Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Aug 29-31, 2014

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94063 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94064 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94065 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94066 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94067 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94068 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94069 From: Lucius Horatius Lupus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94070 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94071 From: Faye Cameron Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: new civis ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94072 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Canada Citerior - Latin Study Group and a couple of reminders
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94073 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: New citizens
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94074 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94075 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94076 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94077 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: new civis ?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94078 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94079 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94080 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94081 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94082 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94083 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94084 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94085 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94086 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94087 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94088 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94089 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94090 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94091 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94092 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94093 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94094 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94095 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94096 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94097 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94098 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94099 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94100 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94101 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94102 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94103 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94104 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Bireme Race for Volturnalia 2767 auc - Race Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94105 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-30
Subject: Re: Bireme Race for Volturnalia 2767 auc - Race Report
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94106 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-30
Subject: EDICT ON APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94107 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94108 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94109 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94110 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94111 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Contacting my province's governor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94112 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94113 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94114 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94115 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94116 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94117 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94118 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94119 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94120 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94121 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94122 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94123 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94124 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94125 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94126 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94127 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94128 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94129 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94130 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94131 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94132 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94133 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94134 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94135 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94136 From: Jim Hooper Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94063 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

We have just as much fighting...debating as ancient Rome did.  I would respectfully suggest you take some time to read up on nova roma's history.  It has been through quite a bit of conflict.  Keep in mind growth requires debate and conflict.  The Republican nature of government also is one of debate too.  Be prepared that when election time happens there will be debate and disagreement.

Nova roma has had 2 civil wars in 16 years.  This is a fact.  During that time we have had people come and go.  Sometimes they disappeared and sometimes they left with a splash.  It's better to know the history of the organization to not be surprised when conflict happens.

Also, this has been the most stable nova roma has been since nova roma was founded. 

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94064 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
SALVETE!

Correction:

" as time the SL ROMA sim admins are in holiday..."

VALETE,
Sabinus

"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94065 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Ave Sulla, 

It is, indeed, clear that the construction of a state by its own citizens is nothing else but a form of organized conflict. If this, however, was "debate" or "politics" then I am a Vestal and a  Virgin. 


Salve, 
M.C. Varro

Ceterum censeo Novam Romam aerarium aureum accumulandam esse, ad maiorem stabilitatem res publicae futurorumque civium beneficium.

For the rest, I am of the opinion that New Rome should accumulate a treasury in gold, for the greater stability of the state as well as for the benefit of future citizens.




Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94066 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

Everything in a matter of degrees is politics. 

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94067 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Ave Sulla, 

That is the 20th / 21st century take on the thing. Pecking your nose is politics. Wouldn't the ancient Roman take on politics replace the "in" with "is" and vice versa: "Everything is a matter of degrees in politics" ? 

Vale, 

M.C. Varro

Ceterum censeo Novam Romam aerarium aureum accumulandam esse, ad maiorem stabilitatem res publicae futurorumque civium beneficium.

For the rest, I am of the opinion that New Rome should accumulate a treasury in gold, for the greater stability of the state as well as for the benefit of future citizens.




Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94068 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

I would say not much is different between ancient Rome view of politics.  Considering that one as a candidate or perspective candidate did what they could to increase their "q".  Whether that would be putting on games...hiring nomenclatures...etc etc.  If one "picked their nose" as you suggested that would be the equivalent of a faux pas...that would need to be fixed.

Some of us who have been in NR...have an extensive history that a newbie lacks.  Over time you will adapt to nr and if your lucky enough you can help change nr a little.

Well I'm off to sleep. :)  take care.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94069 From: Lucius Horatius Lupus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
With all due respect (or none) Felix The Cat, you sound like a sadistic sociopath the way you talk. Maybe you are? Especially I am concerned because you are a college professor. Some people are not natural teachers  - mali discipuli non existent. 

LH Lupus

Sent from my iPhone

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94070 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

Interesting response.  Thanks for the laugh.  Felix the cat...lol funny.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94071 From: Faye Cameron Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: new civis ?
Greetings! 

I would like to start being active here. but I don't know where to begin, how to do things. I kind of feel... unsure..! I mean, I've always been good at organising, but I don't know how to do this. Plus, I'm only 19..! If I had some sort of guidance, I wouldn't mind, or at least someone to think through things with, together. So any help would be awesome..! :) 

L. V. Bestia


On Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:43 PM, "'Cn. Cornelius Lentulus' cn_corn_lent@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
Cn. Lentulus Virginiae Bestiae salutem plurimam dicit:


Welcome to Nova Roma! Khaire! I would like to encourage you to start a Nova Roma recruitment mission in Greece around you! Don't worry if there is no province organized at this moment in your area. It doesn't mean you and your area aren't recognized by Nova Roma. The provincia in Nova Roma is a community unit (it's not about the area but about the team of activists), and the provincia first needs at least a small community, and before there would be a governor appointed, it is necessary to have people whom to govern. It will be an exciting mission and fun to start the creation of Graecia! I envy you! :) As Cn. Caesar has mentioned, T. Sabinus started to organize Dacia: he was first alone. and now Dacia is a community. In the same year, I had entered an empty province, there was zero Pannonian citizen in Hungary (the province existed only because previously there were citizens there, but they left, and I inherited an empty box). I was alone then, and now Pannonia is the most active provincia when it comes to real life events and festivals. Ti. Iulius Nerva and Sex. Lucilius Tutor are organizing the Czech area, and as a result, they are growing. These people are our pioneers. If you have the vision and want to achieve a goal with Graecia (or Achaia), start organizing a membership there! With time, with endurance, you will soon reach this goal. And there are people who can help, or give advice at least. I will be ready to help you, as much as I can from a distance, to create a Nova Roma provincia in Greece.

Vale optime!

Cn. Lentulus, pontifex
praefectus Italiae
leg. pr. pr. Pannoniae






Da: "Gnaeus Iulius Caesar gn_iulius_caesar@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
Caesar sal.

Indeed Macra is correct, the senate can. I think of Dacia - it too was not a province and then Sabinus arrived. With his drive, contacts and enthusiasm it became a province and a very successful one. The senate would need only to be convinced that a potential governor exists, and that they have a viable plan to expand numerically, and that there is more than just one person backing such a venture. Therefore, in my opinion, recruiting a core group of people locally should be the first step for anyone who seeks to convince the senate the plan is viable. It tells the senate that the work of building a province is under-way, and if those people are local to each other they can easily meet and keep in contact with each other. Mutual support and encouragement over a good meal has many benefits :)

Optime valete

--------------------------------------------




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94072 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Canada Citerior - Latin Study Group and a couple of reminders
Salvete,
ADVISORY: I'd like to suggest that said Latin course be offered, as a "taste," herein online Nova Roma (considering I, and the caring ones, help by paying tribute [taxes]).
Cum amor et magicus,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 
 


On Friday, August 29, 2014 5:07 PM, "' A. Tullia Scholastica' fororom@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Claudio Quadrato quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D. 

 
Salvete omnibus in foro!

Next month I will be undertaking the Sermo Latin course offered by Scholastica and her colleagues.  It would be good to get in some live conversational practice - so, if anyone around the Montreal area of Canada Citerior would like to join me in this activity, please let me know.

ATS:  You might get enough practice in class, but we might be able to find some students in your area.  Not yet, however.  


Reminder #1.  Nova Roma has a very fine office available for study, meetings, etc., in Westmount.  There are a couple of Roman coin enthusiasts in the immediate area.  If you would like to examine coins and discuss Roman numismatics (or anything else of mutual interest) come visit - but contact me in advance.

Reminder #2.  The Augustus memorial essay contest closes on September 16th.  There is still plenty of time to enter, but it would be best to not wait until the last minute.   The requirements have been twice posted but if someone needs that information it could be posted again.  In brief, an ORIGINAL two-page essay on any subject connected to the coinage of Augustus.  A genuine Roman coin to every entrant and a rather scarce As issued by Caligula bearing the image of his grandfather, M. Agrippa, (he who built the original Pantheon) to the winner.

Valete!

C Claudius Quadratus
Procurator, Canada Citerior

Valete.  





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94073 From: Robin Marquardt Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: New citizens
Salvete,
Latine scribere ego diligo ut vos es;
I love that you are writing in Latin!
Valete,
Tiberius Marcius Quadra
 




On Friday, August 29, 2014 12:18 PM, "' A. Tullia Scholastica' fororom@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae S.D. 

 
Salve Crispa!
 
Welcome to Nova Roma, Civis!  I will defer to our Latinists for comment on your Latin, but compliment you on using it, regardless of its correctness.  I’ve often read that the very best way to learn a language is to use it,
  Indeed it is.  Unfortunately one does not get much of the necessary practice in NR, for, as you and your colleagues in the praetura have just demonstrated, the use of Latin is not allowed in the interest of catering to the lowest common denominator.  Other than a few physical handicaps, such as your blindness, there is no excuse for anyone in a Roman-based organization not to be able to read some basic Latin.  

For many years, anyone was allowed to use any major language, including Latin, on the ML.  Many did so, and we had wonderful intellectual discussions in several languages, including English.  There is no excuse for this current foolish  anti-language policy, which violates the moral law by impeding learning.  What was good enough for NR when it was flourishing should be more than good enough now.  

and get gentle correction along the way, so as my Australian friends would say, “good on ya!”

Yes, some gentle correction is also good.  That also applies to wrongheaded policies and practices.  
 
Vale bene!
C. Maria Caeca

Vale. 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94074 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Cn. Iulius Caesar sal.

I am replying to all who commented on this thread via this last post.

Firstly, Nova Roma is a community - warts and all. If anyone was expected edification, without a single wart, let alone a collection of them, then you are no doubt, to put it mildly shocked. Well get over it, it happens here. If it isn't over Scholastica and what she did, a matter she was found responsible for by a jury of her peers, then it will be something else and someone else. It can get feisty in here. It can get very pointed. This community is not some hallowed institution where people mumble inanities and pleasantries. Occasionally it gets a bit rough and ready. Well what can I say? It has been that way since the doors opened, different people, different issues, it often ends up here. It ain't going to change. The names of the combatants may change, the issues, but it always ends up in the arena of the Main List.

Secondly, in respect of Scholastica, this is exactly how she works. It starts with a comment in public and then simply put indoctrination behind the scenes in responses to questions put in private to her. It is not just her "spin" on events, it is a factually wrong and warped series of distortions. Now having just processed 120 or 130 new citizens does anyone credibly believe that I am going to stand by and watch as she repeats the whole sorry exercise that led to her public disgrace? Well I am not. So suck it up.

Thirdly, this is directed to Scholastica. It doesn't take much to get you to reveal your true self now does it. Read that drivel in your reply to me. Parse it against the fact that the Senate found you responsible for a disgraceful episode in Nova Roma's history. An abuse of your office. Your explanations were not credible, they were not even incredible. They were ludicrous. I will deal with that entire version of events in your reply to me shortly, but you and I both know you have been up to this for years in the censura. You used your office as scribe and then as censor to indoctrinate new citizens with your bogus version of history.

Optime vale

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94075 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
M.C. Varro Cn. Iulio Caesari sal.

Well then, thanks for the heads-up. I'll see that I fasten my seat-belt :-)

Vale !


Ceterum censeo Novam Romam aerarium aureum accumulandam esse, ad maiorem stabilitatem res publicae futurorumque civium beneficium.

For the rest, I am of the opinion that New Rome should accumulate a treasury in gold, for the greater stability of the state as well as for the benefit of future citizens.



Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94076 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Omnibus in Foro S. P. D.

 

One of the things that has always fascinated me about ancient Rome is the exuberance and zest for all aspects of life that the Romans demonstrated.  When it came to politics, I’ve sometimes thought (and no, this is not a serious observation) that the Romans had a “politics gene” in their DNA structure.  The Romans loved politics as much as they loved war, and it often seems as though when they weren’t conquering some foreign nation, they were fighting one another (or doing both at the same time).  Our modern concepts of political activity have changed somewhat, because in ancient Rome, there was no such thing as “dirty” politics.  They did all sorts of tricks that would horrify us today. 

 

We, in Nova Roma have had, and will probably have again, a turbulent history.  Sometimes we disagree on issues.  Sometimes those disagreements are civil discourse between friends; sometimes they are much less civil, and quite unfriendly.  Like our chosen ancient ancestors, Nova Romans tend to say what they think, directly and often as forcefully as they can.  There are one sided views.  Views are presented in whatever way the presenter thinks will convince his/her readers.  There are exaggerations.  These things are part and parcel of being deeply involved in NR, passionate about its growth and well being, and determined to effect that in what the presenter believes is a positive and “correct” way.  Our goals are the same, but very often the paths we each of us thinks we should take to achieve those goals will vary widely, and our views will collide here, in the main forum.  This is how we hash out our differences, and yes, it can get messy.  But, in the end, it is also likely that we will reach a consensus, and even if we don’t, the Senate and our magistrates will get a very clear sense of how we feel about an issue.

 

Remember, too, that many of us have known one another in Nova Roma for more years than is usual in on line communities.  Lasting friendships have been formed, as well as lasting enmities, and the dynamics of these relationships will reveal themselves in our discussions at some point.  I have a very few, very cherished friends here, but I have been known to strongly and publicly disagree with each of them from time to time.  That changes nothing about my feelings toward them, however. 

 

I found it instructive, as a new citizen, to simply observe, read archives, and get a sense of the people around me.  I have also found that, in any debate, one must read everything observantly to get a well rounded perspective of the issues at hand, so that one can make informed, objective choices when it comes time to vote.

 

I encourage our new citizens not to be discouraged when we become contentious.  Observe the combatants’ conduct, consider what they are saying as much as how they are saying it, and use our verbal set-tos to learn more about Nova Roma, and about her citizens.  Reading our history in the main list archives is extremely helpful, also.

 

Valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94077 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: new civis ?

Salve Bestia!

 

At this point, I think you would be best served by observing how we conduct our Roman lives and affairs.  However, when you’ve gotten to know us and have met the minimum time as citizenship requirements, seeking a scriba position in one of the magistracies is the best way I can think of to begin your involvement, since you will see, from the inside, how each magistracy functions.  Contests are announced from time to time, some of them involving writing and researching, so participate in any of those which interest you, and participate in our Ludi (games), where we are less formal, and far less contentious.  In short, get to know us, and ideas for contributing will probably present themselves, as well as ideas for our growth, or for doing what we do more effectively.  Of course, you are more than welcome to email me privately, and if I can, I will be happy to assist you in any NR matters.

 

Vale bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94078 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

C. Maria Caeca T. Iulio Sabino S. P. D.

 

I probably won’t make this party, but only because I need to check a few things with Aeternia that involve the visual effects of the way I do things.  But, if I can find someone in Virtual Ability to tell me what I need to know, perhaps …. It’s almost time for me to come back, publicly, to Roma, and I’m very much looking forward to doing so.

 

Vale quam optime!

 

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94079 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

I'm going to try to be there...it depends on when the nurses will be done changing my wound vac...and their daily routine here.  I'm looking forward to seeing everyone on sl again. :)

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94080 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

Ave Sulla!

 

You mean the nurses haven’t bound and gagged or killed you, yet? Are you providing us with a prodigy by being a good patient??? (grin).

 

Vale bene!

CMC

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94081 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

Lol nope not yet rofl....I bribe them...Every 5th pain pill I give back to them....lol but seriously everything has gone rather well...it's just taken far longer than expected.

Actually I think I'm one of their favorites... I like to share my stuff...my cousin sent me some wonderful almonds...4 bags of almonds and I gave 1 bag to the nurses. :)  and last weekend my sister came here with a lebanese dinner and  we both shared with the on duty nurses.  

Vale

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94082 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

Ave!

 

Good strategy!  After all, they have a great control over how comfortable your life will be, so I have found it wise (and pleasant) to make sure I got along with all the support staff.  Doctors, of course, live on their own clouds, and are so exalted that they don’t even notice us as people, just medical conditions, LOL, although in one case, I did cut a resident down to size.  It took me about 30 seconds, I think, and we came to an understanding about a few things.

 

Vale bene!

CMC

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94083 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

Ave,

I've only lost my patience 3 times.  Each time it was a combination of pain spike...waiting for care longer than 40 min...and dislike of the meals...luckily I'm well past that now...I'm just not yet in a position to go home yet.  I miss being home....but I'm comfortable here for the most part...and waiting 2-3 weeks for next surgery....The last one! :)

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94084 From: Belle Morte Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!
Salvete,

Will not be able to make said party since I will be at work and working overtime today.

Tomorrow I am attending a Anime convention here in Glendale.  I will probably return to SL Sunday...

Valete bene,
Aeternia 

Sent from my iPhone

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94085 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

Who told ya about that anime convention ;) he heh heh

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94086 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Caninus sal.
 
Scholastica stated:
 
"Your take, and Sulla's, and that of others in the tribe to which you belong.  For the benefit of the new citizens, this 'gang' was a different political faction.  Do not confuse the moderate citizens with any 'gang.'  "
 
Every time this comes up Scholastica refers to the Libre as the 'moderate citizens.' How is it that a group of citizens who put in motion a plan to install a dictator can be labeled as 'moderate'. Let's be a bit more honest when we reminisce about the good ol' days, shall we? Moderate and freedom loving citizens do not resort to creating a dictator when they cannot spend funds from the treasury on their pet projects. Especially so when the project costs half of the entire sum of the treasury, the project is sole sourced and not offered out to bid in an RFP, the project work will be done by an individual within Nova Roma with close political ties to the consules at the time, the project price is outrageous, and the project is not defined with a clear statement of work and solid project plan.

Bene valete.

 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94087 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
A. Vergilius Figulus Caninó aliísque S.P.D.

Canine, you said: "How is it that a group of citizens who put in motion a plan to install a dictator can be labeled as 'moderate'."

Without commenting on the purpose, etc., since I obviously wasn't here, wasn't the nomination of a dictator an occasional and accepted practice in the Roman Republic whenever the need arose? It was always a temporarily position and never frowned upon until Sulla and Caesar abused the office in the latter days of the republic, so I don't see how it has any direct relation to whether one is moderate or not...

Valé et valéte!



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94088 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

I would argue that we are the moderates in our actions during the coup.  We certainly did not take anyone's speech away...which was done repeatedly to us.  We did not try to take a third of Nova roma's money for some vague template of a plan for website improvement.

Even when I was sole consul last year no one was deprived of their right of speech.  Compare that to nova roma under the control of the former powers that be....by that standard alone nr is 180 degrees better.

Absence might make the heart fonder; but those of us who fought against the attempted coup will not have nova roma go through that history again. 

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94089 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Salve Sulla, 

Just out of curiosity: what made you take that ominous cognomen ?

Vale ! 

M.C. Varro

Ceterum censeo Novam Romam aerarium aureum accumulandam esse, ad maiorem stabilitatem res publicae futurorumque civium beneficium.

For the rest, I am of the opinion that New Rome should accumulate a treasury in gold, for the greater stability of the state as well as for the benefit of future citizens.



Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94090 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

Yes it was.  However nova roma is bound by macronational-laws given that nova roma is registered as a not for profit corporation in the state of Maine and with the IRS.  As such we are bound to be compliant with those laws and regulations.  Those former powers that be tried to violate those laws by imposing a dictator in a way that would violate Maine law. 

There are other issues that we must contend with beyond the mos maiorum of the ancients.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94091 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: Think-tank - Party!!!

Salve Sabine!

 

I *think* things are arranged so that I will neither embarrass myself or be an embarrassment to Nova Roma, so if you would do me the kindness of sending me a landmark to your Domus, I would very much like to join you all.

 

Vale quam optime!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94092 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

I think Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix was an amazing Roman!  His triumph over adversity alone puts him in a standard very few other people have been able to reach.  He was an undefeated and very successful general.  He was conservative in his outlook.   Each of his reforms tended to look back to history to fix the modern ills of the republic.  Finally, I esteem and live to the axiom no better friend....no worse enemy.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94093 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

C. Maria Caeca A. Virgilio Figulo S. P. D.

 

You are absolutely correct; the office of Dictator was entirely valid in ancient Rome, and was often used to excellent effect.  However, in our case in 2010, the matter was more complicated.

 

I don’t remember if the duration of the dictatorship had been precisely established, but I don’t think it was.  Had the mandate of the dictatorship been to resolve the current impasse by allowing the Senate to be called and the mechanisms of Government to fully function, I would have supported it, given our situation at that time.

 

However, there were other agenda, some stated, some implied, that (not that it signifies in the least) I could not support, and against which I would have been extremely vocal.

 

Vale bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94094 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
M. Pompeius Caninus M. Cornelio Varroni spd.
Welcome, new citizen! I hope you will find enjoyment and value here in Nova Roma.
 
You asked, "How does this further the cause of New Rome?" Well, this is not a Latin Club - we hope Nova Roma will be much more than that, something closer to a true res publica. The fighting is not something that happens everyday, so do not be too worried about it. And, for the most part, the fighting is minor compared to what our ancient forefathers went through while they steered the course of the ship of state, as your gens brother Sulla has stated. On closer examination, you may find the fighting actually is educational and edifying. Nova Roma becomes stronger and wiser when the lessons of its past are kept in mind. When Nova Roma forgets its past, it is very likely to repeat mistakes. Some of the fights in the past, like the fight over the treasury in 2010, could have had far worst consequences had they been played out a different way. Even more so if people did not raise strenuous objections and fight for what is best for our res publica. Too many times in the past have citizens come up with ideas that, if fully executed, could have resulted in the loss of Nova Roma's charity status or would have enriched one or more members at the expense of the treasury. It is very important for all citizens to raise their voices and speak plainly and openly regarding the leadership, strategic goals and direction of this organization. Many of us are here because we have a passion for Rome and part of the passion is expressed through politics and debate in this forum. I appreciate your candor and your fresh perspective.

Fac valeas!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94095 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
M.C. Varro M. P. Canino s.p.d.


Thanks.  Your thoughtful reply puts things into perspective. I do agree that having a ( living ) memory is of utmost importance for Nova Roma's stability. There is a theory about stability that says that a system can either be fragile ( every challenge threatens its survival ), robust ( most challenges do not threaten its survival ) or non-fragile ( every challenge actually makes the system better ). It would, then, be very desirable for Nova Roma to be non-fragile, ,and in this sense the fights and arguments might be the best way to N.R. lastingly exhibiting such a characteristic.

I suppose I will get  used to the fights - and will think of your comment the day I myself will be engaged in one :-) Thanks again. 


Optime valeas ! 





Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94096 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Caesar sal.

The issues were:

1. The propriety of sole sourcing a project that would strip just under half our funds

2. That no independent evaluation was done, they relied on the word of the original designer who had left NR and hadn't seen the state of the program for some time. Therefore commercially it could have cost more if the damage that had been done to it was worse.

3. That the intended recipient was a close associate of one of the principals in the coup attempt

4. That the method of convening the senate ignored a veto imposed by one of the consuls


Personally I don't have a problem with the office of dictator - as long as rules are followed, which they were not. In any case subsequently it was discovered that the office as structured is illegal under Maine State law, where we are incorporated.

Optime valete

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94097 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Caninus Figulo spd.
 
Oh, it definitely does have a direct relation on whether one is a moderate or not.
 
 Yes, the office of dictator has a sound and reasonable purpose. Appointing a dictator is a good thing when the circumstances call for such a measure. However, there was no clear and present danger to Nova Roma. The Senate was functioning and magistrates were working. There were simple ways to take care of the database and the server. The attempt to appoint a dictator in that particular case was a calculated move to force Nova Roma to proceed with a course of action that should and could readily be dealt with in the normal day-to-day operations of the Senate. No dictator was required --- except by those who were not satisfied with leaving the decision in the hands of the Senate. A moderate would allow such decisions to be made at the appropriate levels and accept the outcome rather than take the extreme action of appointing a dictator to force a particular outcome. Taking an extraordinary measure when ordinary means will do the job is not a moderate course of action. I find it ironic that a group that advocated freedom sought to place restrictions on the Senate in order to proceed with a crazy technology project.
 
Optime vale!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94098 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Salvete Canine et Salvete Omnes,

 

As I remember it, the Senate wasn’t functioning, because if one Consul called it into session the other immediately vetoed the call.  This happened for several months, as I remember, but yes, the other mechanisms of Government were functioning, and the stated reasons for trying to impose a dictatorship were, as you indicated, and were unacceptable.

 

Vale et valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94099 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave caeca,

The Senate met previously in 2010.  It was one of the items I discussed and gave to the irs agent during the audit. 
Prior to May the consuls were able to work together.  That changed when quintilanus tried to push the IT fixes.  If I recall correctly Albucius veto the session and then the Tribunes (except to his credit, dexter) got involved which made a very ambiguous Senate session clearly illegal.

The conflict between magistrates is a feature!  It is an important check on possible abuses of power.  This is why we never had a problem with conflict even when we lost battles we never gave up the fight.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94100 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Salve amica!

I submit the Senate was functioning. But when the Senate was not meeting the needs and expectations of some of the magistrates steps were taken to ensure the Senate could not function. Again, this is not the type of activity someone who describes themselves as politically moderate would engage in. And it certainly isn't a tactic employed by someone who advocates political liberty.

Fac valeas amica!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94101 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Caninus Sullae sal.
 
Exactly! Each magistrate works with a colleague. Sometimes a colleague will object to a particular course of action or veto a project. That's how things work. It's the Roman way. As a magistrate, you accept the veto and you move on. You can't always have things go your own way. A magistrate who is unable to deal with a collegial veto and accept such gracefully is unfit for office.
Fac valeas!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94102 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)

Ave,

:)

Only 2 people in nr were able to govern in extraordinary ways.  Flavius Vedius, as nova roma's only dictator, about 10 or 11 years ago...and myself last year as sole consul without a colleague.   Ironically,  both actions were inspired by actions of our ancients and Gods willing we will never need a consul without a colleague again.

Even now I look back with fondness when I was consul without a colleague. ..I enjoyed being busy and productive.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94103 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Re: (was Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: New citizens)
Caesar sal.

The dictatorship had been an option that was being discussed since 2009. I found that out after an email discussing it was accidentally sent to me. What then happened was that some people were itching to find any old excuse to implement it. The goals were (1) purges (as confirmed in my conversations with the would-be dictator during the crisis where he didn't rule them out in specific cases - whatever that means - but assured me they wouldn't be widespread for whatever that was worth), and (2) loot the treasury.

The actual senate call was made by consuls AND almost all the tribunes. The reason they used the tribunes (except Dexter who opposed this ignoring of a veto) was to try to shield one consul from the veto of another, the tribunes not being able to be vetoed. The constitution didn't allow for that and therefore, correctly, Albucius consul and Sabinus censor refused to recognize that the Senate call was valid. Issues of legality never stopped the plotters of course, many having had a career in NR in prostituting the laws of NR to the highest bidder to meet their own ends, so the vote for a dictator proceeded.

What happened then was simple. Sulla and I threatened to use our own personal funds to sue the proposed dictator if he touched one cent of the treasury money. That forced the issue and he consulted a lawyer. The rest is history - the coup fizzled and died when the would-be dictator refused to accept the office based on legal advice.

Optime valete

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94104 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2014-08-29
Subject: Bireme Race for Volturnalia 2767 auc - Race Report
M. Pompeius Caninus quiritibus salutem.


Welcome to Nova Roma News Radio, broadcasting to you from the eternal
city.

Today is the Volturnalia and we have a special event taking place at the
river front. Our reporter, Titus Nautius Sura, has a report on the
bireme race!

Salvete omnes! The Governor of Alasca et Havaia has arranged a course on
the river to honor Volturnus with a bireme race. It is 6:00 pm with
clear skies and a warm breeze. There was plenty of action earlier but
the final race to determine today's winner is about to begin. The six
finalists are: Nicephorus, commanding the bireme "Mersatus", owned by
Aulus Iulius Paterculus for Factio Veneta; Tita Pompeia Canina, our
Praetor Minor's eldest daughter, commanding the bireme "Ops", owned by
Marcus Pompeius Caninus for Factio Veneta; Quintus Visellius, commanding
the bireme "Triton's Pride", owned by Gaius Decius Laterensis for Factio
Albata; Apollodoros of Crete, commanding the bireme "Wind Rider", owned
by Lucius Atellus Ulpius for Factio Veneta; Lucius Vitellius Triarius,
commanding his own bireme “Mortem Carthagenian” for Factio Veneta;
and, Midir, commanding the bireme "Dagda", owned by Publius Annæus
Constantinus for Factio Russata.

Banners for the factiones are displayed proudly everywhere along the
river banks. Several merchants are drawing crowds, eager to purchase
trinkets and food.

The biremes have lined up and stand ready. M. Pompeius Caninus drops the
mappa and they're underway. It’s a good clean start. The ships are
closing in on the first dolphin. Mortem Carthagenian is beginning to
pull away with Ops well ahead of the rest of the pack. Passing the first
dolphin Triton’s Pride is in third place, Mersatus in fourth, Wind
Rider is in fifth and Dagda is in sixth.

The boats are moving almost effortlessly on the river as they pass the
second dolphin with Mortem Carthagenian still in the lead. Triton’s
Pride has moved up second pulling a bit ahead of Mersatus. Ops seems to
have faded to the back of pack with Wind Rider and Dagda.

As they approach the third dolphin Mersatus has surged ahead to take the
lead. Ops has somehow managed to regain second place. The crowd is
cheering as Mortem Carthagenian passes the dolphin in third position
with Triton’s Pride close behind. Wind Rider and Dagda are pulling up
the rear.

The river is shimmering in the late afternoon sun with very little wave
action. The boats are just passing the fourth dolphin now. Only one more
to go! And Ops has a commanding lead. Mortem Carthagenian is well behind
in second position. Triton’s Pride is in third and Dagda appears to be
making a move, now in fourth position ahead of Mersatus and Wind Rider.
Mortem Carthagenian has just pushed Ops into the spina! That's a tough
break for the young Canina. It will take some time for the crew of Ops
to recover as Mortem Carthagenian seizes the lead.

And here they come! Mortem Carthagenian crosses first! Dagda follows
almost immediately in second place. Mersatus has come up to third place,
leaving Triton’s Pride a bit behind in fourth place. Wind Rider takes
fifth place. And Ops is limping in sixth place. The Veneta fans are
going wild. Cheers can be heard all along the banks of the Tiber. Our
Curule Aedile is pumping his fist as he guides his ship to the shore!
And his son has just come out of nowhere and covered Triarius in
Falnerian! Well, there will definitely be a party tonight! Russata and
Albata fans are joyful as well and the celebrations are bound to last
long into the night.

That's it from the Tiber River grandstands. Lucius Vitellius Triarius
has scored a win with his bireme Mortem Carthagenian. And the Blues have
taken the bireme trophy from last year’s winners, the Whites.
Congratulations to Triarius on his victory! Now back to the studio.


The final results and this report are on the NR Wiki at
http://novaroma.org/nr/Volturnalia_2767_AUC_(Nova_Roma)


Valete omnes!

M. Pompeius Caninus
Praetore Alascae et Havaiae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94105 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-30
Subject: Re: Bireme Race for Volturnalia 2767 auc - Race Report
M.C. Varro M. Pompeio Canino s.p.d. 

Gratias multas tibi ago propter haec emissionem N.R.N.R. iucundissimam !

Thank you very much for this N.R.N.R. broadcast. Jolly, jolly  ! 

Vale, 

M.C. Varro 



Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94106 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-30
Subject: EDICT ON APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBE
CENSORIAL EDICT ON APPOINTMENT OF SCRIBE:

Cn. Iulius Caesar censor sal.

Effective immediately, I appoint Titus Iulius Sabinus as my scribe within the censura.

Optime valete
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94107 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Question about laws & taxes
M.C. Varro quiritibus omnibus s.p.d.

Valete ! 


Some questions have risen with me that, obviously, find no anwer in browsing the Nova Roma web site. Maybe the cives here can help me out. 

1) The last Senate Agenda posted on Nova Roma : http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senate_Agenda_(Nova_Roma)
dates back to the 7th of November, 2012. Is this a mistake or omission, i.e. have there been other Senate meetings but have their agenda not been posted, or does the Senate really convene that rarely ?

2) It would seem that decisions regarding taxes, finances etc. are enacted as Senatus Consultum, and not as Lex. Is that not somewhat strange, given that there seems no indication of Nova Roma to be in some sort of emergency ?

3) To my understanding, a Senatus Consultum Ultimum is only necessary and useful in circumstances of dire emergency, e.g. ( in historical Rome ) the Gracchus affair or the Catilina conspiration. Civis Sulla, Princeps Senatus, advised me to dive into the history of Nova Roma, which I did. A quick Google search says that in the entire history of Nova Roma, a total of 4 ( four ) Senatus Consultum Ultimum were taken: de Sarmatia Provincia, regarding the appointment of quaestors, de ratione Senatus, and regarding the purchase of an internet voting progam. Was each or any of these four subjects, in the history of Nova Roma, a dire emergency ? 

M.C. Varro



Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94108 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Caesar Varroni sal.

Re your points:

1) No, the Senate has met since then.

2) Because the Constitution assigns control of financial matters to the Senate. The Senate is also the Board of Directors of the non-profit corporation Nova Roma Inc.

3) The Constitution does not say that a "dire emergency" is a pre-condition for an SCU.

Optime vale

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94109 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
M.C. Varro Gn. Iulio Caesari sal. 

Thank you. 

1) Where can we find the agenda of the respective meetings since then ? 

2) Why does the Senate have a preference for governing by SC rather than by Lex ? 

3) It would, however, seem to be so. An SCU can only be repealed or changed by an absolute Senate majority, i.e. the Senate would steer itself more and more into a corner by using SCUs. Are you, and other Senators, conscious of this side-effect ? 

Vale optime. 



Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94110 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
A. Vergilius Figulus M. Cornelió Varroni aliísque S.P.D.

There are a few not-so-Roman aspects to Nova Roma that I'm sure we'd all like fixed. Since I got here we had an incident where the senate removed the Pontifex Maximus and reorganized the collegium pontificum, something definitely unheard of in the Roman republic. The current government thought this absolutely necessary since the pontifex maximus was refusing to grant imperium, etc., but the whole thing still made me (and I'm sure everyone else, including those who felt the step necessary) a bit uncomfortable due to the lack of Romanitas in the action...

I can't complain too much, though, since my involvement in Nova Roma has been fairly limited so far. The best way to help Nova Roma become more Roman is to become involved yourself in making it so. I hope you and the other new members take the initiative to become involved. Maybe I'll start taking my own advice too...

Valé valéteque!


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94111 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Contacting my province's governor
M.C. Varro omnibus sal. 

I have tried to contact Petronius, the governor of my province ( Germania ), but without success. 
Does anyone know how and where to contact him ? 

Valete ! 




Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94112 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
M.C. Varro A.V. Figulo s.p.d. 

You are right where it comes to personal involvement. I shall heed your advice, and am only trying to decide what would be the optimal path, and which the most fruitful field, to do so. 

Vale !






Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94113 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes

Ave,

Have you read the constitution?

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94114 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes

Ave,

Except you have already called me a sociopath....so pardon if I kinda take that claim with a grain of salt.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94115 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes

A. Vergilius Figulus Varroni Sullaeque S.P.D.

I had skipped over a lot of the debate since the mud-slinging isn't my favorite part of NR (but at least ot hasn't scared me off, either!), but I couldn't resist going back throught that new cives thread to find where Sulla was called a sociopath. Forgive my lack of self control, ha ha!

Sulla, going through that thread, it looks to me like it was Lupus who called you a sociopath, not Varro. Am I missing something? If Varro did too, I'd sure enjoy reading it, if you'd be so kind as to point me in the direction of said post...

Valéte!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94116 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Caesar Varroni sal.

1) In the archives here in this list. The tribunes publish the agenda and results here.

2) The senate can only pass an SC as per the Constitution, so it doesn't have a preference. That is the way it is.

3) What seems to be so? SCUs have been used when the situation has demanded it in the view of the senate - people deserting posts and responsibilities (like calling the curia to invest imperium), where laws required an action that wasn't possible, etc etc.

Optime vale

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94117 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Ave Sulla, 

I did not call you a sociopath. I don't know you well enough for applying either positive or negative epithets to you. 

Vale, 

M.C. Varro



Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94118 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Salve Figule.

This is not Rome. This is Nova Roma. Underpinning our structure and finances is a non-profit corporation. Now, as to the issue of removing a pontifex maximus, the fact the ex-pontifex maximus had a spat over who won the consular elections indicates an un-Roman attitude. Instead of doing his duty and investing the new consuls with imperium, he put his pants on his head and went off into the corner to suck his thumb. As the law requires the consuls be invested he was removed. If you want to talk about an un-Roman attitude then point your gaze to wards the ex-PM. He was the one reduced to sulking like a baby and the Senate wasn't going to sit on its hands waiting for him to get over his tantrum. The other possibility was that he would simply have refused to invest them. That was unacceptable.

Vale bene
Caesar

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94119 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Caesar Varroni sal

Wrong thread

Optime vale
--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94120 From: Jan van Oort Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Salve Caesar,

That can be heard / read quite frequently here: "This is not Rome, this is Nova Roma". Do you realize that this sounds strange, in the mouth of magistrates / officials of an organization dedicated to bringing Romanitas back to and into life ? A quick search on this forum on "not Rome" yields 94 hits, several of the more recent ones of which are directly traceable to you...

Vale !





Fortuna audaces adiuvat - hos solos ? 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94121 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes

A. Vergilius Figulus Cn. Julió Caesarí S.P.D.

You said: "This is not Rome. This is Nova Roma."

That is a tautology. Nevertheless it makes me sad that you feel the need to bring it up, because it makes me wonder if Scholastica is perhaps correct in her assertions that the current powers that be in NR really have abandoned NR's advertised mission...

As far as the former pontifex maximus, based on what you said, perhaps I was wrong about you all being uncomfortable with his removal as well. Sulla et. al. seemed to imply they didn't like that it had to be done, only that they considered it a necessity. I completely agree that his failure to convene the collegium was wrong. I'm inclined to think it was un-Roman, but that doesn't magically make the SCU used to oust him Roman. At best it was an unfortunate necessity. I thought my mention of the fact that he refused to grant imperium would have indicated that my "gaze" was indeed "cast" toward him as much as anyone else.

I can't imagine any way he could've convinced me that his actions (or lack thereof) were right, but I certainly would have liked to see him try. I'm not subscribed to BA or some of the other lists, however, so I probably missed part of the debate. I did notice he started to post some criticism of Sulla on this list and was hoping that this would begin an explanation of his actions for those of us not so close to the action. Nevertheless he appears to have been banned from the list shortly thereafter, which strikes me as odd coming from those complaining about the prior regime's alleged restraints on speech and plans to cast out dissenters... Did the SCU ban him completely from NR rather than simply removing him from office? Or am I mistaken and he is still welcome on this list, but has voluntarily withdrawn? I would indeed be happy to be corrected on this matter... (And if he has been exiled, someone might explain to Varro that this is why he can't contact his governor.)

Valé!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94122 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes

Ave,

My sincere apologizes.  I know someone did...and called me Felix the cat (same person). :)

I do apoloigze. 

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94123 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes

Ave,

The problem is...that it's true.

Ironically Caesar and myself were members of the boni.  A conservative faction in Nova Roma.  Our goal was always to go back to the ancients and try ancient methods in NR first. 

Case in point when I was censor the first time in 2001 and we had the gender wars.  My response was simple.  Latin is a gender driven language.  If you are a man your name must be masculine.   If you are a woman your name must be feminine.   To account for those gender disorders and such if your macronational government recognizes your gender classification then so shall nr. 

That was not good enough for the liberal wing in Nova Roma and that created years of conflict that have never been fully resolved, even to this day though the specific issue is resolved.

My point for bringing this up is that if you are expecting a carbon copy...nr and any organization is not going to measure up to that expectation.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94124 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Salve Varro

Well then there must have been 94 times people were insisting this was Rome, flying in the face of the obious that this is Nova Roma, and no doubt suggesting 9as was the way) that we could safely ignore macronational laws.

If it sounds that strange, research building a time machine.

Vale bene
Caesar

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94125 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Salve Figule

Re. ex-PM: At last report he is still in his corner sucking his thumb. He can come, go, dance a jig on his head as far as am I concerned.

You may feel it is a tautology, but it isn't. People need reminding of that. Nova Roma is governed by the contents of its constitution. If you don't like it, invest a number of years in NR, get to be consul, promulgate changes and see if the senate and people will pass it. Oh, and ensure that you factor in the requirements of our incorporated status. Simply thinking this should be more Roman is all very well, but in its current form it cannot be. When in the past people have gone too far down the "this is Rome" path, we have ended up nearly or actually breaking macronational laws in respect of our incorporated status.

Read my paper in the archives of this list if you want to know how we could make it more Roman. Its title is "Nova Roma Reborn".

Vale
Caesar

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94126 From: A. Vergilius Figulus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes

A. Vergilius Figulus Caesarí S.P.D.

I'm glad to hear that the ex-PM is only gone of his own accord, so that I don't mistakenly blame you or others for his absence.

I also hope that you are sincere in your assertion that you're making NR as Roman as practical and legal. I will happily do my part to help. I paid my taxes this year in good faith that you all want what's best for NR, and, in particular want it to fulfill its mission. (I noticed that I'm not listed as a taxpayer, though, so I'll contact Sulla at some point to see if we can figure out what happened there...)

Valé valéteque!

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94127 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Question about laws & taxes
Salve Figule

No, I only spent 10 years arguing that we shouldn't simply assert we are independent and stumble into legal quagmires, and imperil our non-profit status as a result. for the fun of it. It's been a real hoot arguing with the demented, the delusional, and the devious - I never had any other things that could have occupied my time.

As for relying on anything Scholastica said, well her old buddies in RPR didn't want her in 2011, so if even that pack of inveterate losers returned her to sender that should tell you something.

Read my paper, if you haven't, since that will explain where Nova Roma has to go - in my opinion. We however needed to make repairs to the existing structure to ensure that 2010 did not occur again, as well as correct a number of issues through legislation. Sulla and myself have pursued that goal, and will continue to pursue it.

Vale bene
Caesar

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94128 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus

Avete omnes,

I just received a phone from Stephen, brother of Tiberius galerius Paulinus.  He informed me that Paulinus passed away from a possible blood clot.  I am shocked and very saddened over the loss of my friend and very important members of our community.   He was a consular and very successful censors who always worked for the success of nova roma.  I will greatly miss his calming words and insight...As much as I will miss his discussions such as on topic of the red wedding on game of thrones.

I was planning on visiting him once I've fully recovered and now I won't have the pleasure and privilege of meeting him and I'm so disappointed with that I've missed my chance.

May g-d grant him and his family peace and I hope his passing was painless.

Most respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94129 From: iulius sabinus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
SALVETE!

Incredible sad news....

VALETE,
Sabinus


"Every individual is the architect of his own fortune" - Appius Claudius

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94130 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus

Salve Sulla et omnes,

Truly sad and chocking news, we have lost one of our best citizens.

Please convey my deepest condolences to his family.

Vale,
Crassus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94131 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Salvete Omnes:

My condolences to his family.....May the mother guide him gently through the veil..

Valete bene,
Aeternia


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94132 From: Gnaeus Iulius Caesar Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Caesar sal.

This is awful and shocking news. I have lost a good friend, as did we all those of us who knew him. Nova Roma has lost a true stalwart. Paulinus was a tower of enthusiasm and moderate policy making, intelligent, witty and strong-minded.He and I shared a number of conversations on the phone where we were both always laughing and his advice was always sound. My condolences to his family.

Optime valete

--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94133 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus

Omnibus in foro S. P. D.

 

He was a truly fine gentleman, an exemplar of Romanitas, and he shall be truly missed, and always remembered.  May his journey be swift and gentle, and may the gods continue to bless and protect him.

 

C. Maria Caeca

Virgo Vestalis Maxima

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94134 From: cmc Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus

Salvete!

 

I didn’t know Paulinus personally very well, but he has been a part of my Nova Roman life since I came here, and I have always had great respect for him, and will truly miss his presence, his wisdom, and his humor.

 

Valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94135 From: A. Tullia Scholastica Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio quiritibus bonae voluntatis s.d. 


 

Avete omnes,

I just received a phone from Stephen, brother of Tiberius galerius Paulinus.  He informed me that Paulinus passed away from a possible blood clot.  I am shocked and very saddened over the loss of my friend and very important members of our community.   He was a consular and very successful censors who always worked for the success of nova roma.  I will greatly miss his calming words and insight...As much as I will miss his discussions such as on topic of the red wedding on game of thrones.

I was planning on visiting him once I've fully recovered and now I won't have the pleasure and privilege of meeting him and I'm so disappointed with that I've missed my chance.

May g-d grant him and his family peace and I hope his passing was painless.

I am equally shocked and saddened by the sudden and premature passing of Paulinus.  I had met him several times at the Roman Days reenactment (which will not be held this year due to site acquisition issues), and will miss him.  On one such occasion, a group of us (including Vedius, the one from NR, not classical antiquity) dined together at some steak house or other, and Paulinus enjoyed one of his favorite meals there.  He was a teddy bear of a man, very nice, a gentleman and an example of Romanitas (looked good in his tunic and toga, too), and proof that conservative principles do not always have to be accompanied by a hefty dose of acid. 

Requiescas in pace, Pauline.   


Most respectfully,

Sulla


Valete. 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 94136 From: Jim Hooper Date: 2014-08-31
Subject: Re: Farewell my friend rip tiberius galerius paulinus
Salve,
I offer my sincerest sympathy to the family of Paulinus. We grieve with you.
Vale,
Gaius Pompeius Marcellus


On Sunday, August 31, 2014 7:27 PM, "' A. Tullia Scholastica' fororom@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio quiritibus bonae voluntatis s.d. 


 
Avete omnes,
I just received a phone from Stephen, brother of Tiberius galerius Paulinus.  He informed me that Paulinus passed away from a possible blood clot.  I am shocked and very saddened over the loss of my friend and very important members of our community.   He was a consular and very successful censors who always worked for the success of nova roma.  I will greatly miss his calming words and insight...As much as I will miss his discussions such as on topic of the red wedding on game of thrones.
I was planning on visiting him once I've fully recovered and now I won't have the pleasure and privilege of meeting him and I'm so disappointed with that I've missed my chance.
May g-d grant him and his family peace and I hope his passing was painless.
I am equally shocked and saddened by the sudden and premature passing of Paulinus.  I had met him several times at the Roman Days reenactment (which will not be held this year due to site acquisition issues), and will miss him.  On one such occasion, a group of us (including Vedius, the one from NR, not classical antiquity) dined together at some steak house or other, and Paulinus enjoyed one of his favorite meals there.  He was a teddy bear of a man, very nice, a gentleman and an example of Romanitas (looked good in his tunic and toga, too), and proof that conservative principles do not always have to be accompanied by a hefty dose of acid. 

Requiescas in pace, Pauline.   


Most respectfully,
Sulla

Valete.