounter this difficulty.  We are not understood, and our words get twisted and all 'bent out of shape,' as someone I knew long ago used to say.  Could be because we don't belong to the conservative faction…and are perceived as fair game for such nonsense.  We could state that it snows in Minnesota in the winter, and that would be denied, even ridiculed.  If one of them said that Quadratus (in Montreal) had a pineapple plantation and an orange grove (maybe a rice paddy, too) in his yard, why, that would believed.  Of course they will deny this…but we know better.  


I also feel that those arguing that the Senate has *no* authority in religious matters is just stupid.. The Senate and (in fact) every elected body in the Roman State is Sacrosanct. My previous post (four threads back) had an option that would make everyone happy.. except those out for blood.

On the matter of the Pontifix Maximus.. yes, he failed in his annual duty. No, this shouldn't be made light of. No, someone elected to a position for life shouldn't be removed by an outside body. 

Although this has occurred more than once in NR history.  The pontifex maximus is politically independent and perhaps has gotten tired of being insulted for using two words of his well-known and academically-mandatory native language (French) in the presence of those who refuse to learn any language their respective mothers didn't teach them in the cradle, for being less than Shakespearean or Churcillian in his English, and for being other than a member of the conservative faction.  


Yes, when it comes to the PM and the CP.. the Catholic Church is one of the best examples. Considering that, a Pope can be removed from office (before death) either by resignation or a majority vote of the College of Cardinals when there has been a situation that would taint the office. 

Lastly, there is a lot of talk about auspices being taken.. I have read that they were favorable about the subject of the vote, but can we have them taken for the actual enforcement of the vote? If they are favorable, then the arguments people are making against it or for it are now invalid in the eyes of the Divine. No more argument, no more mess, the government can continue, and forgiveness of the extra commas and grammatical errors here. :)

As I am not a practitioner of the RR, I may be wrong about this, but I believe that the auspices referred to the actual session of the Senate, NOT the outcome of its votes.  

I hope this hasn't offended anyone, but when people are saying that Nova Roma looks idiotic in the eyes of the World.. it infuriates me. 

Unfortunately, there are things that Nova Roma has done which have indeed made it a laughingstock.  There are many people who misunderstand Nova Roma, including in my own field (classics), and some who look upon the lack of interest in the language of the Romans, the mutilations thereof in the titles of various laws, etc., the bizarre names once allowed and now apparently back in favor despite our efforts to bring our names into keeping with genuine Roman practice, certain matters relating to the religio, the presence of only one consul and one praetor last year, a situation which in the past would have brought a riot of complaints from the conservatives had that consul and praetor been of a different political stripe (it did some years ago when a consul had to act for his colleague and both praetors, all of whom were missing.  I have been here over ten years, and have seen a lot).  And so it goes. 


Call me narcissistic, but that makes *me* foolish in the eyes of the World. I don't like to look foolish. I don't like my friends to look foolish. I don't like my Gods to look foolish.

Most of us don't.  Some, however, can't see, or don't care, how they look to the outside world. They simply cannot take another's perspective.  In reality, there are organizations opposed to Nova Roma, some formed by former citizens after one or another mass exodus (which Sulla and friends prefer to term 'civil wars,' though the second at least was not really a war, but a reaction to senate paralysis and other matters); there are independent people who hate Nova Roma, and will nit pick anything they can find.  That is reality.  It may not be pleasant, but it is there.  So are hurricanes, tornados, forest fires, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, blizzards…and political chicanery, inter alia.  

Please forgive my temper.

Et in rebus difficilibus aequum animum serva; even in difficult situations, maintain a calm temperament.  

Sincerely,
Titus Iulius Nix

Vale.  



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92948 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave,

You had a meltdown...A moment of weakness...or a moment of honesty...or whatever you want to call it.   Your "I apologize IF you were offended" is not an apology in my book.  It's a cop out...A prevaracation. 
You know Lentulus, there is a saying that always pops in my head without fail when you post.  The saying is this "those that can....do.  Those that can't teach."

You teach.

You want to know why?  Because you cannot do.  You have no concept of organization.  You have no concept of management, resource management, strategic leadership, utilization of resources.  Let alone learning from history.

You complain about the recent government... one that you were apart of last year til I fired you...but you were there for about 11 months.  And in caeca ' s post she explained it as clear as day to you.  You obviously did not understand what she was trying to get across.  I don't know if that was intentional on your part, because I don't trust you...or if it's genuine lack of grasping of the big picture...either way it's a failing.

Since the civil war, nova roma's magistrates had to focus on rebuilding the foundation.  Just like during the first civil war when nova roma had its only dictator.   We, the magistrates had to learn the lessons that got us to the state of conflict and take action that we felt would not have us repeat it for the future.  This wasn't fun.  This was hard taxing work.  This wasn't attractive.  Trying to make it attractive would be the equivalent of putting make up on a pig!  It's still a pig! 

But this work had to be done....do you seriously forgot the malaise nova roma went through before I became consul?  Is your memory that short?  Let's refresh that forgetful memory....look at the activity on the ml from Cato  and venii ' s  consul ship to todays....see the growth there.  Why don't you review the number of votes I got when I became consul.  It was less than 50.  Yet the most votes cast last year was over 180!

Nova roma had to focus on the foundation before nova roma could start decorating the interior of the house!  You do at least have an idea of what it takes to build a house right?  Setting the foundation...adding the struts and framework...building the walls and rooms....adding the drywall...stucco...wiring...electrial..The roof....and once up to code then one can start working on the decorations, the paint...The fun stuff.

Seriously, I get so damn frustrated with you Lentulus because despite the fact that I don't trust you...and I think you know better....but you continuously waste your potential.  You want to do all the paint...All the fun and pretty stuff...because heaven forbid...it's hard work to do the important stuff....not to mention that stuff is boring.  Yet you fail to realize had it not been for the work that caesar did last year nova roma would be in another civil war right now.....and had it not been for me dealing with the audit nova roma would be all but dead because nr would not have its 501c3.   If it had not been for the past 3 years of consuls nova roma would have died from the general malaise that had set in.

You think your entitled to criticize us for our focus on the foundation.  I think your a fool.  We had nova roma's best interest at heart and did the work that nr desperately needed so that our current and future magistrates will be able to focus on some of those fun ideas now instead of having to continually deal with serious problem after problem.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92949 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)

Ave amice

I admit I'm my own worst enemy for the very reason you gave.  I'm an ass...but I'm rarely wrong.  I'd rather have that combination than having those reversed. 

I enjoy debating, arguing and beating a dead horse til it's bones are white.  But at the same time I am cimpromising, I'll bend as far as I can go to reach accommodation as long as it does not prevent action from occurring when I believe action is needed.

I do know I've toned down my bluntness...need proof look at my posts in late 2008 - 2010.  I was much more confrontational given that we were in the minority back then. 

I do give 110% of myself....and I believe this is why even when I was dead I was still a focus by tptb that governed nr until the civil war.

Like me or hate me, I'm still me...living up to my namesake doing the name proud. :)

Respectfully

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92950 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Caninus Scholasticae sal.

I find your use of the term 'moderate' to describe the political faction that attempted to install a dictator and ripoff Nova Roma for $10,000 a bit strange. That faction did not seem to display much in the way of 'moderate' politics to me. It might be a bit more accurate to describe that faction as one supporting liberal self-interest. Of course, they also supported kangaroo courts, expulsion of senatores from the opposition and just about any tactic they could justify to silence critics. Moderate? Really?

Your statement suggesting the current political climate in Nova Roma is a bit like a dictatorship would be funny if you were not so serious. 

Bene vale.
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92951 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
Scholastica,

I wanted to say that I enjoyed reading your reply to my post. It was naturally eloquent. I will take your advise and the advise of Otto von Bismark, "Be polite; write diplomatically; even in a declaration of war one observes the rules of politeness."

Also (on an unrelated note), my majors in college are History/Political Science with a concentration on Classical Studies. If you had some free time, I would love to pick your brain on those subjects.

Respectfully,
T. Iulius Nix





--
"Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92952 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
To all,

When I said "left, right, etc." I was relating it to modern politics, I didn't mean a literal division between Conservatives and Liberals. Also, I thought how Caninus described our "moderates" was funny... the term "Moderate Extremists" kept popping into my head.

-Nix


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92953 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Lentulus Sullae sal.


fail when you post.  The saying is this "those that can....do.  Those that can't teach."
You teach. <<<


Yes, I do teach, but I do hard work, as well. You said this about me as well, when you referred to me not so long ago as one of the hardest working citizens. But, in all seriousness, I don't think anyone can question this if someone has observed NR at least for one-two years. Do I really need to prove this? Really, is it necessary to list what I do? I have worked for most of the magistrates either as administrator, or advisor, or both. I maintained the website almost alone for about 4-5 years, developed its navigation and enlarged its contents. I create real life NR programs, which are at many times open to all Nova Romans internationally, and there were visitors even from America, but in larger part from European countries as well. Most of what NR can provide to its citizens currently is online programs. I create and manage online activities and programs, in fact, I am one of the most active organizers of NR online activities. I really wouldn't need to defend myself. As a NR priest, I created most of the rituals we have, and I'm the most active priest when it comes to documented public ritual performance as well.  As a NR governor, I created a most active province which has monthly gatherings, Roman summer camps, two working reenactor legions, and numerous public (even city wide) events, all of which are publicized and sometimes recorded by the media as Nova Roma events. Do I teach in NR, do I mentor citizens? Yes... But my teaching activity is insignificant in comparison to my organizational and administrative activities done for NR. Maybe I can talk, but I'm not really a man of words but deeds.


why?  Because you cannot do.  You have no concept of organization.  You have no concept of management, resource management, strategic leadership, utilization of resources.  <<<


I think you must be joking. It's sure I have weaknesses, just like everyone, I have faults, and I do mistakes. But as governor I manage, coordinate and administer not only an online community, but an active real life community (we even have a legally incorporated agent corporation for our provincial business) which has contracts with museums, schools, and even with city governments. As chief of staff scribe or quaestor I have managed numerous staffs of magistrates, and I served as organizer or task manager to so many officials that I could hardly enumerate all. I have nothing to prove to you, but this kind of false speech you delivered must be corrected and straightened up.


the recent government... <<<


Sulla, we all know you yourself complained and viciously criticized all past governments of NR which you weren't part of. It was your confession that it's the people's duty to criticize and thus get the things into motion. And by the way I talked about the governments of the last 4-5 years, which includes magistrates of various factions, those, too, whom you fervently opposed, whom you didn't like. If you take all of these upon yourself, that's your decision. From my part my conscience is clear because I helped whenever I could, and I continue to do so.


review the number of votes I got when I became consul.  It was less than 50.  Yet the most votes cast last year was over 180!<<<


Sulla, now really... The number of voters increased only because of the methods VotingPlace.Net applies. Before we started to use VotingPlace.Net, only those citizens were informed about voting who regularly read this mailing list. The hundreds of more passive citizens had no idea a voting was condected. Now, VotingPlace.Net SENDS AN AUTOMATIC email directly to each individual citizen's mailbox, calling for their vote. This is a huge difference. But, to prove my argument, you only have to ask Caninus about how many people participate in the elections that he conducted via the traditional NR cista (voting site), which doesn't send warning email to citizens. This is ever so convincing an evidence, because the NR cista election (without the warning emails sent) and the VotingPlace.Net election was conducted at the same time this last December. While the votes submitted to the VotingPlace.Net election site were about 100, the elections held in the NR cista site (which didn't send warning emails) could number about a 30-40 voters. I don't know the exact number, but it was very, very low. The increase in number of voters sadly is a misleading or fallacious argument, because we can deduce conclusions about the number of active citizens only from the number of those people who voted in the NR cista site: since they were the ones who cared to read the Main List and listened to the mailing list announcement, and didn't get a direct warning call for vote.


me dealing with the audit nova roma would be all but dead because nr would not have its 501c3.   If it had not been for the past 3 years of consuls nova roma would have died from the general malaise that had set in. <<<


I praised this effort in my message, and also I outlined in my message that it was a vital, necessary thing to do, and I said who did it he deserves our appreciation. You are here defending yourself against something which has not been criticized by me, on the contrary, recommended by me as your virtue.


Vale!

Lentulus


On Jan 24, 2014 7:00 AM, "Cn. Cornelius Lentulus" <cn_corn_lent@...


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92954 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: musical interlude
Salvete!

I hope you find this as lovely as I did!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lccggIWkWVw

I also hope this link works as I think it should, LOL!

Valete!
C. Maria Caeca
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92955 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Caninus Lentulo et Sullae sal.

In a large degree, you are correct, Lentule. A significant amount of the difference in the number of ballots cast in votingplace.net vs. Cista Novae Romae is due to the fact that the Cista on our website was not built with a voting notification and reminder function. This can be clearly seen in numbers of voters that turned out for the comitia plebis tributa election vs. the number of voters that turned out for the comitia populi tributa election at the end of the year. The comitia plebis tributa saw a noticeable upswing in numbers of ballots cast when I started sending voting reminders to citizens directly myself. The lack of email notifications will be remedied this year. I am not sure whether or not I consider this one benefit of votingplace.net worth the annual subscription fee, which I believe is in the neighborhood of $800. However, let us not dismiss Sulla's statement completely. It seems clear to me there is some percentage of increased voter turnout due to the nature of the reforms that were put forward last year. So, the turnout for votingplace.net is due to both the notifications and the agenda of reforms that Sulla championed. I doubt we can determine the ratio between those to driving forces and it probably is not that important. What is important is that Sulla accomplished a lot and Lentulus worked hard in drafting and reviewing leges that were put before the citizens for approval.

I believe Sulla is still recovering from the pugio wound in his back, though. 

Facite valeatis.
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92956 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
"Some people do joke, but a lot of us are more serious when dealing with serious matters. This is a very serious matter, and with the possible exception of Triarius, I don't think anyone is joking about it."
 
Yep, that's me alright! I don't take anything serious, ESPECIALLY, matters concerning the religio. I am truly glad that we are so blessed with deities as yourself to guide us all, Scholastica. 


Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Friday, January 24, 2014 4:04 AM, A. Tullia Scholastica <fororom@...  


A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D.  
I truly hope I'm not stepping out of line... but can I say.. I'm getting fed up! We are bickering more than the US Congress and getting the same amount of work done! It seems like when one thread gets exhausted by this topic, someone brings up a new one. 

This is part and parcel of Nova Roma, for better or for worse.  The Forum Hospitum list forbids such discussion in an effort to shield the prospective citizens from this perfectly normal activity, although the earlier NewRoman one did not utterly forbid discussion of Nova Roman politics as Hospitum does.  Some would prefer that we sit quietly and accept whatever is thrown at us, however abominable--but that sort of thing is more characteristic of a dictatorship in the modern world than a true democracy or republic.  Democracy is messy, and there will be arguments--or rather, debates some turn into arguments.  

I hope I'm wrong, but the five people who keep stepping up to the argument are either right, left, or just making jokes about everything.

First of all, there is no 'left' as such in Nova Roma.  We used to have a moderate faction and a conservative one, but nearly all of the former have left, or been driven out.  Most of the magistrates in recent years have been / are various flavors of the conservative faction, once known as the Boni.  Sulla is among them, and being blessed with boundless keyboard energy and a vociferous nature, has been talking a lot and giving you newer citizens his take on Nova Roma politics--but it is only HIS take, and that of his political allies.  Reality looks quite different to the rest of us.  

Some people do joke, but a lot of us are more serious when dealing with serious matters. This is a very serious matter, and with the possible exception of Triarius, I don't think anyone is joking about it.  

 I've put my two cents in before with a previous thread with the Honorable Sulla (please don't turn like the press and think I'm taking sides because I used "the Honorable" as far as I know, since no new Consuls have been granted imperium... he remains Consul, thus deserving the respect of the office no matter your position in this matter). 

My personal feelings on this matter is with the "Opposition Pontiffs." I feel it is sacrilegious for the Senate to supersede the CP in these matters. 

Those far more knowledgeable than I about such matters have concluded as much.  It is also extremely foolish to appoint pontifices who have not been trained, who have not held even a minor religious post, such as that of sacerdos.  Kindly note that all of the prospective appointees belong to the conservative faction, and will pack the Collegium.  Even a former citizen from that faction, and that, too, one with certain apparently disqualifying health issues, was proposed until that error was corrected.  All are going to start not at the bottom, as is proper, but at the top.  Instead of having altar boys, we will have cardinals.  

Sulla's term as consul is over.  The new magistrates have taken their oaths and entered office, but have not yet been granted imperium.  They are able to perform many of their duties with potestas, which is inherent.  


While, trust me, I REALLY want to start my training as a Fetialis…

As far as I am aware, Metellus is our sole fetialis; perhaps he could assist you.  

 it's very annoying. The only thing I am doing to train for the priesthood is study the Constitution.. which infuriates me more when I read people debating sentences and try to twist meanings from clearly stated lines.

Pontifex Lentulus and I often encounter this difficulty.  We are not understood, and our words get twisted and all 'bent out of shape,' as someone I knew long ago used to say.  Could be because we don't belong to the conservative faction…and are perceived as fair game for such nonsense.  We could state that it snows in Minnesota in the winter, and that would be denied, even ridiculed.  If one of them said that Quadratus (in Montreal) had a pineapple plantation and an orange grove (maybe a rice paddy, too) in his yard, why, that would believed.  Of course they will deny this…but we know better.  


I also feel that those arguing that the Senate has *no* authority in religious matters is just stupid.. The Senate and (in fact) every elected body in the Roman State is Sacrosanct. My previous post (four threads back) had an option that would make everyone happy.. except those out for blood.

On the matter of the Pontifix Maximus.. yes, he failed in his annual duty. No, this shouldn't be made light of. No, someone elected to a position for life shouldn't be removed by an outside body. 

Although this has occurred more than once in NR history.  The pontifex maximus is politically independent and perhaps has gotten tired of being insulted for using two words of his well-known and academically-mandatory native language (French) in the presence of those who refuse to learn any language their respective mothers didn't teach them in the cradle, for being less than Shakespearean or Churcillian in his English, and for being other than a member of the conservative faction.  


Yes, when it comes to the PM and the CP.. the Catholic Church is one of the best examples. Considering that, a Pope can be removed from office (before death) either by resignation or a majority vote of the College of Cardinals when there has been a situation that would taint the office. 

Lastly, there is a lot of talk about auspices being taken.. I have read that they were favorable about the subject of the vote, but can we have them taken for the actual enforcement of the vote? If they are favorable, then the arguments people are making against it or for it are now invalid in the eyes of the Divine. No more argument, no more mess, the government can continue, and forgiveness of the extra commas and grammatical errors here. :)

As I am not a practitioner of the RR, I may be wrong about this, but I believe that the auspices referred to the actual session of the Senate, NOT the outcome of its votes.  

I hope this hasn't offended anyone, but when people are saying that Nova Roma looks idiotic in the eyes of the World.. it infuriates me. 

Unfortunately, there are things that Nova Roma has done which have indeed made it a laughingstock.  There are many people who misunderstand Nova Roma, including in my own field (classics), and some who look upon the lack of interest in the language of the Romans, the mutilations thereof in the titles of various laws, etc., the bizarre names once allowed and now apparently back in favor despite our efforts to bring our names into keeping with genuine Roman practice, certain matters relating to the religio, the presence of only one consul and one praetor last year, a situation which in the past would have brought a riot of complaints from the conservatives had that consul and praetor been of a different political stripe (it did some years ago when a consul had to act for his colleague and both praetors, all of whom were missing.  I have been here over ten years, and have seen a lot).  And so it goes. 


Call me narcissistic, but that makes *me* foolish in the eyes of the World. I don't like to look foolish. I don't like my friends to look foolish. I don't like my Gods to look foolish.

Most of us don't.  Some, however, can't see, or don't care, how they look to the outside world. They simply cannot take another's perspective.  In reality, there are organizations opposed to Nova Roma, some formed by former citizens after one or another mass exodus (which Sulla and friends prefer to term 'civil wars,' though the second at least was not really a war, but a reaction to senate paralysis and other matters); there are independent people who hate Nova Roma, and will nit pick anything they can find.  That is reality.  It may not be pleasant, but it is there.  So are hurricanes, tornados, forest fires, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, blizzards…and political chicanery, inter alia.  

Please forgive my temper.

Et in rebus difficilibus aequum animum serva; even in difficult situations, maintain a calm temperament.  

Sincerely,
Titus Iulius Nix

Vale.  



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92957 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: A Billion Minutes Ago
Salvete omnes,
 
When looking at the difference in a million, a billion and a trillion, if you went to the doctor today and he said:
 
You have one million seconds to live, you would live for 11.5 days
 
You have one billion seconds to live, you would live for 31.7 years
 
You have one trillion seconds to live, you would live for 317 centuries

 
Vale,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Friday, January 24, 2014 7:37 AM, "charlesaronowitz@..." <charlesaronowitz@...  
Salvete!

Something to think about!  Thus, a trillion minutes ago the human race was at the very beginning of its evolutionary climb.  The U.S. national debt exceeds $17 trillion and has been increased by the better part of a trillion dollars recently each and every year.

Valete!

Quadratus

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: caninus@...
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 02:02:27 -0700
Subject: [Nova-Roma] A Billion Minutes Ago

 

Avete!

A billion minutes ago it was DCCCLXVII A.U.C. (114 AD) and Trajan was in power.

Valete!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92958 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Ave amice

I was elected in voting place.net

I was comparing apples to apples.

I made no comparison to the cista.

So we can correct that erroneous statement please.

As for the stab in my back that will always be there.

Vale

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92959 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Ave amice.

True. The number of ballots cast by voters in the comitia populi tributa in 2012 vs. 2013 did go up. In 2012 all voting took place at votingplace.net. The Cista was not back into operation until June 2013 but the Cista has not been used for a session of the comitia populi tributa since 2010. So, an apples to apples comparison of voter turn out for the comitia populi tributa in 2012 vs. 2013 shows an increase.

Bene vale. 

Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92960 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
 
 
In a message dated 1/24/2014 8:57:24 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, snowj3@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92961 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium

Thanks for the confirmation.

And, it was a substantial increase.  Over 200% and probably closer to 300%.

That's no small feat.

And this is just simple math.  This says nothing in the aura of the environment change.  Before my consul ship we all complained about being ruled through SCU...no voice of the people...lethargy. .In general.

Now we don't need scus only for rare and unforeseen issues like what our pontifex maximus did.

 

Ave amice.

True. The number of ballots cast by voters in the comitia populi tributa in 2012 vs. 2013 did go up. In 2012 all voting took place at votingplace.net. The Cista was not back into operation until June 2013 but the Cista has not been used for a session of the comitia populi tributa since 2010. So, an apples to apples comparison of voter turn out for the comitia populi tributa in 2012 vs. 2013 shows an increase.

Bene vale. 

Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92962 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)

C. Maria Caeca A. Tulliae Scholasticae Omnibusque in foro S. P. D.

 

As much as I hate interleaving my replies to posts, I think that in this case, I must, lest I be accused of responding out of context to several comments. 


A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D.  

I truly hope I'm not stepping out of line... but can I say.. I'm getting fed up! We are bickering more than the US Congress and getting the same amount of work done! It seems like when one thread gets exhausted by this topic, someone brings up a new one. 

 

          This is part and parcel of Nova Roma, for better or for worse.  The Forum Hospitum list forbids such discussion in an effort to shield the prospective citizens from this perfectly normal activity, although the earlier Newroman one did not utterly forbid discussion of Nova Roman politics as Hospitum does. 

CMC.  No, the Newroman list did not allow discussion of NR politics, and that policy was strictly enforced.  What it did allow, as does the Forum Hospitum were general questions about how our NR Government and institutions work.  What was not allowed, on either list, were posts advocating one political position or another, or debates about the actions of specific magistrates or citizens.  There is a good reason for this policy on the FH.  The members of that list range from long term citizens to people interested in ancient Rome, but not specifically in NR, and include new citizens, potential citizens, and those who are curious about NR.  Many of our members are not interested in watching us deal with our laundry, dirty or otherwise, and the FH is not, and will not become (for as long as I am associated with it) a recruitment ground for any political faction.  When new citizens join the ML, they can, if they quietly observe for a while, learn to sort through the debate rhetoric and evaluate the points, making their own decisions concerning important matters of our public life.

 Some would prefer that we sit quietly and accept whatever is thrown at us, however abominable--but that sort of thing is more characteristic of a dictatorship in the modern world than a true democracy or republic.  Democracy is messy, and there will be arguments--or rather, debates some turn into arguments.  

 

I hope I'm wrong, but the five people who keep stepping up to the argument are either right, left, or just making jokes about everything.

 

            First of all, there is no 'left' as such in Nova Roma.  We used to have a moderate faction and a conservative one, but nearly all of the former have left, or been driven out.  Most of the magistrates in recent years have been / are various flavors of the conservative faction, once known as the Boni.  Sulla is among them, and being blessed with boundless keyboard energy and a vociferous nature, has been talking a lot and giving you newer citizens his take on Nova Roma politics--but it is only HIS take, and that of his political allies.  Reality looks quite different to the rest of us.  

 

CMC.  Actually, there used to be 3 factions, the Conservative, (formerly, and sometimes till called the Boni), the Libra, who were considered the liberal party, somewhat akin to the Populist party in ancient Rome, and the Moderati, composed of those who were affiliated with neither faction, or who agreed with one or another depending on the issue and the stance of the faction’s members.   While there are no longer formal factions in NR (at least not yet) there are conservatives, moderates, and liberals here, which explains our debates, among other things, and no, I am not going to either evaluate their stances nor advocate for any specific position in this post.

            Some people do joke, but a lot of us are more serious when dealing with serious matters.

 

CMC.  I don’t think anyone here is unaware of how serious the matters we have been discussing are, but there is a place for humor, even in the most serious debates, to lessen the tension, if nothing else, and often points can be made more potently using humor.  The use of humor does not indicate a lack of either understanding or thought.

 

This is a very serious matter, and with the possible exception of Triarius, I don't think anyone is joking about it.  

 

 I've put my two cents in before with a previous thread with the Honorable Sulla (please don't turn like the press and think I'm taking sides because I used "the Honorable" as far as I know, since no new Consuls have been granted imperium... he remains Consul, thus deserving the respect of the office no matter your position in this matter). 

 

My personal feelings on this matter is with the "Opposition Pontiffs." I feel it is sacrilegious for the Senate to supersede the CP in these matters. 

 

            Those far more knowledgeable than I about such matters have concluded as much.  It is also extremely foolish to appoint Pontifices who have not been trained, who have not held even a minor religious post, such as that of Sacerdos.  Kindly note that all of the prospective appointees belong to the conservative faction, and will pack the Collegium.  Even a former citizen from that faction, and that, too, one with certain apparently disqualifying health issues, was proposed until that error was corrected.  All are going to start not at the bottom, as is proper, but at the top.  Instead of having altar boys, we will have cardinals.  

 

            Sulla's term as consul is over.  The new magistrates have taken their oaths and entered office, but have not yet been granted imperium.  They are able to perform many of their duties with potestas, which is inherent.  

 

 

While, trust me, I REALLY want to start my training as a Fetialis…

 

            As far as I am aware, Metellus is our sole fetialis; perhaps he could assist you.  

 

 it's very annoying. The only thing I am doing to train for the priesthood is study the Constitution.. which infuriates me more when I read people debating sentences and try to twist meanings from clearly stated lines.

 

            Pontifex Lentulus and I often encounter this difficulty.  We are not understood, and our words get twisted and all 'bent out of shape,' as someone I knew long ago used to say.  Could be because we don't belong to the conservative faction…and are perceived as fair game for such nonsense.  

 

CMC.  No.  Disagreement with points you make are neither dismissal (which would be to utterly ignore what you have to say) or demonstrations of biased political factionalism.  They are disagreement with your points, and if you take a stand in a debate, you can expect that stand to be challenged.  And before you say it, no, I am not advocating for ad Hominum attacks, whether or not they were acceptable in ancient Rome, which, I might add they sometimes were, but that’s a topic (maybe) for an entirely different post.  And when anyone presents a view different from yours, that is not “nonsense”.  What you say is well understood, it just isn’t accepted as the final and correct view of the matters you address. 

 

We could state that it snows in Minnesota in the winter, and that would be denied, even ridiculed.  If one of them said that Quadratus (in Montreal) had a pineapple plantation and an orange grove (maybe a rice paddy, too) in his yard, why, that would believed.  Of course they will deny this…but we know better.  

 

CMC. Quadratus, when you harvest your pineapple crop, would you send me a few?  I’d be happy to pay postage!  Oh, wait … I’m not being serious! 

 

I also feel that those arguing that the Senate has *no* authority in religious matters is just stupid.. The Senate and (in fact) every elected body in the Roman State is Sacrosanct. My previous post (four threads back) had an option that would make everyone happy.. except those out for blood.

 

On the matter of the Pontifex Maximus.. yes, he failed in his annual duty. No, this shouldn't be made light of. No, someone elected to a position for life shouldn't be removed by an outside body. 

 

            Although this has occurred more than once in NR history.  The Pontifex Maximus is politically independent and perhaps has gotten tired of being insulted for using two words of his well-known and academically-mandatory native language (French) in the presence of those who refuse to learn any language their respective mothers didn't teach them in the cradle, for being less than Shakespearean or Churcillian in his English, and for being other than a member of the conservative faction.  

 

CMC.  I first read this email soon after I got up, and this last comment made me very angry, so I decided to calm down, have some coffee, do unrelated things, and then post.  However, even rereading this makes me very angry.  This is a deflection.  Dexter’s politics are not the issue.  Dexter’s native language is not the issue.  Dexter’s English usage is not the issue.  The issue is Dexter’s choice to neglect his sacred and State duty.  You can minimize the importance of Imperium all you want, but in order to fully perform their duties, Consuls and Praetors must have it, which requires that certain specific steps be taken.  Dexter, as Pontifex Maximus was the only one who could initiate that process, and he *chose* not to do so, despite his word to the CP that he would.  I am, quite frankly, sick and tired of the unacceptable actions of your political allies being justified, rationalized and sanctioned, simply on the basis that they agree with you, politically.  This, among other reasons, is why I never desired to become a member of your political party.  And, before you accuse me, publicly or privately, of being a “Boni” or a member in good standing of the Caesar/Sulla regime, I suggest you *ask* the members of that group about that.  By all means, do ask the former Consul how compliant, acquiescent and obedient I am.  There are more important things than political alignment.  I have friends all over the political landscape, inside and outside of NR, because I base my friendships on other things, such as qualities I see in people which I value and admire, coinciding interests, and agreement on personal values.

 

Yes, when it comes to the PM and the CP.. the Catholic Church is one of the best examples. Considering that, a Pope can be removed from office (before death) either by resignation or a majority vote of the College of Cardinals when there has been a situation that would taint the office. 

 

Lastly, there is a lot of talk about auspices being taken.. I have read that they were favorable about the subject of the vote, but can we have them taken for the actual enforcement of the vote? If they are favorable, then the arguments people are making against it or for it are now invalid in the eyes of the Divine. No more argument, no more mess, the government can continue, and forgiveness of the extra commas and grammatical errors here. :)

 

            As I am not a practitioner of the RR, I may be wrong about this, but I believe that the auspices referred to the actual session of the Senate, NOT the outcome of its votes.  

 

I hope this hasn't offended anyone, but when people are saying that Nova Roma looks idiotic in the eyes of the World.. it infuriates me. 

 

            Unfortunately, there are things that Nova Roma has done which have indeed made it a laughingstock.  There are many people who misunderstand Nova Roma, including in my own field (classics), and some who look upon the lack of interest in the language of the Romans, the mutilations thereof in the titles of various laws, etc., the bizarre names once allowed and now apparently back in favor despite our efforts to bring our names into keeping with genuine Roman practice, certain matters relating to the Religio, the presence of only one consul and one praetor last year, a situation which in the past would have brought a riot of complaints from the conservatives had that consul and praetor been of a different political stripe (it did some years ago when a consul had to act for his colleague and both praetors, all of whom were missing.  I have been here over ten years, and have seen a lot).  And so it goes. 

 

 

Call me narcissistic, but that makes *me* foolish in the eyes of the World. I don't like to look foolish. I don't like my friends to look foolish. I don't like my Gods to look foolish.

 

            Most of us don't.  Some, however, can't see, or don't care, how they look to the outside world. They simply cannot take another's perspective.  In reality, there are organizations opposed to Nova Roma, some formed by former citizens after one or another mass exodus (which Sulla and friends prefer to term 'civil wars,' though the second at least was not really a war, but a reaction to senate paralysis and other matters); there are independent people who hate Nova Roma, and will nit pick anything they can find.  That is reality.  It may not be pleasant, but it is there.  So are hurricanes, tornados, forest fires, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, blizzards…and political chicanery, inter alia.  

 

Please forgive my temper.

 

            Et in rebus difficilibus aequum animum serve; even in difficult situations, maintain a calm temperament.  

 

Sincerely,

Titus Iulius Nix

 

Vale.  

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92963 From: James V Hooper Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: musical interlude
be nice if you can provide a usable link
C. Pompeius Marcellus


On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:29:31 -0500
"cmc" <c.mariacaeca@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92964 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: musical interlude

Salve Marcelle!

 

My apologies.  I’ll see if I can find it again, and do so.

 

Vale!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92965 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: musical interlude redux
Salve Marcelle et Salvete omnes!

Try this link, I'm pretty sure it will work.

Vale!
C. Maria Caeca

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lccggIWkWVw
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92966 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
Avete Omnes,

It is nearing the end of January, so it is about that time where we begin to open the Tax Season.

This year our tax rate has started decreasing.  

Here is the Table to compare the tax rate for last year vs this year:

Tax Rate     2013          2014     DECREASE    %
Class I       $ 44.00      $ 38.00              9%
Class II      $ 36.00       $ 32.00            13%
Class III     $ 26.00       $ 22.00             15%
Class IV    $ 18.00       $ 14.00              22%
Class V     $ 10.00       $ 8.00               20%

So, just for clarification:

Class I - $ 38.00 
Class II - $ 32.00
Class III - $ 22.00
Class IV - $ 14.00
Class V - $ 8.00

If you are unsure what class you are in, please message me privately at robert.woolwine@... and I will be able to assist you.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
CFO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92967 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: What class am I in?
Avete Omnes,

In the past 15 min, I have been asked the same question 5 times. :)  What Class Am I in.

Usually in Nova Roma's past this was a very vague answer.  Not anymore. 

Transparency was the watch word of last year's consulship.  Here is how this works out.

In the Album Civium you can see under details the amount of CPs you have.  For example mine (Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix) lists 248 CPs.

With the passage of the Lex Cornelia de classibus et ordine equestri, http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Lex_Cornelia_de_classibus_et_ordine_equestri_(Nova_Roma), you use the CP total to determine what class you are in:

a. The Number of Census points will determine what class citizens are allocated in the Comitia Centuriata.

i. If Citizens hold 220 or more Census Points and have accepted enrollment into the Ordo Equester they will be allocated to that Class and appropriate Century.

ii. If Citizens hold between 140-219 Census points OR have not accepted membership into the Ordo Equester they will be allocated to the First Class of Centuries.

iii. If Citizens census points fall within the 100 – 139 Census points they will be allocated to the Centuries within the Second class.

iv. If Citizens census points fall within the 50-99 Census points they will be allocated to the Centuries within the Third class.

v. If Citizens census points fall within the 35-49 Census points they will be allocated to the Centuries within the Fourth class.

vi. If Citizens census points fall within 17-34 Census points they will be allocated to the Centuries within the Fifth class.

vii. If Citizens census points do not meet the minimum threshold of 16 Census points they will be allocated to the Capite Censi Century.


Since I have a total of 248 CPs.  Based on this law, I am in Class I.


Thus I pay the tax rate of Class I.


I hope this helps.


Respectfully,


Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92968 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-24
Subject: Re: De Virtute Vitioque Magisterium
Sta. Cornelia Aeternia Cn. Lentulus L. Cornelio Sullae Omnibusque S.P.D.

I find myself hestitant to respond to this.  Yet I'm going to anyway.  Besides I think the two of you have calmed down for someone else to say something.

I remember reading one of the posts in this thread someone spoke about "passion".  What we see here before us citizens are two examples of such thing.  Sulla and Lentulus are two very passionate people who both equally care about Nova Roma.  We just see them coming from two opposite sides of the spectrum.

Lentulus you may not think you had a "meltdown".  I like to think of it as a  you had a very brutually honest moment.  It goes along the saying "Everyone is thinking it.  I'm just deciding to say it out loud".  Well the out loud moment happened.   Words carry power Lentulus, remember the pen is mightier than the sword.  You may have felt you said nothing offensive although I do disagree as I'm sure others as well.  It may not have been so bad if perhaps presented in a different tone or just a different approach altogether.

I wish there was an immediate solution to the grittier points you brought up Lentule.  Yet there is not but I feel we are getting back on track to a better Nova Roma.   There was more I was going to say however I feel they may come off mushy so here is where I end this post.

Valete bene,
Statia Cornelia Aeternia





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92969 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: insipientia (non, suis sententiis)
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae S.D. 

 

C. Maria Caeca A. Tulliae Scholasticae Omnibusque in foro S. P. D.

 

As much as I hate interleaving my replies to posts, I think that in this case, I must, lest I be accused of responding out of context to several comments. 


A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D.  

I truly hope I'm not stepping out of line... but can I say.. I'm getting fed up! We are bickering more than the US Congress and getting the same amount of work done! It seems like when one thread gets exhausted by this topic, someone brings up a new one. 

 

          This is part and parcel of Nova Roma, for better or for worse.  The Forum Hospitum list forbids such discussion in an effort to shield the prospective citizens from this perfectly normal activity, although the earlier Newroman one did not utterly forbid discussion of Nova Roman politics as Hospitum does. 

CMC.  No, the Newroman list did not allow discussion of NR politics, and that policy was strictly enforced.  What it did allow, as does the Forum Hospitum were general questions about how our NR Government and institutions work. 

ATS:  And even THAT was not allowed on the FH.  Remember the year when not even the virtual ludi were allowed?  


What was not allowed, on either list, were posts advocating one political position or another, or debates about the actions of specific magistrates or citizens.  There is a good reason for this policy on the FH.  The members of that list range from long term citizens to people interested in ancient Rome, but not specifically in NR, and include new citizens, potential citizens, and those who are curious about NR.  Many of our members are not interested in watching us deal with our laundry, dirty or otherwise, and the FH is not, and will not become (for as long as I am associated with it) a recruitment ground for any political faction. 

ATS:  We may leave that to the Album Civium, which was used to shop for votes in the past, and may still be used for that purpose now that the mail system apparently is back online.  


When new citizens join the ML, they can, if they quietly observe for a while, learn to sort through the debate rhetoric and evaluate the points, making their own decisions concerning important matters of our public life.

 Some would prefer that we sit quietly and accept whatever is thrown at us, however abominable--but that sort of thing is more characteristic of a dictatorship in the modern world than a true democracy or republic.  Democracy is messy, and there will be arguments--or rather, debates some turn into arguments.  

 

I hope I'm wrong, but the five people who keep stepping up to the argument are either right, left, or just making jokes about everything.

 

            First of all, there is no 'left' as such in Nova Roma.  We used to have a moderate faction and a conservative one, but nearly all of the former have left, or been driven out.  Most of the magistrates in recent years have been / are various flavors of the conservative faction, once known as the Boni.  Sulla is among them, and being blessed with boundless keyboard energy and a vociferous nature, has been talking a lot and giving you newer citizens his take on Nova Roma politics--but it is only HIS take, and that of his political allies.  Reality looks quite different to the rest of us.  

 

CMC.  Actually, there used to be 3 factions, the Conservative, (formerly, and sometimes till called the Boni), the Libra, who were considered the liberal party, somewhat akin to the Populist party in ancient Rome, and the Moderati, composed of those who were affiliated with neither faction, or who agreed with one or another depending on the issue and the stance of the faction’s members.   While there are no longer formal factions in NR (at least not yet) there are conservatives, moderates, and liberals here, which explains our debates, among other things, and no, I am not going to either evaluate their stances nor advocate for any specific position in this post.


ATS:  Actually, Maria, the Libra faction took its name from the Latin word for 'scale,' a gadget with two pans suspended by chains / wires / cords from a movable  arm perpendicular to a post.  Several of us have seen such a device even though they are not as much in use today as they were back then.  This faction had nothing to do with liberalism, but with moderate views.  Libra and the Moderati merged, and neither was terribly liberal, just more accepting of political and other differences than the Boni were, or are.  The Moderati were nothing like what you describe.  They were not independent, changing their positions on every issue, as you seem to believe.  The Moderati were a faction with what in modern terms might be called a platform.  So was Libra, and so were the Boni.  None of the above had much, if anything, in common with modern macro world political independents.  There were independents, such as Cordus, but he was not in any faction.  He despised them all.  

            Some people do joke, but a lot of us are more serious when dealing with serious matters.

 

CMC.  I don’t think anyone here is unaware of how serious the matters we have been discussing are, but there is a place for humor, even in the most serious debates, to lessen the tension, if nothing else, and often points can be made more potently using humor.  The use of humor does not indicate a lack of either understanding or thought.

 


ATS:  Indeed, but one must be careful as to what type of humor is employed. 

This is a very serious matter, and with the possible exception of Triarius, I don't think anyone is joking about it.  

 

 I've put my two cents in before with a previous thread with the Honorable Sulla (please don't turn like the press and think I'm taking sides because I used "the Honorable" as far as I know, since no new Consuls have been granted imperium... he remains Consul, thus deserving the respect of the office no matter your position in this matter). 

 

My personal feelings on this matter is with the "Opposition Pontiffs." I feel it is sacrilegious for the Senate to supersede the CP in these matters. 

 

            Those far more knowledgeable than I about such matters have concluded as much.  It is also extremely foolish to appoint Pontifices who have not been trained, who have not held even a minor religious post, such as that of Sacerdos.  Kindly note that all of the prospective appointees belong to the conservative faction, and will pack the Collegium.  Even a former citizen from that faction, and that, too, one with certain apparently disqualifying health issues, was proposed until that error was corrected.  All are going to start not at the bottom, as is proper, but at the top.  Instead of having altar boys, we will have cardinals.  

 

            Sulla's term as consul is over.  The new magistrates have taken their oaths and entered office, but have not yet been granted imperium.  They are able to perform many of their duties with potestas, which is inherent.  

 

 

While, trust me, I REALLY want to start my training as a Fetialis…

 

            As far as I am aware, Metellus is our sole fetialis; perhaps he could assist you.  

 

 it's very annoying. The only thing I am doing to train for the priesthood is study the Constitution.. which infuriates me more when I read people debating sentences and try to twist meanings from clearly stated lines.

 

            Pontifex Lentulus and I often encounter this difficulty.  We are not understood, and our words get twisted and all 'bent out of shape,' as someone I knew long ago used to say.  Could be because we don't belong to the conservative faction…and are perceived as fair game for such nonsense.  

 

CMC.  No.  Disagreement with points you make are neither dismissal (which would be to utterly ignore what you have to say) or demonstrations of biased political factionalism.  They are disagreement with your points, and if you take a stand in a debate, you can expect that stand to be challenged.  And before you say it, no, I am not advocating for ad Hominum attacks, whether or not they were acceptable in ancient Rome, which, I might add they sometimes were, but that’s a topic (maybe) for an entirely different post.  And when anyone presents a view different from yours, that is not “nonsense”.  What you say is well understood, it just isn’t accepted as the final and correct view of the matters you address. 

 

We could state that it snows in Minnesota in the winter, and that would be denied, even ridiculed.  If one of them said that Quadratus (in Montreal) had a pineapple plantation and an orange grove (maybe a rice paddy, too) in his yard, why, that would believed.  Of course they will deny this…but we know better.  

 

CMC. Quadratus, when you harvest your pineapple crop, would you send me a few?  I’d be happy to pay postage!  Oh, wait … I’m not being serious! 


ATS:  You don't like oranges or rice?  Both would have to be pretty hardy to stand that frigid climate, though.  So would pineapples.  Anyone for that fine Roman dish of old, acorns?  

 

I also feel that those arguing that the Senate has *no* authority in religious matters is just stupid.. The Senate and (in fact) every elected body in the Roman State is Sacrosanct. My previous post (four threads back) had an option that would make everyone happy.. except those out for blood.

 

On the matter of the Pontifex Maximus.. yes, he failed in his annual duty. No, this shouldn't be made light of. No, someone elected to a position for life shouldn't be removed by an outside body. 

 

            Although this has occurred more than once in NR history.  The Pontifex Maximus is politically independent and perhaps has gotten tired of being insulted for using two words of his well-known and academically-mandatory native language (French) in the presence of those who refuse to learn any language their respective mothers didn't teach them in the cradle, for being less than Shakespearean or Churcillian in his English, and for being other than a member of the conservative faction.  

 

CMC.  I first read this email soon after I got up, and this last comment made me very angry, so I decided to calm down, have some coffee, do unrelated things, and then post.  However, even rereading this makes me very angry.  This is a deflection.  Dexter’s politics are not the issue.  Dexter’s native language is not the issue.  Dexter’s English usage is not the issue.  The issue is Dexter’s choice to neglect his sacred and State duty.  You can minimize the importance of Imperium all you want, but in order to fully perform their duties, Consuls and Praetors must have it, which requires that certain specific steps be taken.  Dexter, as Pontifex Maximus was the only one who could initiate that process, and he *chose* not to do so, despite his word to the CP that he would.  I am, quite frankly, sick and tired of the unacceptable actions of your political allies being justified, rationalized and sanctioned, simply on the basis that they agree with you, politically. 

ATS:  Maria, this outburst is both totally uncharacteristic of you and totally uncalled-for.  It is also based on something closely resembling quicksand.  In case you missed this when we all met Dexter, not once, but twice, he is NOT a member of ANY political faction.  He is fully independent of the Boni AND the remnants of the other factions.  What he does is his own action, his own independent choice, not sanctioned by any party or faction.  Thus it is that he is NOT my political ally, or that of anyone else. I certainly do not approve of failing to convene the lictores or going back on his word.  Probably he has his reasons, though, whatever they may be.  

You weren't there when Petronius was gratuitously insulted for using two words of French, a language taught in virtually all high schools and required for most master's degrees.  I was.  In any case, anyone, even those who somehow did not learn French, could get a small Collins Gem dictionary and look said words up in it.  Certain people don't like him because he is politically independent, because he speaks Latin and French, because (fill in the blanks).  They want him out.  They found an excuse.  Wouldn't be the first time that that happened.  

  

This, among other reasons, is why I never desired to become a member of your political party.  And, before you accuse me, publicly or privately, of being a “Boni” or a member in good standing of the Caesar/Sulla regime, I suggest you *ask* the members of that group about that.  By all means, do ask the former Consul how compliant, acquiescent and obedient I am. 


ATS:  Well, I don't think you are very compliant, acquiescent, or obedient.  You share felinity with your favorite critters.  

There are more important things than political alignment. 


ATS:  Indeed.  I can think of some, too.  

I have friends all over the political landscape, inside and outside of NR, because I base my friendships on other things, such as qualities I see in people which I value and admire, coinciding interests, and agreement on personal values.

 

Yes, when it comes to the PM and the CP.. the Catholic Church is one of the best examples. Considering that, a Pope can be removed from office (before death) either by resignation or a majority vote of the College of Cardinals when there has been a situation that would taint the office. 

 

Lastly, there is a lot of talk about auspices being taken.. I have read that they were favorable about the subject of the vote, but can we have them taken for the actual enforcement of the vote? If they are favorable, then the arguments people are making against it or for it are now invalid in the eyes of the Divine. No more argument, no more mess, the government can continue, and forgiveness of the extra commas and grammatical errors here. :)

 

            As I am not a practitioner of the RR, I may be wrong about this, but I believe that the auspices referred to the actual session of the Senate, NOT the outcome of its votes.  

 

I hope this hasn't offended anyone, but when people are saying that Nova Roma looks idiotic in the eyes of the World.. it infuriates me. 

 

            Unfortunately, there are things that Nova Roma has done which have indeed made it a laughingstock.  There are many people who misunderstand Nova Roma, including in my own field (classics), and some who look upon the lack of interest in the language of the Romans, the mutilations thereof in the titles of various laws, etc., the bizarre names once allowed and now apparently back in favor despite our efforts to bring our names into keeping with genuine Roman practice, certain matters relating to the Religio, the presence of only one consul and one praetor last year, a situation which in the past would have brought a riot of complaints from the conservatives had that consul and praetor been of a different political stripe (it did some years ago when a consul had to act for his colleague and both praetors, all of whom were missing.  I have been here over ten years, and have seen a lot).  And so it goes. 

 

 

Call me narcissistic, but that makes *me* foolish in the eyes of the World. I don't like to look foolish. I don't like my friends to look foolish. I don't like my Gods to look foolish.

 

            Most of us don't.  Some, however, can't see, or don't care, how they look to the outside world. They simply cannot take another's perspective.  In reality, there are organizations opposed to Nova Roma, some formed by former citizens after one or another mass exodus (which Sulla and friends prefer to term 'civil wars,' though the second at least was not really a war, but a reaction to senate paralysis and other matters); there are independent people who hate Nova Roma, and will nit pick anything they can find.  That is reality.  It may not be pleasant, but it is there.  So are hurricanes, tornados, forest fires, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, blizzards…and political chicanery, inter alia.  

 

Please forgive my temper.

 

            Et in rebus difficilibus aequum animum serva; even in difficult situations, maintain a calm temperament.  

 

Sincerely,

Titus Iulius Nix

 

Vale.  


Iterum vale.  

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92970 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Salve Maria, et salvete omnes!

Thank you, Maria, for posting the musical interlude. It was a charming piece with many fascinating Mithras images.

Of course, as a Brit, as a Kipling fan as well as a Mithras follower, my mind instantly went to a totally different "Hymn to Mithras", which is the following poem.

We haven't looked at this one recently, but I greatly admire it. It tells of a simple soldier, posted in the bleak and distant front-line of the Wall, who, like many servicemen and women of all ages think of their own special god and gain comfort, support and strength from knowing that their god is with them in time of danger. I personally find Mithras a great comfort, and a straightforward part of Roman religion. I try to take the opportunity to visit and think awhile at mithraea I sometimes visit.

I especially like the line "Many roads Thou hast fashioned: all of them lead to the Light". There is surely something good and true in all religions, yet believers sometimes seem to ignore common truths and argue about small differences.

So here is the poem, I hope you enjoy reading it. I also post a link.



"A Song to Mithras"



MITHRAS, God of the Morning, our trumpets waken the Wall! 
' Rome is above the Nations, but Thou art over all!' 
Now as the names are answered, and the guards are marched away,
Mithras, also a soldier, give us strength for the day!

Mithras, God of the Noontide, the heather swims in the heat,
Our helmets scorch our foreheads ; our sandals burn our feet.
Now in the ungirt hour; now ere we blink and drowse,
Mithras, also a soldier, keep us true to our vows !

Mithras, God of the Sunset, low on the Western main,
Thou descending immortal, immortal to rise again ! 
Now when the watch is ended, now when the wine is drawn,
Mithras, also a soldier, keep us pure till the dawn!

Mithras, God of the Midnight, here where the great bull dies,
Look on Thy children in darkness. Oh take our sacrifice !
Many roads Thou hast fashioned: all of them lead to the Light,
Mithras, also a soldier, teach us to die aright!

Valete omnes!

Crispus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92971 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
C Claudius Quadratus Tr. Pl. Quiritibus salutem dicit:

Pronouncement  of  Intercessio


A sharply divided Senate, during a voting period that ended at 11:00 p.m. (Canada Citerior time) on January 24, 2014, corresponding to a.d. IX Kal. Feb. MMDCCLXVII, a.u.c., passed a Senatus consultum ultimum (hereafter, SCU) that suspended the Constitution and created five named Pontifices from amongst its own membership.  In effect, the SCU indefinitely expanded the membership of the Collegium Pontificum.  The vote tally was twelve in favor, seven opposed, with one abstention.

An SCU, in keeping with custom, should only be resorted to in situations of dire emergency and to do otherwise is inappropriate.  The perceived need to create new Pontifices and/or expand the Collegium Pontificum did not present such an emergency.  The purported suspension of the Constitution is, thus, ineffective.  Alternative methods to achieve the desired reform, without the need for suspending the Constitution, were and remain available.  Indeed, several were discussed during the debating period prior to the vote. 

Thus, with reluctance, I must pronounce intercessio with respect to the aforementioned SCU.  This action is taken ex-officio in my official capacity as Tribunus Plebis, as per Section IV.A.7.a. of the Constitution, and in accordance with Section II.A of the Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia.  I believe intercessio serves the best interests of the Plebs and the citizens of Nova Roma.

The action prescribed by this SCU is in clear violation of Section VI.B. of the Constitution of Nova Roma, which reads, in part:  "The institutions of the Religio Romana shall have authority over religious matters on the level of the state and nation ..."  Section VI.B.1., moreover, states, in part:  "The collegium pontificum shall appoint its own members."  Section VI.B.1.b., moreover, lists among the responsibilities of the collegium pontificum "To have ritual responsibilities within the Religio Romana; and general authority over the institutions, rites, rituals, and priesthoods of the public Religio Romana;"

The powers of the Senate are described in Section V. of the Constitution.  There is nothing in Section V. of the Constitution authorizing the Senate to act in contravention of the specifics of Section VI.B. cited above.  The specifics of Section VI.B. govern this situation and preclude their override by an interpretation that amounts to an unwarranted expansion of general powers.

For the above reasons, intercessio is pronounced.

Further observations: 

1.  The notion that a Senatus consultum ultimum is not subject to intercessio is not acceptable.  If such an interpretation is valid then anything at all could be imposed upon the People if it is simply given the title Senatus consultum ultimum.  That is not reasonable.  Section IV.A.7.a empowers the Tribuni Plebis  "To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, ... when the spirit and / or letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decreta, Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby;..."  It is entirely reasonable to interpret the text "Senatus consulta" as including within its scope a Senatus consultum ultimum that is enacted in non-emergent situations.

2.  Section V.E of the Constitution reads as follows:  "The Senate shall have the power to issue the Senatus consultum ultimum (the ultimate decree of the Senate).  When in effect, this decree will supersede all other governmental bodies and authorities (with the exception of the dictator) and allow the Senate to invest the consuls with absolute powers to deal with a specific situation, subject only to their collegial veto and review by the Senate.  Even under the authority of the Senatus consultum ultimum, the consuls may only temporarily suspend this Constitution; they may not enact any permanent changes hereto."

Section V.E appears susceptible to conflicting interpretations with respect to how an SCU is to be put into effect. It appears to require that an SCU direct Consuls to take action. But there is no such language in the SCU under discussion, rendering it unclear as to whether or not it is in compliance with V.E.  What is clear, however, is that the suspension of normal constitutional prerogatives is supposed to be only temporary.  The creation of indefinite positions, outside of constitutional norms, is a further irregularity of the SCU under discussion.

3.  It would have been better if those Senators named in the decree for elevation had abstained from the vote.  It is not normal for members of such a body to vote for their own promotion.

Quirites, the bottom line is that the Senate should not be creating Pontifices, and since Nova Roma was not facing an emergent situation, the use of an SCU to do so was improper. 

INTERCESSIO is hereby pronounced this 25th day of January 2014, corresponding to a.d. VIII Kal. Feb., MMDCCLXVII, a.u.c.

C Claudius Quadratus
Tribunus Plebis



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92972 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude

Salve Crispe et Salvete omnes!

 

Gratias tibi ago, Crispe for that glorious poem!  As it happens, I also love Kipling, so I’m always glad to read something of his I haven’t seen before, like this.

 

Vale et valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92973 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Salvete,

It's not often you find Kipling poetry.  Especially something as lovely as this.  I did not know you were a follower of Mithras Crispe :-).

Kipling May become the theme for tomorrow.

Thank you Crispe!

Valete bene,
Aeternia 

Sent from my iPhone

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92974 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Ave,

You can certainly try to intercessio....but it will likely be ignored as SCUs are outside of the realm of what can be intercessio'd.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92975 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Caesar Sullae sal.

Indeed amice. Also it fails to comply with the lex Didia. Thus it fails twice over as it ignores the Constitution and the very lex that regulates the issuance of intercessio.

If it isn't valid it is just an opinion of a Tribune or indeed all of them. Opinions are not intercessio, which is just as well in Nova Roma since we all have opinions ;)

Just a quick point, on the ignoring. Unless an intercessio clearly abides by the lex Didia it fails. If it violates other sections of the Constitution it fails. This also fails on other grounds of logic, which make for interesting debate. Bottom line is this has failed the test. No one has to agree to ignore it as it simply isn't valid. It isn't a provisional intercessio or some such beast, it is just an opinion. It would be a violation of the SCU for anyone to actually recognize the intercessio and attempt to impede its execution. 

This is just a non-event that cannot be accepted, even if some may want to. The SCU overrides all save a dictator, and that includes the powers of the tribunes. Not even a consul can accept the fake intercessio below.

Optime vale.


From: Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
You can certainly try to intercessio....but it will likely be ignored as SCUs are outside of the realm of what can be intercessio'd.
Respectfully,
Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92976 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
C. Aemilius Crassus Consul Novae Romae C. Claudio Quadrato Tribuno Plebis omnibusque SPD,

I'm very sorry to inform but your intercessio is indeed invalid. As you have pointed out the constitution states:
 "The Senate shall have the power to issue the Senatus consultum ultimum (the ultimate decree of the Senate).  When in effect, this decree will supersede all other governmental bodies and authorities (with the exception of the dictator) and allow the Senate to invest the consuls with absolute powers to deal with a specific situation, subject only to their collegial veto and review by the Senate.  Even under the authority of the Senatus consultum ultimum, the consuls may only temporarily suspend this Constitution; they may not enact any permanent changes hereto."

There is no limitation or requisite to the Senate issue such Senatum Consultum Ultimum which supersede all other governmental bodies and authorities, which includes the Tribuni Plebis. It is to the Senate to decide if such SCU is needed and the Senate did decided so no matter if we agree with the decision or not.

More obviously the SCU will be temporally overriding the constitution, that is the reason a SCU was felt to be needed, and what it is state in constitution is the Consuls under SCU authority cannot make permanent changes in the constitution but all other actions under the SCU are not temporally. No permanent change on constitution is made so there is no veto matter here too.

The Senate under its constitutional right decided there was needed to issue such SCU and voted it. Such decision, no matter our personal opinion, respected the constitution and the exception state was declared to handle such matters and the Consules obviously will comply with it.

Vale optime.


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92977 From: anotheruranian Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Salvete!


As a tribune of the plebs I officially announce my agreement and support of the intercessio raised against the SCU passed yesterday regarding the creation of Pontices. 



Valete!



A. Apollonius Antullus 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92978 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Salve A. Apolloni Antulle,

And sadly your support is as invalid as the intercessio itself is.

Unless anyone proves which constitutional article concerning the issuance of this SCU was not respected there cannot be any valid intercessio.

Vale et valete,
Crassus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92979 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Discussion of Intercessio
Salvete!

I appreciate the discussion thus far.  Other commitments will keep me occupied for the remainder of the day.  I will respond further as necessary starting late tonight or tomorrow.

Valete!

Quadratus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92980 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Caesar Crasso sal

And the lex Didia needs to be complied with, to the letter.

Optime vale


From: Aemilius Crassus <c.aemilius.crassus@...  
Salve A. Apolloni Antulle,

And sadly your support is as invalid as the intercessio itself is.

Unless anyone proves which constitutional article concerning the issuance of this SCU was not respected there cannot be any valid intercessio.

Vale et valete,
Crassus


On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:36 PM, <cbhovey@...



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92982 From: l_ulpius_atellus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices


Salvete Omnes!


According the Constitution Section V.E, "The Senate shall have the power to issue the Senatus consultum ultimum (the ultimate decree of the Senate). When in effect, this decree will supersede all other governmental bodies and authorities (with the exception of the dictator) and allow the Senate to invest the consuls with absolute powers to deal with a specific situation, subject only to their collegial veto and review by the Senate."

Therefore the intercessio is invalid. While I believe in checks and balances, I guess the Senators could be seen to act in such capacity, an SCU trumps all.


Valete!
L. Ulpius Atellus
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92983 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Avete Omnes,

Before I post the link, I would like to thank Caninus for facilitating the creation of the webpage.  His assistance has been very important and I believe this answers most of the questions regarding the taxes.


Please, as always, email me @ robert.woolwine@... if you have any additional questions or concerns.

For the record, the tax period goes through the end of March.  If anyone needs arrangements for payment, please contact me.  I am always willing to aid anyone in need of more time.

Also, if you hold a title, an office even scribe or accensus you need to be a tax payer.  If you have a desire to run for office you need to be an Assidui.  Also, once we start setting up the Ordo Equesto you need to be a tax payer. :)

As a tax payer, your vote is MUCH more important and much more powerful.  If you want to have a stronger say in the direction of Nova Roma - paying your tax does exactly that.

Thank you again!

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
CFO
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92984 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Concerning the intercessio against SCU on creation of Pontifices
C. Aemilius Crassus Consul Novae Romae Quiritibus SPD,

I want to be very clear on this matter in the hope we can proceed forward quickly on this matter.

In Nova Roma the Tribuni Plebis can't veto because they don't agree with a measure or action and neither is the way to issue an intercessio open but must follows the Lex Didia.

So all elements in Lex Dilia must be given one of which is what law or constitutional article or articles are being violated.

In the case of the SCU the constitution gives the power to the Senate to issue them without any prerequisite so it is solely on the Senate power to decide when such extreme measure is needed.

As it will be publicly when the Senate report will be presented I voted against this SCU mainly because I don't consider this matter in the needed of using this extreme measure. The Senate decided, following constitution, laws and internal procedures, it was needed to issue this SCU. The session followed all legal requisites and procedures so there is no doubt that the SCU is valid and can't be veto.

I, as Consul of Nova Roma, will comply and implement the SCUs as decide by the Senate, the only body with power to decide the need of such measure.

Valete optime.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92985 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Ave!
Just curious.. Why were taxes decreased? It's not like they were high in the first place, and I thought one of our main goals was to purchase land..
-Nix



--
"Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92986 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Ave,

It is a long term goal, to eventually get land yes.  But there were substantial complaints about the tax amount last year.  It was one of my goals to maximize the number of tax payers vs the amount of the individual tax.  If we have more tax payers we will get more taxes. :)  

Nova Roma is getting to a point where we will have enough monies to pay for our yearly requirements and soon we will be able to get other value added benefits like JSTOR and other projects.  Land is a more long term mission whereas some of these other projects are a shorter term that with their implmenetation will create a more valuable incentive for more citizens to decide to pay the tax.  Because, lets remember the tax is voluntary.  The more incentives to pay the tax the greater the pool of people to pay the tax. :)  See how that works?

Respectfully,

Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92987 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Salvete
 
 As had been discussed before  I believe we could have vetoed the SCU BEFORE it is enacted but not after.
 
I join my colleague L. Ulpius Atellus in declaring my belief that the intercessio is invalid and announce my opposition to it.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
Tribune
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: koalmyner@...
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:19:19 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] RE: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

 


Salvete Omnes!


According the Constitution Section V.E, "The Senate shall have the power to issue the Senatus consultum ultimum (the ultimate decree of the Senate). When in effect, this decree will supersede all other governmental bodies and authorities (with the exception of the dictator) and allow the Senate to invest the consuls with absolute powers to deal with a specific situation, subject only to their collegial veto and review by the Senate."

Therefore the intercessio is invalid. While I believe in checks and balances, I guess the Senators could be seen to act in such capacity, an SCU trumps all.


Valete!
L. Ulpius Atellus
Tribunus Plebis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92988 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: musical interlude
Salve Aeternia, salve Maria, salvete omnes!

I am glad that you enjoyed the poem. Kipling seems to capture huge landscapes and waves of feelings in a few simple words.

Am I a follower of Mithras?

Well, yes, I try to follow Mithras in the basic, simple, unskilled but
heartfelt way in which people throughout history have shown a strong faith in their god. I suppose that in most ways I have never seen myself as a practitioner of the religio. But, in saying this, I think I follow what the majority of Romans would actually have done. They respected what the priests were engaged in, which is to maintain the balance between the state and the gods, promising that each would refrain from interfering in matters that are proper to the other. But Romans would have their private religion or religions, especially when in a province where provincial gods would be honoured, or military gods such as Mithras. Perhaps "the gods that live forever have fought for Rome today" (more Lord Macaulay), and maybe in some way the main gods of Rome did intervene to save Rome. But the average simple man or woman would surely leave such matters to the priests and focus on their own special god who might be more real and personal for them than the state gods.

I have promised never to show disrespect for the gods of Rome, and I have never done so. But I see the state religion as something separate from my personal following of Mithras. Mithras is the one I would turn to if I was in danger. It is, for me, just a much more personal thing.

I also see a relationship to a society of men of which I am a member (fellow brethren will get the link) where, like Kipling, we could learn and work the mysteries together, the higher grades mentoring the younger and less experienced members..

That is why I follow both Kipling and Mithras. So now perhaps you know too much about me!

Valete bene!

Crispus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92989 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Away
Sta. Cornelia Aeternia Consul Omnibus in foro S.P.D.

I will be away attending work related Events. I will be unavailable till tomorrow e

Sent from my iPhone
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92990 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92991 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Away
Salvete,

Okay that was somehow sent before completion.

I will attending work related Events till tomorrow evening.

My Colleague is available and please e-mail me if any emergency happens.

Valete bene,
Statia Cornelia Aeternia

(Chastising IPhone )

Sent from my iPhone

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92992 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
Ah yes.  Taxes and Death.  How much money do we need to run Nova Roma?
Q. Fabius Maximus
 
In a message dated 1/25/2014 3:49:50 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, robert.woolwine@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92993 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR

Ave,

You voted on the budget in September last year.  It was in the same call that decided the tax rate.  you should know the answer to that question.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92994 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Cn. Lentulus C. Aemilio consuli s. p. d.

I prove it to you, esteemed Consul.

First of all, the SCU, as any other legal measure, can only be valid, if it abides by the formal requirements that are required for validity. The SCU needs to be in the form of order to the consuls. This SCU isn’t.

1) The Constitution requires that an SCU be implemented in a form of consular order or edict. An SCU in itself, without the consular edict/action can not take force. I will explain it below, but first, let's see the more important arguments.

2) An SCU can not be valid when it's not used to address an emergency. Why?

It's implied in it's name: Senatus Consultum Ultimum. This is a Latin legal term, and anyone can check what it means: it is a decree of the senate used to resolve immediate emergencies.

The SCU must be used in state of emergency and only in a form limited to the extent as to resolve that specific emergency. 
The removal of Petronius as pontifex maximus was an emergency issue since he was not willing to convene the comitia curiata. Something had to be done in order that the new magistrates can be invested with imperium. This was an emergency issue. The appointment of 5 pontifices wasn't.

3) Also, the SCU can not be used to create permanent positions, such as the life long title pontifex, and I offer you this exhibit and testimony from the Constitution to prove it, which says:

Constitution: V.E. "[…] Even under the authority of the Senatus consultum ultimum, the consuls may only temporarily suspend this Constitution; they may not enact any permanent changes hereto."

Thus, it means the SCU may not alter the normal legal settlement permanently. Positions for life are permanent enough, in my book.

So, there is an argument that since pontifex appointments are permanent (in fact, they are meant life long), this is an area where the senatus consultum ultimum is not meant to be used at all.

Now to the question whether the SCU can be vetoed, or not.

Here are the evidences that it can be vetoed:

4) The argument has been raised on the Forum (ML) that the Constitution does not list SCU among the sources of law that can be vetoed in the listing in section IV.A.7.a.. In fact, this is what the Constitution says:

IV.A.7.a.: "To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the comitia when the spirit and / or letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decreta, Senatus Consulta or leges are being violated thereby; once a pronouncement of intercessio has been made, the other Tribunes may, at their discretion, state either their support for or their disagreement with that intercessio."

Based on this text, to answer the objection of the tribunes’ rights to veto an SCU, the response is this:

The Constitution does not list the SCU in the above section, simply because an SCU isn't a source of law in itself, independently. It isn't a full legal text or source of law, per the NR Constitution.

Why? Because the NR Constitution has a section defining what are legal sources (laws or legally binding documents):

I.A.: "This Constitution shall be the basic authority for all decision-making within Nova Roma and shall limit the authority of all magistrates and bodies, and all leges (laws) passed by the comitia, decreta  (decrees) of the priestly collegia, magisterial edicta (edicts) and Senatus consulta shall be subject to it [...]"

And:

I.B.: "Legal precedence. This Constitution shall be the highest legal authority within Nova Roma, apart from edicts issued by a legally appointed dictator. It shall thereafter be followed in legal authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima, laws properly voted and passed by one of the comitia, decreta passed by the collegium pontificum,
decreta passed by the collegium augurum, Senatus consulta, and magisterial edicta (in order of descending authority as described in section IV of this Constitution), in that order. Should a lower authority conflict with a higher authority, the higher authority shall take precedence. Should a law passed by one of the comitia contradict one passed by another or the same comitia without explicitly superseding that law, the most recent law shall take precedence."

Neither of the above list SCU as a separate legal source. 

Section I.A. does not even mention it.

Section I.B. mentions it and says: "It shall thereafter be followed in legal authority by *edicta* issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima" 

So it lists only EDICTA issued under an SCU. The SCU is not listed in its own right.

What does it mean? The SCU in itself does not have a place in legal precedence: only the consular edict *issued by consuls acting under the SCU*. So the listing of legal sources deny that the SCU would be something independently existing from the normal Senatus Consulta. Therefore the SCU is only a variant of the plain Senatus Consulta (SC). This means that IF the normal Senatus Consulta can be vetoed, then the Senatus Consultum Ultimum can be vetoed as well.

5) This also means that *no* SCU is valid which is not implemented by consular edict or oder. Since the SCU is only among the legal source in the form of "edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima".

So, *after* the SCU is accepted by the senate, and *before* it is issued by the consuls' as an edict, the SCU is just as much a Senatus Consultum as any, which can be vetoed.

Also, the argument that the Constitution IV.A.7.a. does not list SCU among the vetoable sources of law, is broken by this fact, where the Constitution says the tribunes has right to:

"To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the comitia....."

So it mentions EMPHATICALLY that from under tribunician veto the dictator and interrex are excepted from among the magistates. But it does not mention that the Senatus Consulta Ultima would be excepted from among the Senatus Consulta. And since under Constition I.A. and I.B. among the existing legal sources of NR, the SCU is not mentioned as an independent source of law (it's not even mentioned under I.A.!), we can conclude the SCU is not excepted from under tribuncian veto.

Q. E. D.

I hope it's clear now that a Nova Roman SCU can be vetoed by the tribunes, and in fact, it has been now. Now we are waiting the fifth tribune's decision, Q. Metellus Pius.


Vale, consul illustris!

Cn. Lentulus



________________________________
Da: Aemilius Crassus <c.aemilius.crassus@... Pontifices




Salve A. Apolloni Antulle,

And sadly your support is as invalid as the intercessio itself is.

Unless anyone proves which constitutional article concerning the issuance of this SCU was not respected there cannot be any valid intercessio.

Vale et valete,
Crassus



                           
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92995 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR
 
 
In a message dated 1/25/2014 4:24:54 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, robert.woolwine@... writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92996 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D. 

 

Ave!

Just curious.. Why were taxes decreased? It's not like they were high in the first place, and I thought one of our main goals was to purchase land..

Here a little perspective should be supplied.  For many years, the NR taxes were based on the GDP / GNP / whatever of the country in which a given citizen lived.  In the US, the tax was about $16.  This was changed a few years ago, and was then based on the voting class to which one belonged.  This, of course, penalizes those who participate at any level in the NR government, and especially those in third world countries, those who are students, elderly, etc.  One may draw conclusions about the reasoning behind this change, but pay to play seems to be the rule the current government prefers.  They will provide their own reasons, but the consequences are clear.  A fixed amount based on points may not be a huge burden for working-age Americans, but it may be for others.  Having this come due at IRS time, however, is an added impost on Americans, one which any sensible and compassionate person would have avoided.  The previous system was fairer, and allowed more to participate.  Those taxes in fixed amounts ARE high for some. Moreover, until this year, the payment had a later due date, one less likely to coincide with the grasping tendencies of a certain North American government agency, and a longer time to pay.   

Years ago, Cassius had purchased some land in Texas--a landlocked and waterless parcel which apparently got traded around with the complicity of the local authorities down South.  We finally had to get rid of it.  

-Nix

Vale.  




--
"Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92997 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: [BackAlley] Taxes for 2014 - THIS YEAR

Lol ok...There are times where it's impossible to tell if your being rhetorical or yourself.  Thanks for the clarification and the posting of the budget for everyone to see where the money goes.

Also, until the migration is completed we still have to pay fredrik in Sweden...which is hopefully nearing completion.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92998 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014

Ave,

Of course I support completely the concept of Pay to play.

What is the alternative?  That those newest members of Nova Roma get stuck paying more?  Yeah, right!

Those of us who have invested the most time should also be responsible in paying the most funds.  We have set up a graduated tax system that those members to Nova Roma who are newer are not burned with the higher tax rate as those who sit in the Senate.  Who serve as Magistrates.  Who govern and direct Nova Roma.

She calls it pay to play.

I call it putting our money where our mouth is.  There is no reason a brand new citizen should be burdened with paying $38.00 a year while they are deciding if they want to be as active as the magistrates are.

Also, ancient Rome the classes were divided by wealth distinctions.  It is in this spirit that works both the activity as well as financial obligation - it works hand in hand.

Respectfully,

Sulla

 

A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D. 

 

Ave!

Just curious.. Why were taxes decreased? It's not like they were high in the first place, and I thought one of our main goals was to purchase land..

Here a little perspective should be supplied.  For many years, the NR taxes were based on the GDP / GNP / whatever of the country in which a given citizen lived.  In the US, the tax was about $16.  This was changed a few years ago, and was then based on the voting class to which one belonged.  This, of course, penalizes those who participate at any level in the NR government, and especially those in third world countries, those who are students, elderly, etc.  One may draw conclusions about the reasoning behind this change, but pay to play seems to be the rule the current government prefers.  They will provide their own reasons, but the consequences are clear.  A fixed amount based on points may not be a huge burden for working-age Americans, but it may be for others.  Having this come due at IRS time, however, is an added impost on Americans, one which any sensible and compassionate person would have avoided.  The previous system was fairer, and allowed more to participate.  Those taxes in fixed amounts ARE high for some. Moreover, until this year, the payment had a later due date, one less likely to coincide with the grasping tendencies of a certain North American government agency, and a longer time to pay.   

Years ago, Cassius had purchased some land in Texas--a landlocked and waterless parcel which apparently got traded around with the complicity of the local authorities down South.  We finally had to get rid of it.  

-Nix

Vale.  




--
"Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 92999 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-25
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Cn. Iulius Caesar censor sal.

I deal here with the points raised by Cn. Lentulus - his full post below.

CnCL: "1) The Constitution requires that an SCU be implemented in a form of consular order or edict. An SCU in itself, without the consular edict/action can not take force. I will explain it below, but first, let's see the more important arguments."

CnIC: Incorrect. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say this. What it says there is this:

"The Senate shall have the power to issue the Senatus consultum ultimum (the ultimate decree of the Senate). When in effect, this decree will supersede all other governmental bodies and authorities (with the exception of the dictator) and allow the Senate to invest the consuls with absolute powers to deal with a specific situation, subject only to their collegial veto and review by the Senate."

This consists of four components:

A. "The Senate shall have the power to issue the Senatus consultum ultimum (the ultimate decree of the Senate)."
B. "When in effect, this decree will supersede all other governmental bodies and authorities (with the exception of the dictator)..."
C. :..and allow the Senate to invest the consuls with absolute powers to deal with a specific situation..."
D. ".. subject only to their collegial veto and review by the Senate."

So (A) informs us that the Senate has the power to issue an SCU, (B) tells us that when the SCU is passed is is supreme and cannot be interfered with, (C) gives the consuls the right if the Senate so chooses to deal with specific situations that arise, and that these consular powers can only be vetoed by the consul not issuing a consular edictum under the SCU (if they didn't both issue it and one disagrees) and review of such edictum if not vetoed by the consular colleague by the Senate.

There is absolutely noting in here to state that the SCU is triggered into effect once passed by the Senate by a consular edictum to that effect. The point of giving the consuls powers to issue such SCU edictum is to deal with emergent situations arising from, but not specifically covered by, the wording in the SCU. Once the Senate passes the SCU it is in effect.

CnCL: "2) An SCU can not be valid when it's not used to address an emergency. Why?"

CnIC: Incorrect. Deriving meaning from names is irrelevant. What matters is the power to issue it. There is nothing in the Constitution that states that any particular test has to be imposed on the situation under discussion by the Senate. There is no restriction on when and why the Senate may issue the SCU. Even if this derivation of meaning from the name were true, which it isn't, then clearly the Senate is the one to decide, because once it passes and is immediately in force no government body or authority (and that includes the tribunes) can interfere with it. The instant it passes it is in force.

CnCL: "3) Also, the SCU can not be used to create permanent positions, such as the life long title pontifex, and I offer you this exhibit and testimony from the Constitution to prove it, which says:"

CnIC: Incorrect. The SCU suspends the Constitution, leges and decretum that possibly or actually speak to the appointment of pontifices. The moment the SCU is in force, and for the duration of the SCU, they exist but are overridden by the SCU, so essentially there is a legal void which the SCU fills. The SCU determines who gets appointed and under what conditions to the CP. The appointments are in immediate effect. There is no legal need for confirmation, affirmation etc. of those appointments by the pre-SCU constituted CP. The appointments cannot be held hostage to such a claimed confirmation. Once the SCU takes effect and the appointments are immediately in force and done, then the normal provisions for appointment to the CP take force again. 

Further the phrase in the Constitution that says "Even under the authority of the Senatus consultum ultimum, the consuls may only temporarily suspend this Constitution; they may not enact any permanent changes hereto": Lentulus infers that phrase refers to the appointment for life. This is utter nonsense. read what it says - the SCU only temporarily suspends the CONSTITUTION. No permanent changes means no permanent changes to the CONSTITUTION. The meaning of "hereto" is "to this writing or document". So no changes to the CONSTITUTION. Well clearly the Constitution is not permanently changed. The processes for appointment of pontifices reverted back to the CP, but only AFTER the appointments. Trying to conclude from this section of the Constitution that this refers to anything other than a prohibition on making permanent changes to to the Constitution is utter nonsense.

CnCL: "4) The argument has been raised on the Forum (ML) that the Constitution does not list SCU among the sources of law that can be vetoed in the listing in section IV.A.7.a.. In fact, this is what the Constitution says:"

CnIC: Lentulus then goes on to explain that in his view because the SCU as an instrument isn't listed in section I.B of the Constitution it isn't a valid legal authority. The fact that the SCU is a valid legal authority is established by section V.F, which clearly establishes its supremacy over all other legal authorities. Why doesn't it list the SCU in I.B? It was probably a drafting omission, but the impact is nil. V.F states that when in effect it overrides everything and everybody except the dictator. V.F then gives the consuls the right to issue edicta under the authority of the SCU  and I.B states " It shall thereafter be followed in legal authority by edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima". So what can we deduce here? Well the consuls act under the authority of the SCU, so their edicta follow in legal precedence AFTER the SCU. The SCU follows after the edicta of the legally appointed dictator. So the order of legal precedence is:

Edicta of the dictator
SCU
Edicta issued by the consuls acting under the SCU.

The list of items the Tribune scan veto does not contain the SCU, but the SCU has clear powers of its own. To give an example, say a tumult breaks out in Nova Roma inspired by agents of a competing organization. Some magistrates and leading citizens are found to be agents of that organization. The Senate recognizes this and passes the SCU and gives the consuls the rights to expel those found to be consorting with that competing organization. Included in the SCU however are details of five known citizens actively advocating for other citizens to leave NR to join the other organization. At the time the SCU passes details of exactly who else, apart from the five, is involved is uncertain to the Senate empowers the consuls to investigate and expel at their discretion  by consular edicta any other citizens found to be involved in this tumult and destabilization attempt. 

In the example above it would be patent nonsense to say the SCU only takes effect once the consuls issue an edictum confirming the five expulsions, and/or expel others. No "trigger" is needed to make the SCU active other than the Senate passing it. The consular edicta powers under an SCU are to deal with as yet unknown issues relating to the situation the SCU was issued to deal with. It says nowhere in the Constitution that the SCU is activated by any other means that the Senate enacting it. This is all wishful thinking and smokle and mirrors tricks by Lentulus.

CnCL: "5) This also means that *no* SCU is valid which is not implemented by consular edict or oder. Since the SCU is only among the legal source in the form of "edicta issued by consuls acting under the Senatus consulta ultima"."

CnIC: See above. This point is a reiteration of legal mumbo jumbo and wishful thinking.

QED? I hardly think so. This line of reasoning advanced by Lentulus is flawed and contradicts what the Constitution actually "SAYS". tribunes and Lentulus cannot simply make wild inferences. They have to read the Constitution and not explain away absences with nonsensical arguments, such as the fact a tribune can veto a senatus consultum means they can veto a senatus consultum ultimum because the both have the words senatus and consultum in them!! I nearly spat my cornflakes out laughing at that one when I first read it.

Finally - the intercessio is ALSO invalid, in addition to my reasons above, as it does not comply with the Lex Didia. That isn't an opinion - it is a fact.

Optime valete



From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus <cn_corn_lent@...  
Cn. Lentulus C. Aemilio consuli s. p. d.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93000 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Caeca omnibus sal!

 

I would like to be sure that my understanding of at least part of this is correct.  The SCU is an extraordinary legislative instrument intended to deal with a specific and there definable? Situation or set of circumstances that threaten the Res Publica, the Corporation, or both.  Once passed by the Senate, its provisions become law, and take precedence over anything except the um, actions, decrees? Laws? Of a dictator or Interrex (sp?) and the Constitution is suspended for a specific period of time.  This means that if the CSU enables something to be done that the Constitution disallows, that thing, whatever I is, can be done until the SCU expires, or until the situation has been resolved (who determines that, the Senate?) 

 

The SCU *also* as part of its structure makes the provision that allows the Consuls to administer its specific dictates, and further provides that in doing so, the Consuls are, in essence, protected by, and have almost the same authority as is contained in the SCU.  The only way a Consular edicta issued under the authority of a SCU can be nullified is by the Veto of the other Consul.

 

OK, how much of it did I get wrong or miss?  Thank you for your patience.

 

Valete Bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93001 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Salvete!

 

Oh …forgot … if I’m not entirely wrong, one can safely say that the SCU authorizes certain actions, which the Consuls are permitted (but not required) to administer.

 

Valete!

CMC

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93002 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Ave Caeca,

Nope you are not wrong at all. :)  That is precisely what it means.

The Consuls are permitted but not required to administer...in most liklyhoods, but not all, they would be the persons most likely to administer it.  But, one could not rule out an occasion when they would not be the key point-men to administer...such as in this case.

Respectfully,

Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93003 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Ave Sulla!

 

So let me, if I may, ask a hypothetical question.  Could the Senate have chosen to instruct the Consuls to issue an edicta appointing the new Pontifici, or could the Consuls themselves have chosen this route?  Was there a specific reason that the Senate made the appointments directly, and if so, was this done because this was by way of being a “one time deal”?

 

Gratias et vale!

CMC

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93004 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Ave, 

Yes, depending on how the SCU was written it could have stipulated that.  For example some of our SCUs in the past required a consular edicta (the votingplace.net SCUs are a great example of this)

Was there a specific reason, When I spoke with Caesar about what I was looking for specifically for the SCU I wanted to streamline the process so that there would not be an undue delay.  The first two SCUs were written in such a way that smoothed out the process so that our new magistrates would be vested with Imperium as humanly fast as possible.  

When Sabinus gave the concept for the third SCU I told Caesar that I wanted them to be as close as possible for consistency.  This conclusion worked in concert as both consuls did not want to have to continue dealing with the College once they were invested with Imperium.  This way once the vote in the Senate was concluded - that was it. It would be a seamless transition to implementation without needing any extra hands to compel compliance.  

As it was, I had to shorten the Senate session, in compliance with the Senate rules in order to facilitate the smooth transition to our incoming magistrates.  If the Session ended on its original date, with the calendar set as it was the Religious officials and Magistrates would have had to wait over 3 weeks before Sabinus would be able to summon the Comitia Curiata.  By ending the session in the current schedule Pontifex Maximus was able to summon the Comitia Curiata this very week to invest them with Imperium and frankly Dexter made the magistrates and Religious officials wait long enough and I did not want them to wait any longer.

Respectfully,

Sulla




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93005 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Ave Sulla!

 

Thank you.  I’ll go away now, while I’m still ahead, so to speak, LOL!

 

CMC

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93006 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Ave, 

No problem at all.  I hope I answered all your questions.

Respectfully,

Sulla



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93007 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Caesar Caecae sal.

Q: The SCU is an extraordinary legislative instrument intended to deal with a specific and there definable? 
A: The Constitution neither limits the number of times an SCU maybe passed. The word specific only appear in reference to the Consuls issuing edicta under the authority of the SCU.

Q: Situation or set of circumstances that threaten the Res Publica, the Corporation, or both.  
A: The Constitution does not state that. In fact it doesn't apply any test or limitation on what and when an SCU can be passed.

Q: Once passed by the Senate, its provisions become law, and take precedence over anything except the um, actions, decrees? Laws? Of a dictator or Interrex (sp?) and the Constitution is suspended for a specific period of time. 
A: Edicta of a dictator only, not interrex. The Constitution is suspended temporarily but the Constitution does not define what temporary is. Thus logically it can be any period of time which is not permanent.

Q: This means that if the CSU enables something to be done that the Constitution disallows, that thing, whatever I is, can be done until the SCU expires, or until the situation has been resolved (who determines that, the Senate?)
A: Correct, it can be done. Correct it can be done until the SCU expires or until a provision in the SCU is satisfied. 

Q: The SCU *also* as part of its structure makes the provision that allows the Consuls to administer its specific dictates, and further provides that in doing so, the Consuls are, in essence, protected by, and have almost the same authority as is contained in the SCU.
A: It is not obligatory for an SCU to invest the consuls with powers under its authority, but it is normal and wise. The consuls are the ones to deal with specific circumstances unforeseen by the SCU but within its scope, or foreseen but requiring more investigation (for example). It is an option but not mandatory to invest them with such power.  The consuls cannot negate the SCU unless it itself grants them that power, so with that proviso yes they are protected and immune from intercessio. One consul can veto the other's edictum, but the tribunes for example cannot pronounce intercessio against an edictum of the consuls. 

Q: The only way a Consular edicta issued under the authority of a SCU can be nullified is by the Veto of the other Consul.
A: Yes correct regarding the other consul, but also by the Senate subsequently reviewing any edicta issued under the authority of the SCU by the consuls.

Optime vale


From: cmc <c.mariacaeca@...  
Caeca omnibus sal!
 
I would like to be sure that my understanding of at least part of this is correct.  The SCU is an extraordinary legislative instrument intended to deal with a specific and there definable? Situation or set of circumstances that threaten the Res Publica, the Corporation, or both.  Once passed by the Senate, its provisions become law, and take precedence over anything except the um, actions, decrees? Laws? Of a dictator or Interrex (sp?) and the Constitution is suspended for a specific period of time.  This means that if the CSU enables something to be done that the Constitution disallows, that thing, whatever I is, can be done until the SCU expires, or until the situation has been resolved (who determines that, the Senate?) 
 
The SCU *also* as part of its structure makes the provision that allows the Consuls to administer its specific dictates, and further provides that in doing so, the Consuls are, in essence, protected by, and have almost the same authority as is contained in the SCU.  The only way a Consular edicta issued under the authority of a SCU can be nullified is by the Veto of the other Consul.
 
OK, how much of it did I get wrong or miss?  Thank you for your patience.
 
Valete Bene!
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93008 From: cmc Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Caeca Caesari Sal!

 

Thank you, Censor, for your corrections and clarifications.

 

Vale!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93009 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Cn. Lentulus Mariae Caecae s. p. d.

Yes, this is how the forces in power interpret the SCU, but it does not mean they are correct. In fact, they are incorrect, but I can't do anything because I'm not the senate or the magistrates. But I would like to outline an aspect of this interpretation that you didn't mention in your summary below.

You wrote: 

"The SCU is an extraordinary legislative instrument intended to deal with a specific and there definable situation or set of circumstances that threaten the Res Publica, the Corporation, or both." 

This is not exactly the current interpretation which the leaders in power apply. 

The SCU, in THEIR reading of the Constitution, is an almighty instrument which the senate can use to override all laws and the Constitution without any limitation, without any condition, the only requirement for the senate that it can be allowed to resort to an SCU being nothing else than the will of the senate itself. In THEIR interpretation, no emergency, no threatening the republic/corporation is needed to justify an SCU, in fact, nothing is needed, they only have to want to do it, since, in their reading, there are no prerequisites required to the enactment of an SCU other than the will of the dominant group of senators. 

If 50% plus one senator (which could be even less than 10 Nova Roma citizens) agree that they want to override all laws and the Constitution, and they have someone to put it on the senate agenda, they can just simply issue an SCU any time. According to the Caesar's interpretation, thus 10 people could convert NR into a Kingdom, or a Shogunate, or even a to Disney Dreamworld, say, for the next 30 years (temporarily because the SCU must have time limits, but this time limit does not have a length limit). If not all the senators vote, but only e. g. 15, then it means the agreement of 8 people can create such an SCU, and they can impose, depose, appoint, remove, build or destroy anything they want (the only limit being a time limit which doesn't have upper limit).

So I guess this is a healthy situation, and since this interpretation is the accepted one by the current powers, they must also realize that this is a double edged sword.

Vale optime!
Lentulus


Da: cmc <c.mariacaeca@...  
Caeca omnibus sal!
 
I would like to be sure that my understanding of at least part of this is correct.  The SCU is an extraordinary legislative instrument intended to deal with a specific and there definable? Situation or set of circumstances that threaten the Res Publica, the Corporation, or both.  Once passed by the Senate, its provisions become law, and take precedence over anything except the um, actions, decrees? Laws? Of a dictator or Interrex (sp?) and the Constitution is suspended for a specific period of time.  This means that if the CSU enables something to be done that the Constitution disallows, that thing, whatever I is, can be done until the SCU expires, or until the situation has been resolved (who determines that, the Senate?) 
 
The SCU *also* as part of its structure makes the provision that allows the Consuls to administer its specific dictates, and further provides that in doing so, the Consuls are, in essence, protected by, and have almost the same authority as is contained in the SCU.  The only way a Consular edicta issued under the authority of a SCU can be nullified is by the Veto of the other Consul.
 
OK, how much of it did I get wrong or miss?  Thank you for your patience.
 
Valete Bene!
C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93010 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Lentulus Sullae sal.


font-family:Georgia;font-size:13px;">
If you really had wanted to do it quickly so that there may be no delay and we don't have to wait, you simply could have proposed an SCU that empowers the consuls with imperium until the comitia curiata isn't convened... Or, by using the SCU, the comitia curiata could have been simply circumvented, and there would have been no need to call it. But you could also remove Petronius and appoint Sabinus as pontifex maximus, there was no serious debate or opposition about it.

So, in fact, you chose the longest and most complicated way among all possibilities, the one that violated the most rules (religious, sacred, and constitutional rules at the same time). Frankly, there couldn't have been invented a worse and slower way to handle the crisis, even if you had intentionally wanted to delay the imperium conferral on the new magistrates (which I suppose you didn't want...).


Vale!



Da: Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave, 

Yes, depending on how the SCU was written it could have stipulated that.  For example some of our SCUs in the past required a consular edicta (the votingplace.net SCUs are a great example of this)

Was there a specific reason, When I spoke with Caesar about what I was looking for specifically for the SCU I wanted to streamline the process so that there would not be an undue delay.  The first two SCUs were written in such a way that smoothed out the process so that our new magistrates would be vested with Imperium as humanly fast as possible.  

When Sabinus gave the concept for the third SCU I told Caesar that I wanted them to be as close as possible for consistency.  This conclusion worked in concert as both consuls did not want to have to continue dealing with the College once they were invested with Imperium.  This way once the vote in the Senate was concluded - that was it. It would be a seamless transition to implementation without needing any extra hands to compel compliance.  

As it was, I had to shorten the Senate session, in compliance with the Senate rules in order to facilitate the smooth transition to our incoming magistrates.  If the Session ended on its original date, with the calendar set as it was the Religious officials and Magistrates would have had to wait over 3 weeks before Sabinus would be able to summon the Comitia Curiata.  By ending the session in the current schedule Pontifex Maximus was able to summon the Comitia Curiata this very week to invest them with Imperium and frankly Dexter made the magistrates and Religious officials wait long enough and I did not want them to wait any longer.

Respectfully,

Sulla




On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:37 PM, cmc <c.mariacaeca@...



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93011 From: pompeia_minucia_tiberia Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Sal


vete Omnes:


I'm not sure if I've tagged this on to the proper email, probably not as I hate this format and cannot even find where to start a new email, but tis ok


I wanted to get something off my chest regarding the Lex Didia Gemina_____________on how a tribune must behave when pronouncing intercessio


This is what the consitution allows a Tribune to do:

To pronounce intercessio (intercession; a veto) against the actions of any other magistrate (with the exception of the dictator and the interrex), Senatus consulta, magisterial edicta, religious decreta, and leges passed by the comitia when the spirit and / or letter of this Constitution or legally-enacted edicta or decretaSenatus Consultaor leges are being violated  (snipped)


The above constitutional passage allows Tribunes, under normal, but not, according to the constitution, extraordinary circumstances (an SCU being  extrordinary)  to pronounce intercessio on the basis of violation of the *spirit* of the constitution as well; a violation of spirit  cannot always be traced to a verbatim passage in any law or in the constitution, but said infraction can be viewed sometimes from a theme of the several laws, decreta, constitution etc over the years,which defines  the common purpose and values of NR as a whole.

The lex Didia attempts to make tribunes cite a particular passage to verbatim, to justify their veto, implying of course that if it isn't in black and white, circles and sticks, we don't have a vetoable issue.  The consititution allows the tribunes a greater privilege as I've read it, so the Lex Didia may as well be repealed IMO. No lex can constrict a tribune's constitutional privileges (or any other magistrate's for that matter)It is the highest law of the land, in 'ordinary' circumstances.

We are debating the nature and use of an SCU, which are, as the constitution reads, an extraordinary  act, typically reserved for *emergent* situations. Given that they are to be used by the Senate for dire situations when the constitution leaves us no solution or recourse, they were, at least originally in NR and in antiquity, not subject to intercessio. Granted we probably look a little silly as a Senate body, proclaiming SCU  III in particular as an *emergency*, in light of the marginal vote count citing it as such (why is this common knowledge when the Tribunes are supposed to be the heralds of this sort of news in a formal report?)


But  anyway, I think one has to carefully examine wording of the Lex Didia, comparing it to the language of the constitution.  If the constitution offers a sacrosanct Tribune more, no law may restrict him to less. And I think this restricts the Tribune privilege and protections of the people. This law was  written in good faith, but also in haste, and in response to what was perceived as an abusive intercessio. 


Pompeia

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93012 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Convening the Comitia Curiata.

SALVETE!


I, Titus Iulius Sabinus, acting Pontifex Maximus of Nova Roma, receiving favorable auspices (Aves admittunt!) call the Comitia Curiata to order.


The Comitia Curiata is hereby called to assemble starting with this day, a.d VII Kal Feb (26th of Jan 2014) until a.d III Kal Feb (30th of Jan 2014), 15.00 Rome time,  in order that the  Lictores and Lictrices of Nova Roma may:

- attest the election of Curule Magistrates for the year 2767 a.U.c and invest them with imperium,

- attest appointments of sacerdotes and an augur,

- approve or reject the status elevation of a citizen.


Given under my hand this thirty day of December 2767 a.U.c (AD 2014) in the consulship of St. Cornelia C. Aemilio cos.


VALETE!

Sabinus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93013 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Convening the Comitia Curiata.

The same with the issue date correction.


SALVETE!


I, Titus Iulius Sabinus, acting Pontifex Maximus of Nova Roma, receiving favorable auspices (Aves admittunt!) call the Comitia Curiata to order.


The Comitia Curiata is hereby called to assemble starting with this day, a.d VII Kal Feb (26th of Jan 2014) until a.d III Kal Feb (30th of Jan 2014), 15.00 Rome time,  in order that the  Lictores and Lictrices of Nova Roma may:

- attest the election of Curule Magistrates for the year 2767 a.U.c and invest them with imperium,

- attest appointments of sacerdotes and an augur,

- approve or reject the status elevation of a citizen.


Given under my hand this twenty six of January 2767 a.U.c (AD 2014) in the consulship of St. Cornelia C. Aemilio cos.


VALETE!

Sabinus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93014 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Ave,

No.

There were other people who needed imperium.  This is your continued epic failing. 

There were two issues that had to be addressed...Both of equal importance.

1st getting all the individuals who needed imperium properly vested with it.

2nd punishing dexter for trying to hold nova roma hostage.

You do realize that is what he tried to do?

The senate had to make a firm example that anyone who has a constitutional duty...and intentionally fails to complete that duty is punished with the severity of their transgression.

The senate had to throughly address both issues at the same time.  Both matters were involved in the fastest way possible.

The only faster way would have been appointing a dictator...which the senate was silent when that option was presented.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93015 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Salvete,
Where do we want to buy land?

On Guam USA, there is a four tower building that has been halted due to a public hearing issue. Maybe I can work out a deal. Prime location, next to the hospital; each about 10 stories.

I am a licensed real estate broker on Guam. If there is any interest please contact me.
Valete,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 
 


On Sunday, January 26, 2014 1:01 PM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
Of course I support completely the concept of Pay to play.
What is the alternative?  That those newest members of Nova Roma get stuck paying more?  Yeah, right!
Those of us who have invested the most time should also be responsible in paying the most funds.  We have set up a graduated tax system that those members to Nova Roma who are newer are not burned with the higher tax rate as those who sit in the Senate.  Who serve as Magistrates.  Who govern and direct Nova Roma.
She calls it pay to play.
I call it putting our money where our mouth is.  There is no reason a brand new citizen should be burdened with paying $38.00 a year while they are deciding if they want to be as active as the magistrates are.
Also, ancient Rome the classes were divided by wealth distinctions.  It is in this spirit that works both the activity as well as financial obligation - it works hand in hand.
Respectfully,
Sulla
 
A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D. 

 
Ave!
Just curious.. Why were taxes decreased? It's not like they were high in the first place, and I thought one of our main goals was to purchase land..

Here a little perspective should be supplied.  For many years, the NR taxes were based on the GDP / GNP / whatever of the country in which a given citizen lived.  In the US, the tax was about $16.  This was changed a few years ago, and was then based on the voting class to which one belonged.  This, of course, penalizes those who participate at any level in the NR government, and especially those in third world countries, those who are students, elderly, etc.  One may draw conclusions about the reasoning behind this change, but pay to play seems to be the rule the current government prefers.  They will provide their own reasons, but the consequences are clear.  A fixed amount based on points may not be a huge burden for working-age Americans, but it may be for others.  Having this come due at IRS time, however, is an added impost on Americans, one which any sensible and compassionate person would have avoided.  The previous system was fairer, and allowed more to participate.  Those taxes in fixed amounts ARE high for some. Moreover, until this year, the payment had a later due date, one less likely to coincide with the grasping tendencies of a certain North American government agency, and a longer time to pay.   

Years ago, Cassius had purchased some land in Texas--a landlocked and waterless parcel which apparently got traded around with the complicity of the local authorities down South.  We finally had to get rid of it.  

-Nix

Vale.  


On Saturday, January 25, 2014, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...


--
"Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93016 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Ave,

Lentulus, you do realize that the issue is done.

ALL 3 SCUs have been implemented.  The matter is over. The new pontiffs have their new titles and their new points (some of which push them into a higher class in the Centuries) in the Album Civium...they have either joined the College email list...or have been invited.

All you are doing now is an intellectual exercise?  For the implementation phase is completed.  

You guys can debate the intellectual exercise about what if the SCU clause wasn't in the Constitution...since that is really what you guys have been doing.  We will do as we always do, follow and implement the law.

Vale,

Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93017 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Salvete
 
I think we should buy in Belize.
 
We could  design a city that looks Roman on the outside and uses modern
methods to create a 21st century city.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: remarq777@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:11:02 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
Salvete,
Where do we want to buy land?

On Guam USA, there is a four tower building that has been halted due to a public hearing issue. Maybe I can work out a deal. Prime location, next to the hospital; each about 10 stories.

I am a licensed real estate broker on Guam. If there is any interest please contact me.
Valete,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 
 


On Sunday, January 26, 2014 1:01 PM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,
Of course I support completely the concept of Pay to play.
What is the alternative?  That those newest members of Nova Roma get stuck paying more?  Yeah, right!
Those of us who have invested the most time should also be responsible in paying the most funds.  We have set up a graduated tax system that those members to Nova Roma who are newer are not burned with the higher tax rate as those who sit in the Senate.  Who serve as Magistrates.  Who govern and direct Nova Roma.
She calls it pay to play.
I call it putting our money where our mouth is.  There is no reason a brand new citizen should be burdened with paying $38.00 a year while they are deciding if they want to be as active as the magistrates are.
Also, ancient Rome the classes were divided by wealth distinctions.  It is in this spirit that works both the activity as well as financial obligation - it works hand in hand.
Respectfully,
Sulla
 
A. Tullia Scholastica T. Julio Nivi S.P.D. 

 
Ave!
Just curious.. Why were taxes decreased? It's not like they were high in the first place, and I thought one of our main goals was to purchase land..

Here a little perspective should be supplied.  For many years, the NR taxes were based on the GDP / GNP / whatever of the country in which a given citizen lived.  In the US, the tax was about $16.  This was changed a few years ago, and was then based on the voting class to which one belonged.  This, of course, penalizes those who participate at any level in the NR government, and especially those in third world countries, those who are students, elderly, etc.  One may draw conclusions about the reasoning behind this change, but pay to play seems to be the rule the current government prefers.  They will provide their own reasons, but the consequences are clear.  A fixed amount based on points may not be a huge burden for working-age Americans, but it may be for others.  Having this come due at IRS time, however, is an added impost on Americans, one which any sensible and compassionate person would have avoided.  The previous system was fairer, and allowed more to participate.  Those taxes in fixed amounts ARE high for some. Moreover, until this year, the payment had a later due date, one less likely to coincide with the grasping tendencies of a certain North American government agency, and a longer time to pay.   

Years ago, Cassius had purchased some land in Texas--a landlocked and waterless parcel which apparently got traded around with the complicity of the local authorities down South.  We finally had to get rid of it.  

-Nix

Vale.  


On Saturday, January 25, 2014, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...


--
"Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93018 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
I was looking at land just outside of DC. I thought it would be poetic.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93019 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
A. Liburnius Hadrianus Sullae omnibus in foro S.P.D.

Sulla dixit:

"The only faster way would have been appointing a dictator...which the senate was silent when that option was presented"

May I then understand that the law of Maine no longer finds illegal the position of Dictator?
Can you please explain, simply as a clarification, what has changed?

Vale et valete Optime
ALH




On Sunday, January 26, 2014 8:44 AM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...  
Ave,

Lentulus, you do realize that the issue is done.

ALL 3 SCUs have been implemented.  The matter is over. The new pontiffs have their new titles and their new points (some of which push them into a higher class in the Centuries) in the Album Civium...they have either joined the College email list...or have been invited.

All you are doing now is an intellectual exercise?  For the implementation phase is completed.  

You guys can debate the intellectual exercise about what if the SCU clause wasn't in the Constitution...since that is really what you guys have been doing.  We will do as we always do, follow and implement the law.

Vale,

Sulla


On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Robert Woolwine <robert.woolwine@...



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93020 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices

Ave,

There was no discussion so it never got that far. I just gave every option I could think of at the time I summoned the senate.

To ask and answer that question you asked would require discussion with our lawyer, which I did not do. 

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93021 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Salvete
 
Land in DC to expensive. Need to buy lots of land and cheap.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: snowj3@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:39:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
I was looking at land just outside of DC. I thought it would be poetic.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93022 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
It's expensive, but you can always lobby. Besides, this would give us access to the Patomic. We could nickname it the "New Tiber"

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93023 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
And unless you want to keep paying fees to the government.. No matter where we buy land, we'll need to lobby for sovereignty. Similar to Vatican City in Rome.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93024 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: FW: [Explorator] explorator 16.41
FYI
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93025 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Foolishness - NOT!
Cn. Lentulus M. Pompeio SPD

I shall do my best, praetor.

Vale!



Da: M. Pompeius Caninus <caninus@...  
M. Caninus senator Cn. Lentulo pontifici salutem dicit.

I look forward to your instruction. And I thank you for explaining your position.

Fac valeas!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93026 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
A. Liburnius Hadrianus Paulino omnibus in foro S.P.D.

There is no need to own land to claim a title of independent nation. There have been and still are governments in exile, officially recognized and with whom ambassadors are regularly exchanged.

There is also the alternative of creating a nation, intentionally without land, and negotiate the extraterritoriality of some building (owned or leased), where the administration resides. A good example would be the "Hospitaller  order of Malta" which entertains diplomatic relations,  as an independent nation, by 104 nations and is an observer at the UN and participates in most of its agencies.
 
The official page of the "Hospitaller's Nation"  can be found at: http://www.orderofmalta.int/

Considering our purpose and goals, we may well consider this as an alternative, since I doubt that any nation  would ever allow a secession, even as small as 108 acres. 

Vale et Valete optime
ALH


On Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:41 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...  
Salvete
 
Land in DC to expensive. Need to buy lots of land and cheap.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: snowj3@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:39:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
I was looking at land just outside of DC. I thought it would be poetic.

On Sunday, January 26, 2014, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93027 From: Scipio Second Date: 2014-01-26
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Ave Omnes,

It is indeed interesting the enthusiasm which accompanies a topic such as buying land in the name of Nova Roma.    Several things come to mind.

First, with respect to buying land in the Washington, D.C., it would be cost prohibitive.   No doubt the same would be true in any capital city.

Second, as Nova Roma has citizens throughout the world, consideration must be given to the feelings/thoughts of everyone respecting the location of a center or headquarters.

Third, accessibility to such facility is critical.   It must be a transportation hub.    I might add that the expense of modern travel restricts the ability of many to attend activities in states (countries) other than their own; even within the U.S. this can be an issue.

Fourth, while expecting recognition of sovereignty of Nova Roma sounds attractive, this issue is fraught with the intricacies of international law.   I suggest that if this is a serious desire, consultation with experts in the field is paramount.

Fifth, lastly practical consideration must be given to sheer cost.   It seems to me that building a city is at best a dream.   Simply buying land and building or buying a building would in the minimum easily run into the millions. 

If this is a topic which the majority of Nova Roma citizens deem important, perhaps the first step would be for a Consul to appoint an exploratory committee.   

Valete,

Petrus Augustinus 
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 5:12 PM, Bruno Zani <reenbru@...  
A. Liburnius Hadrianus Paulino omnibus in foro S.P.D.

There is no need to own land to claim a title of independent nation. There have been and still are governments in exile, officially recognized and with whom ambassadors are regularly exchanged.

There is also the alternative of creating a nation, intentionally without land, and negotiate the extraterritoriality of some building (owned or leased), where the administration resides. A good example would be the "Hospitaller  order of Malta" which entertains diplomatic relations,  as an independent nation, by 104 nations and is an observer at the UN and participates in most of its agencies.
 
The official page of the "Hospitaller's Nation"  can be found at: http://www.orderofmalta.int/

Considering our purpose and goals, we may well consider this as an alternative, since I doubt that any nation  would ever allow a secession, even as small as 108 acres. 

Vale et Valete optime
ALH


On Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:41 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...  
Salvete
 
Land in DC to expensive. Need to buy lots of land and cheap.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus

 
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: snowj3@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:39:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
I was looking at land just outside of DC. I thought it would be poetic.

On Sunday, January 26, 2014, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93028 From: Timothy or Stephen Gallagher Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Salvete,
 
What I meant by building a city is that we have tried the micro-nation-state and  I think we need to start smaller.
The Romans built huts that became a settlement that became a town that grew into a city and mistress of the world.
Our government structure could be more municipal  based  i.e. run like a city. 
 
If we bought undeveloped land individuals could buy/rent/lease from NR a lot to build a residence and or business.
One aspect of NR land could be a link to our retirements. People could plan on living there in retirement.
 
Just some ideas to kick around.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: reenbru@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:12:23 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
A. Liburnius Hadrianus Paulino omnibus in foro S.P.D.

There is no need to own land to claim a title of independent nation. There have been and still are governments in exile, officially recognized and with whom ambassadors are regularly exchanged.

There is also the alternative of creating a nation, intentionally without land, and negotiate the extraterritoriality of some building (owned or leased), where the administration resides. A good example would be the "Hospitaller  order of Malta" which entertains diplomatic relations,  as an independent nation, by 104 nations and is an observer at the UN and participates in most of its agencies.
 
The official page of the "Hospitaller's Nation"  can be found at: http://www.orderofmalta.int/

Considering our purpose and goals, we may well consider this as an alternative, since I doubt that any nation  would ever allow a secession, even as small as 108 acres. 

Vale et Valete optime
ALH


On Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:41 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...  
Salvete
 
Land in DC to expensive. Need to buy lots of land and cheap.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus

 

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: snowj3@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:39:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
I was looking at land just outside of DC. I thought it would be poetic.

On Sunday, January 26, 2014, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93029 From: Lucius Vitellius Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Salvete,
 
In reading this thread, my mind began to shuffle through these ideas.  First, as someone said, there is NO country in the world that would give up one iota of their sovereign ground...nne...nada...ziltch.  For an organization like ours to take on the expense of physical property and buildings, means that someone would have to live locally to run such a facility and there would have to be funds to do this, which there are none.
 
On this planet, unless a war occurs and the action is justified by a majority, if not unanimously, agreed upon by the world powers at the time. Nobody is going to get any new ground. However, in the future, we may see, and we may be the first to successfully do it, create a new brand of dual sovereignty.  In this day and age, we do not need macronational borders. We have already surpassed that mark with economics, social media, political alliances, trade agreements, etc. If you live in Mexico, Canada or Great Britain, and you want to come to my little hamlet of Rockford, Tennessee, to start a business, then all you have to do is go to the County Court Clerk's Office, give them your name, address, and phone number (locally of course) and pay them $25 and you are in business right there and then. Period. You can go rent a space somewhere and start selling your wares or services today. No one cares where you are from. They just want your $25 and the local taxes on what you sell.
 
One can join many different global non-profit organizations. They normally do not get a say in what the org does, cannot control its direction, cannot determine it's success or failure, but millions of dollars are given to these orgs every week. What is different about us? We let our members do it each and every day. All of those things ARE present here in NR.  What is the difference?  Well, people understand what these other orgs are and send them money because they understand their cause.  With us, well, it's a little messy. People generally do not understand what and why and where and how that thing that is called NR works.
 
Tonight, I spent a long time on the phone with our Consul, Aeternia. She has tasked the Curule Aedile's Office with putting together a new video about the nature of NR.  Things are still in the planning, but this video will be composed of short clips and pics from our citizens to explain to the world who we are and what each person came to NR to find, enjoy, experience, whatever.  Once this video is produced, then we can present ourselves to the world a second time and invite them to join us.
 
We have to teach the world what we are, because they do not understand what we are. In 1998, a dozen or so people shared an idea of Roman reconstruction. It wasn't a religious cult, nor a reenactor group, nor a political theory group, nor some amateur gladiators, nor a collegiate study group, nor a scholars association, nor a Latinists guild. It was ALL of those put together in one vision. Two years later, the membership roles were around 10,000.  Over the course of the next 15 years, wars were fought, ideas were implemented and scrapped, visions were altered, and the numbers dwindled.  Granted many of the early masses were curiosity seekers, but many were not. Local groups came to merge theirs with ours. Many left.
 
Recently, many members of NR left our ranks to go establish or join other groups, especially religio groups.  These groups wish to operate a modern religio, based on the ancient Roman state, devoid of the political aspect. This is not the Religio Romana, but a neo-pagan modified form of the ancient religio.  This is okay. If they want to do this, it is their right to do so. But, it is not what we believe, nor has it ever been. 
 
Many reenactor groups and living history societies may not want to be a part of NR, because they may be Imperial and cannot have an Emperor persona or simply do not want to be subject to the Senate Consulta, Religious Decrete, our Constitution, etc.  We give them autonomy to continue to run their group as they see fit, but there are those small imperium strings that they do not wish to deal with. This is okay, as well as is there right. What they fail to see is that THEY can participate and rise to Consul as well. It gives their group a real-life structure which they may never achieve on their own. We have never effectively managed to sell this aspect even remotely to other groups. We need to change that.
 
But, there are other people and groups out there who may want to be a part of NR. What we have to do is let them know we want them to be a part of us, IF they share the same vision. Everyone knows those who are snotty know-it-alls that you'd really like to smack or drive up on the sidewalk and mow down every time you see them. We have had our share of those, and we don't need any more of them.  Ego problems be damned. They are not beneficial to the success of anything. There are 1000 good ones to every bad one, or more. Over the last 15 years, NR has experienced about every "test phase" that we could have tested and succeeded in reaching new heights at failure in many different arenas. It is called "working out the bugs," and it occurs in every new project or venture.  
 
We have now reached the point that we can safely say we've "been there, done that, and gotten the t-shirt."  The last Senate SCU issue was one of resetting the dial back to restart. Regardless of anyone's opinion pro or con, the Senate elected to restart the CP program in effect, to get it going again.  Many things over the last 3 years have been reset button clicks. There may be more, but, right now we basically have an experienced populace who have seen the mistakes of the past and are not doomed to repeat them. They are ready to move forward.
 
How do we do this? Well, Quadratus has already started it. He has opened his personal office up. In the business world, we call what he is doing CRMCs, or Customer Relationship Management Centers.  What we should be concentrating on is providing people, citizens and non-citizens alike, as well as other Roman-related organizations, the opportunity to meet together and with us.  We would be better served in locating and identifying regional places where this could occur.  Do you have office space to donate occasionally to NR? This is Phase One.
 
Phase two is taking a strong look at our current local groups legislation. Do we match other similar groups in how we operate? Well, the answer is no.  Once we amend these laws and programs to provide groups with a reason to want to be a part of NR, them we will have some. Once we have some, then we will be ready for Phase Three.
 
Phase Three comes with us providing NR-owned regional centers, where we sponsor lectures exhibits, meetings, conferences classes, etc. Once those centers are established, providing spaces for our groups and other groups to meet, then we can think of city building.  The cities grow out of the NR Regional Centers, expanding like they should. There is no reason to go off in the middle of nowhere, buy property, and expect people to move there willingly.  Paulinus has a great idea. As we all grow older, we downsize. This retirement aspect is a very viable option. We would have experienced citizens serving as magistrates of the local assemblies running the region centers, which can develop into towns or probably better-suited to be actual working cultural centers. The Respublica, being a global community will always be an online venue when it comes to governing magistrates.
 
Everyone up in arms about the appointed pontifex issue should remember that NR ALWAYS builds from the top down. It is the nature of the online environment. Macronationally, we need to change that focus to building the right way. It can never be done as long as NR remains an online venue only.  There must be F2F contact. Aeternia has stated that provincial reform is a priority for her this year. I have already sent her and Crassus my views and proposals for local group reform. This is where it starts. Send them your thoughts.
 
There are 636 people on this list. 20 express their opinions on any given topic presented.  There are former citizens who comment occasionally, and make great comments and present great ideas.  Do me a favor. Contact the Censors and reinstate your citizenship.  If you normally do not post or comment, do so.  Present your ideas, either publicly or privately.  Participate.  I love these people who say "I've been a citizen for ___ years, and this is my first post."  I wish every one would do that. Imagine all of the great ideas that are out there waiting to be hurled into the Forum and debated. If you do not wish to engage in the complexities of the forum, you can always send ad email to the consuls. You can always send me an email and I will, as your Curule Aedile, present it for you in the Forum. On the wiki, there are in many places an email like to pose your questions to the magistrates. This goes for ideas as well. Your message through this link will find it's way to the correct person(s). There are many ways for you to express your concerns, ideas, dreams and wished about the future of the Respublica.
 
We must, however, remarket ourselves.  We now have citizens creating new media for this, and they are to be applauded for their efforts. I will in the next few days be creating a new directory page in the Curule Aediles' section of the wiki for NR Centers (Centres for you guys across the big pond), where you can list any spaces you may have for NR events.  Have an area that can be used for an NR event? Send me an email and we will list it. Have an idea about forming a local group, local groups in general, special projects, things we need to be doing, then send your provincial governor an email. There are no dumb or stupid ideas. Don't have a governor where you live, send it to any Senator.  You can send it to me and I will add it to the Citizens' Provincial Reform Ideas list from the Curule Aediles office that I will submit to the Senate here shortly. In fact, I'll add in a Citizen Ideas board and you can post at will, either anonymously or by name. But, send in your ideas. Many of us would like to have a standard 108 acre Roman planned town. Your ideas lead to this. Live near an ancient Roman site or museum, or live elsewhere near a Roman-styled venue? Can you make contact with the local group there at the site and ask them if there is anything we can participate with them in doing?
 
If you are a member of another Roman group who is not affiliate with NR, and think a partnership might be a good idea, send me and email at lvtriarius AT yhoo DOT com and we'll explore ideas.  If you can see glaring problems why your group could not ever be associated with NR, send me an email as well and we'll explore ideas. It does not ever ever hurt to talk about things. If you are reading this email, then you obviously have an interest in NR. Please feel free to share your ideas and concerns.
 
If you are a citizen, please consider being part of this upcoming "Faces of Nova Roma" video project.  While we are working out the details and format, start writing down what you want to say. Who you are, what your macronational occupation is, what brought you to NR, what you envision NR to be for the future, etc. If you're not comfortable with a video, then we can use your picture and a written statement. If you already have a toga or stola or segmata or hamata, then you have no option...you gotta participate...it wouldn't be right not too, LOL!
 
Thanks for listening and being a part of the greatest social experiment of the 21st Century. This is the year of ideas.  The CA Office needs to here from you so we can get some real-life municipal projects going.
 
Optime Valete,
 
L VITELLIVS TRIARIVS


On Monday, January 27, 2014 12:52 AM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...  
Salvete,
 
What I meant by building a city is that we have tried the micro-nation-state and  I think we need to start smaller.
The Romans built huts that became a settlement that became a town that grew into a city and mistress of the world.
Our government structure could be more municipal  based  i.e. run like a city. 
 
If we bought undeveloped land individuals could buy/rent/lease from NR a lot to build a residence and or business.
One aspect of NR land could be a link to our retirements. People could plan on living there in retirement.
 
Just some ideas to kick around.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus
 
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: reenbru@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:12:23 -0800
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
A. Liburnius Hadrianus Paulino omnibus in foro S.P.D.

There is no need to own land to claim a title of independent nation. There have been and still are governments in exile, officially recognized and with whom ambassadors are regularly exchanged.

There is also the alternative of creating a nation, intentionally without land, and negotiate the extraterritoriality of some building (owned or leased), where the administration resides. A good example would be the "Hospitaller  order of Malta" which entertains diplomatic relations,  as an independent nation, by 104 nations and is an observer at the UN and participates in most of its agencies.
 
The official page of the "Hospitaller's Nation"  can be found at: http://www.orderofmalta.int/

Considering our purpose and goals, we may well consider this as an alternative, since I doubt that any nation  would ever allow a secession, even as small as 108 acres. 

Vale et Valete optime
ALH


On Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:41 PM, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...  
Salvete
 
Land in DC to expensive. Need to buy lots of land and cheap.
 
Valete
 
Ti. Galerius Paulinus

 
To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: snowj3@...
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:39:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Web Link for Taxes - 2014

 
I was looking at land just outside of DC. I thought it would be poetic.

On Sunday, January 26, 2014, Timothy or Stephen Gallagher <spqr753@...





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93030 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Salvete omnes!

Yes, the Hospitallers (Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem) are indeed a sovereign order. Of course, they used to own the island of Malta, but now just have a property in the Vatican City. But they do attend the United Nations as a rightful delegate, and operate life-saving work throughout the world.

As it happens I am a member (Serving Brother) of the British Anglican branch of this Order - the Most Venerable order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem, which has Priories throughout the world, chiefly in the former British Empire and Commonwealth.

Valete omnes
Crispus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93031 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-27
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement
Avete Omnes,

I, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, as a Lictor of Nova Roma, hereby witness:

The appointment and investment with Imperium of  Statia Cornelia Valeriana Iuliana Aeternia as Consul maior, Gaius Aemilius Crassus as Consul minor, Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus as Praetor maior, Marcus Pompeius Caninus as Praetor minor and Lucius Vitellius Triarius as Aedilis curulis of Nova Roma.

The appointments of Aulus Apollonius Antullus as Magnae Matris Deum Aedis Sacerdos, Marcus Aemilius Agricola as Sacerdos Quirinalis, Gaius Decius Laterensis as Sacerdos Martialis, Gaius Claudius Quadratus as Augur, Marcus Aelius Geminus as Sacerdos Mercuri and Titus Iulius Nix as Fetialis.

Approval of the status elevation of Gaius Decius Laterensis, his current or future own family, from plebeian to patrician.

As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish them good fortune in their offices and in their work on behalf of  the Religio Romana.

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix

Lictor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93032 From: Teleri Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: (no subject)
Avete Omnes,

I, Helena Aureliana Galeria, as a Lictor of Nova Roma, hereby witness:

The appointment and investment with Imperium of  Statia Cornelia Valeriana Iuliana Aeternia as Consul maior, Gaius Aemilius Crassus as Consul minor, Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus as Praetor maior, Marcus Pompeius Caninus as Praetor minor and Lucius Vitellius Triarius as Aedilis curulis of Nova Roma.

The appointments of Aulus Apollonius Antullus as Magnae Matris Deum Aedis Sacerdos, Marcus Aemilius Agricola as Sacerdos Quirinalis, Gaius Decius Laterensis as Sacerdos Martialis, Gaius Claudius Quadratus as Augur, Marcus Aelius Geminus as Sacerdos Mercuri and Titus Iulius Nix as Fetialis.

Approval of the status elevation of Gaius Decius Laterensis, his current or future own family, from plebeian to patrician.

As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish them good fortune in their offices and in their work on behalf of  the Religio Romana.

Helena Aureliana Galeria

Lictor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93033 From: Q Caecilius Metellus Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: Pronouncement of Intercessio - SCU Creation of Pontifices
Q Caecilius Metellus tr. pl. Quiritibus salutem dicit.

Saluete, Quirites.

Having considered the matter in question, and having reviewed our
current legislation, and with deep respect to my colleagues and their
stated views, by this message I state my opposition to the intercession
announced by my colleague C Claudius Quadratus at 13:45 CET a.d. VII
Kal. Feb. MMDCCLXVII AVC.

Valete.

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Postumianus
Tribunus Plebis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93034 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement
Salvete Omnes!

I, Gaius Marcius Crispus, as a Lictor of Nova Roma, hereby witness:

The appointment and investment with Imperium of Statia Cornelia Valeriana Iuliana Aeternia as Consul maior, Gaius Aemilius Crassus as Consul minor, Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus as Praetor maior, Marcus Pompeius Caninus as Praetor minor and Lucius Vitellius Triarius as Aedilis curulis of Nova Roma.

The appointments of Aulus Apollonius Antullus as Magnae Matris Deum Aedis Sacerdos, Marcus Aemilius Agricola as Sacerdos Quirinalis, Gaius Decius Laterensis as Sacerdos Martialis, Gaius Claudius Quadratus as Augur, Marcus Aelius Geminus as Sacerdos Mercuri and Titus Iulius Nix as Fetialis.

Approval of the status elevation of Gaius Decius Laterensis, his current or future own family, from plebeian to patrician.

As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish them good fortune in their offices and in their work on behalf of the Religio Romana.

Gaius Marcius Crispus

Lictor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93035 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: Web Link for Taxes - 2014
Salvete,
Why Belize?

BTW, I'm taking an online course via Coursera at Yale called Roman Architecture. Check it out.

I'm learning quite a lot; here's my notes so far:
 Introduction
Professor Kleiner: “architect of cities; post classical times; urban community; 1) city of Rome, central Italy; core of the ancient city; Coliseum – ‘Icon of Rome'; Roman Forum; Capitoline Hill transformed by Michelangelo into the Campidoglio; Via dei Fori Imperiali built by Mussolini; Imperial Fora; Pompei buildings, houses, shops; entertainment district, theatre, music hall, amphitheatre; Mt. Vesuvius. 2) Roman Eastern and Western provinces, Rome, Croatia (Palace of Diocletian), Greece, Turkey (Library of Celsus), N.Africa, Lybia (Theater at Sabratha), Jordan, Syria, France, Spain; Rome grew ad hoc (to this, for a particular purpose, ‘wasn’t planned all at once, grew up over time’), Victor Emmanuel Monument; conquered the world with masterful military enterprise; Castrum – military camp design; Algeria (Timgad)”
Cardo, Decimana, dual markets halls facing each other sharing a single roof like Acanta Mall on Guam and a mall I saw in Las Vegas,
Baths, theaters
Tombs, aqueducts, temples, coliseums (influenced stadium designs)
 
 Topic 1 - It Takes a City: The Founding of Rome and the Beginnings of Urbanism in Italy
The acme of my ancestor’s building activities are consider a worship center, the Pantheon a temple of all gods, and the Coliseum an entertainment center stadium – these from humble structures of tufa base, wood columns (posts), grass roofs (thatch), with stick and mud walls (wattle and daub – where we get our word for white wash or dabbing white); their taste started early onset.
 
 Topic 2 - Technology and Revolution in Roman Architecture
 
 Topic 3 - Civic Life Interrupted: Nightmare and Destiny on August 24, A.D. 79
 
 Topic 4 - Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous: Houses and Villas at Pompeii
 
 Topic 5 - Habitats at Herculaneum and Early Roman Interior Decoration
Tiberius Marcius Quadra (Augustus Germanicus: I want to add said A.G.; is it possible? If yes, how should the five names be in order?)
Gratias tibi ago.

 
 


On Monday, January 27, 2014 6:09 PM, GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS <jbshr1pwa@...  
Salvete omnes!

Yes, the Hospitallers (Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem) are indeed a sovereign order. Of course, they used to own the island of Malta, but now just have a property in the Vatican City. But they do attend the United Nations as a rightful delegate, and operate life-saving work throughout the world.

As it happens I am a member (Serving Brother) of the British Anglican branch of this Order - the Most Venerable order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem, which has Priories throughout the world, chiefly in the former British Empire and Commonwealth.

Valete omnes
Crispus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93036 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: PANNONIA - ITALIA - VENEDIA: Provincial Reports for 2013
Sta.Cornelia Aeternia Cn. Lentulo Omnibusque S.P.D.

Bravissimo (Bravo) Lentule!  I think in your case you're allowed to give a very full report.  Know that I am totally jealous of your travels especially to fair Verona.  So much you have seen just wow.  You and the citizens of Pannonia are a great example of an active community.

In March after our Proroguing of the Governors there will be steps in Provincial Reform.  I have some ideas lets just put it that way and all will be revealed in good time ;-)

I will reply privately in regards to the Venedia province in the upcoming days.

Valete bene,
Aeternia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93037 From: petronius_dexter Date: 2014-01-28
Subject: Re: Convening the Comitia Curiata.

C. Petronius T. Sabino salutem,


Lol. Why did you act as pontifex maximus when you refused the position? Why did you expell me from the CP list as had made Piscinus? Are you of the same mud? My advice, be away from the Gang making Nova Roma a comedy. Vale.


--
C. Petronius Dexter
Arcoiali scribebat
a. d. IV Kalendas Februarias MMDCCLXVII


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93038 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Convening the Comitia Curiata.
Ave,

Dexter, you failed to do your Constitutional Duty.  The Senate voted and it was a unanimous vote of the Senate (Minus your only vote against the motion).

You posted on the ML and on the Senate list....but you never answered Caninus or myself when we asked you, Why did you not summon the Comitia.

I, personally believe you thought you had Nova Roma by the short and curlies...given how SHOCKED you were when I was summoning the Senate to resolve the issue.

As for past Senate session, you should give yourself a pat on the back, it was the first time to the best of my recollection that a Senate call was convened because of the inaction of one individual, YOU.  

Do you seriously think you were not going to be held responsible?  Do you really think you were not going to face any repercussions?  Are you really this naive?  Did you really think you were smarter than Caesar - after what we all went through after the Civil War to take steps and think through possible and foreseeable actions and inactions?  

Vale,

Sulla


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93039 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Convening the Comitia Curiata.
SALVE!

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93040 From: l_ulpius_atellus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Connectivity Issues
Salvete Omnes!


Due to unseasonal weather here in  NW Florida (and Floridians inability to handle it) I maybe out of commission for a few days. I still have access on my phone for the time being but power outages are expected.

I will check back as often as I can.


Valete!

L. Ulpius Atellus
Legatus Pro Praetore GA/FL
Tribunus Plebis 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93041 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Awesome A Capella Song in Latin
A. Tullia Scholastica Ti. Cassio Atello S.P.D. 

Thank you very much for this.  I have had, and am continuing to have, extreme problems with e-mail the like of which my previous provider never imposed on us, nor did my previous version of M$, so have gotten far behind on the mail.  

The teacher in me is going to correct a bit of this Latin...

 

Salve,

The lyrics are:
Tepidus ventus requiem portat
inter arbores, super foro,


…super forum; like most Latin prepositions, 'super' governs the accusative. However, in classical Latin, it would sound almost like 'foro,' for the final m merely nasalizes the preceding vowel, as in French or (perhaps) Portuguese.  'Requiem portat' doesn't sound very classical, but I'll let that pass.  


Frondesque murmurant leves
madidae fulgentis roris
avium securum refugium.
Sed nimbus saevus imminens
exterret terram a caelo.
Iris concidet timores.

Much of the song is simply repetitions of the same words.
If you go back to the video, but instead of playing it, you click the button labeled "YouTube" on the right side, it'll take you to the video's own page. Then, beneath the video you'll see a thin blue bar. Just under that, there's a small gray icon that looks like a list with an item highlighted. click that, and it'll show you a comprehensive breakdown of the lyrics and their respective repetitions. As the video plays, it'll even show you which lines they're saying!


That sounds good!  



Hope that all made sense and was helpful.


Yes, it was…now to rediscover the URL for the song itself…  hope I can find this special page.  YouTube used to be easier to manage…so did Yahoo before they turned the place over to the cybernauts living in padded cells.  

Would you care to trade your weather for our minus 20 wind chill?  It didn't snow today, after all...


Vale!

Ti. Cassius Atellus


Vale, et gratias!  


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93042 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: PANNONIA - ITALIA - VENEDIA: Provincial Reports for 2013

PROVINCIAL REPORTS ANNOUNCEMENT - EX OFFICIO CN. LENTVLI PRAEF ITAL. ET LEG. PR. PR. PANN. ET VENED.

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus praefectus Italiae, legatus pro praetore Pannoniae et Venediae:   St. Corneliae Valerianae Iulianae Aeterniae et C. Aemilio Crasso consulibus, P. Annaeo   Constantino Placido et M. Pompeio Canino praetoribus, et tribunis plebis, et omnibus   patribus conscriptis, senatui Novo Romano: salutem plurimam dicit: 
 
Avete, St. Cornelia et C. Aemili consules, P. Annaee et M. Pompei praetores, tribuni   plebis et patres conscripti!
 


S.V.V.B.E.N.P.Q.V. If you are well, we and our provinces are well, too. I salute you in the name of Italia, of my provinces Pannonia and Venedia, and in the name of my fellow Italian, Pannonian and Venedian citizens. As the consul illustris Sta. Cornelia has suggested in her call for provincial reports that the reports be concise, I shall restrict myself only to the most important facts. In the focus of our provincial activities last year were the celebrations of the Sacred 15th Anniversary Year of the Founding of Nova Roma which in all events I held, in the lands of Italia and Pannonia, was remembered, and whenever we could, honored and prayed for by a sacrifice, so that the gods favor our Republic propitiously, and lend their support to the cause of the restoration of the Roman People.

Since I report for three territories, I divide my report into three parts. The first report will be Pannonia, which, being my domestic province, naturally, is the provincia where I could do the most. Next will be Italia and then Venedia. 
 
 
PROVINCIA PANNONIA
 
I'm glad to report that last year was another successful year for Nova Roma in Pannonia. We had many internal and international activities and programs, about which you will find details below. As for the governorship, in the absence of other candidates I offer myself to be prorogued as legatus pro praetore of Pannonia.
 
I. New geographical organization of Pannonia
 
With the increased activity of Czech Nova Roman citizens, in order to support their nascent community life, I created Civitas Boihaemum with its praefectus Ti. Iulius Nerva, under the umbrella of a new regio, called Regio Marcomannia, comprising Slovakia and Czechia since the two countries are culturally, historically and linguistically bound together, where my legatus Sex. Lucilius Tutor can exercise supervision and lend his organizational support to the nascent Czech Nova Roman community. With this, Pannonia contains now two regiones, Regio Rostallonensis, centered around Burgus Rostallo (a town-level community cell), and Regio Marcomannia, centered around Civitas Boihaemum (a country-level community group). Map of the   current territorial organization of Pannonia:  
 
 
II. Activities in the past year

6th Nova Roman Aquincum Floralia - Budapest
 
In May, we co-organized the huge Floralia Carnival at the 6th time with the Aquincum   Museum in Budapest, Hungary. The programs lasted two days and included the usual elements we traditionally do year by year: real Roman sacrifice at an original Roman   altar among the ruins of the Roman city, Roman show trial, military drill, Roman fashion etc. We got significant local media coverage. You can find reports here:
 
 
The official poster created by the Museum for the event, featuring the Flag of Nova Roma and listing Nova Roma among the organizers: 
 
The same poster in smaller format on another website (for easier view):
 
http://okoritoredekek.blogspot.hu/2013/05/floralia-aquincumban.html
 
The photos from the Official Website of the Budapest City Aquincum Museum here (second   photo featuring the governor of Pannonia offering a sacrifice): 
 
Obligatory to watch - a large collection of *beautiful photos* taken on this event by our citizens: 
 
 
Carnuntum Römerfest (Roman Festival) in Austria 
 
In June, with the Pannonian Regio Rostallonensis and with the Nova Roman reenactor soldiers of the Cohors VI Carpathica, we participated in the Carnuntum Römerfest, where we established contacts with other reenactor groups, we made a public sacrifice for the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma, and visited Roman sites and museums. Some photos: 
 
 
4th Nova Roman Gardellaca Festival in Tokod 
 
After two years of break, Pannonia Provincia was again among the organizers of the Gardellaca Festival of Tokod, held among the ruins of a Roman fortress called Gardellaca. This is a fantastic event since most of the city's inhabitants go out in Roman clothes and create an atmosphere of real time travel during the two days of the festival, of which the Roman programs was run by the Pannonian Nova Romans. Some photos mostly made about the preparations (not good quality):

Some better photos made by the regional media: 
 
 
8th Nova Roman Summer (Legionary) Camp in Szolnok 
 
This program is the most traditional element in our yearly events. This was the 8th time we held it. It was open to citizens and foreigners as well, main focus was educating children about the Roman way of life, culture and history, with focus on military history and legions. We also celebrated the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma with a public sacrifice in our open day which visitor could attend. It was smaller than usual in respect to participants (about 11-12), but the camp completed its mission successfully. The event lasted one entire week, children and adults were trained as legionary soldiers and Roman citizens: they learned basic Latin, Roman   culture, history, gastronomy, legionary drill and Roman ritual, etc.. Some photos of the program: 

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.532210516826328.1073741827.190572204323496&type=3

Nova Roman Mountain Camp in Rostallo 
 
Besides the main provincial camp, a new tradition of ours is that we hold each year a second summer camp in an areal subdivision of Pannonia, in Regio Rostallonensis, centered around our local community, Burgus Colonia Rostallo. The programs were similar to the first camp, but here a greater emphasis was put on physical training, mountain tours, and daily lectures. A solemn sacrifice was offer for the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma during the event. This cam lasted a week, as well.

Some photos (top section of the page):
 
 
Ben-Hur Concert at Summer Festival Event by Szolnok City 
 
It was an immense honor to us that the City Government of Szolnok asked us to accompany with a Roman ritual and legionary performance a notable city event, the open air public Ben-Hur Concert (symphonic performance of the famous movie's soundtrack written in the 1950s by Oscar award winner Hungarian music composer Miklós Rózsa). My proquaestor Sp. Porcius Gemma with citizens and other assistants performed a ceremony and our Nova Roman Legio XXI Rapax provided a honor guard for the orchestra during the concert. We even had a real Roman racing chariot!

Our photos of the event: 
 
On the Hungarian Armed Forces' website (because the orchestra was from the Hungarian   army), you can see our chariot and some of our soldiers on the 1st and 5th photos: 
 
Internationale Marc Aurel-Marschtage 2013 - Austria 
 
Pannonian Nova Romans of the Cohors VI Carpathica participated in the Internationale Marc Aurel-Marschtage 2013 (12th Marcus Aurelius Marching Days), organized by the Austrian Armed Forces, honoring Marcus Aurelius and his campaign in the same area, in Austria:
 
 
Celebrations of the 2nd Anniversary of Burgus Rostallo 
 
A subdivision of Pannonia and local community that aims to become a colonia one day,   burgus Rostallo has celebrated its second anniversary with a 3 days long Roman autumn camp. We lived an in-depth Roman life for 3 days on the mountain, and performed a   sacrifice for the blessings of the gods for 2nd Anniversary of Nova Roman Rostallo and the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma. 

Some photos (bottom section of the page): 
 
 
Nova Roman Saturnalia in Aquincum - Budapest 
 
Another program we usually organize together with the Aquincum Museum of the Hungarian Capital City Budapest is the Saturnalia, which took place in December. We performed a ceremony for all Nova Romans and in honor of our 15th Anniversary, and there was a   feast with wine and food, lots of games and playful activities in the spirit of Saturnalia. A world sensation, the only working Roman water organ in the world was displayed (replica) and a musician played on it and sang for the closure of the festivity:
 
 
Some photos can be seen in the Aquincum Museum Facebook page: 
 
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.565941023485500.1073741847.123170567762550&type=1

An other Nova Roman Saturnalia for NR Regio Rostallonensis - Sátoraljaújhely 
 
Again a new tradition that we hold a second Saturnalia for Regio Rostallonensis in another city (Sátoraljaújhely). We celebrate a second Saturnalia party/festival in the City Library, to which we have invited the city's Mayor, as well, who supports our activities. There was a Saturnus ritual which was offered for the Republic of Nova Roma, for the magistrates, senate and citizens, as well. As usual, there was a Roman   fashion show, a lecture on the Roman Saturnalia and calendar, Roman games, competitions and activities for kids, legionary equipment demonstration, drinking wine and eating Roman food. A short report with one-two photos here (top section of the page): 
 
 
Governor's visits to Germania and two visits to Italia 
 
In April, I had a trip to the city Verona within my Praefectura Italia, where as praefectus I conducted a ritual for the Italian community. With the Nova Roman Cohors VI Carpathica we visited Provincia Germania in June for the Carnuntum Römerfest where we built connections and good relationship with Roman reenactor groups and communities, improving our international stance. In August-September, with Pannonian government scribe T. Popillia Laenas I visited Praefectura Italia once again in the year and tried to meet Italian citizens and discuss future projects in the Florence-Lucca area. Sadly, unlike last year, now there could not take place a scheduled meeting, but each day during our 6 days long stay in the area, we performed sacrifices for the Nova Roman Italian citizens, and for the Roman revival in this ancient fatherland of ours.
 
About 16-18 Other Minor Miscellaneous Events and Programs 
 
These above were our more notable events. Besides these main events, Pannonia Nova Romana had about 16-18 minor programs and events, such as school visits (performances   and lectures for schools) museum visits, village festivals where we were invited to   participate, citizen internal meetings and smaller performances (e.g. Gulash Festival at Szolnok, Balintnapi Sokadalom at Törökbálint, St. Martin's Day festival at Budapest). An incomplete selection of photos taken on such events can be seen here: 
 
 

PRAEFECTURA ITALIA 

 
My job has to continue in this governorship, too, because there is not yet a volunteer with the needed English skills. Unless a native Italian is volunteering for the position, I shall continue my work to finish what I have started, the revitalization and rebuilding of Praefectura Italia as a thoroughly Nova Roman community.

I made contacts with new citizens, trying to involve them into the process of rebuilding, but we had an even lower influx of citizen than in the previous year which made my job more difficult.  
 
I. Visits to Italia 
 
As I have written in the report about Pannonia, I visited my Italian praefectura two times last year and tried to meet citizens but, unlike last year, my efforts failed in this endeavor. However, I offered each day for 6 days in Italy a sacrifice to the sacred land of Italia and to our Roman Manes for the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma, and for the revitalization of our Italian community.
 
II. New moderation edictum 
 
In cooperation with the most active Italian citizen, and based on a long work with debate and compromise, a new, more community centered, I issued a new electronic forum (mailing list) moderation edict that will govern the online community life of Italia Nova Romana. Up to this date, it worked smoothly, and I hope it will stand the test of time. 
 
III. Italian Facebook page and group for the praefectura 
 
I created and we maintain an Italian Facebook page and Facebook group for NR Italia, which seems to get some attention though much improvement is yet needed. 
 
IV. New Legatus 
 
Italia has advanced to the level that a citizen, C. Aurelius Vindex, was now willing to start local event organization activity, and I appointed him as my legatus for Italia, where he started some local programs in the City of Rome. This is step forward into the desired direction. We discussed plans, the past and the future of Italia Nova Romana. Given that I live in another country, he can address the local issues, while I can maintain the connection with the Anglophone center and serve as a link between Italians and the senate until an internationally qualified candidate appears.  
 
 
PROVINCIA VENEDIA

 
After two terms of trying, I must realize that I was not able to solve the problems with Provincia Venedia, and the causes of this failure can, at least in a great part, be accounted for by the language barrier. We don't share a language, while English is not as widespread in this area than in Western Europe. I hoped to overcome it by finding English speaking Venedian applicant, but it didn't happen.
 
There were almost no new applicants for citizenship last year, which is an even bigger problem. Despite my connection with a Roman group in Poland, (see http://novaroma.org/nr/Kalisz ), negotiations were not successful because Nova Roma as whole could not provide them anything which they didn't have or which they would have needed.
 
Therefore I draw my conclusions, at least for the next year, and I suggest that the senate appoint a person who lives closer to Venedia and is linguistically better suited to the negotiations, a man who has the experience and is also fully qualified for the position: Sex. Lucilius Tutor (from Czech Republic).
 
My recommendation is for the senate to appoint Sex. Lucius as legatus pro praetore Venediae. He will have my support if needed.    



SOME CONCLUSIONS

 
The honorable consules asked if we can suggest ideas or recommend solutions for the   provincial reforms of Nova Roma. At this section, very briefly, I summarize my recommendations: 
 
1) I think Pannonia has proven to be a successful experiment. The organizational principle within our province is that the province needs a larger "umbrella" level with the governor to keep the various smaller communities effectively working together, and to link them to the center (senate and magistrates of NR), while various geographical intermediate (regio) and lower levels (oppidum/civitas/burgus), and   activity based lower levels (legion, cohort), are the places of actual provincial life. This multi-level structure ensures our communities both to keep going into the same direction under the guidance of the Nova Roman governor, and to have a quite free and independent internal community life (which is always a high priority to the communities' good feeling). I think this should be the theoretical model for all provinces. 
 
2) I also think making provinces smaller and smaller is an erroneous idea that is based on the misunderstanding of the nature of a provincia. A provincia can not be the level of actual civic life or real life events. Real life communities are and will always be way much smaller than a real country or state. The role of a provincia instead is to keep together, harmonize and to make a number of nearby local   communities cooperate in concert (or, if there is only one, or there is none, then to install or maintain that one). Therefore I also suggest that all provinces without existing communities be either dissolved or merged with their neighbors, because if we have too many independent subdivisions of Nova Roma, at the end, they will be disorganized and led without cohesion. 
 
3) And as a consequences of the previous thoughts, I would like to suggest that the title provincia, (and other titles like regio, civitas, oppidum etc) be only allowed to territories where a certain number of citizens, and a certain level of activity can be perceived. By this, citizens would be encouraged to work in order to maintain their provincia's status or, if they aren't yet a provincia, to achieve this goal. Being a Nova Roman province should be a matter of pride and a sign of achievement. This would be also a useful indicator for the senate and magistrates to see which territories what really are: which ones are just empty names, which ones are making progress, which ones are fully functioning Nova Roman entities.     
 
 
Thank you, Consules, for your attention, thank you, Conscript Fathers, for reading my report. I wish growth and glory to Nova Roma for this year, and I wish good work to all of my governor colleagues! 
 
 
Valete, consules, praetores, tribuni plebis, valete patres conscripti, resque publica  valeat vobiscum! Vivat nostra Res Pubica prosperrimé!  
 
 
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
PRAEFECTVS ITALIAE
LEGATVS PRO PRAETORE PANNONIAE
LEGATVS PRO PRAETORE VENEDIAE

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93043 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: PANNONIA - ITALIA - VENEDIA: Provincial Reports for 2013 (Edictum
PROVINCIAL REPORTS ANNOUNCEMENT - EX OFFICIO CN. LENTVLI PRAEF ITAL. ET LEG. PR. PR. PANN. ET VENED.

Cn. Cornelius Lentulus praefectus Italiae, legatus pro praetore Pannoniae et Venediae:   St. Corneliae Valerianae Iulianae Aeterniae et C. Aemilio Crasso consulibus, P. Annaeo   Constantino Placido et M. Pompeio Canino praetoribus, et tribunis plebis, et omnibus   patribus conscriptis, senatui Novo Romano: salutem plurimam dicit: 
 
Avete, St. Cornelia et C. Aemili consules, P. Annaee et M. Pompei praetores, tribuni   plebis et patres conscripti!
 


S.V.V.B.E.N.P.Q.V. If you are well, we and our provinces are well, too. I salute you in the name of Italia, of my provinces Pannonia and Venedia, and in the name of my fellow Italian, Pannonian and Venedian citizens. As the consul illustris Sta. Cornelia has suggested in her call for provincial reports that the reports be concise, I shall restrict myself only to the most important facts. In the focus of our provincial activities last year were the celebrations of the Sacred 15th Anniversary Year of the Founding of Nova Roma which in all events I held, in the lands of Italia and Pannonia, was remembered, and whenever we could, honored and prayed for by a sacrifice, so that the gods favor our Republic propitiously, and lend their support to the cause of the restoration of the Roman People.

Since I report for three territories, I divide my report into three parts. The first report will be Pannonia, which, being my domestic province, naturally, is the provincia where I could do the most. Next will be Italia and then Venedia. 
 
 
PROVINCIA PANNONIA
 
I'm glad to report that last year was another successful year for Nova Roma in Pannonia. We had many internal and international activities and programs, about which you will find details below. As for the governorship, in the absence of other candidates I offer myself to be prorogued as legatus pro praetore of Pannonia.
 
I. New geographical organization of Pannonia
 
With the increased activity of Czech Nova Roman citizens, in order to support their nascent community life, I created Civitas Boihaemum with its praefectus Ti. Iulius Nerva, under the umbrella of a new regio, called Regio Marcomannia, comprising Slovakia and Czechia since the two countries are culturally, historically and linguistically bound together, where my legatus Sex. Lucilius Tutor can exercise supervision and lend his organizational support to the nascent Czech Nova Roman community. With this, Pannonia contains now two regiones, Regio Rostallonensis, centered around Burgus Rostallo (a town-level community cell), and Regio Marcomannia, centered around Civitas Boihaemum (a country-level community group). Map of the   current territorial organization of Pannonia:  
 
 
II. Activities in the past year

6th Nova Roman Aquincum Floralia - Budapest
 
In May, we co-organized the huge Floralia Carnival at the 6th time with the Aquincum   Museum in Budapest, Hungary. The programs lasted two days and included the usual elements we traditionally do year by year: real Roman sacrifice at an original Roman   altar among the ruins of the Roman city, Roman show trial, military drill, Roman fashion etc. We got significant local media coverage. You can find reports here:
 
 
The official poster created by the Museum for the event, featuring the Flag of Nova Roma and listing Nova Roma among the organizers: 
 
The same poster in smaller format on another website (for easier view):
 
http://okoritoredekek.blogspot.hu/2013/05/floralia-aquincumban.html
 
The photos from the Official Website of the Budapest City Aquincum Museum here (second   photo featuring the governor of Pannonia offering a sacrifice): 
 
Obligatory to watch - a large collection of *beautiful photos* taken on this event by our citizens: 
 
 
Carnuntum Römerfest (Roman Festival) in Austria 
 
In June, with the Pannonian Regio Rostallonensis and with the Nova Roman reenactor soldiers of the Cohors VI Carpathica, we participated in the Carnuntum Römerfest, where we established contacts with other reenactor groups, we made a public sacrifice for the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma, and visited Roman sites and museums. Some photos: 
 
 
4th Nova Roman Gardellaca Festival in Tokod 
 
After two years of break, Pannonia Provincia was again among the organizers of the Gardellaca Festival of Tokod, held among the ruins of a Roman fortress called Gardellaca. This is a fantastic event since most of the city's inhabitants go out in Roman clothes and create an atmosphere of real time travel during the two days of the festival, of which the Roman programs was run by the Pannonian Nova Romans. Some photos mostly made about the preparations (not good quality):

Some better photos made by the regional media: 
 
 
8th Nova Roman Summer (Legionary) Camp in Szolnok 
 
This program is the most traditional element in our yearly events. This was the 8th time we held it. It was open to citizens and foreigners as well, main focus was educating children about the Roman way of life, culture and history, with focus on military history and legions. We also celebrated the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma with a public sacrifice in our open day which visitor could attend. It was smaller than usual in respect to participants (about 11-12), but the camp completed its mission successfully. The event lasted one entire week, children and adults were trained as legionary soldiers and Roman citizens: they learned basic Latin, Roman   culture, history, gastronomy, legionary drill and Roman ritual, etc.. Some photos of the program: 

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.532210516826328.1073741827.190572204323496&type=3

Nova Roman Mountain Camp in Rostallo 
 
Besides the main provincial camp, a new tradition of ours is that we hold each year a second summer camp in an areal subdivision of Pannonia, in Regio Rostallonensis, centered around our local community, Burgus Colonia Rostallo. The programs were similar to the first camp, but here a greater emphasis was put on physical training, mountain tours, and daily lectures. A solemn sacrifice was offer for the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma during the event. This cam lasted a week, as well.

Some photos (top section of the page):
 
 
Ben-Hur Concert at Summer Festival Event by Szolnok City 
 
It was an immense honor to us that the City Government of Szolnok asked us to accompany with a Roman ritual and legionary performance a notable city event, the open air public Ben-Hur Concert (symphonic performance of the famous movie's soundtrack written in the 1950s by Oscar award winner Hungarian music composer Miklós Rózsa). My proquaestor Sp. Porcius Gemma with citizens and other assistants performed a ceremony and our Nova Roman Legio XXI Rapax provided a honor guard for the orchestra during the concert. We even had a real Roman racing chariot!

Our photos of the event: 
 
On the Hungarian Armed Forces' website (because the orchestra was from the Hungarian   army), you can see our chariot and some of our soldiers on the 1st and 5th photos: 
 
Internationale Marc Aurel-Marschtage 2013 - Austria 
 
Pannonian Nova Romans of the Cohors VI Carpathica participated in the Internationale Marc Aurel-Marschtage 2013 (12th Marcus Aurelius Marching Days), organized by the Austrian Armed Forces, honoring Marcus Aurelius and his campaign in the same area, in Austria:
 
 
Celebrations of the 2nd Anniversary of Burgus Rostallo 
 
A subdivision of Pannonia and local community that aims to become a colonia one day,   burgus Rostallo has celebrated its second anniversary with a 3 days long Roman autumn camp. We lived an in-depth Roman life for 3 days on the mountain, and performed a   sacrifice for the blessings of the gods for 2nd Anniversary of Nova Roman Rostallo and the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma. 

Some photos (bottom section of the page): 
 
 
Nova Roman Saturnalia in Aquincum - Budapest 
 
Another program we usually organize together with the Aquincum Museum of the Hungarian Capital City Budapest is the Saturnalia, which took place in December. We performed a ceremony for all Nova Romans and in honor of our 15th Anniversary, and there was a   feast with wine and food, lots of games and playful activities in the spirit of Saturnalia. A world sensation, the only working Roman water organ in the world was displayed (replica) and a musician played on it and sang for the closure of the festivity:
 
 
Some photos can be seen in the Aquincum Museum Facebook page: 
 
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.565941023485500.1073741847.123170567762550&type=1

An other Nova Roman Saturnalia for NR Regio Rostallonensis - Sátoraljaújhely 
 
Again a new tradition that we hold a second Saturnalia for Regio Rostallonensis in another city (Sátoraljaújhely). We celebrate a second Saturnalia party/festival in the City Library, to which we have invited the city's Mayor, as well, who supports our activities. There was a Saturnus ritual which was offered for the Republic of Nova Roma, for the magistrates, senate and citizens, as well. As usual, there was a Roman   fashion show, a lecture on the Roman Saturnalia and calendar, Roman games, competitions and activities for kids, legionary equipment demonstration, drinking wine and eating Roman food. A short report with one-two photos here (top section of the page): 
 
 
Governor's visits to Germania and two visits to Italia 
 
In April, I had a trip to the city Verona within my Praefectura Italia, where as praefectus I conducted a ritual for the Italian community. With the Nova Roman Cohors VI Carpathica we visited Provincia Germania in June for the Carnuntum Römerfest where we built connections and good relationship with Roman reenactor groups and communities, improving our international stance. In August-September, with Pannonian government scribe T. Popillia Laenas I visited Praefectura Italia once again in the year and tried to meet Italian citizens and discuss future projects in the Florence-Lucca area. Sadly, unlike last year, now there could not take place a scheduled meeting, but each day during our 6 days long stay in the area, we performed sacrifices for the Nova Roman Italian citizens, and for the Roman revival in this ancient fatherland of ours.
 
About 16-18 Other Minor Miscellaneous Events and Programs 
 
These above were our more notable events. Besides these main events, Pannonia Nova Romana had about 16-18 minor programs and events, such as school visits (performances   and lectures for schools) museum visits, village festivals where we were invited to   participate, citizen internal meetings and smaller performances (e.g. Gulash Festival at Szolnok, Balintnapi Sokadalom at Törökbálint, St. Martin's Day festival at Budapest). An incomplete selection of photos taken on such events can be seen here: 
 
 

PRAEFECTURA ITALIA 

 
My job has to continue in this governorship, too, because there is not yet a volunteer with the needed English skills. Unless a native Italian is volunteering for the position, I shall continue my work to finish what I have started, the revitalization and rebuilding of Praefectura Italia as a thoroughly Nova Roman community.

I made contacts with new citizens, trying to involve them into the process of rebuilding, but we had an even lower influx of citizen than in the previous year which made my job more difficult.  
 
I. Visits to Italia 
 
As I have written in the report about Pannonia, I visited my Italian praefectura two times last year and tried to meet citizens but, unlike last year, my efforts failed in this endeavor. However, I offered each day for 6 days in Italy a sacrifice to the sacred land of Italia and to our Roman Manes for the 15th Anniversary of Nova Roma, and for the revitalization of our Italian community.
 
II. New moderation edictum 
 
In cooperation with the most active Italian citizen, and based on a long work with debate and compromise, a new, more community centered, I issued a new electronic forum (mailing list) moderation edict that will govern the online community life of Italia Nova Romana. Up to this date, it worked smoothly, and I hope it will stand the test of time. 
 
III. Italian Facebook page and group for the praefectura 
 
I created and we maintain an Italian Facebook page and Facebook group for NR Italia, which seems to get some attention though much improvement is yet needed. 
 
IV. New Legatus 
 
Italia has advanced to the level that a citizen, C. Aurelius Vindex, was now willing to start local event organization activity, and I appointed him as my legatus for Italia, where he started some local programs in the City of Rome. This is step forward into the desired direction. We discussed plans, the past and the future of Italia Nova Romana. Given that I live in another country, he can address the local issues, while I can maintain the connection with the Anglophone center and serve as a link between Italians and the senate until an internationally qualified candidate appears.  
 
 
PROVINCIA VENEDIA

 
After two terms of trying, I must realize that I was not able to solve the problems with Provincia Venedia, and the causes of this failure can, at least in a great part, be accounted for by the language barrier. We don't share a language, while English is not as widespread in this area than in Western Europe. I hoped to overcome it by finding English speaking Venedian applicant, but it didn't happen.
 
There were almost no new applicants for citizenship last year, which is an even bigger problem. Despite my connection with a Roman group in Poland, (see http://novaroma.org/nr/Kalisz ), negotiations were not successful because Nova Roma as whole could not provide them anything which they didn't have or which they would have needed.
 
Therefore I draw my conclusions, at least for the next year, and I suggest that the senate appoint a person who lives closer to Venedia and is linguistically better suited to the negotiations, a man who has the experience and is also fully qualified for the position: Sex. Lucilius Tutor (from Czech Republic).
 
My recommendation is for the senate to appoint Sex. Lucius as legatus pro praetore Venediae. He will have my support if needed.    



SOME CONCLUSIONS

 
The honorable consules asked if we can suggest ideas or recommend solutions for the   provincial reforms of Nova Roma. At this section, very briefly, I summarize my recommendations: 
 
1) I think Pannonia has proven to be a successful experiment. The organizational principle within our province is that the province needs a larger "umbrella" level with the governor to keep the various smaller communities effectively working together, and to link them to the center (senate and magistrates of NR), while various geographical intermediate (regio) and lower levels (oppidum/civitas/burgus), and   activity based lower levels (legion, cohort), are the places of actual provincial life. This multi-level structure ensures our communities both to keep going into the same direction under the guidance of the Nova Roman governor, and to have a quite free and independent internal community life (which is always a high priority to the communities' good feeling). I think this should be the theoretical model for all provinces. 
 
2) I also think making provinces smaller and smaller is an erroneous idea that is based on the misunderstanding of the nature of a provincia. A provincia can not be the level of actual civic life or real life events. Real life communities are and will always be way much smaller than a real country or state. The role of a provincia instead is to keep together, harmonize and to make a number of nearby local   communities cooperate in concert (or, if there is only one, or there is none, then to install or maintain that one). Therefore I also suggest that all provinces without existing communities be either dissolved or merged with their neighbors, because if we have too many independent subdivisions of Nova Roma, at the end, they will be disorganized and led without cohesion. 
 
3) And as a consequences of the previous thoughts, I would like to suggest that the title provincia, (and other titles like regio, civitas, oppidum etc) be only allowed to territories where a certain number of citizens, and a certain level of activity can be perceived. By this, citizens would be encouraged to work in order to maintain their provincia's status or, if they aren't yet a provincia, to achieve this goal. Being a Nova Roman province should be a matter of pride and a sign of achievement. This would be also a useful indicator for the senate and magistrates to see which territories what really are: which ones are just empty names, which ones are making progress, which ones are fully functioning Nova Roman entities.     
 
 
Thank you, Consules, for your attention, thank you, Conscript Fathers, for reading my report. I wish growth and glory to Nova Roma for this year, and I wish good work to all of my governor colleagues! 
 
 
Valete, consules, praetores, tribuni plebis, valete patres conscripti, resque publica  valeat vobiscum! Vivat nostra Res Pubica prosperrimé!  
 
 
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus
PRAEFECTVS ITALIAE
LEGATVS PRO PRAETORE PANNONIAE
LEGATVS PRO PRAETORE VENEDIAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93044 From: Rev. John W. Snow III, CS3, USN Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Re: Connectivity Issues
Virginia is having a rough time, too. The cities of Norfolk and Virginia Beach have declared a state of emergency.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93045 From: Gaius Tullius Valerianus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement
I, Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus, as a Lictor  of Nova Roma, hereby witness:

The appointment and investment with Imperium of  Statia Cornelia Valeriana Iuliana Aeternia as Consul maior, Gaius Aemilius Crassus as Consul minor, Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus as Praetor maior, Marcus Pompeius Caninus as Praetor minor and Lucius Vitellius Triarius as Aedilis curulis of Nova Roma.

The appointments of Aulus Apollonius Antullus as Magnae Matris Deum Aedis Sacerdos, Marcus Aemilius Agricola as Sacerdos Quirinalis, Gaius Decius Laterensis as Sacerdos Martialis, Gaius Claudius Quadratus as Augur, Marcus Aelius Geminus as Sacerdos Mercuri and Titus Iulius Nix as Fetialis.

I approve the status elevation of Gaius Decius Laterensis, his current or future own family, from plebeian to patrician.

As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish them good fortune in their offices and in their work on behalf of  the Religio Romana.

Gaius Tullius Valerianus Germanicus

Lictor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93046 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: The Collegium Pontificum January session report.

SALVETE!

QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS.

This is the Collegium Pontificum session report:

The Collegium Pontificum was called into session starting with 08.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XVII Kal Feb 2767 a.U.c (Thursday 16 January 2014) until 18.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d IV Kal Feb 2767 a.U.c (Wednesday, 29 January 2014).
The session schedule was:

Contio:

Started with 08.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d XVII Kal feb 2767 a.U.c (Thursday 16 January 2014) until 18.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d IX Kal Ian 2767 a.U.c (Friday, 24 January 2014).

Vote:
Started with 08.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d VIII Kal Feb (Saturday, 25 January 2014) and ends at 18.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d IV Kal Feb 2767 a.U.c (Wednesday, 29 January 2014).

The following CP members participated in session:
- T. Iulius Sabinus (TIS).
- Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus (QCMPP)
- Q. Fabius Maximus (QFM)
- Cn. Cornelius Lentulus (CnCL)
- C. Maria Caeca (CMC)

Proxy were not assigned during the contio.

The following CP member do not vote in sessions:
- M' Titinius Silvanus.

The session results:

Item I: Election of a pontifex ab oficiis.
Candidate: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus.

Details:
TIS: Uti rogas.
CMC: Uti rogas.
QFM: Uti rogas. I still think this is a load of peanut butter....
CnCL: YES (Only because no one else volunteered to do the job.) 
QCMPP: On the items currently under consideration by this college, I declare
myself opposed to both. (recorded as No).

ITEM I: PASS
-------------

Item II: Decretum pontificum de Concordialibus.

I. The collegium pontificum acknowledges the tradition of the Nova Roman people celebrating the Concordialia and the ludi Novi Romani as the Feriae of the birthday and founding of Nova Roma, initiated by the senatus consultum that established the Kalends of March M. Piscino T. Sabino cos. 2761 AUC (2008 CE) as the Feriae Imperativae of the 10th Birthday of Nova Roma during the Decennalia, in the 10th Anniversary of Nova Roma, the Sacred Year of Concordia, and continued ever since by the aediles curules, increasing the days of the ludi Novi Romani each year by one day, from 10 up to to 15, which was reached recently in our 15th Anniversary.  

II. This tradition is hereby sanctioned by this decree, and the Kalends of March shall be as the Concordialia the Dies Natalis Novae Romae (the Birthday of Nova Roma) included as Feriae Stativae into the pontifical perpetual calendar of Nova Roma, and each fifth year of Nova Roma shall be celebrated as a Sacred Year to Concordia. 

III. The ludi Novi Romani, celebrating the Concordialia as the founding of Nova Roma, thus alternatively called ludi Concordiales, shall be held each year from the Concordialia on the Kalends of March to the Feriae Annae Perennae on the Ides of March. The first day, the Concordialia, symbolizes the conception of Nova Roma on the Feriae Martis, the day of Mars, the Father of the Nova Roman nation, which day is also the Matronalia, the day of the Mothers, celebrating the growth of the Roman population by birth, as the day when the fatherly and motherly creative powers, united in Concord, in the Agreement of People in their utmost wish to revive and restore the populus Romanus, give birth to the new sons and daughters of Mars, the Nova Roman people of the Quirites. As the days grow from the Kalends to the Ides, being under the protection of Mars as Feriae Martis days, so does Nova Roma grow under the protection of Mars. Concluding with the Ides of March, sacred to Jupiter, Supreme God of the Roman people, the festivities reach the old New Year's Day of the Romans, thus ending on the old day of new beginning, which is the Feriae of Anna Perenna, Goddess of the Year, Perennial Life and Eternity, the festival of longevity, representing the wish of the Nova Roman people for a perennial life of Nova Roma, and symbolizing that, by stopping the days of the ludi on Her day, Anna Perenna brings the celebration and the festive prayers of the Nova Romans with Herself towards eternity, and, under the custody of Anna Perenna, Nova Roma may live triumphantly forever.

Details:
TIS: Uti rogas.
CMC: Uti rogas.
QFM: uti rogas.
CnCL: Yes.
QCMPP: On the items currently under consideration by this college, I declare
myself opposed to both. Specially, however, I want to address the second item. While I am not opposed to the content of the item itself, my opposition is to the item being put in place by this body. To say that it is not fas to be done as such is an extreme understatement of my position. (recorded as No).

ITEM II: PASS
-----------------

QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS

VALETE,
Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93047 From: GAIUS MARCIUS CRISPUS Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Weather on the East coast
Salvete omnes!

We have seen the news about states of emergency right down the East coast.

I hope all citizens are safe and can get back home through the ice and snow.

Keep warm and safe.

Valete omnes!

Crispus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 93048 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-01-29
Subject: Lictor Witness Statement
I, Gnaeus Iulius Caesar, as a Lictor  of Nova Roma, hereby witness:

The appointment and investment with Imperium of  Statia Cornelia Valeriana Iuliana Aeternia as Consul maior, Gaius Aemilius Crassus as Consul minor, Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus as Praetor maior, Marcus Pompeius Caninus as Praetor minor and Lucius Vitellius Triarius as Aedilis curulis of Nova Roma.

The appointments of Aulus Apollonius Antullus as Magnae Matris Deum Aedis Sacerdos, Marcus Aemilius Agricola as Sacerdos Quirinalis, Gaius Decius Laterensis as Sacerdos Martialis, Gaius Claudius Quadratus as Augur, Marcus Aelius Geminus as Sacerdos Mercuri and Titus Iulius Nix as Fetialis.

I approve the status elevation of Gaius Decius Laterensis, his current or future own family, from plebeian to patrician.

As a member of the Comitia Curiata I wish them good fortune in their offices and in their work on behalf of  the Religio Romana.

Gnaeus Iulius Caesar
Lictor