Selected messages in Nova-Roma group. Sep 13-30, 2015

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95994 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani - Opening Ritual
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95995 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95996 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95997 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Ludi History Contest - 1st Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95998 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95999 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96000 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96001 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96002 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Ludi Romani - Chess Competition
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96003 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96004 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96005 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96006 From: Mark Andrew Holmes Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96007 From: Mark Andrew Holmes Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96008 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96009 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96010 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96011 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96012 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96013 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96014 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96015 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: EDICTUM II DE PUNCTIS CENSUALIBUS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96016 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: LUDI ROMANI - "LOVE THE ROMAN POEM" CONTEST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96017 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: LUDI ROMANI: CHARIOT RACE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96018 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Ludi Romani - Chess Competition
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96019 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM II - WEBPAGE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96020 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI OPENING
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96021 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96022 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96023 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96024 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96025 From: Ugo Coppola Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: EDICTUM CENSORIUM - New Scriba appointment
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96026 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96027 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96028 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96029 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96030 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96031 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96032 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Official Summons of the Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96033 From: cfurius Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96034 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96035 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96036 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96037 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96038 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96039 From: publius_porcius_licinus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: CALL TO ORDER - FORMAL MEETING OF THE SENATE IN SESSION 16-30 Sep 27
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96040 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: The CP is called into session - September 2768 a.U.c
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96041 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96042 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96043 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96044 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96045 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96046 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96047 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI: CHARIOT RACE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96048 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI - SHORT ESSAY CONTEST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96049 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI - "LOVE THE ROMAN POEM" CONTEST
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96050 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: NUNTII ARRII - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96051 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96052 From: Matthew Burns Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96053 From: Matthew Burns Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96054 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96055 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96056 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96057 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96058 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96059 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Consular Edict No1 - Appointing Consular Government Staff and Awardi
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96060 From: Quintus Lutatius Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: NUNTII ARRII - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96061 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: NUNTII ARRII - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96062 From: MajikPiG Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96063 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Ludi History Contest - 3rd Set of Questions - Interim Standings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96064 From: alectocles Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96065 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96066 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Spanish language Interpreter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96067 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2015-09-18
Subject: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96068 From: m.flavius_celsus Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Re: Qyestion about using of NR symbols.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96069 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Re: Qyestion about using of NR symbols.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96070 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Re: Qyestion about using of NR symbols.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96071 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: NUNTII ARRII 2 - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96072 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Ludi History Contest - Final Set of Questions - Interim Standings
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96073 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-20
Subject: Ludi Romani Chess Event Today
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96074 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2015-09-20
Subject: LUDI ROMANI - PROGRAMS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96075 From: ugo21121970 Date: 2015-09-20
Subject: LUDI NOVI ROMANI 2768 - CHARIOT RACE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96076 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: LUDI NOVI ROMANI 2768 - CHARIOT RACE
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96077 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: NUNTII ARRII III - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96078 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96079 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96080 From: Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96081 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Ludi Romani - Chess Competition - Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96082 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Cista is open --- Please VOTE --- Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96083 From: Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: praetorian candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96084 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Ludi Romani History Contest - Questions and Answers
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96085 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96086 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Ludi Romani - History Contest - Final Results
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96087 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: praetorian candidacy
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96088 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96089 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96090 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96091 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96092 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96093 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Cista is open --- Please VOTE --- Comitia Centuriata
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96094 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96095 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96096 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96097 From: george.lichty Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96098 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96099 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96100 From: m.flavius_celsus Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96101 From: M. Lollius Labeo Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96102 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96103 From: george.lichty Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96104 From: xai776@yahoo.com Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96105 From: M. Lollius Labeo Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96106 From: a_pompeia_crispa Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96107 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96108 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96109 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96110 From: Joel Axenroth Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Digest Number 7187
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96111 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Digest Number 7187
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96112 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96113 From: Majikpig@gmail Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96114 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96115 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96116 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96117 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Digest Number 7187
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96118 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96119 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96120 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96121 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: NUNTII ARRII IV - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96122 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96123 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96124 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96125 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96126 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96127 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96128 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96129 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96130 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96131 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96132 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96133 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96134 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96135 From: Majikpig@gmail Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96136 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96137 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96138 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96139 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96140 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96141 From: MajikPiG Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Forum
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96142 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96143 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Your Roman Cat
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96144 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Your Roman Cat



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95994 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Ludi Romani - Opening Ritual
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis C. Decio Laterensi aedili curuli S. P. D.

Thank you very much Colleague, for the opening sacrifice, and thanks to Cn. Cornelius Lentulus for composing the authentic source based prayers.

Happy Ludi Romani to All,

Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95995 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salve,
 
I mentioned the Vatican and the Knights of Malta because they are examples of unusual status, not necessarily because we can be *exactly* like them. Other examples of small states that have gained a sort of special status are Sealand, Seborga, and the Hutt River Province... but we can't do exactly what they have done either, lol!
 
What we're doing is pretty unique. We're bringing a dead Republic back to life. We are reestablishing a government and a religion, and working to rebuild a culture that we were not born into. That doesn't automatically make us a "real nation" but it sure as hell makes us more than a special interest group or organization, or a corporation.  I say we have an opportunity to make this into *anything* we want to, provided we're willing to believe new things are possible, and work toward our goals long term.
 
If we establish an administrative capital (much like corporations build headquarters) maintain that it is the  capital of Rome reborn and that we hold it to have a limited sort of special sovereignty... people will laugh at us and call us cranks. However, if ignore the laughter and just keep on going for a few decades, the laughter will cease. All we have to do is keep working to make things real.
 
Eventually, people will have to agree that it is effectively the capital of our community. Will that get us a place on the UN Security Council? Hell no. Could it lead to some special official consideration and status? Possible, and more likely as time goes on.
 
-Marcus Cassius julianus
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/13/2015 11:25:01 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95996 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salvete,
 
I quite agree with Gaia Maria Caeca here. I'm not "pretending" to be Roman... I have incorporated large amounts of Roman religion, culture and thought into my everyday life, and have followed it as a part of my daily existence for years now.
 
The SCA calls its brand of reenacting "Playing at who we really are."  In Nova Roma, I'm not playing at all. Roman-ness is a fact of my everyday world.
 
People join the SCA and other history organizations to enjoy a passtime and the community of others interested in history. I helped found this place, and am HERE, to do everything in my power to make Rome live again as much as possible. For real. It's not a hobby or an interest - it's a life's work that I've undertaken.
 
Not that there isn't fun and community here... but the object is to restore a living Religio Romana, and a real Roman state. It's a goal that is larger than myself and my personal life.
 
-Marcus Cassius Julianus
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/13/2015 11:55:41 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95997 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Ludi History Contest - 1st Set of Questions
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

Following is the first set of history contest questions. 

Please remember, the answers must be sent only to c.claudius.quadratus@...

There always seems to be someone who by mistake posts answers publicly.  Should that happen, the person who does it will be disqualified from being able to win a prize.  Do not let this happen to you!  Complete rules, procedures and information about prizes have previously been posted.

Deadline for submission:  4:00 p.m. EDT, September 21, 2015.  But note, if the answers are submitted before 4:00 p.m. on September 15th, one bonus point will be added to your score.

First Set of Questions   (Accent on coinage)  Total of 10 points

1.  The first gold aureus was minted shortly before the installation of a "Dictator."  What was the complete name of the future dictator and in what year was the aureus first minted?  (2 points)
     Hint:  It wasn't Gaius Iulius Caesar.

2.  A lituus appears on the reverse of the first aureus.  What is a lituus and who uses them?   (2 points)

3.  The silver coin known as a quadrigatus was first minted c.225 BCE.  Why is it called a quadrigatus?   (1 point)

4.  Approximately when was the first sestertius minted?  Of what metal was it made?    (2 points)

5.  Some silver denarii issued in 89 BCE bear the image of King Tatius.  Some of those also bear the image of Tarpeia.  Who were Tatius and Tarpeia?   (3 points)

Good luck!   Don't post your answers on a public list!  The second set of questions will be posed at 4:00 p.m., on September 15th.

C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95998 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salve,

@Caesar, I understand the text of the Nova Roma Declaration literally, because its provisions are unambiguous and clear, without any interpretation. Catching interpretation, you're doing it wrong, you are wishful thinking. Why? Because even the author of the Nova Roma Declaration said, what's the point has been included in the declaration. My understanding of the text of the declaration is consistent with the understanding of the text of the declaration by the author. So or I, @Julianus and other Sarmatians are wrong or incorrect is your interpretation. I am more inclined to the second variant.

For the rest, I will not comment on your answer, because it is the result of misinterpretation of the Declaration and misunderstanding of the aims and objectives of Nova Roma.

I fully subscribe to @Julian, I fully share his view. I would like to thank @Julian for this excellent declaration which now protects us of the fact that Nova Roma have not gone astray and have not gone through false.

Vale,
T. Fl. Severus
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 95999 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salve, Pater Patriae Marce Cassi Iuliane,

This was inspirational, thanks!

Vale, 
Quintus Arrius Nauta

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96000 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Severo sal.
 
The key difference is Cassius used the term “limited sovereignty”, coupled with the acknowledgement Nova Roma is never going to be a “real nation”. That is indeed clarification from the original text. If your “take away” from this is that you were right, fine, as they say in English “fill your boots” :) Trying to do otherwise would be akin to trying to persuade a blind man that it is day-time outside, where he insists on saying it is night-time and ignoring that he has been told otherwise and obvious differences and facts like the warmth of the sun on his face. If it is that important to you to portray yourself and “other Sarmatians” as correct, go right ahead :)
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 3:04 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Salve,

 
@Caesar, I understand the text of the Nova Roma Declaration literally, because its provisions are unambiguous and clear, without any interpretation. Catching interpretation, you're doing it wrong, you are wishful thinking. Why? Because even the author of the Nova Roma Declaration said, what's the point has been included in the declaration. My understanding of the text of the declaration is consistent with the understanding of the text of the declaration by the author. So or I, @Julianus and other Sarmatians are wrong or incorrect is your interpretation. I am more inclined to the second variant.
 
For the rest, I will not comment on your answer, because it is the result of misinterpretation of the Declaration and misunderstanding of the aims and objectives of Nova Roma.

I fully subscribe to @Julian, I fully share his view. I would like to thank @Julian for this excellent declaration which now protects us of the fact that Nova Roma have not gone astray and have not gone through false.

Vale,
T. Fl. Severus
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96001 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salvete,
 
To be fair, the Declaration does NOT say "limited sovereignty"... it just says sovereignty. I'm pretty sure I've used the term limited sovereignty elsewhere in some of the original documents, but honestly I can't remember where right at the moment.
 
Also, Nova Roma was founded as a micronation. While that term has been removed, I fully believe that a micronation (a miniature "created" nation)  can come to be a "real nation", if only a tiny one. Sealand is a Micronation, and it also has legal international status.  I personally consider it to be as "real" as any other nation... even though I recognize it's resources, and capabilities are infinitely smaller than any established state. 
 
If we build a symbolic administrative world capital (much like the Vatican is for Catholicism) and declare it to be the capital of the Roman Republic who can honestly say it wouldn't be, so long as it was honestly conducting Roman business?  The longer such a thing exists and continues to function the more real it will become.
 
If even 10% of the world were to agree it was a functioning Roman capital overseeing the business of Roman culture, religion and civilization throughout the world, I'd consider that total victory. It wouldn't matter to me one bit if the US, USSR, China, the Eurozone, etc. considered us to have no sovereignty at all... so long as they understand the fact that we're totally harmless.
 
The truth is, no one can say what is or is not ultimately achievable. If we last it out for several decades, we have no idea how far it could go. Hell, some country could invite us to do as we please on a few miles of unwanted land somewhere, and it could all become very real.
 
There are PLENTY of "real" nations out there who are too small to matter. No reason our heirs couldn't be counted among them, lol.
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/13/2015 5:34:42 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96002 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Ludi Romani - Chess Competition
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

The Romans were very fond of latrunculi, a board game between two players, that bears a very distant relationship to chess.  As part of this year's Ludi Romani, we offer a chess competition that will take place on Sunday, September 20, 2015.  There will be two components to the activity.  

1.  In person play at a location near downtown Montreal, in Canada Citerior, starting at 10:00 a.m. local time.  The competition should be concluded by Noon.  The winner of the competition will be awarded a genuine Roman coin in very fine condition.

The normal rules of chess will apply and any necessary equipment will be provided (along with coffee, etc.)  The games will be informal and the precise tournament format and time limits will depend upon the number of players.  Any citizen or friend of Nova Roma near Montreal may participate.  It will be necessary, however, to register in advance by responding to this notice.

2.  Simultaneous internet play as black against C. Claudius Quadratus, starting at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time.  Moves will be transmitted by email.  Games should not last more than two or three hours.  Either descriptive notation (example: 1. P-Q4) or algebraic notation (1. d4 or 1. d2-d4) may be used to transmit moves.  A Nova Roma sestertius will be award to all players.  To a player who wins: a genuine Roman coin in very fine condition.  To a player who draws: a genuine Roman coin in fine condition.  

Quadratus's first move in all games is  1. d4  (1. d2-d4, 1. P-Q4).

If there is interest, we could form a club within Nova Roma whereby citizens and friends of Nova Roma may enjoy each other's company over chessboards and send forth their legions to email battle.

Valete!

C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96003 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-13
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Cassio sal.
 
Yep. I meant that in your clarification you had said limited sovereignty, as opposed to the Declaration. It is sometimes a question of terminology and sometimes an issue of substance that causes issues over how to translate the Declaration into reality. In this case I wonder how much of the divergence is due to translation from English to Russian. That said in respect of your other points, I agree 100%. Yes, in theory we could get offered land, though typically land offered to immigrants and settlers isn’t always top notch. In our declining years we could swap tales of this and that happening years ago in Nova Roma, while we drain the swamps and cut through dense forest <lol
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 5:47 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Salvete,
 
To be fair, the Declaration does NOT say "limited sovereignty"... it just says sovereignty. I'm pretty sure I've used the term limited sovereignty elsewhere in some of the original documents, but honestly I can't remember where right at the moment.
 
Also, Nova Roma was founded as a micronation. While that term has been removed, I fully believe that a micronation (a miniature "created" nation)  can come to be a "real nation", if only a tiny one. Sealand is a Micronation, and it also has legal international status.  I personally consider it to be as "real" as any other nation... even though I recognize it's resources, and capabilities are infinitely smaller than any established state.
 
If we build a symbolic administrative world capital (much like the Vatican is for Catholicism) and declare it to be the capital of the Roman Republic who can honestly say it wouldn't be, so long as it was honestly conducting Roman business?  The longer such a thing exists and continues to function the more real it will become.
 
If even 10% of the world were to agree it was a functioning Roman capital overseeing the business of Roman culture, religion and civilization throughout the world, I'd consider that total victory. It wouldn't matter to me one bit if the US, USSR, China, the Eurozone, etc. considered us to have no sovereignty at all... so long as they understand the fact that we're totally harmless.
 
The truth is, no one can say what is or is not ultimately achievable. If we last it out for several decades, we have no idea how far it could go. Hell, some country could invite us to do as we please on a few miles of unwanted land somewhere, and it could all become very real.
 
There are PLENTY of "real" nations out there who are too small to matter. No reason our heirs couldn't be counted among them, lol.
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96004 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Salve Noctua salveteque omnes,
   This is a good idea, but we should decide exactly what approach to take.
   The simplest route would be something along the lines of Pandora's Kharis, where we simply vote on a worthy charity each month and encourage people to make a voluntary contribution. Another way would be to organize a particular day of the year on which we encourage citizens to volunteer.
   Yet another method which would require more of a centralized effort would be to create a medium- to long-term partnership with a single existing non-profit in which Nova Roma would provide continuing volunteer hours and money in exchange for being acknowledged as a sponsor. This would require significant dedicated donations and committed volunteers beforehand - I think it would be a mistake to take money from NR's overall budget for this purpose, as it isn't really the purpose for  which most people donated it. It might be easier to initiate such a partnership on a local level.
   The last possibility would be to create a charitable arm of our own, but I think this would probably be a waste of resources, since we would be duplicating the efforts of other groups while having less experience or focus than they have.
   Which of these options sounds best to you, Noctua, or did you have something else in mind? What do other people think of these possibilities?
      Vale et valete,
        Paterculus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96005 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salve,

@Caesar, you saw that Julianus wrote:

"It is amazing to see the Declaratio explored in this way, when the people who wrote it are still figuratively standing right here in the room".

Through misinterpretation Nova Roma Declaration, you are trying to invest in this declaration that sense, which is not there.

I do not see any real reason why you are denying Nova Roma the possibility to become a state, and to have sovereignty. You neveliruete concept of time. When you say that Nova Roma can not become a state and have sovereignty, you're forgetting one thing - time. With enough time, we can even fly to Mars. I am aware that Nova Roma does not create a fully sovereign state in my lifetime. But this does not change anything. We must now lay the foundations for this. Own capital - Roman settlement - the first step towards this. 

You can think whatever you want. But I have been involved in this debate for another reason. I would like to set the record straight. If you give up the construction of the state, creation of a Roman settlement, then say so. NRO changes the priorities of Nova Roma. With this I do not agree. A few years later, after the implementation of the Declaration, I do not want to be in an organization that fundamentally changed the direction of its movement. Then I would have lost a few years of my life, that I can spend to achieve my dream - the creation of the Roman state.

Vale,
T. Fl. Severus


 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96006 From: Mark Andrew Holmes Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Something like Pandora's Kharis sounds like the best option to me personally. Perhaps it could be combined with designated days of service to the community. I am a bit concerned about going to a lot of trouble to duplicate other organizations' efforts. Maybe we could also form a long-term partnership with an existing non-profit, particularly one with a Pagan focus, maybe a Pagan rights and education organization like Our Freedom Coalition, which is US-based.

http://www.ourfreedomcoalition.org

Mark A. Holmes


--------------------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96007 From: Mark Andrew Holmes Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
 
Ave




Something like Pandora's Kharis sounds like the
best option to me personally. Perhaps it could be combined
with designated days of service to the community. I am a bit
concerned about going to a lot of trouble to duplicate other
organizations' efforts. Maybe we could also form a
long-term partnership with an existing non-profit,
particularly one with a Pagan focus, maybe a Pagan rights
and education organization like Our Freedom Coalition, which
is US-based.



http://www.ourfreedomcoalition.org



Noctua

(sorry)


--------------------------------------------

On Mon, 9/14/15, Arthur Waite arthur.f.waite@...
[Nova-Roma] <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com


Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Taxes and Marketing - What are we
Marketing?

To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com

Date: Monday, September 14, 2015, 4:26 AM





 



















Salve Noctua salveteque

omnes,   This is a good idea, but we should

decide exactly what approach to take.   The

simplest route would be something along the lines of
Pandora's

Kharis, where we simply vote on a worthy charity each

month and encourage people to make a voluntary
contribution.

Another way would be to organize a particular day of the

year on which we encourage citizens to

volunteer.   Yet another method which would

require more of a centralized effort would be to create
a

medium- to long-term partnership with a single existing

non-profit in which Nova Roma would provide continuing

volunteer hours and money in exchange for being

acknowledged as a sponsor. This would require
significant

dedicated donations and committed volunteers beforehand -
I

think it would be a mistake to take money from NR's

overall budget for this purpose, as it isn't really
the

purpose for  which most people donated it. It might be

easier to initiate such a partnership on a local

level.   The last possibility would be to

create a charitable arm of our own, but I think this
would

probably be a waste of resources, since we would be

duplicating the efforts of other groups while having
less

experience or focus than they have.   Which of

these options sounds best to you, Noctua, or did you
have

something else in mind? What do other people think of
these

possibilities?      Vale et

valete,        Paterculus

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at

10:43 AM, mahtezcatpoc@...

[Nova-Roma] <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
wrote:































 



















There's a Greek Pagan organization, Hellenion
(

http://www.hellenion.org

), mostly US-based but with some members in other
countries,

where there has been talk recently about working with
other

Pagan organizations on charity work like donations to
such

organizations as the Malala

Fund (to increase women's and girls' literacy),

the National Coalition Against

Domestic Violence, disaster response, and local things

like homeless shelters, food drives, and winter coat

collections.



Or, we could

do it by ourselves, along with other organizations. And

maybe publicize it a bit. Not to be real loud about it.
But

that would let people know about things that we do that
are

positive.



Maybe that's

something else we could do.



Noctua







---In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com,

<vedius@...


Salve,

(And, please don't take this as

being personally directed at you, amice, despite it
coming

as a reply to your post. I'm more bouncing off your

topic to hopefully continue a larger discussion which I
feel

is related.)



I'd feel much better about a

marketing fund if there was something we were actually

marketing.

What do we

really have to offer right now? A website (which anyone
can

read for free) and a couple of websites. And the right
to

vote on who's in charge of those assets (or who just

fill a slot in the org chart) for a year. And
occasionally

someone will get together on their own initiative

somewhere.

Yay.

There's so much free content on

the web already, including a lot of free Roman-themed

content, that I submit that what we have to offer must
go

beyond the merely digital. We must have something real,

something substantive, something that people will find

valuable enough that they will be willing to plunk down

their hard-earned money and join. 

I suggest a full-frontal effort to

put together real-world gatherings. Let's give those

regional governors a reason for being beyond just
sending

welcome emails to new members (if we're lucky), and

sending them reminders to pay their taxes. Let's
pour

some of those taxes into the effort. It doesn't have
to

be much to really make a difference. 

This year I paid US$57. A

not-insubstantial sum. And what do I get for that money?
I

can run for office, and I can vote.

There are no other benefits of being

a taxpayer that I can think of off the top of my head. I
can

be a non-taxpaying Citizen and still fully participate
here.

(That should change, by the way, but that's a whole

other discussion.)

I

say that the thing we can market is not just our love of

Rome, nor just our interest in all things Roman, but our

real, visceral, *CONNECTION* to Rome. We *ARE* the
spiritual

descendant of the Roman Republic. *THAT* is what sets us

apart from all the others out there. 

We should have, first and foremost,

real-world rituals being performed by our priests on
behalf

of our cives, subsidized by the State. That's why
there

*IS* a State. Not to give a handful of people an
opportunity

to play power politics on a small scale. There are plenty
of

online games where one can do that. 

(As an aside, some have mentioned

that that's a turn-off for some scholars. You know
what

I say to that? Nova Roma isn't for them. Go join one
of

the dozens of other Roman reenactment, or Roman interest

groups that are out there. Nova Roma is for people who
value

the fact that there are priests making offerings for
their

well-being to the Gods, even if they are not themselves

practitioners of the Religio.)

We should also sponsor a robust

reenactment community. Costuming, crafts, arts and
letters,

gladiator contests, legionnaire demonstrations, etc. We

should have people reaching out to local schools to do

demos. If it's just some guy with a toga, he's
going

to look a lot less impressive than someone who's got

three or four people who can come over as part of the
Nova

Roman Cultural Education Program.

We should embrace Latin as a living

language. I'm one of the first and worst offenders
on

this, and I admit it, unhappily. We should actively

encourage people to learn Latin and use it in all our
fora,

virtual and material. Could we get a member discount for

some online or CD course in Latin? Have we even

tried?

And finally,

there are purely cultural and social events. Book
studies.

Poetry readings. Drama clubs. Cooking get-togethers.
Just

simple hanging out. Even these things cost money. The

provinces were originally supposed to keep half the taxes
to

finance exactly these sorts of events. I say we should
see

that become reality. 

Let's worry about marketing Nova

Roma once we have something real to market. Something
that

gives people real value for your money. I guarantee you,
if

there are events like those I describe above happening
all

over the world, on a monthly or weekly basis, people
will

flock to us. 

Vale,

Flavius Vedius

GermanicusPater Patriae



 































































#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924 --

#yiv0725731924ygrp-mkp {

border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px

0;padding:0 10px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mkp hr {

border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mkp #yiv0725731924hd {

color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px

0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mkp #yiv0725731924ads
{

margin-bottom:10px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mkp .yiv0725731924ad {

padding:0 0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mkp .yiv0725731924ad p
{

margin:0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mkp .yiv0725731924ad a
{

color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-sponsor

#yiv0725731924ygrp-lc {

font-family:Arial;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-sponsor

#yiv0725731924ygrp-lc #yiv0725731924hd {

margin:10px

0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-sponsor

#yiv0725731924ygrp-lc .yiv0725731924ad {

margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924actions {

font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924activity {

background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924activity span {

font-weight:700;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924activity span:first-child {

text-transform:uppercase;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924activity span a {

color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924activity span span {

color:#ff7900;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924activity span

.yiv0725731924underline {

text-decoration:underline;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924attach {

clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px

0;width:400px;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924attach div a {

text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924attach img {

border:none;padding-right:5px;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924attach label {

display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924attach label a {

text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 blockquote {

margin:0 0 0 4px;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924bold {

font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924bold a {

text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 dd.yiv0725731924last p a {

font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}



#yiv0725731924 dd.yiv0725731924last p span {

margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}



#yiv0725731924 dd.yiv0725731924last p

span.yiv0725731924yshortcuts {

margin-right:0;}



#yiv0725731924 div.yiv0725731924attach-table div div a {

text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 div.yiv0725731924attach-table {

width:400px;}



#yiv0725731924 div.yiv0725731924file-title a,
#yiv0725731924

div.yiv0725731924file-title a:active, #yiv0725731924

div.yiv0725731924file-title a:hover, #yiv0725731924

div.yiv0725731924file-title a:visited {

text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 div.yiv0725731924photo-title a,

#yiv0725731924 div.yiv0725731924photo-title a:active,

#yiv0725731924 div.yiv0725731924photo-title a:hover,

#yiv0725731924 div.yiv0725731924photo-title a:visited {

text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 div#yiv0725731924ygrp-mlmsg

#yiv0725731924ygrp-msg p a span.yiv0725731924yshortcuts
{

font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924green {

color:#628c2a;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924MsoNormal {

margin:0 0 0 0;}



#yiv0725731924 o {

font-size:0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924photos div {

float:left;width:72px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924photos div div {

border:1px solid

#666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924photos div label {

color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924reco-category {

font-size:77%;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924reco-desc {

font-size:77%;}



#yiv0725731924 .yiv0725731924replbq {

margin:4px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-actbar div a:first-child
{

margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mlmsg {

font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean,

sans-serif;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mlmsg table {

font-size:inherit;font:100%;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mlmsg select,

#yiv0725731924 input, #yiv0725731924 textarea {

font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mlmsg pre,
#yiv0725731924

code {

font:115% monospace;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mlmsg * {

line-height:1.22em;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-mlmsg #yiv0725731924logo
{

padding-bottom:10px;}





#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-msg p a {

font-family:Verdana;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-msg

p#yiv0725731924attach-count span {

color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-reco

#yiv0725731924reco-head {

color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-reco {

margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-sponsor
#yiv0725731924ov

li a {

font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-sponsor
#yiv0725731924ov

li {

font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-sponsor
#yiv0725731924ov

ul {

margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-text {

font-family:Georgia;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-text p {

margin:0 0 1em 0;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-text tt {

font-size:120%;}



#yiv0725731924 #yiv0725731924ygrp-vital ul li:last-child
{

border-right:none !important;

}

#yiv0725731924













#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850 --
#yiv0572051850ygrp-mkp {
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px
0;padding:0 10px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mkp hr {
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mkp #yiv0572051850hd {
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px
0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mkp #yiv0572051850ads {
margin-bottom:10px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mkp .yiv0572051850ad {
padding:0 0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mkp .yiv0572051850ad p {
margin:0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mkp .yiv0572051850ad a {
color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}
#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-sponsor
#yiv0572051850ygrp-lc {
font-family:Arial;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-sponsor
#yiv0572051850ygrp-lc #yiv0572051850hd {
margin:10px
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-sponsor
#yiv0572051850ygrp-lc .yiv0572051850ad {
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850actions {
font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850activity {
background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850activity span {
font-weight:700;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850activity span:first-child {
text-transform:uppercase;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850activity span a {
color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850activity span span {
color:#ff7900;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850activity span
.yiv0572051850underline {
text-decoration:underline;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850attach {
clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px
0;width:400px;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850attach div a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850attach img {
border:none;padding-right:5px;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850attach label {
display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850attach label a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 blockquote {
margin:0 0 0 4px;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850bold {
font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850bold a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 dd.yiv0572051850last p a {
font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}

#yiv0572051850 dd.yiv0572051850last p span {
margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}

#yiv0572051850 dd.yiv0572051850last p
span.yiv0572051850yshortcuts {
margin-right:0;}

#yiv0572051850 div.yiv0572051850attach-table div div a {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 div.yiv0572051850attach-table {
width:400px;}

#yiv0572051850 div.yiv0572051850file-title a, #yiv0572051850
div.yiv0572051850file-title a:active, #yiv0572051850
div.yiv0572051850file-title a:hover, #yiv0572051850
div.yiv0572051850file-title a:visited {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 div.yiv0572051850photo-title a,
#yiv0572051850 div.yiv0572051850photo-title a:active,
#yiv0572051850 div.yiv0572051850photo-title a:hover,
#yiv0572051850 div.yiv0572051850photo-title a:visited {
text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 div#yiv0572051850ygrp-mlmsg
#yiv0572051850ygrp-msg p a span.yiv0572051850yshortcuts {
font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850green {
color:#628c2a;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850MsoNormal {
margin:0 0 0 0;}

#yiv0572051850 o {
font-size:0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850photos div {
float:left;width:72px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850photos div div {
border:1px solid
#666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850photos div label {
color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850reco-category {
font-size:77%;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850reco-desc {
font-size:77%;}

#yiv0572051850 .yiv0572051850replbq {
margin:4px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {
margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mlmsg {
font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean,
sans-serif;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mlmsg table {
font-size:inherit;font:100%;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mlmsg select,
#yiv0572051850 input, #yiv0572051850 textarea {
font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv0572051850
code {
font:115% monospace;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mlmsg * {
line-height:1.22em;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-mlmsg #yiv0572051850logo {
padding-bottom:10px;}


#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-msg p a {
font-family:Verdana;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-msg
p#yiv0572051850attach-count span {
color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-reco
#yiv0572051850reco-head {
color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-reco {
margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-sponsor #yiv0572051850ov
li a {
font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-sponsor #yiv0572051850ov
li {
font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-sponsor #yiv0572051850ov
ul {
margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-text {
font-family:Georgia;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-text p {
margin:0 0 1em 0;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-text tt {
font-size:120%;}

#yiv0572051850 #yiv0572051850ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {
border-right:none !important;
}
#yiv0572051850
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96008 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Severo sal.
 
I certainly don’t read the same meaning as you do into Cassius’ comment.
 
In NRO what we discuss is the concept of sovereignty, not the concept of the nation state. The existence of the nation state can occur at a different time than the existence of a sovereign state. Sovereignty, or as Wikipedia (which is a useful place of common reference for summaries of some subjects, although not always academic) terms it the “full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies” is something that is certainly beyond our reach. Sovereignty is acquired through:
 
Cession is the transfer of territory from one state to another usually by means of treaty;
Occupation is the acquisition of territory that belongs to no state, or terra nullius;
Prescription is the effective control of territory of another acquiescing state;
Operations of nature is the acquisition of territory through natural processes like river accretion or volcanism;
Creation is the process by which new land is reclaimed from the sea such as in the Netherlands.
Adjudication and
Conquest
 
 
Cession – existing sovereign states don’t just transfer land to organizations such as Nova Roma. Typically it is transferred between existing states.
 
Occupation – if you see the amount of terra nullius left on the planet it is typically small overlooked patches, in environmentally hostile or challenging areas. Also existing states frequently dispute the nature of terra nullis in the very infrequent times when/where it does occur.
 
Prescription – we are hardly going to squat on land belonging to another state, haul up our flag and declare sovereignty exists. That rarely ends well.
 
Operations of nature – new and geologically unstable land – not suitable for colonization and usually claimed by existing nation states. Currently it is my understanding your own country lays claim to portions of the North West Passage because of the continetal shelf that extends from Russia. The point is land pops up like this and more often than not an existing state will be laying claim to it.
 
Creation – well you have to have land adjoining the reclaimed land usually. We don’t have that.
 
Adjudication – I highly suspect that simply declaring we are the successor to the Republic and Empire of Ancient Rome will not provide us strong enough grounds for a legal case to have an adjudication over former Roman territory. We would have to have a realistic claim to existing land owned by another state (see above for why we won’t have that).
 
Conquest – well that is not going to happen for obvious reasons, not least because we have disavowed such methods.
 
Over time we may through activism, and then being accepted by the various cultural committees of the UN as a result of that activism as having a voice of advocacy for classical heritage sites, move towards being granted Special Consultative Status. Then after still more time we in theory might end up with Permanent Observer Status under the “other entities” class. Ultimately we may become to be seen by some nations / organizations as a “landless nation” as Caeca termed it, or a “sovereign subject of international law”. Further than that it is pointless to project or speculate.
 
The point of being absolutely clear over the whole issue of sovereignty is to ensure that all of us do not waste our lives pursuing the concept of a sovereign state, when it is clear that this will not happen. Cassius as the author of the Declaration has clarified that his concept of sovereignty was that it was one of LIMITED sovereignty, as he describes in his recent post. That is a very important clarification, and one that allows us to construct goals that can create that condition. Sulla and I believe that NRO and its 5 goals assist in the push towards limited sovereignty, which is partly about recognition, acceptance and involvement by national states and international bodies like UNESCO.
 
Organizations rarely remain so rooted and fixed that nothing changes ever. Rome as a nation was a practical one, that adapted its goals, its policies and its constitution to meet the challenges of the times. In the same way Nova Roma should be prepared to do that, where it is necessary. The vision of limited sovereignty, the concept of the “landless nation” and the goals in NRO don’t violate the Declaration, they enhance it, and take it from a general vision to one where specific and achievable goals can be crafted, which we can all work to. So I am NOT denying us anything, just simply stating that there are some things we can do, and others we cannot and/or should not do. Hauling our flag up on someone else’s land, sequestering it, and declaring the existence of a capital and Roman state is likely to get those trying it arrested and/or confined to an asylum. The sort of “capital” that Cassius describes is one that doesn’t violate existing host nation laws, and at best gets us regarded as charming cranks. It is highly unlikely to see anyone arrested or put into a padded cell (if that turns out to be a wrong assumption Cassius I am going to be having words with you in our adjoining rubber rooms <lol
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 7:52 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Salve,

 
@Caesar, you saw that Julianus wrote:
 
"It is amazing to see the Declaratio explored in this way, when the people who wrote it are still figuratively standing right here in the room".

Through misinterpretation Nova Roma Declaration, you are trying to invest in this declaration that sense, which is not there.

I do not see any real reason why you are denying Nova Roma the possibility to become a state, and to have sovereignty. You neveliruete concept of time. When you say that Nova Roma can not become a state and have sovereignty, you're forgetting one thing - time. With enough time, we can even fly to Mars. I am aware that Nova Roma does not create a fully sovereign state in my lifetime. But this does not change anything. We must now lay the foundations for this. Own capital - Roman settlement - the first step towards this.

You can think whatever you want. But I have been involved in this debate for another reason. I would like to set the record straight. If you give up the construction of the state, creation of a Roman settlement, then say so. NRO changes the priorities of Nova Roma. With this I do not agree. A few years later, after the implementation of the Declaration, I do not want to be in an organization that fundamentally changed the direction of its movement. Then I would have lost a few years of my life, that I can spend to achieve my dream - the creation of the Roman state.

Vale,
T. Fl. Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96009 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salve,

@Caesar, well, just imagine that the NRO does not change the priorities of Nova Roma and the direction of development. When are you going to implement this provision of the Nova Roma Declaration?

Therefore we limit our active territorial claim to an amount of land at least equal to that held by the sovereign state of Vatican City; 108 contiguous acres. On this land a world capital for the administration of our culture will be founded in the form of a Forum Romanum. The exact site for this New Roman governmental and spiritual capital is to be determined.

You are in a hurry to take on new obligations, but have not yet fulfilled previous obligations. Nova Roma, in general, should be engaged in the implementation of the provisions of the Nova Roma Declaration. And you, if you wish, you can implement the provisions of the NRO within the sodalitas, or individual organization. 

Following NRO, Nova Roma will remain virtual community. One gets the impression that you generally avoid any activity in the real world. Neither the Nova Roma Declaration nor the Constitution does not mention that Nova Roma should protect historical monuments, partnership with UNESCO and so on. But in the Declaration referred to the creation of a Roman settlement - the capital. And this is the real work in the real world. So we should start with this.

Over the past six years, Nova Roma does not substantially progress in implementing the provisions of its own Declaration. Taking this into account, do you seriously believe that will succeed in protecting cultural heritage, ie you do something better in this field than the states and influential international organizations? Really?

Let Nova Roma finally will implement the own Declaration. You can gather like-minded people and implement the provisions of the NRO in the framework of a sodalitas or a private organization.

Vale,
T. Fl. Severus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96010 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Edictum de officio aedilicio Q. Arrii Nautae aedilis curulis

I. I appoint T. Domitius Draco as Praefectus Officio Aedilicio as my Head of Staff. He serves as my staff administrative leader (this is an apparitor position with different title).

II. I appoint Sex. Lucilius Tutor as Accensus Aedilicius as my chief policy advisor.

III. I appoint Cn. Cornelius Lentulus as Scriba Princeps. He serves as my ludi organization leader and primary cultural, academic and research director.

IV. I appoint P. Annaeus Constantinus Placidus, C. Claudius Quadratus, A. Liburnius Hadrianus as Scribae to work on ludi programs.

V. I appoint C. Octavius Tranquillus, Q. Lutatius Catulus and A. Scribonius Nasica as Praecones (apparitor position) to work on communication, consultation and administrative duties. 

VI. Effective immediately, and no oath is required.

Given on the Ides of Sept. in the Consulship of M. Pompeius Caninus and Sex. Lucilius Tutor.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96011 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Ave,

Which ones get Census Points..or do none of them do?

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96012 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Sorry I just checked the new rules.

I issue a correcting edict.

Thank you for calling my attention :)

Vale,
Quintus Arrius

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96013 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Severo sal.
 
Well “I” am not implementing anything. Nova Roma’s decision making bodies implement policy and the comitia vote in legislation if required to pursue that policy. So it is more a question of if and when Nova Roma collectively is going to do that do that. That said, as to the order in which things should be done, I think I made my preferences clear in NRO. At this stage we have neither the financial muscle to purchase nor maintain land and headquarters in a central location. In fact the issue of location is likely to be as contentious as any other we have faced. Purchasing it in a non-central location where it accessible to only a few citizens rather defeats the objective.
 
I think it is generally accepted that in order to make a purchase of this significance we are going to need a lot more funds than we have now, and citizens, and citizens who donate and pay tax and a tax likely far far higher than it is currently set at, as well as items/products that Nova Roma itself can retail to raise funds. Even before we make that purchase we would have to decide whether the terms and conditions of the purchase are what people expect. We can, if we have the money, purchase land and build a Forum Romanum, but it wouldn’t be sovereign territory for the reasons I spelt out earlier. we can call it what we like, but the realities are it would not be sovereign territory.
 
On the other hand we can at the same time as we work towards such a purchase engage in the activism and advocacy we describe.  Currently Nova Roma can do little in these respects, but if it pursues activism and advocacy as a policy, then over time there is absolutely no reason why it cannot grow into an effective group. So do I seriously believe this? Yes. Do I think we could do a better job? Yes, given time and a requisite increase in citizens, why not? In the west there are plenty of advocacy and activist groups that have grown from nothing into very large and respected organizations. They almost all, if not all, started life as much smaller groups.
 
On your point about implementing the Declaration first, or as described by Cassius as implementing LIMITED sovereignty, then I see the way to do that is through activism and advocacy, going hand in hand with an increase in citizen numbers and a significant increase in our finances that can lead in turn to the purchase of property that can be deemed a headquarters, as he described. As they say in English, I think you are putting the “cart before the horse” Severe by focusing first hand on land purchase, when it is clear we don’t have the infrastructure to support that. Activism and advocacy can lead to an increase in publicity for Nova Roma, which in turn can lead to an increase in citizen numbers, leading then hopefully to an increase in our funds. At a certain point we will have the numbers of citizens and funds to make the purchase and maintain the land and any buildings on them. One of the significant paths that could get us to that point is activism/advocacy. Equally activity and advocacy rather requires activity in support of those things in “the real world”.
 
As to performing such work within the context of a Sodalitas, we aren’t suggesting policy for a small group of people, but for the whole of Nova Roma. Therefore it isn’t appropriate to limit this to a Sodalitas. Equally just because you don’t see it as having any role to play in the realization of the Declaration, others may well do. That is the point of discussing things, talking about them, despite the fact that apparently that isn’t seen as a valuable activity by some people.
 
Optime vale.
 
 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Salve,

 
@Caesar, well, just imagine that the NRO does not change the priorities of Nova Roma and the direction of development. When are you going to implement this provision of the Nova Roma Declaration?
 
Therefore we limit our active territorial claim to an amount of land at least equal to that held by the sovereign state of Vatican City; 108 contiguous acres. On this land a world capital for the administration of our culture will be founded in the form of a Forum Romanum. The exact site for this New Roman governmental and spiritual capital is to be determined.
 
You are in a hurry to take on new obligations, but have not yet fulfilled previous obligations. Nova Roma, in general, should be engaged in the implementation of the provisions of the Nova Roma Declaration. And you, if you wish, you can implement the provisions of the NRO within the sodalitas, or individual organization.
 
Following NRO, Nova Roma will remain virtual community. One gets the impression that you generally avoid any activity in the real world. Neither the Nova Roma Declaration nor the Constitution does not mention that Nova Roma should protect historical monuments, partnership with UNESCO and so on. But in the Declaration referred to the creation of a Roman settlement - the capital. And this is the real work in the real world. So we should start with this.
 
Over the past six years, Nova Roma does not substantially progress in implementing the provisions of its own Declaration. Taking this into account, do you seriously believe that will succeed in protecting cultural heritage, ie you do something better in this field than the states and influential international organizations? Really?
 
Let Nova Roma finally will implement the own Declaration. You can gather like-minded people and implement the provisions of the NRO in the framework of a sodalitas or a private organization.
 
Vale,
T. Fl. Severus
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96014 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Re: EDICTUM DE OFFICIO AEDILICIO Q. ARRII NAUTAE
Ave,
Your original edict is correct.  You are allowed to appoint however many apparitor you wish.  There is just a cap as to how many apparitories you can "pay" Considering you term is less than 3 months from the date of this edicta.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96015 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: EDICTUM II DE PUNCTIS CENSUALIBUS
Edictum II de punctis censualibus

I. All apparitores in my Edictum I de officio aedilicio get the census points defined in the law force.

II. The names of these people are: T. Domitius Draco, Sex. Lucilius Tutor, Cn. Cornelius Lentulus, P. Annaeus Constantinus Placidus, C. Claudius Quadratus, A. Liburnius Hadrianus, C. Octavius Tranquillus, Q. Lutatius Catulus and A. Scribonius Nasica.

Given on the Ides of Sept. in the Consulship of M. Pompeius Caninus and Sex. Lucilius Tutor.


Quintus Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96016 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: LUDI ROMANI - "LOVE THE ROMAN POEM" CONTEST
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

This is the second team building and friends-maker style contest, and the last one, for this Ludi Romani. It is about loving Roman poetry and spreading this love among Citizens to get friends to share your Roman poem with! We must build Nova Roma from bricks of people, and from bricks of Roman culture, including the Roman arts and literature. By connecting to each other we can find new friends, and grow the sense of community in Nova Roma, so we will accomplish the mission of Nova Roma together easier.

Courtesy of my Colleague Aedilis Curulis C. Decius Laterensis, he donates the winner a Nova Roman Sestertius. Participate in the contest and take home a real NR Sestertius.

THE RULES

1. Choose your favorite Roman poem (or one of your favorites). It must be originally Roman, written by an ancient Roman citizen, but English (or other) translation will be accepted as well.

2. Send this poem to your fellow NR citizens in private. Explain to them in your email that this is part of the Ludi Romani, talk to them why you like this poem, and if they like the poem you sent, they must forward (both the poem and your explanation why you like it) to me at my Album Civium page, here:

Only mails sent through my Album Civium page will be counted.

3. Participants get points for how many contacted citizens forward their chosen Roman poem. Each forward will be awarded by one point given to the contest participant who chose and spread that poem. Forwards from assidui citizens will be awarded by two points given to the contestant who chose the poem.

4. At the end of the Ludi Romani, I will reveil, based on counting the forwards, "NOVA ROMA'S FAVORITE ROMAN POEM" for this Ludi Romani, and the participant who chose taht poem will be awarded by the real brass NR Sestertius donated by Aedilis collega Laterensis.

If you don't yet have so many personal friends in NR, don't worry. Go to the Nova Roma website and you will find many assidui in the Magistrates page, Governors page, Senate members page, Scribes page, and other pages too. If you don't know anybody's email address, you can go into your Album Civium account, log in, and you can write to the people you choose, using the "send mail" function in the Album Civium page. This is the link to the Album Civium:


If you have any questions regarding this contest, contact me at:


Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
AEDILIS CURULIS
Nova Roma
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96017 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: LUDI ROMANI: CHARIOT RACE
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

Continuing Nova Roman tradition, we celebrate the Ludi Romani also with ludi circenses, aka Chariot Races!  
If you wish to join the Chariot Race, send your entries to the email below  (a maximum of two chariots per person) according to the following table. If 16 chariots is reached no further entries shall be accepted. Our reporter will be Placidus, very experienced chariot race master!

1. Your name in Nova Roma
2. The name of your chariot 
3. The name of your driver
4. The tactic you intend to use for the Quarterfinals and Semifinals races
5. The tactic you intend to use for the Final race.
6. The name of your FACTIO or team: Russata, Albata, Veneta, Praesina

Send your entries to ugo.coppola@... or to ugo DOT coppola AT tin DOT it.  DO NOT use any other addresses and DO NOT post your entries on the main list if you do not wish to be disqualified.

Send you entries until 17 September, midnight, Rome time.

Please feel free to add all the details you think suitable to items 2 and 3 - the more details I have, the better will the race accounts turn out to be. As for racing tactics (items 4 and 5), choose one from the Competition Rules page (http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Regulae_ludorum; scroll down to Circenses rules) and insert only the corresponding letter (A, B,C, D, E, F) in items 4 and 5. Dirty actions are NOT allowed. 


Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96018 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-14
Subject: Ludi Romani - Chess Competition
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

The Romans were very fond of latrunculi, a board game between two players, that bears a very distant relationship to chess.  As part of this year's Ludi Romani, we offer a chess competition that will take place on Sunday, September 20, 2015.  There will be two components to the activity.  

1.  In person play at a location near downtown Montreal, in Canada Citerior, starting at 10:00 a.m. local time.  The competition should be concluded by Noon.  The winner of the competition will be awarded a genuine Roman coin in very fine condition.

The normal rules of chess will apply and any necessary equipment will be provided (along with coffee, etc.)  The games will be informal and the precise tournament format and time limits will depend upon the number of players.  Any citizen or friend of Nova Roma near Montreal may participate.  It will be necessary, however, to register in advance by responding to this notice.

2.  Simultaneous internet play as black against C. Claudius Quadratus, starting at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time.  Moves will be transmitted by email.  Games should not last more than two or three hours.  Either descriptive notation (example: 1. P-Q4) or algebraic notation (1. d4 or 1. d2-d4) may be used to transmit moves.  A Nova Roma sestertius will be award to all players.  To a player who wins: a genuine Roman coin in very fine condition.  To a player who draws: a genuine Roman coin in fine condition.  

Quadratus's first move in all games is  1. d4  (1. d2-d4, 1. P-Q4).

If there is interest, we could form a club within Nova Roma whereby citizens and friends of Nova Roma may enjoy each other's company over chessboards and send forth their legions to email battle.

Valete!

C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96019 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: CERTAMEN PETRONIANUM II - WEBPAGE
Salve,
This is wonderful initiative, my respect to aedile Paterculus and to his assistants.
If you need something you have my support as consul to help the Certamen Petronianum project.
Vale,
-- 

Sextus Lucilius Tutor
Consul


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96020 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI OPENING
As Consul I wish all citizens a happy Ludi Romani!

Enjoy the games! You can learn if participate in various contests.

Vale,
-- 

Sextus Lucilius Tutor
Consul


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96021 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salve Omnibus
We must balance between what is possible in short term and what is possible in long term but not forget about the real long term goal. For present time we must produce activity. If NR doesn't produce activity or projects, we don't have legitimacy to exisit and we don't get any respect.We must do something as to be abe to show this is what we create, this what NR service to outer community.
  I want to address land question too. If we buy land for building our representative center with authentic Roman buildings it must be in Italy in Rome or near Rome. Tourists who visit ancient Rome ruins they can visit Nova Roma center and we can raise funds from this. Location would give credibility and authenticity too.

Vale,
-- 

Sextus Lucilius Tutor
Consul


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96022 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Greetings,
 
I've been working crazy hours and have lost the thread of conversation a bit. Could someone kindly remind me what NRO stands for? 
 
-Cassius
 
In a message dated 9/14/2015 12:23:12 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96023 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Cassio sal.
 
It is short for Nova Roma Onward – the title of a paper Sulla and I recently published.
 
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Greetings,
 
I've been working crazy hours and have lost the thread of conversation a bit. Could someone kindly remind me what NRO stands for? 
 
-Cassius
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96024 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward

Ave

Cassius have you gotten my emails?  I've been trying to get in touch with you for the past 2 weeks if not longer.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96025 From: Ugo Coppola Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: EDICTUM CENSORIUM - New Scriba appointment
EDICTUM CENSORIUM P. ANNÆI CONSTANTINI PLACIDI de Scriba creanda

I. I hereby appoint A. Tullia Scholastica as Scriba Censoria to work in the Onomastic Advisory Board.

II. She receives the census points described by relevant legislation.

III. This Edictum is effective immediately. No oath is required.

Given on 15 September, in the Consulship of M. Pompeius Caninus and Sex. Lucilius Tutor, 2768 AUC.
Datum a.d. XVII Kal. Oct. M. Pompeio Canino et Sex. Lucilio Tutore coss. MMDCCLXVIII AUC.





Avast logo

Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
www.avast.com


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96026 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

Following is the second set of history contest questions

Please remember, the answers must be sent only to c.claudius.quadratus@...

Deadline for submission: 4:00 p.m. EDT, September 21, 2015.  But note, if the answers are submitted before 4:00 p.m. on September 17th, one bonus point will be added to your score.

Second Set of Questions  (Accent on military matters)

1.  From the perspective of length of time, which two foreign leaders were Rome's most persistent enemies?    (2 points)

2.  Towards the end of the life of Augustus a military reversal profoundly upset him.  What happened?  Where and when?    (2 points)

3.  Describe the military device known as a "corvus."  When and where was it first used in battle?    (2 points)

4.  Where is Eryx and what happened there in 244 BCE involving the Roman military?    (2 points)

5.  What is meant by the expression "to be put under the yoke" and how does that expression relate to an event that took place in 321 BCE?    (2 points)

Good luck!  The third set of questions will be posed at 4:00 p.m. on September 17th.

C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96027 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2015-09-15
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Valete, omnes

I agree with my former colleague Tutor: Nova Roma needs to be anchored to a ROMAN base camp from where it can branch out to the rest of the world.

On the other hand owning land is not as important as gaining  trust and respect in the real world.

I am also concerned about the current course of Nova Roma. Having a board of directors capable of strangling it  at their whim does not prevent "those people" from taking over or from even becoming "those people", which Caesar and Sulla seem to believe to be a major selling point of their proposed change.

The basic question was posed long time ago: "Quis custodiet  custodes?" 

Valete omnes
ALH, Praetor.  





On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 12:56 AM, "Sextus Lucilius Tutor lutorianis@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
Salve Omnibus
We must balance between what is possible in short term and what is possible in long term but not forget about the real long term goal. For present time we must produce activity. If NR doesn't produce activity or projects, we don't have legitimacy to exisit and we don't get any respect.We must do something as to be abe to show this is what we create, this what NR service to outer community.
  I want to address land question too. If we buy land for building our representative center with authentic Roman buildings it must be in Italy in Rome or near Rome. Tourists who visit ancient Rome ruins they can visit Nova Roma center and we can raise funds from this. Location would give credibility and authenticity too.

Vale,
-- 

Sextus Lucilius Tutor
Consul


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:00 PM, gn_iulius_caesar@... [Nova-Roma] <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96028 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Hadriano sal.
 
“Quis custodiet  custodes?”: The proposal was for a Board of Directors for Nova Roma Inc. that includes representatives directly elected by the people; a cross section of all the constituent parts of Nova Roma.
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Valete, omnes

I agree with my former colleague Tutor: Nova Roma needs to be anchored to a ROMAN base camp from where it can branch out to the rest of the world.

On the other hand owning land is not as important as gaining  trust and respect in the real world.

I am also concerned about the current course of Nova Roma. Having a board of directors capable of strangling it  at their whim does not prevent "those people" from taking over or from even becoming "those people", which Caesar and Sulla seem to believe to be a major selling point of their proposed change.

The basic question was posed long time ago: "Quis custodiet  custodes?"

Valete omnes
ALH, Praetor. 
 


.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96029 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salvete,

I read the message of @Hadrian, and caught myself thinking about the point that @Caesar created a theme called "Long term goals", wrote about  this thirty-two pages declaration entitled "NRO", but not even raised the issue of acquisition of land and building settlement. Apparently, according to @Caesar, the Roman settlement does not have place in long term goals of Nova Roma.
However, as can be seen, issues and prospects for the creation of the Roman settlement concern not only Sarmatians.

Valete,
T. Fl. Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96030 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Severo sal.
 
That would be incorrect to state that a Roman settlement has no place.
 
Firstly the Declaration states “On this land a world capital for the administration of our culture will be founded in the form of a Forum Romanum.” It doesn’t actually mention a “settlement”, if you mean a residential area to be included.
 
That aside, secondly as I have stressed it is a question of finances, to purchase and maintain such land. Already one poster has expressed a hope that it would be land in Rome, which of course is not inexpensive. Far from it and currently well beyond our means. Most land and construction in any part of the world with basic services available would be beyond our means currently. We would have to fund not only the purchase of the land, but also the construction and then the general maintenance and upkeep of the buildings. My suggestion was that by pursuing a policy that aims to meet more than one part of the Declaration, through activism and advocacy, we would hope to see the numbers of our citizens increase to the point that those funds required were available. Thus it is a question of ensuring we have the capacity first to carry out the land purchase. The fact that I didn’t mention land in NRO was because it is not a re-iteration of the component parts of the Declaration, but an exploration of one way to meet some (not all but some) of the objectives in that document.
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:47 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Salvete,

 
I read the message of @Hadrian, and caught myself thinking about the point that @Caesar created a theme called "Long term goals", wrote about  this thirty-two pages declaration entitled "NRO", but not even raised the issue of acquisition of land and building settlement. Apparently, according to @Caesar, the Roman settlement does not have place in long term goals of Nova Roma.
However, as can be seen, issues and prospects for the creation of the Roman settlement concern not only Sarmatians.
 
Valete,
T. Fl. Severus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96031 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
Paterculus Nautae s.d.
  That sounds like the most reasonable approach to me as well. It requires the least immediate effort, and it encourages us to research a variety of charitable organizations and interact with them as volunteers. That's good for its own sake, but would also facilitate a long-term partnership in the future if we eventually wanted to take that route.
   Logistically, how would we organize such a project? Caesar makes the point in NRReborn that dedicated lists tend to get lost over time, and I would prefer not to use Facebook as Pandora's Kharis does. Could we perhaps have a dedicated thread each month on Laterensis' Trial Forum (http://nrtrialforum.royalwebhosting.net/index.php)?
   Vale.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96032 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Official Summons of the Comitia Centuriata
M. Pompeius Caninus consul Quiritibus SPD.

I summon the Comitia Centuriata to gather in the official fora in order to elect a Praetor to fill the currently open seat. Contio begins at 9:00 PM Rome Time today, Wednesday, 16 September 2015.

The candidates for Praetor are:

    Aula Tullia Scholastica
    Gaia Maria Caeca

The schedule for the Comitia Centuriata is:
 
    Start of Contio     9:00 PM Rome Time on 16 Septebmer 2015
    End of Contio      9:00 PM Rome Time on 21 September 2015
    Start of Voting     9:00 PM Rome Time on 21 September 2015
    End of Voting      9:00 PM Rome Time on 28 September 2015

Facite valeatis!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
Consul Novae Romae
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96033 From: cfurius Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salvete;

Discussions like these are immeasurably important for the future of Roma and the Res Publica, the foundation and origin of the modern world.

But I feel it is worth pointing out to all that there is a reason that there is such a thing as Nova Roma at all. We forget quite easily that it may be possible, for those of us who have chosen this path over others, that this is about the future of the Republic--The original Republic--and while it may be daunting to claim such a burden your own, such a thing as old as the ancient republic requires favour of the Gods themselves to survive into the modern day, 2,000 years later. Those that aid such a thing are surely rewarded by the Gods for their contribution in restoring their greatest triumph. To influence so much of the modern world despite the abrahamic illness that has befallen her is testament to Their will that Rome survive.

We must all remember that we must further the glory of Rome and her restoration.

For Rome;
C. Furius Scaevola
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96034 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward

Ave,

Because that is something I've said I have been working on.  Of course these conversations happened here on the main list...a couple of times. 

Caesar knows exactly what I'm working on.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96035 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward

Ave,

Instead of trying to highlight an area that is not discussed.  All you did, Severus, is highlight the continued issue of your disappearance.  Since these issues have been discussed multiple times.  I hate to say it but our newer citizens have more knowledge of nr's current events then you, a candidate for governor.  That is quite striking.

Perhaps if you spent time catching up on the archive you wouldn't have made this faux pas.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96036 From: pro_praetore Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Salve,

I do not agree with you. First, the theme of my "disappearance" here is discussed in detail. Although for me, as for others Sarmatians remains a mystery, that you were not able to contact with the WHOLE province. I did not get in touch, so I lost the governorship. That's all. I thought that the subject is exhausted. Second, in this topic, as I understand it, we are discussing the NRO. Third, be so kind as to not invest in my actions outside meaning, stick to the topic of discussion.

Vale,
T. Fl. Severus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96037 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Severo sal.
 
How about asking instead the question about why no Sarmatian ever bothered to contact the Senate during the period when you were not available to them? The answer I think is that Nova Roma, as outlined by a number of your posters from Sarmatia, means nothing to them. They didn’t need Nova Roma then, nor now. The message from them is clear. There appears to be only one Sarmatian invested in NR to any degree and that is you.
 
As for NRO, I think you are being deliberately obtuse by glossing over the obvious impediments to land purchase, and deliberately not seeing that an idea is good that if executed aims to increase our citizens numbers through increased publicity and exposure for NR, increase our standing through activism and advocacy and finally increase our funds, thus positioning us to make the very land purchase envisaged in the Declaration. NRO is not a replacement for the Declaration, but a policy suggestion that aims to create conditions that will assist us in realizing the objectives of land purchase contained within the Declaration.
 
Currently in an organization where some insist on flying in the face of financial reason and demanding expenditure from the “state” to provide validity for making a tax payment (you give me X first then I might give you Y), the chances of raising the money necessary is virtually nil. We have to expand, not just for this reason, but to survive and grow. NRO seeks to do that, grow our image, reputation, stature, citizen numbers and finances. Without a defined strategy like this raising money will be an impossible task. For example, trying to take a shorter route and seeking investors (an alternative for actually generating the funds ourselves) for a project that could run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars will be difficult if Nova Roma consistently collectively appears to be disjointed, disorganized and unrealistic in its outlook.
 
The objectives in NRO are clear, they are not an impediment to the Declaration, but supportive of it and will over time create the conditions for land purchase. This is not rocket science Severe, however I tend to think you have your own reasons for maintaining this line of “debate”.
 
Optime vale
 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Salve,

 
I do not agree with you. First, the theme of my "disappearance" here is discussed in detail. Although for me, as for others Sarmatians remains a mystery, that you were not able to contact with the WHOLE province. I did not get in touch, so I lost the governorship. That's all. I thought that the subject is exhausted. Second, in this topic, as I understand it, we are discussing the NRO. Third, be so kind as to not invest in my actions outside meaning, stick to the topic of discussion.

Vale,
T. Fl. Severus
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96038 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward

Ave,

Of course you don't agree with me.  Yet you are still wrong.

You are the one who deviated the topic to an area not discussed in NRO.  To plant a seed that it's not exhaustive only to be shown that if you were actually informed of what has been discussed here on the ml, multiple times thusly highlighting your ignorance.

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96039 From: publius_porcius_licinus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: CALL TO ORDER - FORMAL MEETING OF THE SENATE IN SESSION 16-30 Sep 27

P. Porcius Licinus tribunis plebis Omnibus spd:

 

M. Pompeius Caninus consuI has called the Senate to Order and will preside over the session.   The Schedule and Agenda of the session follow:

 

SCHEDULE:

06:00 AM Rome Time (CET) : 16 Sep 2015 : Call to order. Debate period commences.

06:00 AM Rome Time (CET) : 22 Sep 2015 : Debate period ends.

06:00 AM Rome Time (CET) : 24 Sep 2015 : Call to vote. Voting period commences.

06:00 AM Rome Time (CET) : 28 Sep 2015 : Voting period ends.

06:00 AM Rome Time (CET) : 30 Sep 2015 : Call to close issued before this time.

 

AGENDA:

1. Grant Cn. Cornelius Lentulus access to the Censorial Database as a scribe of P. Annaeus Constantinus Placidus.  (Debate and Vote)

SC: The Senate of Nova Roma grants Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, the duly appointed scribe of Publius Annaeus Constantinus Placidus, access to the Censorial database of Nova Roma for the remainder of 2768 AUC or until such time as his service under Censor Placidus is terminated, whichever occurs first.

2. Reappointment of T. Flavius Severus as governor of Sarmatia.  (Debate and Vote)

SC: The Senate of Nova Roma appoints Titus Flavius Severus as governor of Sarmatia.

3. Appointment of T. Domitius Draco as governor of Mediatlantica with a prior service exemption.  (Debate and Vote)

SC: The Senate of Nova Roma grants a prior service exemption for Titus Domitius Draco and appoints Titus Domitius Draco as governor of Mediatlantica.

4. Province of Activity for 2016 CE / 2769 AUC - Senior Consul.  (Debate and Vote)

SC: The senior consul for the year 2769 A.U.C. is instructed by the Senate of Nova Roma to pursue the following items to a successful completion on or before the date indicated during his/her year in office. The senior consul shall post a progress report monthly to the Senate, by means of posting to the Senate list, detailing the steps he/she has taken to bring these items to a successful conclusion. Between December 1st and December 15th of 2769 A.U.C. the senior consul shall post his/her final progress report to the Senate list. If he/she has not brought any item below to a successful conclusion, then he/she will explain in detail to the Senate the reasons for his/her failure to do so.

To complete the migration of the web, wiki and censorial tools from the current provider to a provider based in the USA, before July 2016.

5. Province of Activity for 2016 CE / 2769 AUC - Junior Consul.   (Debate and Vote)

SC: The junior consul for the year 2769 A.U.C. is instructed by the Senate of Nova Roma to pursue the following items to a successful completion on or before the date indicated during his/her year in office. The junior consul shall post a progress report monthly to the Senate, by means of posting to the Senate list, detailing the steps he/she has taken to bring these items to a successful conclusion. Between December 1st and December 15th of 2769 A.U.C. the junior consul shall post his/her final progress report to the Senate list. If he/she has not brought any item below to a successful conclusion, then he/she will explain in detail to the Senate the reasons for his/her failure to do so.

To sponsor, commence and conclude discussions on what innovations people would like to see on the website, before July 2016.

This is Senate session 2768-03.

 

Publius Porcius Licinus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96040 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: The CP is called into session - September 2768 a.U.c

SALVETE!


The Collegium Pontificum is called into session starting with 09.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d. XV. Kal Oct 2768 a.U.c (Thursday 17 Sept 2015) until 18.00 hr.(Rome time) on pr. Kal. Oct. 2768 a.U.c (Wednesday, 30 Sept. 2015).

 

The session schedule is:

 

1. Contio:

Starts with 09.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d. XV. Kal Sept. 2768 a.U.c (Thursday 17 Sept. 2015) until 18.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d. VII Kal. Oct. 2768 a.U.c (Friday, 25 Sept. 2015).

 

2. Vote:

Starts  with 09.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d VI Kal. Sept. 2768 a.U.c (Saturday 26 Sept. 2015) and ends at 18.00 hr.(Rome time) on pr. Kal. Sept. 2768 a.U.c (Wednesday, 30 Sept. 2015).

 

QUOD BONUM FAUSTVM FELIX FORTUNATUMQUE SIT POPULO ROMANO QUIRITIBUS

 

A. Items:

 

1.Reistatement of C. Popilius Laenas as lector.

2.Reinstatement of St. Ullerius Venator Piperbarbus as lector.

3.Lictor/lictrix position minimum requirements.

4.Priesthood application of A. Pompeia Crispa.

 

B. The Collegium Pontificum members can add new matters to debate or items to vote during the contio but not later than 18.00 hr.(Rome time) on a.d VIII Kal. Oct. 2768 a.U.c (Thursday 24 Sept. 2015).

 

C. Proxy. A CP member who is unable to vote can give his proxy to another CP member during the contio.

 

D. The Collegium Pontificum session can be observed by the entire Nova Roman community at this address:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/collegium_pontificum_nr/   

 

VALETE,

T. Iulius Sabinus

Pontifex Maximus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96041 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward

Omnibus in foro S. P. D.

 

It seems to me that NRO is both a policy guideline, and a road map which, if followed, will lead to what the Declaration envisions.  It is healthy (IMHO) to self identify as the heirs of the Roman Republic, but that is in our own minds only.  If we want others to recognize our legitimate right to these claims, (and since most of us aren’t even Italian, that will become essential), then we will have to *earn* that status, and NRO provides a path for doing just that, in time.  Once we have demonstrated, (and activism in the areas of ancient site preservation, promotion of all aspects of ancient Roman culture, both virtually and using physical events, hopefully, quality research, education (I would dearly love to see us maintain our own educational facility, virtually and eventually physically), and reconstructing a historically accurate, functioning model of a Roman Republic, (again, first, virtually), *then* we will garner the recognition and respect we will parlay into the attainment of our ultimate goal.  Before we can even contemplate obtaining land, we have to have the money to pay for it, which means we *must* increase our active, taxpaying, participating citizen base.  Since only a small number of people tend to actively participate in any large organization, we will need more citizens to do this …a *lot* more citizens.  I won’t discuss ways of doing that in this post, but we have several initiatives already under way.  It would be nice if we could track (maybe as part of the citizens application form?) just what “gateway” (Facebook, Twitter, word of mouth, attendance at an event, etc) brought the applicant to us, so that we can determine the effectiveness of what we use, but that’s a discussion for another thread.

 

My point is that our goals *ARE* long term goals, and there are things we must accomplish on the way to attaining the ultimate goal of International acceptance and some form of Nation/Statehood.  Remember also, that we think of nations in terms of what we now know, but the concept  of Nationhood has changed over history, and will, perhaps, by the time we are ready to pursue it seriously, have changed again.  There are indications, even now, that this may be happening.

 

NRO isn’t a final policy statement, and I don’t think it was intended to be.  Neither is it set in stone, we will, as we start following these guidelines, probably find that adjustments will need to be made.  We are not in some sort of either/or situation, where we are either supportive of the Declaratio or against it.  We all (or most of us) want to end up at the same place.  There is not just one way of getting there, though, so now is the time to plan, find what looks to be the most viable, attainable and direct route, and then go about the long, slow, and meticulously careful process of following that route, reaching, attaining, then passing interim goals.  To my mind, following what the NRO lays out is an admirably constructed means of positioning ourselves to attain our ultimate goal.

 

Valete Bene!

C. Maria Caeca

 

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96042 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
Caesar sal.
 
Caeca is exactly correct. NRO is not a final policy statement. It does not replace the Declaration. It does not mean if we choose the path that NRO sets out we cannot at the same time be working towards the goal of a forum, of land. It is one aspect of many things that we need to be doing, from small meet-ups, to forging communities, to much more in the “real world”.
 
I have also noticed a trend among some posters in respect of our on-line existence. We need to remember that the internet is the glue that binds us all together and there are still things we can do on-line. We really should avoid type casting that type of activity as sub-standard. We need a healthy mix of “real” and online to be sure, but let us not demonize on-line.
 
Optime valete
 
 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Re: Long term goals & the Declaration - Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Omnibus in foro S. P. D.

It seems to me that NRO is both a policy guideline, and a road map which, if followed, will lead to what the Declaration envisions.  It is healthy (IMHO) to self identify as the heirs of the Roman Republic, but that is in our own minds only.  If we want others to recognize our legitimate right to these claims, (and since most of us aren’t even Italian, that will become essential), then we will have to *earn* that status, and NRO provides a path for doing just that, in time.  Once we have demonstrated, (and activism in the areas of ancient site preservation, promotion of all aspects of ancient Roman culture, both virtually and using physical events, hopefully, quality research, education (I would dearly love to see us maintain our own educational facility, virtually and eventually physically), and reconstructing a historically accurate, functioning model of a Roman Republic, (again, first, virtually), *then* we will garner the recognition and respect we will parlay into the attainment of our ultimate goal.  Before we can even contemplate obtaining land, we have to have the money to pay for it, which means we *must* increase our active, taxpaying, participating citizen base.  Since only a small number of people tend to actively participate in any large organization, we will need more citizens to do this …a *lot* more citizens.  I won’t discuss ways of doing that in this post, but we have several initiatives already under way.  It would be nice if we could track (maybe as part of the citizens application form?) just what “gateway” (Facebook, Twitter, word of mouth, attendance at an event, etc) brought the applicant to us, so that we can determine the effectiveness of what we use, but that’s a discussion for another thread.

My point is that our goals *ARE* long term goals, and there are things we must accomplish on the way to attaining the ultimate goal of International acceptance and some form of Nation/Statehood.  Remember also, that we think of nations in terms of what we now know, but the concept  of Nationhood has changed over history, and will, perhaps, by the time we are ready to pursue it seriously, have changed again.  There are indications, even now, that this may be happening.

NRO isn’t a final policy statement, and I don’t think it was intended to be.  Neither is it set in stone, we will, as we start following these guidelines, probably find that adjustments will need to be made.  We are not in some sort of either/or situation, where we are either supportive of the Declaratio or against it.  We all (or most of us) want to end up at the same place.  There is not just one way of getting there, though, so now is the time to plan, find what looks to be the most viable, attainable and direct route, and then go about the long, slow, and meticulously careful process of following that route, reaching, attaining, then passing interim goals.  To my mind, following what the NRO lays out is an admirably constructed means of positioning ourselves to attain our ultimate goal.

Valete Bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96043 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Nova Roma Onward
Caninus sal.
 
Nova Roma Onward seems to be completely compatible with the Declaration. NRO provides some guidelines that move us closer to the goal of the Declaration. But we need to keep in mind, that regardless of how we get to a point where the goal of the Declaration is within sight, even a landless nation or limited sovereignty is meaningless if we do not build a heritage. Without a living culture, without children being raised in its values, internatonal recognition of Nova Roma is kind of pointless. The Declaration has meaning only if there is a succession of generations of citizens who cherish it. I do not expect to see the Declaration fully realized in my lifetime. Within my lifetime Nova Roma can certainly build one or more locations where citizens live close by one another and meet face-to-face often. Nova Roma might even be able to buy a few acres of land somewhere and build a castrum or a place for reenactors to gather and practice. We can work on real world projects and we can set some things in motion, like Nova Roma Onward, while keeping the goal of the Declaration firmly in mind.
 
Facite valeatis!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96044 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Canino sal.
 
Cherishing it? We are still at the level of debate that requires us to prove, and repeatedly thereafter prove, that black is black, that the sun rises in the morning and sets in the evening, and that world isn’t flat. The very point of publishing NRO was to address one aspect, (just one) sovereignty, of that document, and that is (as I suspected) contentious enough. We can’t even agree it seems yet on what it should be.
 
When its author clarifies it is LIMITED sovereignty and adds some other qualifiers, the “debate” seamlessly switches track to “Quis custodiet  custodes”, with the insinuation that the Senate may one day launch some evil plot to take over every aspect of life in Nova Roma, you know that bubbling cauldron of initiative and culture we all live in here. Of course the fact that most of the Senate would rather bang nails in their heads than be responsible for every facet of Nova Roman existence is equally ignored. If getting people to discuss these things in order to reach some form of resolution is like pulling teeth (remember we got off to a cracking start with one of the first comments being essentially “why is Caesar talking about this, no one else is?” .. duhhh.. refer to how to start a conversation guide 101 maybe!), why on earth would anyone with any sanity want to be responsible for every moan, groan, reproach, idiotic ambition, hair pulling conspiracy theory, inconsistency and mind boggling ounce of ignorance that spills out on these lists? The Senate wants to take over Nova Roma? I nearly spat my coffee all over the screen laughing so much. We might be a lot of things in the Senate, but we aren’t that insane <lol
 
So cherish it? I could wish we could but there are some many different versions of reality here that we would never be cherishing the same version of the Declaration. The idea that we might bequeath all of this to our children is probably a strong argument for reporting immediately to be neutered, for the sake of the unborn.
 
Optime vale
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:42 PM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Caninus sal.
 
Nova Roma Onward seems to be completely compatible with the Declaration. NRO provides some guidelines that move us closer to the goal of the Declaration. But we need to keep in mind, that regardless of how we get to a point where the goal of the Declaration is within sight, even a landless nation or limited sovereignty is meaningless if we do not build a heritage. Without a living culture, without children being raised in its values, internatonal recognition of Nova Roma is kind of pointless. The Declaration has meaning only if there is a succession of generations of citizens who cherish it. I do not expect to see the Declaration fully realized in my lifetime. Within my lifetime Nova Roma can certainly build one or more locations where citizens live close by one another and meet face-to-face often. Nova Roma might even be able to buy a few acres of land somewhere and build a castrum or a place for reenactors to gather and practice. We can work on real world projects and we can set some things in motion, like Nova Roma Onward, while keeping the goal of the Declaration firmly in mind.
 
Facite valeatis!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96045 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward
Caninus Caesari sal.
 
Nova Roma should not expect anything more than limited sovereignty. And Nova Roma should expect a huge challenge to gain any status remotely approaching limited sovereignty. For any international recognition of limited sovereignty, Nova Roma will almost certainly need to demonstrate a multigenerational culture. Recognition is highly unlikely for a landless people if they are simply random individuals around the world who subscribe to a certain vision or favor a certain form of government or religion. International NGO status would be the best we could get.
 
Optime vale.
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96046 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward

C. Maria Caeca M. Pompi Canino Omnibusque S. P. D.

 

I understand your thinking here, Canine, and I agree.  We, Cives, in effect *are* the first generation, and in order to become an organization with a solid, strong, multi-generational base, we must become a cohesive community.  I think this is best accomplished by the intelligent integration of all means of communication, and the wise use of virtual resources, which Caesar correctly terms the glue that holds us together.  I have spoken out for years about the demonization of our online presence in favor of “real world” events.  Both are essential, and, to be honest, the virtual world is no less “real” , though in a slightly different way, than, say, Atlanta, GA.  We are International, and therefore we need both a strong virtual presence *and* closely knit, local groups in our Provinciae, because what these separate aspects won’t simply be supplicating activities, but doing those things best done in person, or on line.  Our virtual community and our physical communities are interlocking and interdependent, and we lose track of this to our detriment.

 

And, yes, I, in fact *do* cherish my Nova Roma.  I care deeply about the organization, take pride in our accomplishments, and despite our flaws and foibles, our contentiousness, our politics and its attendant drama, I choose to stay, (even when I threaten to leave, I *know* I won’t). 

 

If what I say opens me to ridicule, so be it.  If what I feel marks me as weak, so be it.  If what I think marks me as insipid, so be it.  I made a post once, in 2010, I think, when there was a great deal of encouragement  from former citizens to abandon Nova Roma (in fact, we had been informed that the Gods had already done so), and I will repeat it now, from memory, because it was true then, and it is as true now.

 

Nova Romana Sum: Semper Nova Romana ero.

 

Vale et valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96047 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI: CHARIOT RACE
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

Fellow celebrating Nova Romans, you can still submit your chariot race entries to the ludi circenses of the LUDI ROMANI. We will accept another 3 enntries. Remember: you can submit two chariots!

Here are the rules:

If you wish to join the Chariot Race, send your entries to the email below  (a maximum of two chariots per person) according to the following table. If 16 chariots is reached no further entries shall be accepted. Our reporter will be Placidus, very experienced chariot race master!

1. Your name in Nova Roma
2. The name of your chariot 
3. The name of your driver
4. The tactic you intend to use for the Quarterfinals and Semifinals races
5. The tactic you intend to use for the Final race.
6. The name of your FACTIO or team: Russata, Albata, Veneta, Praesina

Send your entries to ugo.coppola@... or to ugo DOT coppola AT tin DOT it.  DO NOT use any other addresses and DO NOT post your entries on the main list if you do not wish to be disqualified.

Send you entries until 17 September, midnight, Rome time.

Please feel free to add all the details you think suitable to items 2 and 3 - the more details I have, the better will the race accounts turn out to be. As for racing tactics (items 4 and 5), choose one from the Competition Rules page (http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Regulae_ludorum; scroll down to Circenses rules) and insert only the corresponding letter (A, B,C, D, E, F) in items 4 and 5. Dirty actions are NOT allowed. 

Q. Arrius Nauta
AEDILIS CURULIS
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96048 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI - SHORT ESSAY CONTEST
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

This is a reminder about the SHORT ESSAY CONTEST.
Read the rules, join the contest, and obtain a real ancient Roman coin.
The deadline is the end of the LUDI ROMANI (Sept 19 midnight)

The topic of the essay is an intriguing obscure question of Roman republican history: 

---------------------------------------------------------------
DID THE AEDILES CURULES POSSESS IMPERIUM?
---------------------------------------------------------------

It is a very befitting essay contest topic, organized by an Aedilis Curulis, isn't it? ;)
You will find arguments on boths sides, some scholars say they did, others say they didn't. We have just seen the comitia curiata invested us Aediles Curules with imperium, so you can see Nova Roma's legal take on this question. But history may not agree with Nova Roma practice: you have to discover the truth!

THE PRIZE

A real ancient Roman coin (an Antoninianus minted by Valerian I) in good condition, donated to the winner by my Honorable Colleague Aedilis Curulis Gaius Decius Laterenis. 

THE RULES

If you want to participate in this essay contest, you have to write a ***ONE PAGE*** long (font size 12) essay about the topic. It can be longer if you want (it will be no problem if shorter a little bit than one page). The only requirement is your work must be original work of yours, and you must form AN OPINION. You must take sides and decide if you think yes, the Roman curule aediles had imperium or no, they didn't.

What is the friendship, community building and social interaction element here?

After you have written your essay, you must convince 5 assidui (taxpayer) citizens to write to me, Quintus Arrius Nauta, IN SUPPORT of your essay! You don't only have to write an essay, but you also must "sell" your thoughts to 5 Nova Romans :) And possibly after talking with them about your essay's ideas you will get 5 new NR friends! :)
If you are a new citizen and don't know 5 Nova Roman assidui citizens yet, don't worry. Go to the Nova Roma website and you will find many assidui in the Magistrates page, Governors page, Senate members page, Scribes page, and other pages too. If you don't know anybody's email address, you can go into your Album Civium account, log in, and you can write to the people you choose, using the "send mail" function in the Album Civium page. This is the link to the Album Civium:


Important rule: one citizen can support only one essayist! If another essay writer gets the recommendation of an assidui citizen, the same citizen is not permitted to write in support for an other essay. You must discuss it with the citizen who you want to support you, so he or she supports nobody but you. Support statements from the same person for a second essayist will not be counted.

Your essay must be sent to:
whitewolfbde@...

Your supporters "in favor"-recommendations must be sent to Quintus Arrius Nauta, me, accross my Album Civium page, here:

Only support statements sent via my Album Civium page will be counted.

If you have questions, contact me on whitewolfbde@...


Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
AEDILIS CURULIS
Nova Roma





Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96049 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: LUDI ROMANI - "LOVE THE ROMAN POEM" CONTEST
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

My last reminder today is about the "LOVE YOUR ROMAN POEM" competition.
By spreading the word about a Roman poem you chose, you can win a valid Nova Roma sestertius! You can participate in this game until Sept. 19, the last day of the LUDI ROMANI.

Here are the rules:

1. Choose your favorite Roman poem (or one of your favorites). It must be originally Roman, written by an ancient Roman citizen, but English (or other) translation will be accepted as well.

2. Send this poem to your fellow NR citizens in private. Explain to them in your email that this is part of the Ludi Romani, talk to them why you like this poem, and if they like the poem you sent, they must forward (both the poem and your explanation why you like it) to me at my Album Civium page, here:

Only mails sent through my Album Civium page will be counted.

3. Participants get points for how many contacted citizens forward their chosen Roman poem. Each forward will be awarded by one point given to the contest participant who chose and spread that poem. Forwards from assidui citizens will be awarded by two points given to the contestant who chose the poem.

4. At the end of the Ludi Romani, I will reveil, based on counting the forwards, "NOVA ROMA'S FAVORITE ROMAN POEM" for this Ludi Romani, and the participant who chose taht poem will be awarded by the real brass NR Sestertius donated by Aedilis collega Laterensis.

If you don't yet have so many personal friends in NR, don't worry. Go to the Nova Roma website and you will find many assidui in the Magistrates page, Governors page, Senate members page, Scribes page, and other pages too. If you don't know anybody's email address, you can go into your Album Civium account, log in, and you can write to the people you choose, using the "send mail" function in the Album Civium page. This is the link to the Album Civium:


If you have any questions regarding this contest, contact me at:


Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
AEDILIS CURULIS
Nova Roma


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Q. Arrius Nauta <whitewolfbde@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96050 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: NUNTII ARRII - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

It is my pleasure to launch the NUNTII ARRII (Arrian Newsletter) series within the LUDI ROMANI, which I will continue until the end of the year.

The NUNTII ARRII Aedilician Newsletter will inform you about the latest news of Romanitas, discoveries or current debates wordwide about Roman topics, archeology, history, literaure, movie and everything.

This is the First Edition, and the current newsflesh are:

1. CULTURAL EXCURSION: The Mystery of the Ancient Roman Tunnel to Hell

There is a place on the northern shore of the Bay of Naples that has long been steeped in history, mystery, myth, and magic. Known as the Phlegræan Fields, it is a desolate place; a barren wasteland strewn with rubble and intersected by deep underground vents that belch out choking fumes and fire. Legends and strange phenomena cling to this hellish, smoke-wreathed landscape, so it is perhaps no wonder that these fields are a location believed since ancient times to hold a tunnel that leads to Hell itself. Read more:

2. ROMAN COIN TREASURE FOUND

A hoard of 419 ancient Roman coins were discovered by Matthew Perry, Paul Perry and George Hughes on land in Martock. Two pieces of coin have been legally declared as "treasure". Read more:
http://www.westerngazette.co.uk/Ancient-Roman-coins-Martock-legally-defined/story-27779793-detail/story.html

3. ROMAN CULINARY PLEASURES: Italian food before tomatoes (Ancient Roman "Lentils with Chestnuts" reecipe)

We often think of spices as related to flavor and as a nice addition to food, but spices in the ancient world were more essential. Spices were traded between distant places and enabled cooks to preserve (and often mask the spoiled tasted of) food without refrigeration. Way before “globalization” as we know it, the Apicius cookbook from the Roman Empire indicates a wide-reaching spice trade in the ancient world. Because fresh produce and meats spoiled quickly, the cookbook includes instructions for how to preserve fruits in honey, how to pickle fish, and, disturbingly, how to mask the smell of chicken that has gone bad (we respectfully decided to pass on that recipe). Read more:

That was the First Edition of the NUNTII ARRI!
Good Night Nova Roma!

You could read Quintus Arrius Nauta, your Aedilis.

Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96051 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: Nova Roma Onward
Caesar Canino sal.
 
Yes, that’s about my assessment too. That would of itself, all the naysayers notwithstanding, be a huge achievement. That’s why I said as to what could/would come after that, it is pointless to speculate on. If Nova Roma gets that far, unless they have figured out uploading consciousness to computers (in which case Sulla and I might still be here <lol other lucky consuls and senate that have to grapple with that and expectations. For us now we have more mundane concerns, but having a realistic long-term goal (not the only or final one before anyone starts pulling their hair out) would be a huge leap forward.
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Nova Roma Onward
 
 

Caninus Caesari sal.
 
Nova Roma should not expect anything more than limited sovereignty. And Nova Roma should expect a huge challenge to gain any status remotely approaching limited sovereignty. For any international recognition of limited sovereignty, Nova Roma will almost certainly need to demonstrate a multigenerational culture. Recognition is highly unlikely for a landless people if they are simply random individuals around the world who subscribe to a certain vision or favor a certain form of government or religion. International NGO status would be the best we could get.
 
Optime vale.
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 
 
 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96052 From: Matthew Burns Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions

1. Mithradates the Great and Hannibal.

2. The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest resulted in the annihilation of the Roman commander Publius Quintilius Varus and his forces by the Germanic tribesmen of  Arminius in 9 AD. Three legions were annihilated and Germania remained independent from Roman rule

3. A corvus was a Roman device they used to board enemy ships and fight in infantry combat vs. Naval warfare. It was used during the First Punic War against Carthage

4. Eryx was an ancient city and mountain in Sicily that was contested during the First Punic War. In 244 BCE the Carthaginaian Hamilcar Barca recaptured the town from Roman forces by moving his forces at night to the slopes of the mountain and aiding the besieged Carthaginaian garrison in Drepanum. Combined they overwhelmed the Roman forces in Eryx and then positioned themselves between the Roman forces at the summit of the mountain and Roman camp at its base. He then moved the population of the city to the nearby town of Drepanum and continued in that position for two more years.

5. To be put under the yoke was an ancient practice of forcing defeated soldiers to stoop under a "yoke" of spears whilst being derided by the victors. Now it commonly means a way of humiliating the losers in a conflict. In 321 BCE, the two Roman consuls, Spurius Postumius Albinus and Titus Veturius Calvinus, leading an invading force into Samnium, and were trapped in Caudium and couldn't escape and after a desperate struggle, they were forced to submit to the humiliating terms imposed by the Samnites. The romans passed under the yokr and the captured consuls pledged themselves to a 5 year treaty which was dictated on yhe Samnite's terms.

Salve,

Tiberius Ulpius Pulcher


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96053 From: Matthew Burns Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Aaaaaannndd that's why having to use my phone is the devil. Replied to the wrong person accidently. Sorry everyone, maybe next time for me, good luck.

Salve,

Ti. Ulpius Pulcher


------------------------------
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96054 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
Grrrr:

Get the sack, the snake and the dog and off to the Tiber we go.

Quadratus


To: Nova_roma_@yahoogroups.com; nova-roma@yahoogroups.com; backalley@yahoogroups.com
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:30:40 +0000
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions

 

1. Mithradates the Great and Hannibal.

2. The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest resulted in the annihilation of the Roman commander Publius Quintilius Varus and his forces by the Germanic tribesmen of  Arminius in 9 AD. Three legions were annihilated and Germania remained independent from Roman rule

3. A corvus was a Roman device they used to board enemy ships and fight in infantry combat vs. Naval warfare. It was used during the First Punic War against Carthage

4. Eryx was an ancient city and mountain in Sicily that was contested during the First Punic War. In 244 BCE the Carthaginaian Hamilcar Barca recaptured the town from Roman forces by moving his forces at night to the slopes of the mountain and aiding the besieged Carthaginaian garrison in Drepanum. Combined they overwhelmed the Roman forces in Eryx and then positioned themselves between the Roman forces at the summit of the mountain and Roman camp at its base. He then moved the population of the city to the nearby town of Drepanum and continued in that position for two more years.

5. To be put under the yoke was an ancient practice of forcing defeated soldiers to stoop under a "yoke" of spears whilst being derided by the victors. Now it commonly means a way of humiliating the losers in a conflict. In 321 BCE, the two Roman consuls, Spurius Postumius Albinus and Titus Veturius Calvinus, leading an invading force into Samnium, and were trapped in Caudium and couldn't escape and after a desperate struggle, they were forced to submit to the humiliating terms imposed by the Samnites. The romans passed under the yokr and the captured consuls pledged themselves to a 5 year treaty which was dictated on yhe Samnite's terms.

Salve,

Tiberius Ulpius Pulcher


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96055 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-16
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions

Salvete Omnes!  Don’t forget the rooster!  LOL!

 

Valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96056 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions

Lol!!! Is this entertainment free? ;)

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96057 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions

Salve Sulla!

 

The CFO is asking this question????  FREE???  We need to generate income, so …no, and sales of food, drink and souvenirs is encouraged, part of the proceeds from which, of course, will go into our treasury!

 

Vale bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96058 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions

Lol well we don't need to tax everything lol.  I was just wondering if I needed to bring more cash beyond what I was going to bet on. ;)

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96059 From: Sextus Lucilius Tutor Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Consular Edict No1 - Appointing Consular Government Staff and Awardi
Consular Edictum No.1 of Consul Sextus Lucilius Tutor 
Appointing Consular Government Staff and Awarding Census Points

I.A. Quaestor Tiberius Iulius Nerva is assigned as my Consular Quaestor. As Consular Quaestor he is the Chief of Staff, Head and Premier of Consular Government Staff, leader of consular cohors and consular office. B. His special project is investigating the possibility of an European NR Market Service.
II. A. Aulus Iulius Paterculus is appointed Accensus to serve as general advisor. B. He is also mandated to manage all my consular support activities for the Certamen Petronianum II in cooperation with Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus. C. In this capacity they receive the job title Praefectus for Consular Support to Certamen Petronianum Project.
III. Gaius Decius Laterensis is appointed Accensus to serve as general advisor. B. He is also appointed in charge of my consular support activities for forum message board project, with the job title Praefectus for Consular Support to Forum Message Board Project.
IV. Titus Domitius Draco is appointed Accensus to be Head of Administrative Bureau which is in charge of all scribes. 
V.A. Quintus Arrius Nauta is appointed Accensus to be Head of Public Relations Bureau. B. He is also appointed as Praeco to be in charge of consular office communication, and as my English Language Assistant.
VI.A. Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus is appointed Accensus to be Head of Legal Bureau. He can use the scribes and fellow accensuses to plan or work with proposals. B. His other task is described in II.B. and II.C.
VII. Aulus Scribonius Nasica, Gaius Octavius Tranquillus, Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus and Quintus Lutatius Catulus are appointed Scriba to work on various administrative tasks and assist all areas of work in the Consular Government.
VIII. In in accordance with lex Cornelia de punctis censualibus, I can assign census points to 5 apparitores of my staff and I choose the following 5 persons:
Aulus Iulius Paterculus
Gaius Decius Laterensis
Quintus Arrius Nauta
Titus Domitius Draco
Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus

Datum a.d. XV Kal. Oct. ‡ M. Pompeio Sex. Lucilio cos. ‡ MMDCCLXVIII a.u.c.

Sextus Lucilius Tutor
Consul


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96060 From: Quintus Lutatius Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: NUNTII ARRII - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Q. Lutatius Catulus Q. Arrio Nautae s. p. d.
That is a great idea, if you need help with that you know you can count on me
Valete
Catulus



El Jueves 17 de septiembre de 2015 1:46, "'Q. Arrius Nauta' whitewolfbde@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

It is my pleasure to launch the NUNTII ARRII (Arrian Newsletter) series within the LUDI ROMANI, which I will continue until the end of the year.

The NUNTII ARRII Aedilician Newsletter will inform you about the latest news of Romanitas, discoveries or current debates wordwide about Roman topics, archeology, history, literaure, movie and everything.

This is the First Edition, and the current newsflesh are:

1. CULTURAL EXCURSION: The Mystery of the Ancient Roman Tunnel to Hell

There is a place on the northern shore of the Bay of Naples that has long been steeped in history, mystery, myth, and magic. Known as the Phlegræan Fields, it is a desolate place; a barren wasteland strewn with rubble and intersected by deep underground vents that belch out choking fumes and fire. Legends and strange phenomena cling to this hellish, smoke-wreathed landscape, so it is perhaps no wonder that these fields are a location believed since ancient times to hold a tunnel that leads to Hell itself. Read more:

2. ROMAN COIN TREASURE FOUND

A hoard of 419 ancient Roman coins were discovered by Matthew Perry, Paul Perry and George Hughes on land in Martock. Two pieces of coin have been legally declared as "treasure". Read more:
http://www.westerngazette.co.uk/Ancient-Roman-coins-Martock-legally-defined/story-27779793-detail/story.html

3. ROMAN CULINARY PLEASURES: Italian food before tomatoes (Ancient Roman "Lentils with Chestnuts" reecipe)

We often think of spices as related to flavor and as a nice addition to food, but spices in the ancient world were more essential. Spices were traded between distant places and enabled cooks to preserve (and often mask the spoiled tasted of) food without refrigeration. Way before “globalization” as we know it, the Apicius cookbook from the Roman Empire indicates a wide-reaching spice trade in the ancient world. Because fresh produce and meats spoiled quickly, the cookbook includes instructions for how to preserve fruits in honey, how to pickle fish, and, disturbingly, how to mask the smell of chicken that has gone bad (we respectfully decided to pass on that recipe). Read more:

That was the First Edition of the NUNTII ARRI!
Good Night Nova Roma!

You could read Quintus Arrius Nauta, your Aedilis.

Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96061 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: NUNTII ARRII - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Q. Lutatio Catulo S. P. D.

Great! Thank you for offering your help. I contact you privately and we will talk.

Vale,

Q. Arrius Nauta
aedilis curulis

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96062 From: MajikPiG Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: [Nova_roma_] Ludi History Contest - 2nd Set of Questions
I think Pulcher should be made to pass sub iugum. ;)

-Vestinus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96063 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Ludi History Contest - 3rd Set of Questions - Interim Standings
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

Here are interim standings after two rounds.  The top four scores (out of seven) are listed.  It is still possible to enter this contest as the deadline for the submission of all sets of questions is 4:00 p.m. EDT on September 21, 2015.  Three nice prizes await the leaders.

Marcus Pompeius Caninus     22.0
Lucius Marius Vestinus           21.5
Quintus Lutatius Catulus        21.0
Aula Tullia Scholastica            20.5


Following is the third set of history contest questions

Please remember, the answers must be sent only to c.claudius.quadratus@...  One participant has already been disqualified from winning a prize because he posted a set of answers publicly.

Deadline for submission: 4:00 p.m. EDT, September 21, 2015.  But note, if the answers are submitted before 4:00 p.m. on September 19th, one bonus point will be added to your score.

Third Set of Questions

1.  Several Republic denarii bear images of a curule chair and/or fasces.  
     What is a curule chair and who used them?   (2 points)
     Describe fasces and their use.   (2 points)
     What United States coin series bears the image of fasces?   (1 point)

2.  A shocking religious scandal took place in 62 BCE.  Who was involved and what did he do?   (2 points)

3.  In what year was Octavian given the name Augustus?   (1 point)

4.  A tax upon the assets of wealthy women was decreed by the Second Triumvirate.  A woman successfully campaigned against that tax.  Who?   (1 point)

5.  Especially for the back alley dwellers of the Subura and our senior Censor:  Did the Romans consider Pluto to be a planet?   (1 point)

Good luck!  The final set of questions will be posed at 4:00 p.m. on September 19th.

C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96064 From: alectocles Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?

That could work, I think.

Noctua

---In Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com, <arthur.f.waite@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96065 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Re: Taxes and Marketing - What are we Marketing?
All right, the thread is started in the Egressus sub-forum, although
it may be moved - I wasn't quite sure whether it belonged there or in
the "off topic" section.



On 9/17/15, mahtezcatpoc@... [Nova-Roma]
<Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96066 From: Bruno Zani Date: 2015-09-17
Subject: Spanish language Interpreter
Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus quiritibus  salutem plurimam dicit

Edictum Praetorium
 
I.  Quintus Lutatius Catulus is hereby appointed as praetorian interpreter/translator for the Spanish language with all the duties and privileges of his rank.

II.   No oath is required. This edict becomes effective immediately.

Enacted on the seventh day  of September in the year of the Consulship of Marcus Pompeius Caninus and Sextus Lucilius Tutor, 2768 aUc.
 
Aulus Liburnius Hadrianus, Praetor
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96067 From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com Date: 2015-09-18
Subject: New file uploaded to Nova-Roma
Hello,


This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Nova-Roma
group.


File : /NovaRomaOnward.pdf
Uploaded by : reenbru <reenbru@... Description : Caesar and Sulla proposal for the separation between Nova Roma not for profit part and incorporated company for legal reason. It follows Nova Roma Reborn.


You can access this file at the URL:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Nova-Roma/files/NovaRomaOnward.pdf


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=content&y=PROD_GRPS&locale=en_US&id=SLN15398


Regards,


reenbru <reenbru@...
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96068 From: m.flavius_celsus Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Re: Qyestion about using of NR symbols.
Still wait answer.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96069 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Re: Qyestion about using of NR symbols.
Caesar Celso sal.
 
Re (1) & (2) see:
 
 
The short answer is contained there “Permission to use the image of the Nova Roman flag in other contexts, in altered form, or without the accompanying attribution must still be obtained through the Consuls” – so strictly according to the senatus consultum its seems that use for anything other than on a webpage, you have to speak to the consuls. My guess is that I can’t imagine them objecting to either (1) or (2), but that is just my opinion. It is theirs you need.
 
Re (3) – Manufacture of the flag may need Senate approval – speak to the consuls.
 
Re (4) – There are none for sale yet that I know of. Maybe someone else knows something different.
 
Re (5) – Not sure if there are any still available. It depends which issue you want.
 
Optime vale
 
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 2:07 AM
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Re: Qyestion about using of NR symbols.
 
 

Still wait answer.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96070 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Re: Qyestion about using of NR symbols.
Salve, Celse!

If you want an NR sestertius and play chess, you will be awarded one if you participate in the Ludi Romani online chess contest starting Sunday at 1:00 p.m. EDT as previously announced.

Vale!
Quadratus


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:47:58 -0700
Subject: [Nova-Roma] Qyestion about using of NR symbols.

 

Salvete omnes!

There is topic "drowned" in mail list (as it be with all another topics), about limits of using NR symbols, because it's a registered Trade Mark e.t.c.

So I have some querstions about this, ask it in public because think not only me interested in this.

1) If i want hang flag of NR on my house, what things i must do? G
et some permission?
2) If i want using flag on meetings of local community ( or local events)

what things i must do?
3) I can craft NR flag on my own, or i must only buy it?
4) If answer on pervious question - "buy" - how i can buy it?

 
And one more related question on NR coins - there i can buy it?

Thank you, for answers!

Valete!


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96071 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: NUNTII ARRII 2 - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

Welcome to the 2nd Edition of NUNTII ARRII (Arrian Newsletter) series within the LUDI ROMANI, which I will continue until the end of the year.

The NUNTII ARRII Aedilician Newsletter will inform you about the latest news of Romanitas, discoveries or current debates wordwide about Roman topics, archeology, history, literaure, movie and everything.

The current newsflesh are:

1. POLITICAL ANALYSIS: Pope Francis and the New Roman Empire

Interesting article in the Time magazine about the political concepts and perspectives of Pope Francis. Time magazine is indicating that Pope Francis is taking steps that resemble a push for a new Roman Empire. Pope Francis’ ‘New Roman Empire’ is an attempt to unify the world in his image. He, and other pontiffs, have worked to establish some version of the old ‘Holy Roman Empire’ in Europe. The Holy Roman Empire had Roman Catholic support and the Vatican wants it again. Read more here:

2. ECONOMY ANALYSIS: Death and transfiguration - Roman economy repeating today

According to The Economist, the golden age of the Western corporation may be coming to an end. Edward GIBBON, the great English historian, begins his “Decline and Fall” with a glowing portrait of the Roman Empire in the age of Augustus. The Empire “comprehended the fairest part of the earth”. Citizens “enjoyed and abused the advantages of wealth and luxury”. Alas, this happy state of affairs was not to last: the Empire already contained the seeds of its own destruction. Gibbon soon changed gear from celebrating triumphs to chronicling disasters. Perhaps the history of the Western corporation will one day be written in much the same vein. Read more here:

3. ROMAN ARCHEOLOGY NEWS: Bulgarian archaeologists discover three Roman pagan temples, nymphaeum at ancient and medieval rock city Perperikon

A total of three Roman pagan temples, 49 public and residential buildings, over 1,000 artifacts, and what might turn out to be a nympheaum, a monument dedicated to the nymphs, have been discovered by Bulgarian archaeologists during the four-month 2015 summer excavations of the ancient and medieval rock city of Perperikon (also known as Perperik or Perperek) located in the southern District of Kardzhali. Read more:


That was the Second Edition of the NUNTII ARRI!
Good Day Nova Roma!

You could read Quintus Arrius Nauta, your Aedilis.

Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96072 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-19
Subject: Ludi History Contest - Final Set of Questions - Interim Standings
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

Here are interim standings after three rounds.  The top four scores (out of eight) are listed.  It is still possible to enter this contest as the deadline for the submission of all sets of questions is 4:00 p.m. EDT on September 21, 2015.  Three nice prizes await the leaders.

Marcus Pompeius Caninus     33.0
Lucius Marius Vestinus           32.5
Aula Tullia Scholastica             31.0
Quintus Lutatius Catulus         30.0


Following is the fourth and final set of history contest questions

Please remember, the answers must be sent only to c.claudius.quadratus@... 

Deadline for submission: 4:00 p.m. EDT, September 21, 2015.  

The answers will be posted at 4:00 p.m. EDT, on September 21st.  Final standings will be posted as soon as possible thereafter.


Final Set of Questions

1.  Briefly define the terms "Optimates"  "Populares"  "Novus Homo" and name one person who fits each category  (3)

2. The large size of the sestertius in the early Empire permitted lengthy legends.  Here is the obverse legend of a sestertius of Trajan:

     IMPCAESNERTRAIANOOPTIMOAVGGERDACPARTHICOPMTRPCOSVIPP  Here it is again, but divided into its elements:

     IMP   CAES   NER   TRAIANO   OPTIMO   AVG   GER   DAC   PARTHICO   PM   TRP   COS VI   PP

    Seven portions of the legend are underlined.  Briefly explain the significance of each underlined part as it relates to Trajan.  Do not discuss Latin grammar, case endings, etc.    (7 points)


C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96073 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-20
Subject: Ludi Romani Chess Event Today
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

Reminder:

The Ludi Romani chess simul will take place today starting at 1:00 p.m.  

Anyone wishing to participate should respond to my first move, 1. d4 (in descriptive, 1. P-Q4) at 1:00 p.m. EDT, today. The move should be emailed to c.claudius.quadratus@....

A Nova Roma sestertius will be awarded to all participants who complete a game.  Games should continue in real time until concluded - most likely in less than an hour or two.  Anyone who wins or draws the game will receive a genuine ancient Roman coin.

Valete!

C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96074 From: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Date: 2015-09-20
Subject: LUDI ROMANI - PROGRAMS
Cn. Cornelius Lentulus scriba princeps aedilicius Q. Arrii Nautae aedilis curulis Quiritibus sal.

Dear citizens celebrating the Ludi Romani, 

You will find all Ludi Romani programs collected on our current Ludi Romani webpage. Participation in all programs is extended until September 21 by special order of Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis.

You can find all of Quadratus' quiz questions on the website, and you have still time to answer them and receive valuabe prizes:



HAPPY LUDI ROMANI!

Cn.Cornelius Lentulus, 
scriba princeps aedilicius Q. Arrii Nautae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96075 From: ugo21121970 Date: 2015-09-20
Subject: LUDI NOVI ROMANI 2768 - CHARIOT RACE

Ladies and gentlemen, dominæ et domini, iuvenes, puellæ et pueri, salvete omnes! Welcome to the single, massive 5-vehicle Chariot Race for these Ludi Romani 2768! This is Censor Publius Annæus Constantinus Placidus, or just Placidus for his friends, talking to you live from the edge of the Circus Maximus racetrack here in Roma. Yes, I am here again! Thanks to the dedication and commitment of my great Scribæ, Lentulus and Quadratus, who worked like mad during the past months on all those backlogged applications, I now have a little bit more free time… so I decided to come here again, obviously because I like it! And even before I considered asking our Consul Caninus for the official authorization to conduct the broadcast, he texted me on my mobile…”I heard that you are handling the Chariot Race again, amice. Visit me in my office for the usual piece of paper.” Needless to say, I got it! [He shows a rolled scroll emerging from his belt]. So now, without further ado, let’s get right into the specifics of this race.

The usual bichromy on the bleachers I have by now getting used to see in here has reappeared again, with a slight prevalence of blue as we have 3 chariots for Veneta and 2 for Russata, subscribed by… [he checks the sheets in his hand, a look of incredulity appears on his face…]… our Ædilis Quintus Arrius Nauta himself?! But isn’t he supposed to start the race? Indeed, there he is. [Shot of Nauta approaching the starter’s podium, a red nappa in his hand.] Well, it’s not forbidden for event promoters to actually participate in the event itself, is it? However, right now, I would invite all of you in front of your screen to take a look at our electronic billboard, which has been newly updated to show the race’s full set-up! Tullia, may we have a zoom on that, please?

 

[Zoom on the billboard, which shows the following.]

 

LANE         CHARIOT                 DRIVER                      OWNER                           TEAM

I                 The Triremis             Ben-Hur                       Q. Arrius Nauta                Russata

II                Potentia                   Atrectus                      M. Pompeius Caninus       Veneta

III               Hyacintus Libertatis  Tib. Domitius Vicarius   T. Domitius Draco             Veneta

IV              Commander              Messala                      Q. Arrius Nauta                Russata

V               Ignis                        L. Marius Palla             L. Marius Vestinus            Veneta      

 

OK, folks? All clear to you? Hopefully yes! Ah, by the way, just in case you were wondering, my trusted camera operator Tullia Celer has been promoted to broadcast director… I’m not sure whether only for this event or permanently, we’ll see. I have to say that I’m also glad to see the return of the bulky brewer Atrectus from Vindolanda, after his not-so-good performance in the Ludi Apollinares in August, and of course of his owner, our Senior Consul. Hey… but who is that I’m seeing now? Oh gee, it’s the Consul himself! I can’t miss this!! [Placidus runs to the racetrack, approaches the Consul and raises his arm in a Roman salute.] Salve, Consul! How nice to have you back here!

[Caninus: “Censor amice, I think I told you several times not to salute me at all, didn’t I? I’m not your Centurio.”] Sorry, sir, I can’t help it. [Caninus: “And I think I also told you not to ‘sir’ me.”] [Placidus blushes.]

[Caninus: “Aw, don’t worry about formalities. Yes, sure it’s nice to be here, and of course it’s nice to have you here again.”] Thanks, Consul. [Caninus: “I just hope this time my driver will do better than… you know when!”] We shall see that in a minute, Consul. Indeed, please excuse me for interrupting this, but I have to rush back to my place, there on the edge, to do the chronicle.

[Caninus: “Yes, sure, you may go! Vale!”]

Well, folks, let me tell you that the simple fact of getting near our Consul invariably fills me with awe. But I’d better not think about any of this anymore… I see Ædilis Nauta climbing on his podium, meaning that it’s time to start! Indeed, here he is raising the red nappa… he drops it… and off they go!

 

LAP I

According to my notes, our Ædilis Nauta’s two drivers have chosen the rewarding-but-dangerous tactic of “hugging the spina”, i.e. doing the curves very close to the central wall in the Circus. I’ve already had quite a few experiences of seeing drivers crash on that wall… it takes some real charioteering skills to do that harmlessly, I hope our two Russata drivers have them! I’m also told that they have movie-inspired pseudonyms, as Nauta is a sort-of film buff… but right now I can’t say I care about this, as I’m seeing Mr. Ben-Hur and his shining body armour, on The Triremis, speeding up in front of everyone. Here comes the first spina… perfect. Wow, this guy sure can do it, pseudonym or not. In the meantime, I see Nauta’s other driver, Messala, who’s dressed up in a vaguely military-looking attire… regulation helmet, lorica and all… fighting for second place with Atrectus, who has chosen to race wearing nothing but a furry waistcoat… well, I guess his muscles are his natural armour. Messala attempts a push-to the-walls move, which I’ve so often seen in these races… but before he can do anything, here comes Atrectus’ lash! Ow! A thin red streak appears on Messala’s arm, but never mind… I’ve seen worse things, in here. Indeed Messala almost catches up with his teammate and rival Ben-Hur, who keeps however a short but constant lead by easily going around the second spina. The only ones who don’t seem to have done much up to now are the two newcomers, Palla and Vicarius, who for the moment seem to be quietly trudging along the track, next to each other paired in fourth place. But I bet some further development of all this is bound to happen in a few minutes, as the first lap is over and we’re into…

 

LAP II

Ben-Hur on The Triremis is still in the lead, but Messala has by now definitely overtaken blue-eyed Atrectus in spite of his lashes… which I can’t be sure anymore whether they are directed to his horses or towards other, two-legged, creatures… and he is visibly threatening his teammate’s first position. However, the armoured driver keeps being a little bit distanced from his pursuer. In the meantime… just look at that, folks… the trudging newcomers in the back are catching up as well! They seem to have remembered just now that they’re in a race, rather than having a pleasant stroll along the Appian Way… but you can’t really blame them, after all it’s Sunday! L. Marius Palla on Ignis makes a push forward and settles himself  in fourth place, and exactly at the same time Messala on Commander attempts to overtake Ben-Hur … guess where, folks… yeah, you got it! In the most perilous spot of the whole Circus, the second spina! I don’t think that this passage is going to be as smooth as the others for Ben-Hur’s Triremis… indeed the chariots are so close that they slightly hit each other, and the hub of Commander’s left wheel hits the spina. BANG! Sparks fly, but nothing more than that happens. Commander is eveidently so well built that it’s endowed with a rather high capabiliy of resistance to hits, and I’m congratulating myself with Ædilis Nauta for owning such strong chariots now that the third brazen dolphin bows down, meaning that it’s time for…

 

LAP III

The situation of this race seems definitely to have stabilized itself now, at least for the first three places, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the current standings would hold until the next lap, and the very end. Ben-Hur on Ædilis Nauta’s The Triremis strenghtens his lead with his uncanny ease in going around the spinæ, his friend Messala on Commander, also owned by Nauta, is a very close second, and Consul Caninus’ Potentia and Atrectus are third. But it’s in the other two chariots that the all of the unstability apparently lies! Vicarius, on Domitius Draco’s Hyacintus Libertatis, makes yet another push forward… his scheduled tactic is, indeed, hurrying in the last laps!... and pairs himself with Palla on Marius Vestinus’ Ignis, but he has no idea how short-lived his effort is… as Vicarius gets a mighty push from Palla, which sends his chariot straight onto the wall! He turns, and his chariot’s left side reveals itself to be very badly scratched, the blue paint having come off all of it… but other than that, he seems not to have undergone anything at all, except of course for a very sudden and very quick slowing-down motion, which brings him back to the fifth place. Right now all chariots are crossing the finish line for the penultimate time in this great race, and the fourth dolphin is coming down, bringing all of the charioteers, and all of us, straight into…

 

LAP IV

Ben-Hur’s The Triremis is still going strong, putting a serious claim on what appears to be a definite victory for him and our Ædilis. But… what’s happening behind him? Atrectus is catching up with Messala… he gets closer to the right side of Russata’s Commander… and closer… and closer… and closer…they are PAIRED… what the heck is he going to do? And moreover, what’s he going to do in a straight line? [Pause.] Ah, now I get it. Messala, watch it!! Ah, too late. CRASH! Atrectus gave such a vigorous push to Messala’s chariot that its left side appears now in awfully worse conditions than Hyacintus Libertatis a few minutes ago… Commander’s fiery red paint having become nothing more than a pale pink… its right wheel goes up in the air and then thumps back again on the ground… Messala jumps up as if he’s been suddenly bolted awake… but, yet again, nothing worse than that happens to either Commander or its driver. I have to say that Nova Roma’s chariot builders have improved their techniques a lot since August… not a single wheel has become unhinged, not a single chariot has fallen apart during the whole race, despite the drivers’ rough and violent (but still within-the-rules) behaviour. Well, folks, right now Ben-Hur is going around the final spina smoothly as usual… he speeds up one more time… and, in a quod-erat-demostrandum sort-of attitude, he crosses the finish line first, he unties his body armour, bangs it on the ground and lifts both his arms up high in a victory gesture. VERY closely behind him, here’s his Russata colleague Messala, maybe a bit undeservedly second after a truly fantastic race. As for the third and fourth places… well, I think we’ll have to wait a bit here. You see, folks, Atrectus’ push to Messala had its price… he lost all of the advantage he had on Palla’s Ignis, slipped back, paired with him…and they crossed the finish line in perfect unison, so much that the human eye cannot distinguish who came third and who came fourth… and even if a bronze-medal placement doesn’t count much, in this particular single race, for the overall chart in the Nova Roma Virtual Chariot Racing championship, the third-place driver is still entitled to get points. However, I do think that we’re going to get a photofinish shot to estabilish precisely who… [Ædilis Nauta approaches Placidus from behind and taps on his shoulder. “Hey, Censor, I think they’ve already got it.”] Oh, salve, Ædiles. Have they really? [Nauta points towards the broadcasting centre, from where Tullia is making A-OK gestures to Placidus.] Ah! Well, let’s see then. [Screen changes to a freeze-frame on the finish line, showing Atrectus on Potentia crossing it very slightly ahead of Palla’s Ignis.] OK, then Atrectus is third, Palla is fourth and, still quite close, we have Vicarius on Hyacintus Libertatis as fifth, remarkably unscathed in both his body and his vehicle.

Well, it seems that everything is getting near its closure here. So, beyond congratulating Ædilis Quintus Arrius Nauta not only for his great victory, but for getting BOTH his chariots in the first two places, on behalf of Nauta himself I would like to express my most sincere and heartfelt gratitude to all participants for having entered their chariots, and to all of you out there for watching, for listening to me and for bearing with me on my occasionally over-enthusiastic reports.

 

This is Censor Placidus signing off, and hopefully seeing you all next time!    

 

 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96076 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: LUDI NOVI ROMANI 2768 - CHARIOT RACE
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis P. Annaeo Constantino Placido S. P. D.

Thank you for the lovely broadcasting Placidus!
Congratulations to the winner, eh... it's myself :) but who could lose with Ben-Hur as chariot driver?
My congratulatilations go the T. Domitius Draco and L. Marius Vestinus for their participation!

Valete,
Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96077 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: NUNTII ARRII III - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

Welcome to the 3rd Edition of NUNTII ARRII (Arrian Newsletter) series within the LUDI ROMANI, which I will continue until the end of the year.

The NUNTII ARRII Aedilician Newsletter will inform you about the latest news of Romanitas, discoveries or current debates wordwide about Roman topics, archeology, history, literaure, movie and everything.

The current newsflesh are:

1. ARCHEOLOGY NEWS: Early ancient Rome was bigger than many believed

[Q. Lutatius Catulus reports:] Archaeologists excavating a palazzo in central Rome uncovered a residence dating back to the 6th-century B.C. much farther away from what they had thought had been the city’s residential district then.Excavation chief Mirella Serlorenzi told the Italian news agency ANSA that the discovery “means that Rome at the start of the 6th century was much bigger than what we thought and wasn’t just centered around the Forum.” Discovered in the Quirinale Hill area — that was previously thought to have been a necropolis or ancient cemetery, the home was found in its preserved rectangular form with wooden beams, clay walls, and a roof, evidence that it was used as a place of residence. Read more here:


2. ROMAN SPORT NEWS: Totti scores 300 !!!

[A. Liburnius Hadrianus reports:] Roma legend Francesco Totti scored his 300th goal for the club on Sunday. The landmark goal came in the 36th minute of Roma's Serie A clash with Sassuolo at the Stadio Olimpico, as Totti capitalised on a suicidal pass from the opposition 'keeper, Andrea Consigli, by scuffing an untidy finish into the net. Read more here:

3. ROMAN TRAINS: The pope's special Vatican train sensation

[A. Liburnius Hadrianus reports:] There is a private railroad  connecting the Vatican to the Pope's summer residence in Castel Gandolfo, on the  Alban Lake (The lake fills the crater of a extinct Vulcan). There are talks of replacing the steam engine with a diesel engine. The tourists traveling between the two locations seem to prefer the steam for the 20 Km voyage. The palace and the trains are considered to be extraterritorial by Italy, as they are extension of the Vatican State. Watch video here:
4. MARCHING TO ROME?: The Bersaglieri Corps and their special "march"

[A. Liburnius Hadrianus reports:] The Bersaglieri corps has a very special relation with the City of Roma and vice versa. The Bersaglieri were the first Italian solders to enter the city on the 20th September 1870, liberating Rome from the papal domination. This film was shot during the military parade of the 2nd of June 2015, the 69th anniversary of the proclamation of the Italian Republic. Their helmets are covered with black feathers, and if you ask: yes they never march. Watch video here



That was the Third Edition of the NUNTII ARRI!

Good Day Nova Roma!

You could read Quintus Arrius Nauta, your Aedilis.

Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96078 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Praetor election
Caninus sal. 

In less than two hours the cista will be opened for voting in an election for a suffect Praetor by the Comitia Centuriata. We are fortunate to have two fine candidates stand for election to this office. The winner will hold the Praetor seat until New Year's Day. After due consideration, I will put my support behind Gaia Maria Ceaca, who has served on the Praetorial staff for several years. It will be her first time in that office. I am confident she will be a fine Praetor

Please take time to vote in this election and back the candidate you choose for Praetor with your ballot.   

Bene valete!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96079 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: Praetor election

C. Maria Caeca M. Pompeii Canino COS. Omnibusque S. P. D.

 

Thank you, Consul, for your very kind support and confidence.  I would like to say a little about how I perceive my term in this office.  First of all, I fully intend to continue to support the current low key, sensible policies of the Praetura.  We interfere as little as possible in the free flow of communication here, and only intervene when either Yahoo terms of use have been violated, or when debates serious personal attacks or allegations have been made that could easily lead to serious difficulties.  Our policies have worked, and worked well, so I see absolutely no reason to change them.

 

I will be, essentially, a “place holder” during these 3 months, there to provide support to my co-Praetor in any way that I can, and to ensure that this important office is, as it is supposed to be, collegial.  My agenda, therefore, is extremely simple.  To continue to support the policies already established in the Praetura, and to continue to perform those tasks I already perform, as well as any other “jobs” the senior Praetor would like me to take on.

 

I urge each and every citizen to exercise your privilege and fulfill your duty as a citizen, and vote.  *That* you vote means far more to me than for *who* you vote.

 

Vale et Valete quam optime!

 

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96080 From: Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: praetor election
A. Tullia Scholastica M. Pompejo Canino quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

I have also served on the praetorian staff for several years, and have served as praetrix. I am the first woman to have completed a full term as praetrix, and subsequently won an election as suffect praetrix in a year when turmoil invalidated not only elections, but also Senate calls. Voters should bear my long experience in mind when they make their choice, plus the fact that I can read at least two languages besides English, and thus am able to deal with any posts in those tongues--which upon occasion is necessary, and was more so when all new members were moderated.

Vale, et valete.

Caninus sal.

In less than two hours the cista will be opened for voting in an election for a suffect Praetor by the Comitia Centuriata. We are fortunate to have two fine candidates stand for election to this office. The winner will hold the Praetor seat until New Year's Day. After due consideration, I will put my support behind Gaia Maria Ceaca, who has served on the Praetorial staff for several years. It will be her first time in that office. I am confident she will be a fine Praetor

Please take time to vote in this election and back the candidate you choose for Praetor with your ballot.

Bene valete!

Marcus Pompeius Caninus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96081 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Ludi Romani - Chess Competition - Results
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

The Ludi chess competition took place on September 20, 2015, with the following results:

In person play:

One friend, but noncitizen, of Nova Roma, who adopted the praenomen Lucius participated in two in-person games in Montreal, Canada Citerior.  The games were played with a 30' time limit within which to complete all moves.  (If a player's clock runs out, it is a time forfeit regardless of the position on the board.)

Results:   

Quadratus  1 - 0  Lucius     (first named player has white)
Lucius         1 - 0  Quadratus
.
Match was drawn.  Lucius awarded a Nova Roma sestertius.

On line simultaneous play:

Two European members of Nova Roma took up the challenge.  Moves were transmitted via email.

Results:

Quadratus     0.5  -  0.5    M. Flavius Celsus       (draw)
Quadratus          1 - 0        Q. Lutatius Catulus

Both challengers awarded a Nova Roma sestertius.  Celsus awarded an identifiable Roman coin.

Observations

The Romans were fond of playing a board game "Latrunculi" which bears a distant relation to modern chess.  Perhaps we can take up the earlier game, but it would be extremely difficult to do so in the absence of face-to-face play.  For the time being, playing chess seems an excellent alternative since the rules are standard and well known.

Transmitting moves by email is possible, as has just been demonstrated, but it is cumbersome and mistakes may easily be made both in the transmission and interpretation of moves.  One game had to be halted several times for interpretation. 

The on line games were played without a time limit, which also led to some problems as one game lasted over seven hours, which for me is about four hours too long.

The solution probably involves games being played off diagrams similar to the methodology of the Internet Chess Club or Facebook platforms.  This way there would be no misinterpretation and reasonable time limits could be set.  (My suggestion would be for a 30' time limit for all moves, but anything reasonable would be okay with me.)

I would like to hear from anyone in the Nova Roma community who plays chess and may wish to participate in future activity of this nature.

Valete!
C. Claudius Quadratus




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96082 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Cista is open --- Please VOTE --- Comitia Centuriata
M. Pompeius Caninus consul Quiritibus SPD.

The Cista is open. Look at Getting to the Cista for simple directions. Please cast your ballot for the office of Praetor.

As a reminder, the comitia schedule is:

    Start of Voting     9:00 PM Rome Time on 21 September 2015
    End of Voting      9:00 PM Rome Time on 28 September 2015

The candidates for Praetor are:

    Aula Tullia Scholastica
    Gaia Maria Caeca

Please vote at your earliest convenience.

Facite valeatis!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
Consul Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96083 From: Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: praetorian candidacy
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.

Whichever of us is elected, Nova Roma will have someone who is experienced as a praetorian scriba, and one who will continue most, if not all, of the present policies. I, however, have actually held office as praetrix, and completed my term at a time when moderation was imposed on all new members--thus requiring much more effort on the part of the praetores and their staffs. Recent and current policies have eliminated that while restricting membership on the Main List to full citizens; previously probationary citizens, former citizens, and all interested parties, including minors, were admitted. I would continue all of these policies, but would note that several recent instances of a scatological vulgarity seem to have escaped the notice of the current staff although such language likely violates the Yahoo ToS for a non-adult list. The ML is not the place for that sort of thing; adults should be able to make their points without resorting to language appropriate for a certain unofficial list limited to adults.

Valéte.
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96084 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Ludi Romani History Contest - Questions and Answers
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

Here are the questions posed in the Ludi Romani history contest and answers.

Valete!
C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba

------------------------------------

Set 1

1.  The first gold aureus was minted shortly before the installation of a "Dictator."  What was the complete name of the future dictator and in what year was the aureus first minted?  (2 points)
     Hint:  It wasn't Gaius Iulius Caesar.

     Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix,  84/83 BCE.

2.  A lituus appears on the reverse of the first aureus.  What is a lituus and who uses them?   (2 points)

     A curved wooden staff used by augurs.

3.  The silver coin known as a quadrigatus was first minted c.225 BCE.  Why is it called a quadrigatus?   (1 point)

     A 4-horse chariot (quadriga) is depicted on the reverse.

4.  Approximately when was the first sestertius minted?  Of what metal was it made?    (2 points)

     c.211 BCE, silver.

5.  Some silver denarii issued in 89 BCE bear the image of King Tatius.  Some of those also bear the image of Tarpeia.  Who were Tatius and Tarpeia?   (3 points)

    According to legend, Tatius was king of the Sabines, who for a time ruled Rome jointly with Romulus.  Tarpeia was the daughter of a Roman general.  She betrayed Rome to the Sabines in return for what she thought would be jewelry (what was worn on the left arm) but instead was crushed to death by shields.

Set 2

1.  From the perspective of length of time, which two foreign leaders were Rome's most persistent enemies?    (2 points)

     Hannibal and Mithridates VI.

2.  Towards the end of the life of Augustus a military reversal profoundly upset him.  What happened?  Where and when?    (2 points)

     In 9 CE, three Roman legions under the command of Varus were wiped out after being ambushed by Germans in the Teutoberg Forest.

3.  Describe the military device known as a "corvus."  When and where was it first used in battle?    (2 points)

     What we might call a gangplank.   It had a curved spike at the end which would hook on to enemy ships.  First used in the naval battle at Mylae in 260 BCE, in the First Punic War.

4.  Where is Eryx and what happened there in 244 BCE involving the Roman military?    (2 points)

     In western Sicily (now Erice).  The Romans suffered a military defeat there in 244 BCE, after which it was held by Carthage until the end of the First Punic War three years later.

5.  What is meant by the expression "to be put under the yoke" and how does that expression relate to an event that took place in 321 BCE?    (2 points)

     At war with the Samnites, Roman forces were trapped in a defile at the Caudine Forks in 321 BCE.  They were let go but not before being humiliated by being reduced to wearing undergarments and having to bend down in submission while passing under a "yoke" constructed of spears.

Set 3

1.  Several Republic denarii bear images of a curule chair and/or fasces.   What is a curule chair and who used them?   (2 points)

     A folding chair with no back and curved legs used by magistrates with imperium.  Often made of or coated with ivory,

     Describe fasces and their use.   (2 points)

    A bundle of wooden sticks, often containing an ax.  Fasces symbolized the state power to punish and were carried by varying numbers of Lictors in the presence of magistrates.  The higher the rank of the magistrate, the more Lictors they were allowed.

     What United States coin series bears the image of fasces?   (1 point)

     The "Mercury" dime (minted from 1916 - 1945).

2.  A shocking religious scandal took place in 62 BCE.  Who was involved and what did he do?   (2 points)

     Publius Clodius Pulcher dressed up as a woman and intruded upon the Bona Dea ritual (no men allowed) which was being held in the home of C. Iulius Caesar.  It was assumed by some that it involved his trying to have an affair with Caesar's wife, Pompeia - soon divorced.

3.  In what year was Octavian given the name Augustus?   (1 point)

     27 BCE

4.  A tax upon the assets of wealthy women was decreed by the Second Triumvirate.  A woman successfully campaigned against that tax.  Who?   (1 point)

     Hortensia

5.  Did the Romans consider Pluto to be a planet?   (1 point)

     No.
 
Set 4

1.  Briefly define the terms "Optimates"  "Populares"  "Novus Homo" and name one person who fits each category  (3)

     Optimates:  The "best" men.  A political faction that stood for power being concentrated in the Senate and resisted the expanding participation of those not considered noble enough.  Examples would be  L. Cornelius Sulla Felix, M. Tullius Cicero, and Cn. Pompeius Magnus.

     Populares:  Those who stood for power-sharing and greater participation in decision-making by the People.  Examples would be C. Marius, the Gracchi brothers, and C. Iulius Caesar.

     Novus Homo:  A "new" man, i.e., one who was the first in his family to become a senator or elected consul.  Examples would be Cato the Censor, C. Marius, M. Tullius Cicero.

2. The large size of the sestertius in the early Empire permitted lengthy legends.  Here is the obverse legend of a sestertius of Trajan:

     IMP   CAES   NER   TRAIANO   OPTIMO   AVG   GER   DAC   PARTHICO   PM   TRP   COS VI   PP

    Seven portions of the legend are underlined.  Briefly explain the significance of each underlined part as it relates to Trajan.  Do not discuss grammar, case endings, etc.    (7 points)

    IMP:  Imperator.  Honorific given to generals after a significant victory.  Later came to mean "emperor."
    OPTIMO AVG:  The best "Augustus" or emperor.  On other coins of Trajan, it appears as OPT PRINC or best "princeps."
    GER DAC PARTHICO:  Honorifics commemorating his victories in Germany, Dacia, and Parthia.
    PM:  Pontifex Maximus, one of his titles.
    TRP:  Tribunicia potestas.  Signifies his having the powers and immunities of a Tribune of the Plebs.
    COS VI:  Indicates he had been consul six times up to the time the coin was minted.
    PP:  He had the honorific title of Pater Patriae.  (In the U.S., George Washington is often described as the Father of the Country.)




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96085 From: Aemilius Crassus Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: Praetor election

C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,

I second the Consul Caninus words a will vote and ask every citizen to also vote for C. Maria Caeca for Praetrix. She served exemplary as Praetor Scriba in my term as Praetor, as she did in every other post I had the honour to have Caeca as my scribe or where I did serve beside her as scribe.

I can't think no one better to serve as Praetrix, Caeca will, in conjugation with the her colleague, ensure both well working fora and minimum intervention in the same fora.

I will voting for Caeca and ask you all to give her your support and vote,
Crassus


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96086 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Ludi Romani - History Contest - Final Results
In the name of Aedilis Curulis Quintus Arrius Nauta, Salvete!

Eight citizens of Nova Roma participated in the Ludi Romani history quiz.

The prize winners are:

M. Pompeius Caninus   -  1st prize  -  43  points  (maximum possible - 43 points)

L. Marius Vestinus  -  2nd prize  -  42.5 points

A. Tullia Scholastica  -  3rd prize  -  41 points


Congratulations to the prize winners and thanks to all who participated.  The Roman coin prizes will be sent by mail.

C. Claudius Quadratus, Quaestor
Scriba



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96087 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: praetorian candidacy

Omnibus in Foro S.P.D.

 

As far as I am aware, there has been little, if any, inappropriate language used either on the ML or in the FH.  Yes, there was one borderline word used, but that word has nearly become a part of the English vernacular language, when used in the sense of whining or complaining, which it was.  Because we are not preemptive in our policies, there were, recently, a very few posts that we considered inappropriate for the ML, and the offenders were moderated within hours.  In my estimation, and despite the fact that I have never held the office of Praetor, I think we served the Res Publica well.

 

Valete Bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96088 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-21
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Salve Crasse Amice et Salvete Omnes!

 

Thank you for your kind support and confidence, my friend.  This means a great deal to me, coming, as it does, from someone I have always highly respected here, and who I have the honor as counting among my friends.

 

Vale et valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96089 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Cn. Iulius Caesar sal.
 
I would like to add my voice to those of Caninus and Crassus. Caeca will make an excellent Praetor. She has spent her time since 2010 expanding her experience, serving admirably in the praetura and in the Senate and the Collegium pontificum. She also has broadened her experience in many other areas of Nova Roma. She brings to the position a moderate view point, one committed to preserving freedoms of speech yet at the same time ensuring that the very simple and basic moderation rules we do have here in this forum are upheld. She has demonstrated since 2010 she is quite capable of a gentle hint first, then a more firm yet always polite and civilized admonishment to those who have breached the rules, or who are teetering on the brink of doing so. She is able to listen, and doesn’t bring pre-conceived prejudices to debates or issues.
 
In the past this forum saw various forms of heavy handed moderation policy enforcement, to outright censorship. None of us want, I am sure or I hope, to see a return of those days, and Caeca will be just the person to ensure that essential balance between freedoms and responsibilities is preserved. She has an excellent and even “wicked” (in the nicest meaning of wicked <lol of humour, and truly as a citizen is one of the gems of Nova Roma. I have been very impressed by her posts and ideas in the Senate and the Collegium Pontificum and she has proven more than capable in those roles, so that is a very good indicator that as Praetor she will continue the path of excellence in performance that she has already demonstrated in those other areas of our res publica. She is always ready to help those that need assistance and support, and balances a sparkling and kind soul with the firmness sometimes necessary to a magistrate. She is also highly efficient on the administration side of running a list such as this.
 
So for those of you who are undecided, please consider voting for Caeca. You will not regret it. As a former Praetor myself I know she can do this job and more importantly excel in doing it. She is an excellent person, an excellent candidate and she will make an excellent Praetor. Please let her prove that to be an accurate prediction and vote for Caeca to be our next Praetor.
 
Optime valete  
 
 
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Praetor election
 
 

C. Aemilius Crassus omnibus SPD,

I second the Consul Caninus words a will vote and ask every citizen to also vote for C. Maria Caeca for Praetrix. She served exemplary as Praetor Scriba in my term as Praetor, as she did in every other post I had the honour to have Caeca as my scribe or where I did serve beside her as scribe.

I can't think no one better to serve as Praetrix, Caeca will, in conjugation with the her colleague, ensure both well working fora and minimum intervention in the same fora.

I will voting for Caeca and ask you all to give her your support and vote,
Crassus


On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:22 'M. Pompeius Caninus' caninus@... [Nova-Roma] <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96090 From: iulius_sabinus Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
SALVETE!

Both candidates are valuable members of our community. Have great commitments and experience. But of course only one will win in elections.

Currently I support C. Maria Caeca for praetor. It is the time as she to continue her cursus honorum.
I work very close with Maria in Collegium Pontificum and other places, and, all what I can say is she is outstanding person. Dedicated, wise, full of energy and what I like more is she keep going whatever obstacles are in front.
If elected, I know she will do exemplary her job. Succes from my part.

VALETE,
Iulius Sabinus
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96091 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election

C. Maria Caeca GN. Iulio Caesari S. P. D.

 

Thank you very much, Senator for your kind support and confidence.  I have to admit that I never expected to read *this* from you, J.  I’d say your post left me speechless, but that would be obviously inaccurate.  I deeply appreciate your assessment of my performance and qualities, and will, of course, do everything I can to fulfill the duties of this important office efficiently, even handedly, and maintain the excellence our citizens have come to expect from the Praetura.

 

Vale quam optime!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96092 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election

C. Maria Caeca T. Iulio Sabino Pontifici Maximo S. P. D.

 

I cannot even begin to tell you, Sir, how much your support and confidence  means to me.  Since I have been in Nova Roma, the high standard of honorable excellence and professionalism has been my model, and my goal.  It is, then, with both humility and joy that I thank you.

 

Vale quam optime!

 

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96093 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Cista is open --- Please VOTE --- Comitia Centuriata
M. Pompeius Caninus consul Quiritibus SPD.

The Cista is open. Look at Getting to the Cista for simple directions. Please cast your ballot for the office of Praetor.

As a reminder, the comitia schedule is:

    Start of Voting     9:00 PM Rome Time on 21 September 2015
    End of Voting      9:00 PM Rome Time on 28 September 2015

The candidates for Praetor are:

    Aula Tullia Scholastica
    Gaia Maria Caeca

Please vote at your earliest convenience.

Facite valeatis!
 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
Consul Novae Romae
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96094 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae quiritibus bonae voluntatis sal.  

Indeed, Caeca amica, anyone who has been here long enough would have been left more than speechless upon seeing such effusive praise, such a kindly and gentle post, from the very same man who, when he was your opponent for the praetura, savaged you so viciously that you withdrew from your candidacy almost in tears, your self-respect in tatters.  Has he turned into a marshmallow overnight?  Who knew he could be so sweet and gentle? Judging from his comments on other lists, one would not suspect that such a miracle had occurred; he still seems to hate Lentulus and me, his political opponents, as well as others both still here and those vanished from our group.   Nonetheless he remains about the last person I would have suspected would have supported you (and so graciously) although your apparent move toward the Sullan political faction's views has brought you their favor.  I would not be surprised that others from this group would support you, but that he did is, well, astonishing.   

Of course he is wrong that prior moderation was heavy-handed or the equivalent of censorship; it never really was, although at that time we not only had probationary and former citizens as well as otherwise unaffiliated parties interested in ancient Rome on the main list, but we also had minors there.   Moreover, there were citizens so unconcerned about others that they felt compelled to resort to sexual and other inappropriate terms and discussions despite the presence of minors and others who have no desire for things more appropriate to an adult list; like spoiled brats, they just had to have their way, even if it offended others and violated the Yahoo ToS.  We also had a rather different group seeking Christians for dating purposes, and we had outright spammers.  At that time there was initial moderation, which prevented a lot (but not all) of such materials from reaching the list (unmoderated parties managed to get some highly unsuitable material onto the ML), but there was no restriction on membership, so anyone who knew how to join a Yahoo list could do so and be on the Main List in minutes.  In any case, there is no guarantee that being 18 or over and / or  a citizen is the same as having good sense in such matters; I have personally seen graduate students behaving in manners more suitable to junior high school age kids--if anyone even that mature.  Any such status is no guarantee of emotional maturity, or even of sanity.  Anyway, praetors have to do much more than deal with list moderation (or its absence, as has been the case in recent years); they deal with laws, and with trials, as I did when I was praetrix.  The praetura is a very serious office, one conveying imperium minus, and one should consider that when one makes one's choice.  I've been there, and done that.  

I certainly don't expect any support from that team although I am just as nice as Maria, and just as magisterial when needed, plus equipped with a good sense of humor (anyone who stuck around Nova Roma for a dozen years would have to have a good sense of humor); some friends asked me to run, and it would be helpful if they, and any other friends, would support me.  Perhaps they have been cowed by the vociferous members of those far less moderate in approach than I, and dare not appear in my favor.  Better, though, that I not receive any visible support than that I receive it from that contentious NR group whose tolerance of viewpoints different from their own seems even less than that of the prominent American hyperconservative media host, Rush Limbaugh, a man who seems to think that perfection resides in his ample frame, and nowhere else other than in his "dittohead" followers.

Valéte.  

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96095 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-22
Subject: Re: Praetor election
C. Maria Caeca A. Tulliae Scholasticae Omnibusque in foro S. P. D.



Although I do not usually interleave my replies, I am going to in this case
because there is a lot of material on which I wish to comment, and it seems
more rational to place my responses as close to the original comments as I
can. I have tried to indicate my responses by placing my initials before
each of my comments, and I hope I havenÂ’t forgotten to do that anywhere in
this admittedly very long post. CMC







Indeed, Caeca amica, anyone who has been here long enough would have been
left more than speechless upon seeing such effusive praise, such a kindly
and gentle post, from the very same man who, when he was your opponent for
the praetura, savaged you so viciously that you withdrew from your candidacy
almost in tears, your self-respect in tatters.

CMC: My reasons for withdrawing from that election were far more
complicated than you indicate, and cannot be laid at CaesarÂ’s or anyone
elseÂ’s door. I had hoped never to discuss this, because what I did involved
not only myself, but since you choose to use that part of my NR history to
gain political currency, I will explain fully. Originally, I had no
intention of running for Praetor, although I had hoped that there would be a
3rd moderate candidate to balance the 2 conservative candidates. I had, in
fact, placed myself in the running for a very minor office that no longer
exists, because I felt that it would have given me important experience that
I would use later.



However, a very dear friend, who I trusted absolutely and who is extremely
persuasive, convinced me that A. I was fully qualified to fulfill the duties
of the office, and B. that I *should* run to give the voters a more broad
political choice. This friend, essentially told me what I wanted to hear,
and I became over confident, and placed my name in the running as a
candidate. In short, I allowed myself to be convinced, and I allowed my ego
more leeway than was healthy. I left that race for 2 reasons. First, I
left because I knew (and should have known from the very beginning) that I
was NOT qualified, and second, because I wanted to protect my friend from
the heated attacks being made on him. But, *I* made the original decision.
*I* made the decision to withdraw, and *I* recovered from whatever damage
that I, through my own actions, did to my self esteem. The other
candidates, specifically Caesar, treated me no differently than they would
have treated any other opponent.



Has he turned into a marshmallow overnight? Who knew he could be so sweet
and gentle? Judging from his comments on other lists, one would not suspect
that such a miracle had occurred; he still seems to hate Lentulus and me,
his political opponents, as well as others both still here and those
vanished from our group. Nonetheless he remains about the last person I
would have suspected would have supported you (and so graciously) although
your apparent move toward the Sullan political faction's views has brought
you their favor.



CMC: Let me make something clear, once and for all, Amica. I am, have
always been, and will always be, a moderate. I am not aligned with any
political party, here or in my macronational life, where I vote as an
independent. I support or oppose on the basis of whether I think the issues
involved will be in the best interests of Nova Roma, or whether I think the
candidate will do the best job in the office for which he or she is
candidating. I draw my friends based on personal qualities, and NOT on
political alignment, and I do NOT place political alignment above everything
else. Do I have Conservative friends in NR? Yes, and I enjoy their
friendship. Do I have liberal friends in NR? Yes, assuredly, some of whom,
including you, amica are very dear to me. Oddly, it is the very political
camp you criticize that understands, and has always understood and
respected, my nonaligned status, and has NEVER used my friendships with
people whose politics differ from theirs against me, as you have just done
here, and elsewhere. So, once again. I am an independent, and I am as
likely to oppose the people of whom you so disapprove as I am to support
them, and they know and accept this.





I would not be surprised that others from this group would support you, but
that he did is, well, astonishing.



Of course he is wrong that prior moderation was heavy-handed or the
equivalent of censorship; it never really was,



CMC: no. I will say plainly that I never observed you or Cato misuse your
office, but your moderation policies were far more strict, and, in some
respects, for good reason. As you say, at that time, the ML was open to
all, citizen and noncitizen alike, so it required different policies.



However, I well remember a situation when a sitting Praetor joined a private
list (yes, letÂ’s not use euphemisms) the Back Alley) copied a post from one
of its members, and despite an internal rule on that list against cross
posting, posted it on the ML and THEN moderated the original poster for
doing something not in accord with the moderation policies of the Praetura.
I also remember an individual being moderated not for something he had DONE
but because he MIGHT damage someoneÂ’s reputation. That seems fairly heavy
handed to me, and if not censorship, is itÂ’s kissing cousin.



Yes, we are more relaxed, especially on the ML, but we have demonstrated,
quietly and without fanfare, that we can deal with things when they get out
of hand. We just donÂ’t talk about it publicly, we see no need to do so.



although at that time we not only had probationary and former citizens as
well as otherwise unaffiliated parties interested in ancient Rome on the
main list, but we also had minors there. Moreover, there were citizens so
unconcerned about others that they felt compelled to resort to sexual and
other inappropriate terms and discussions despite the presence of minors and
others who have no desire for things more appropriate to an adult list; like
spoiled brats, they just had to have their way, even if it offended others
and violated the Yahoo ToS. We also had a rather different group seeking
Christians for dating purposes, and we had outright spammers. At that time
there was initial moderation, which prevented a lot (but not all) of such
materials from reaching the list (unmoderated parties managed to get some
highly unsuitable material onto the ML), but there was no restriction on
membership, so anyone who knew how to join a Yahoo list could do so and be
on the Main List in minutes. In any case, there is no guarantee that being
18 or over and / or a citizen is the same as having good sense in such
matters;



CMC: We do not rely on the fact that the people on this list are either
citizens or over the age of 18. We read, and carefully, each and every post
in this forum, and, if anyone in the Praetura sees a potential problem
developing, that issue is brought to the cohors for discussion, and we
increase our already careful vigilance, so that, should something cross the
line set by Yahoo or by our own Edicta, we are able to react quickly and
appropriately. Usually, this can be accomplished by communicating directly
with the offender. If not, then we have other measures at our disposal, as
you well know, and we will not, nor have we, hesitated to use them.



I have personally seen graduate students behaving in manners m

more suitable to junior high school age kids--if anyone even that mature.
Any such status is no guarantee of emotional maturity, or even of sanity.
Anyway, praetors have to do much more than deal with list moderation (or its
absence, as has been the case in recent years); they deal with laws, and
with trials, as I did when I was praetrix.



First, just because moderation isnÂ’t obvious does not mean it is absent.
Second, I am fully aware of the duties of this office. Third. The laws
governing breaches of NR law have changed (I edited some of those laws, as a
matter of fact, so know their provisions well). While it is very true that
the Praetura administers NRÂ’s legal system, adjudicates in matters both
between citizens and between a citizen and Nova roma, the management of both
the ML and the FH are the hands on, day to day job of the Praetura, and
these are the duties that take up 99.99% of the time and energy of the
Praetorian staff. As I said, I am perfectly familiar with our amended legal
system, and I assure the citizens of Nova Roma that, should the need arise,
I will be perfectly competent to handle the issues involved.



The praetura is a very serious office, one conveying imperium minus, and
one should consider that when one makes one's choice.



CMC: I am aware of the seriousness of this high office. Are you suggesting
that I am not, or are you suggesting that I am incapable of performing these
exalted duties Â…or perhaps that I am so inferior to you that I *cannot* do
so? I will leave it to the citizens of Nova roma to make that decision,
based on my conduct in the Praetura since 2010, and what they know of me as
a citizen since 2006.





I've been there, and done that.



I certainly don't expect any support from that team although I am just as
nice as Maria, and just as magisterial when needed, plus equipped with a
good sense of humor (anyone who stuck around Nova Roma for a dozen years
would have to have a good sense of humor); some friends asked me to run, and
it would be helpful if they, and any other friends, would support me.
Perhaps they have been cowed by the vociferous members of those far less
moderate in approach than I, and dare not appear in my favor. Better,
though, that I not receive any visible support than that I receive it from
that contentious NR group whose tolerance of viewpoints different from their
own seems even less than that of the prominent American hyper conservative
media host, Rush Limbaugh, a man who seems to think that perfection resides
in his ample frame, and nowhere else other than in his "dittohead"
followers.



Valéte.



Vale et valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96096 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Praetor election
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae S.P.D. 

It is late, and I may be able to address only portions of your reply, minus my preferred interleaving.  

At the time when you ran for a full term as praetrix, you had already moderated a number of lists, and were qualified for the office.  Your persuasive friend was right.  I would have liked to see you win that office, and would like to see you run for a full term as praetrix.  Please do not sell yourself short--even though the praetura does not require anything resembling your talent in poetic composition.  

As for your comments regarding what you think was a hint from me that you are not capable of performing that office, you are wrong:  I know you are capable.  You were back then, and are now.  You and I may have different views on some elements of the tasks involved, but both of us are fully capable of the duties of this office.  Moreover, in this brief suffect praetorship, the successful candidate will not get much opportunity to make many changes--nor should she do so.  We have a very sensible praetor, and there is no need to upset the apple cart, or to return to the days when only English was allowed.  

Yes, there have been some stellar problems with moderation--but the policies themselves, the moderation edicta, have been sensible, although earlier ones were far more complex than the more recent ones.  A more complex (and much larger) audience required a more complex set of rules, and got them.  That some moderators flew off the handle cannot be denied--but neither can the fact that some items were so vile that they never, ever should have seen the light of day--even on the back alley, let alone the ML.  

Amica, I don't have a chance in this election.  You will win an election to a rump term although you deserve a full one.   I, on the other hand, have already completed a full term as praetrix, the first to do so, but would prefer a short stint to get back into the swing of things.  In any case, I did not write a reply to you for political advantage (hope you haven't caught something going around on some other lists), but from bemusement that such an epitome of gruffness had metamorphosed overnight into a teddy bear.  Next thing you know, others will follow suit, and apologies for past insults with praises for one's opponents will fill the air.  

No, Maria, other candidates would not do what was done to you and some others.  I wouldn't, and others wouldn't.  For that matter, there was a time when NR mores would have prohibited anything of the sort; several of the macro world's political tactics were frowned upon here.  Please don't tar all of us with the same brush that some use; there are too many about town who always see any action in the worst possible light, always see the glass as half empty rather than half full.  You and I know who some of those are; you and I have seen them in action on another list or two or three--and maybe this one. 

Vale.

  
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96097 From: george.lichty Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Life of Rome

Life of Rome on Steam

Coming December of this year, Life of Rome is a MMO set in the time of the Roman Empire.  Players can form families, become elected to the Senate, or even actively rebel against the Empire.  From what I've gathered, estates can be set up as well.

It's the successor to Roma Victor, a game that never really got off the ground (set in Imperial Britain).  

Personally, I think it looks promising.  Is anyone else looking forward to it?

-Draco


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96098 From: Arthur Waite Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Praetor election
A. Paterculus omnibus in foro s.p.d.
  I would like to endorse A. Tullia Scholastica in her campaign for praetrix suffecta.
  From what I know of their records and participation in this forum, either of the candidates would do an excellent job as a moderator and in the other duties of the praetoral office. It seems almost redundant to offer a recommendation when the final choice is assured to turn out well, but Scholastica herself is right to say that those who know her should offer their knowledge of her virtues, as others have stepped forward on behalf of Caeaca.
  Scholastica has the experience for this office - not only has she held it before, as a member of the Senate she has had a firsthand view of the creation of the laws, ensuring that she will interpret them correctly. She has shown her commitment to Nova Roma by many services (for example she is currently assisting the Censors). She has been a witness and sometime participant on many of the occasions where this forum was the scene of conflict, and so should be able to head off future instances of improper speech, while not restricting what can be recognized as harmless or necessary arguments. Even her macronational experience suits her to the task, for who has to maintain order more constantly or with more restraint than an educator?
   Please vote for Scholastica or at least for one of these two qualified and intelligent women.
   Valete.

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96099 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
The game looks like it could be interesting.  Since it's an MMO, though, my interest will depend entirely on how it's paid for.  I don't do monthly fees, nor do I do pay-to-win microtransactions.  So far, the game I've encountered that handles it best is Star Trek Online.  There's plenty of stuff to pay for, but none of it is necessary to play the game.  You can enjoy every bit of the game without spending a dime.  If they do something like that or a one-time payment, I'll consider it.

Laterensis



On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 6:14 AM, "KarlvonRoma@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
Life of Rome on Steam

Coming December of this year, Life of Rome is a MMO set in the time of the Roman Empire.  Players can form families, become elected to the Senate, or even actively rebel against the Empire.  From what I've gathered, estates can be set up as well.

It's the successor to Roma Victor, a game that never really got off the ground (set in Imperial Britain).  

Personally, I think it looks promising.  Is anyone else looking forward to it?

-Draco



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96100 From: m.flavius_celsus Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Salvete!

Fraction information looks strange - Romans or Roman-rebels .What?!
Hope this will changes soon.

Also we realy must expect Roman Gods - because in otherwise we must forgot about mage and priest classes.

Valete!
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96101 From: M. Lollius Labeo Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Salvete!

Seems to be very early access alpha right now. I wonder if we as Nova Roma could contribute to this endeavor in some way? Lending expertise and knowledge could be a good way to get ourselves in the credits and gain prestige for Nova Roma. 

Valete!
Lollius Labeo
America Cismississippiana 
Sent from my iPhone

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96102 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-23
Subject: Re: Praetor election
A. Tullia Scholastica A. Julio Paterculo S.P.D. 

Many thanks, aedilis, for your endorsement and your kind words!  Both your endorsement and your laudatory remarks are greatly appreciated.  

In addition to the other praetorian duties you mentioned, I became thoroughly familiar with the Tabularium, for during one of my praetorian scribaships, I was asked to review all of the laws and check them for orthographic and other simple errors.  The dust in the Tabularium was quite deep in certain areas, but I brushed it away and set to work with my trusty vat of minium (red ink) at my side.  It was a very interesting experience, and now those early laws are error-free.  

Valé!  
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96103 From: george.lichty Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
I haven't seen anything about the payment system, if anything, quite yet.  I'm certainly keeping an eye out though.

"Fraction information looks strange - Romans or Roman-rebels"
They were originally Romans and Barbarians, but it made little sense.  

The world at release will be roughly 50km2, and this includes the historically accurate Rome that takes up approximately 15km2 of the game world. Roads and rivers flow throughout the map to encourage faster travel via boats and mounts. The furthest points on the map act as ‘barriers’ to contain the world; North and East are too mountainous to travel, West and South are encompassed by sea. However, both of these points have their benefits; the sea allows for a more unnoticed travel, and the mountains benefit as ideal lookout spots.

Having barbarians at the gates of Rome wouldn't happen for a few more centuries...  Sort of.
Rebels though?  Yeah, rebels/criminals living in the hills are far more likely.  

"Also we realy must expect Roman Gods - because in otherwise we must forgot about mage and priest classes."

There won't be magi or magic at all.  Though religion will play an important role, giving perks when you remain pious (praying at the temples or your domestic shrine).  http://lifeofrome.com/religion/


 "I wonder if we as Nova Roma could contribute to this endeavor in some way?"
Good question and certainly something to consider.  Getting our name attached in some way, even through presence, in a game that is sure to be populated by fellow Romanophiles would be a good move.  

-Draco

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96104 From: xai776@yahoo.com Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Life of Rome
Salvete Omnes,

Would I need a steam account to play?

Valete been,
Macra

Sent from my MetroPCS 4G LTE Android device

----- Reply message -----
From: "KarlvonRoma@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com "Fraction information looks strange - Romans or Roman-rebels" They were originally Romans and Barbarians, but it made little sense. The world at release will be roughly 50km2, and this includes the historically accurate Rome that takes up approximately 15km2 of the game world. Roads and rivers flow throughout the map to encourage faster travel via boats and mounts. The furthest points on the map act as ‘barriers’ to contain the world; North and East are too mountainous to travel, West and South are encompassed by sea. However, both of these points have their benefits; the sea allows for a more unnoticed travel, and the mountains benefit as ideal lookout spots. Having barbarians at the gates of Rome wouldn't happen for a few more centuries... Sort of. Rebels though? Yeah, rebels/criminals living in the hills are far more likely. "Also we realy must expect Roman Gods - because in otherwise we must forgot about mage and priest classes." There won't be magi or magic at all. Though religion will play an important role, giving perks when you remain pious (praying at the temples or your domestic shrine). http://lifeofrome.com/religion/ http://lifeofrome.com/religion/ "I wonder if we as Nova Roma could contribute to this endeavor in some way?" Good question and certainly something to consider. Getting our name attached in some way, even through presence, in a game that is sure to be populated by fellow Romanophiles would be a good move. -Draco
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96105 From: M. Lollius Labeo Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Salve Macra, 


I would say that an MMO like this will likely eventually spilt off and have its own logins, but for now it looks attached to steam at the hip. Good thing is that steam accounts are free :)

Sent from my iPhone

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96106 From: a_pompeia_crispa Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Life of Rome
Salve!

It looks interesting. I've been waiting for an RPG/MMORPG based on Ancient Rome for a very long time. I hope it is free to play. I already subscribe to too many games. :)

Vale!

A Pompeia Crispa
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96107 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-24
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Ave,

Awww...it sure sounds like someone's jealous of our vestal.  That the best she can do is to bring up ancient history while completely ignoring current events over the past few years.  Perhaps had Scholastica  spent less time defaming citizens she might have a 10th of the respect and popularity of Caeca?

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96108 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.D. 

Sorry to disappoint you, Sulla, but no.  One might envy the Teflon coating which currently protects her from being targeted by the Usual Suspects; one might envy her poetic talents, but no.  

Unlike some others, I don't make a habit of 'defaming citizens.'  Those of us who have been here awhile, those of us who have seen certain performances on various lists, know who the 'winner[s] and still "champeen[s]"' of 'defaming citizens' is / [are].  Some of the past and present comments in various places directed at Pontifex Lentulus, at me, at consularis censoriusque Quintilianus, consularis censoriusque Marinus, senatrix Hortensia, even at the neutral ancient historian and legal 'eagle' Cordus, and at many others who do not share the political vision of certain parties here have been so vicious that on occasion they almost bordered on libel.  At least the first three in the latter group enumerated above (and many others) have gone from our shores, taking their talents and experiences in multiple magistracies with them--along with viewpoints different from yours, and from those of several others here.  To me, that is sad, and a serious detriment to Nova Roma.  

BTW, you wouldn't be worried that Caeca might lose, now would you?  I doubt it, but perhaps you are concerned.  

Vale, et valete.  


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96109 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Ave,

You had a nota that said differently.  Or is your memory failing you?

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96110 From: Joel Axenroth Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Digest Number 7187
Ave
Sad to see after my initial foray into NR nothing has really changed. Scholastica is still the same self absorbed (and self important) person she once was that disillusioned me the first time here. The only thing that amazes me is she still has a shoulder under that chip she carries.
And sorry if that breaks some rules here but as they say Rome wasn't built by following rules and holding tenure meetings but by stopping everyone that disagreed with them
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96111 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Digest Number 7187
Salve Axenrothe,
 
Good to see you post again. With regards to Scholastica, she does indeed labour long and hard carrying that chip around, but she seems to really enjoy the pain of it so whatever turns her crank, as they say.  She also seems determined to continue her career as the Harry Turtledove of Nova Roma. Her accounts of past events are excellent revisionist alternate history, bearing as they do very little relationship to the truth and actual occurrences, but then you yourself have already experienced that yourself at her hands. 
 
Vale bene
Cn. Iulius Caesar
 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 4:39 AM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Digest Number 7187
 
 

Ave
Sad to see after my initial foray into NR nothing has really changed. Scholastica is still the same self absorbed (and self important) person she once was that disillusioned me the first time here. The only thing that amazes me is she still has a shoulder under that chip she carries.
And sorry if that breaks some rules here but as they say Rome wasn't built by following rules and holding tenure meetings but by stopping everyone that disagreed with them

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96112 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Caesar Scholasticae sal.
 
It is interesting that among the list of those that you think possessed “talents”, we find one failed leader of a coup attempt, one failed would-be dictator, and a senator whose behaviour veered from odd to downright unbalanced and disturbed (a fact you yourself have commented on in the past), and whose tenure as praetor was marked on this list by several examples of her unstable nature and perversion of logic. If this is an example of those that you find laudable, then maybe you need to adjust your value parameters as they seem somewhat unbalanced too.
 
It is also worth remembering that those that you bemoan leaving had a majority in the senate, which made their inability to stage a coup even more staggering in its incompetence, and that with only two exceptions they were not expelled or forced out. Quintilianus and Marinus, for example, both resigned their citizenship, which was their choice alone. They abandoned the ship, even though they possessed the requisite number (if not the required amount of ability) of senators to order affairs to their liking in the Senate, with the exception of not having the two thirds majority necessary to ratify any constitutional changes.
 
Some of us wondered how long it would take you, after tendering your apology to the Senate and the subsequent lifting of your nota, to once again resume your normal Goebbellian style broadcasts, where truth is present in small doses (if at all) and fictional characters, personalities and accounts seem to predominate.
 
Apparently not very long was the answer.
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:09 AM
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Praetor election
 
 

A. Tullia Scholastica L. Cornelio Sullae quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.D.


Sorry to disappoint you, Sulla, but no.  One might envy the Teflon coating which currently protects her from being targeted by the Usual Suspects; one might envy her poetic talents, but no. 

Unlike some others, I don't make a habit of 'defaming citizens.'  Those of us who have been here awhile, those of us who have seen certain performances on various lists, know who the 'winner[s] and still "champeen[s]"' of 'defaming citizens' is / [are].  Some of the past and present comments in various places directed at Pontifex Lentulus, at me, at consularis censoriusque Quintilianus, consularis censoriusque Marinus, senatrix Hortensia, even at the neutral ancient historian and legal 'eagle' Cordus, and at many others who do not share the political vision of certain parties here have been so vicious that on occasion they almost bordered on libel.  At least the first three in the latter group enumerated above (and many others) have gone from our shores, taking their talents and experiences in multiple magistracies with them--along with viewpoints different from yours, and from those of several others here.  To me, that is sad, and a serious detriment to Nova Roma. 

BTW, you wouldn't be worried that Caeca might lose, now would you?  I doubt it, but perhaps you are concerned. 

Vale, et valete. 
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96113 From: Majikpig@gmail Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election
L. Marius Vestinus L. Cornelio Sullae omnibusque S.P.D. 

Do you really think that mudslinging is the best reflection on the Respublica? Both candidates seem to be good choices. I understand why a person might support one over the other, but both would do their duty well. There is no need to try to bring one candidate down in this case.

And, no, please do not try to "educate" me about my vote for Scholastica. I am proud of my choice, though it was a difficult one for me because I carefully weighed both candidates and I found them both capable and worthy.

We Romani should approach such matters with a little more decorum.

-Vestinus 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96114 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Ave

 

"Do you really think that mudslinging is the best reflection on the Respublica? Both candidates seem to be good choices. I understand why a person might support one over the other, but both would do their duty well. There is no need to try to bring one candidate down in this case."

 

I for one was not throwing mud or interfering in the election in any way merely commenting on the interesting (to me) sociological construct that a little over 3 1/2 years later I see that some citizens haven't changed in the slightest. Growth is a necessary part of the evolution of any society, be it this one or others, and I saw very little evidence of it. Nova Roma is referred to in some places as a Micro Nation (otherwise known as a fishbowl) and is interesting to stop reading for three years, step back in, and see the same arguments as three years ago

 

Salve


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96115 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Omnibus in Foro S. P. D.

 

Actually, there have been a number of changes in Nova Roma over the last 3 years, and we are preparing for, possibly, even more major structural changes.  Of course, a superficial glance at the ML, especially during an election, isn’t going to reveal any of this.  One would, if one wanted to really find out what had been going on in the Res Publica, need to read some of the ML list archives.  That is, I admit, time consuming, but it also presents a more in depth and accurate picture.

 

I thought we’d done away with the label of micro nation some years ago, BTW.  Of course, we have no control over the labels others give us.  Oh ... and the correct Latin closing for a letter or message is Vale, if to one person, or Valete to more than one person.

 

Valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96116 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Ave,

Do you consider the truth to be mudslinging?

Vale,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96117 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Digest Number 7187

Ave,

You have not broken any rules at all.  Thank you for your opinion and courage posting...considering the numerous wrongs done to you made by Scholastica. 

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96118 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Greetings

 

I will try English then for now until I get back in the swing of things. I did not mean to imply that Nova Roma itself has not progressed just elements within it. And I harbor no one here any ill will especially not Scholistica. She is what she is and in and of herself bothers me not in the least. I had not given her any thought until for some reason I read today's update instead of deleting it like I normally do and found it amusing. So I commented on it, not for the intent of causing her any harm, but because I found it interesting.

 

It was not intended to comment on any ongoing election or "Mud Sling" but before you dismiss mudslinging as "Un Roman" perhaps you should reread Cicero and the Philippics. The Romans, and the Roman Senate, almost invented mudslinging or at the least refined it to high art.

 

My interest in Nova Roma, and Ancient Rome itself, was always multi faceted. Part was an interest in the religion and the Gods, part in the art, part in the military, and part philosophical (or Greco-Roman philosophy). So it stands to reason that the actions of any one individual would not affect that multi faceted interest. Nor was I looking to restart an old feud or settle an old score. On my part all is forgotton and forgiven

 

Like any society NR seems to have good and bad, fair and foul. Just as we don't judgeany country by the actions of one of it's members it would be unfair to judge NR by the actions of one of it's members.

 

Your Servant

 

Joel

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96119 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Forum


Greetings

 

I remember a few years back there was talk of developing a proper forum to replace this outdated Yahoo Groups messenger list was this ever done? I actually developed my own forum on a completely different historica topic in the past few years so I understand how simple the process is to set up and administer. Mine is here:

 

http://www.percussionrevolvers.com/

 

and for an obscure topic and no promotion has around 250 members so this isn't all that difficult

 

your servant

 

Joel

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96120 From: Robert Woolwine Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: Re: Forum

Ave,

Cool.  Now there are three to review.

Caninus, then Laterensis, now this!  Very cool.

Respectfully,

Sulla

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96121 From: Q. Arrius Nauta Date: 2015-09-25
Subject: NUNTII ARRII IV - Q. Arrius Nauta's Aedilician Newsletter
Q. Arrius Nauta aedilis curulis Omnibus S. P. D.

Welcome to the 4th Edition of NUNTII ARRII (Arrian Newsletter) series within the LUDI ROMANI, which I will continue until the end of the year.

The NUNTII ARRII Aedilician Newsletter will inform you about the latest news of Romanitas, discoveries or current debates wordwide about Roman topics, archeology, history, literaure, movie and everything.

The current newsflesh are:

1. ARCHEOLOGY NEWS: An intact pre-Roman tomb in Pompeii

[Q. Lutatius Catulus reports:] A team of French archaeologists working in Pompeii has made a remarkable find: a perfectly preserved pre-Roman tomb dating to the 4th century B.C., when Pompeii was home to the Samnite people. Historians believe the Oscan people, descendants of Campania’s Neolithic inhabitants, built the city of Pompeii in the 6th or 7th century B.C. The Samnites, an Italic tribe, conquered the Osci in the 5th century B.C., though the city likely came under Greek and Etruscan influence before that time. The newly discovered tomb is especially exciting because it dates to a period about which archaeologists know relatively little. Read more here:


2. ROMAN CRIME NEWS: Roman gladiators rob foreign filmmakers

[Cn. Cornelius Lentulus reports:] A group of Romanian journalists filming outside the Colosseum have exposed the racket being run by 'gladiators' in a shocking video. Christian Sabbagh from Romania's Kanal D was filming outside the Colosseum when his team decided to pose for a photo with the gladiators  in order to document the tacky tourist tradition. Once they had posed for the photo, an elderly man dressed as Julius Caesar told the team that the photo would cost them €€100. When the group tried to explain that the price was too high - one of the gladiators stole Sabbagh's wallet and removed €€50 from it. "“We'll just take half then," the gladiators explained. A heated argument ensued, during which the gladiators became aggressive and threatened to beat up the team's cameraman. Another gladiator even exposed his genitals in front of the camera. Read more here:

3. LATIN FOR ALL: Our favourite children's book translated to Latin

[Cn. Cornelius Lentulus reports:] According to The Latin Language Blog everything is better in Latin. They argue that languages are easier to learn the younger you are, and this is why they encourage anyone to teach their young relatives a second language early! How awesome would it be to have your child reading Latin at 7! The great thing about the Latin versions of children's books is that there are English texts which you can own or borrow from your local library to compare your translations. You can learn Latin by reading these simple texts. Read more here:


That was the Fourth Edition of the NUNTII ARRI!

Good Night Nova Roma!

You could read Quintus Arrius Nauta, your Aedilis.

Valete,

Q. Arrius Nauta
Aedilis Curulis
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96122 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
A. Tullia Scholastica L. Mario Vestino quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D. 

Thank you very much for your confidence in me, your message, and your vote. Both of us are qualified, both are friends, and both would serve well, but one is the current darling of some vociferous citizens, and the other is their scapegoat (or one of them).  

I agree that more decorum in these matters is desirable.  I have not said a bad word about my friend C. Maria Caeca, nor has she said one about me, but some of her supporters have managed to revert to the more recent version of Nova Roman politics--even when nothing more than a campaign for such a very brief suffect term is at issue.  One would think I were running for something far more exalted than that in order to have provoked so much effort on their part.  Makes one wonder, doesn't it?  

 As I mentioned earlier, there was a time when negative campaigning was effectively forbidden in NR.  It was frowned on when I became a citizen over a dozen years ago.  Now, however, certain parties feel compelled to employ this tactic--even though the comment period, or contio, for this election was supposed to be over when this began.  Not a peep was uttered then, but when voting started, out came the moat monsters and the vats of boiling oil along with the flaming arrows as if Caeca's castle were being attacked by catapults and battering rams. 

To set the record straight, the nota is no longer in effect, and referred to one citizen whose reputation some felt had been harmed by me, whether or not that was actually the case.  I pass over public and insulting remarks made by others on numerous occasions against several citizens, including against me, for those pass unnoticed by legal mechanisms despite the merit of such actions.  In this instance a private communication with one citizen was involved.  That one citizen has just reappeared after a very long absence; possibly he was "asked" to do so, as he was "asked" to do something else some years ago.  Said citizen shared private correspondence between the two of us with a political opponent of mine when he was importuned to do so; initially he had refused, but probably Caesar twisted his arm rather forcefully.  That private correspondence, which I sent to this citizen in confidence, apparently was then shared not only with the party who "requested" it, but also with others of his political stripe.  I shall pass over the other elements of this event; suffice it to say that not every action of any government (or person) anywhere is based on reality, nor does it spring from a sense of honor.   

To the great disappointment of Sulla, Caesar, and other political opponents, I do not suffer from Alzheimer's Disease, or any form of dementia.  Moreover, family longevity informs me that I should last at least another dozen years, if not two dozen years (or more)--with wits intact.  One of my relatives was a centenarian, and several were nonagenarians.  

These two citizens who seem so concerned about my mental acuity have access to the censorial database, and therefore know that I am older than they are--and that so is my friend C. Maria Caeca.  Note that since she is armored in Teflon just now, she does not get accused of being demented from old age (or anything else) whereas that is hinted at in my case; there may be some hidden agenda going on here, but for now, she serves their purpose, and they support her.   With regard to me, however, my age (none too different from hers) is a convenient club with which to attack me.  Well, teaching Latin takes plenty of brain power, so I don't think that I have lost much, if any, of it.  Ageism at work...

As for the persons I enumerated earlier who have left NR to our detriment, one did indeed have mental health issues--but some of the partisans on the other side have far worse ones than her mood disorder.  The other comments made about some of our former citizens are almost laughable (not that they are really relevant to this campaign), but it is sad that some actually believe that Marinus intended to be a modern dictator of any sort rather than merely a Roman one, with a six month term (if that), and that, too, at a time when the Nova Roman government was so fully paralyzed by power plays between an augur and a consul that nothing could happen.  Even the Senate sessions were invalid.  A Roman dictator would have been the best solution to break this impasse, but rest assured that the opposing faction would not stand for that, especially given that the office would not in be their hands, so it seems they went bleating to the civil authorities.  

Remember:  in Nova Roma, history is what the more vociferous members of a particular political faction say it is.  Anything else is deemed 'revisionist.'  The original Caesar, C. Julius, the conqueror of Gallia (not to be confused with NR's Cn. Julius), said 'homines id quod volunt credunt,' 'people believe what they want.'  He was right.  

Oh, I don't have a chip on my shoulder, either, nor am I self-absorbed or self-important.  One has to look elsewhere for that.  

Vale, et valete.  



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96123 From: gnaeus_iulius_caesar Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Caesar Scholasticae sal.
 
Your age has never been mentioned. Your memory though does seem impaired. The two are not co-dependent.
 
Some points of note to correct your revisionist accounting of this event:
 
1. Axenrothus did not have his arm twisted, forcefully or otherwise, by myself or anyone else. He gave his original account of his own free will.
 
2. Axenrothus was not asked to appear again. He is a Nova Roman citizen and comes and goes of his own free will. A more likely explanation for his most recent post was exactly what he said, namely that he was reflecting on how nothing has changed. One can understand that. The last time he was active in Nova Roma you were busy distorting the truth (so said the majority of the jury of your peers in the Senate, and common sense itself would compel someone to reach that conclusion), and when he revisits us again, here you are still distorting the truth. From his perspective time must have stood still in Nova Roma.
 
3. The majority of the Senate found that you had lied, and you very recently apologized for that incident of lying to the Senate. One assumes that, unless your apology was meaningless - in which case you essentially lied again, since you apologized you recognised and accepted you did lie in respect of the whole sorry incident involving Axenrothus. Now, as you are a candidate in an election I can understand your wish to pass over that unfortunate example of an ethical failure on your part, but no one compelled you to make that apology. You elected to do so yourself I assume. So now your account below is radically different from the actual incident and from your most recent apology, as I say either your memory is faulty, or you lied again in that apology, in that you didn’t mean a word of it and it was just a political ploy to remove the nota so you can stand in elections and regain your Senate seat.
 
4. I am sure you do wish to pass over this event, but you yourself, and you alone, managed to create this event in the first place by maligning Axenrothus, and then compounded it by lying to the Senate about the incident. You keep giving this incident fresh legs, because you keep changing your story. You did this at the time of the incident when it was debated in the Senate, you have done it subsequently and most recently again now, where your apology and the consequences of that apology (that you accepted in it you did lie) seem to have been entirely glossed over by yourself.
 
As for 'homines id quod volunt credunt,' 'people believe what they want.', for once never a truer word was spoken by you (which makes a nice change), in that you do exactly that. You believe exactly what you want. You have constructed an alternate revisionist history of that occasion and you seem determined to stick to it, and even compound it by further un-evidenced assertions about Axenrothus’ most recent appearance. You clearly still do not accept the things the Senate found you responsible for, and reprimanded you for, ( http://www.novaroma.org/nr/Senatus_consultum_on_Senate_reprimand_of_Aula_Tullia_Scholastica ), among which were oath breaking, maligning a citizen’s character and lying. Your nota  (https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Nova-Roma/conversations/messages/90590 ) was issued as a result of your continuing failure to address that reprimand.
 
I therefore conclude that your apology to the Senate was meaningless and clearly didn’t mean a word of it. Therefore your apology is likely to have been made solely to ensure you could regain your right to sit in the Senate and/or run in this, and future, elections. If this is the hallmark of what you would bring to the praetorship (or indeed any magistracy), this level of duplicity, then that is a sad indictment of your value system and a measure of what Nova Roma can expect from you should you win. Even if you don’t win having someone in the censura who has either a huge problem with their short to medium term memory, or a huge problem with consistent accounting of events and telling the truth,  is concerning (to put it mildly). 
 
Optime vale
 
 
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Nova-Roma] Praetor election
 
 

A. Tullia Scholastica L. Mario Vestino quiritibus bonae voluntatis S.P.D.


Thank you very much for your confidence in me, your message, and your vote. Both of us are qualified, both are friends, and both would serve well, but one is the current darling of some vociferous citizens, and the other is their scapegoat (or one of them). 

I agree that more decorum in these matters is desirable.  I have not said a bad word about my friend C. Maria Caeca, nor has she said one about me, but some of her supporters have managed to revert to the more recent version of Nova Roman politics--even when nothing more than a campaign for such a very brief suffect term is at issue.  One would think I were running for something far more exalted than that in order to have provoked so much effort on their part.  Makes one wonder, doesn't it? 

As I mentioned earlier, there was a time when negative campaigning was effectively forbidden in NR.  It was frowned on when I became a citizen over a dozen years ago.  Now, however, certain parties feel compelled to employ this tactic--even though the comment period, or contio, for this election was supposed to be over when this began.  Not a peep was uttered then, but when voting started, out came the moat monsters and the vats of boiling oil along with the flaming arrows as if Caeca's castle were being attacked by catapults and battering rams.

To set the record straight, the nota is no longer in effect, and referred to one citizen whose reputation some felt had been harmed by me, whether or not that was actually the case.  I pass over public and insulting remarks made by others on numerous occasions against several citizens, including against me, for those pass unnoticed by legal mechanisms despite the merit of such actions.  In this instance a private communication with one citizen was involved.  That one citizen has just reappeared after a very long absence; possibly he was "asked" to do so, as he was "asked" to do something else some years ago.  Said citizen shared private correspondence between the two of us with a political opponent of mine when he was importuned to do so; initially he had refused, but probably Caesar twisted his arm rather forcefully.  That private correspondence, which I sent to this citizen in confidence, apparently was then shared not only with the party who "requested" it, but also with others of his political stripe.  I shall pass over the other elements of this event; suffice it to say that not every action of any government (or person) anywhere is based on reality, nor does it spring from a sense of honor.  

To the great disappointment of Sulla, Caesar, and other political opponents, I do not suffer from Alzheimer's Disease, or any form of dementia.  Moreover, family longevity informs me that I should last at least another dozen years, if not two dozen years (or more)--with wits intact.  One of my relatives was a centenarian, and several were nonagenarians. 

These two citizens who seem so concerned about my mental acuity have access to the censorial database, and therefore know that I am older than they are--and that so is my friend C. Maria Caeca.  Note that since she is armored in Teflon just now, she does not get accused of being demented from old age (or anything else) whereas that is hinted at in my case; there may be some hidden agenda going on here, but for now, she serves their purpose, and they support her.   With regard to me, however, my age (none too different from hers) is a convenient club with which to attack me.  Well, teaching Latin takes plenty of brain power, so I don't think that I have lost much, if any, of it.  Ageism at work...

As for the persons I enumerated earlier who have left NR to our detriment, one did indeed have mental health issues--but some of the partisans on the other side have far worse ones than her mood disorder.  The other comments made about some of our former citizens are almost laughable (not that they are really relevant to this campaign), but it is sad that some actually believe that Marinus intended to be a modern dictator of any sort rather than merely a Roman one, with a six month term (if that), and that, too, at a time when the Nova Roman government was so fully paralyzed by power plays between an augur and a consul that nothing could happen.  Even the Senate sessions were invalid.  A Roman dictator would have been the best solution to break this impasse, but rest assured that the opposing faction would not stand for that, especially given that the office would not in be their hands, so it seems they went bleating to the civil authorities. 

Remember:  in Nova Roma, history is what the more vociferous members of a particular political faction say it is.  Anything else is deemed 'revisionist.'  The original Caesar, C. Julius, the conqueror of Gallia (not to be confused with NR's Cn. Julius), said 'homines id quod volunt credunt,' 'people believe what they want.'  He was right. 

Oh, I don't have a chip on my shoulder, either, nor am I self-absorbed or self-important.  One has to look elsewhere for that. 

Vale, et valete. 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96124 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Greetings

1. No one contacted me in any way and asked me to post here I just sort of stumbled into this. I think I use the words self important or something to that effect yesterday if you see a grand conspiracy against you it obviously proves my point.

2. I stated my reasons for posting in that I found the situation mildly amusing and worthy of comment. To question that and spin a fantasy conspiracy, without a shred of proof, is tantamount to calling me a liar.

3. I care little who wins the election having been away

4. To set the record straight we did not "enter into a private conversation". To enter into an agreement requires the consent of both parties. Instead you sent me a unsolicited vile diatribe slandering your fellow senators and asked me to keep it private a commitment I didn't agree to either before or afterwards.

5. You know little of me and obviously what little you do know is sadly misinformed if you think anyone, anywhere, can "twist my arm" to do anything against my will. Again you toss out slanderous unfounded allegations under the guise of victim hood.

6. It was the above reflections of your character that prompted my post as the brief exchange I saw told me little had changed. I now find that brief impression reinforced.

7. I actually still have the original email you sent me, unaltered, and time having passed would be happy to post it here for all to see.

You see the definition if integrity is standing behind who you are and what you write. I have I problem doing so and can back up what I say with examples. Do you have similar documentation for your accusations?


And can you even comprehend why I felt little had changed, at least in your case?

As I said I find the exchanges amusing especially the arm twisting. I could kit imagine anyone who knows me personally doing more than laughing at that

Your servant

Joel
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96125 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Greetings

I would like to set the record straight on one other matter. Shortly after the incident that resulted in the above mentioned Senate decree (which I had no knowledge of until today) I fell and shattered the orbital bones surrounding the eye socket. I was in the hospital for five or do days and had a plastic plate put in to hold the bones together and the eye in the proper place. The necessitated a long recovery, it still troubles me today, and was my main reason for drifting away as looking at a computer screen was painful and as I make my living programming most of my computer time was engaged in that. After that I became engaged in other interests for a bit

I was not driven away and if I had been contacted by anyone in anyway about the Senate Decree would have said I preferred to let it drop. I find Scholastica an interesting diversion, or a trifle, but not someone to take seriously so from my part there is no ill will. It is like having ill will towards a fly or flea that bites you. It, like she, is just following it's nature.

I doubt a Senate Decree telling a flea not to bite would be ignored as well by the flea. Such is it's nature

Again I bear no one any ill will not was I driven away, asked to leave, or asked to return. It appears I just wandered in and out and caused my own brand of idiocy

Your servant

Joel
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96126 From: cassius622 Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Forum
Salvete,
 
There have been many calls to move away from "this outdated forum" and onto a shiny new webpage only "forum page." 
 
After doing some research, it seems that many organizations that move away from a format that delivers direct emails find their members become less engaged. Receiving mail to your inbox is a reminder... having to visit a special page and sift through a log of postings means one has to be proactive.  Many organizations find that moving away from listserv mailings loses them about 70% of the membership activity. You end up with a web page that a few people LOVE... and most people don't bother to take the time to visit.
 
The real "new and updated" way to do this is a forum that is both a list serve *and* a message board. That way folks that need email reminding in order to participate can have that... and the folks that just want to visit a webpage can have that too.
 
Here is an interesting page about the issue:
 
 
Interestingly, the "old and outdated" Yahoo lists actually do offer both listserv and forum functions. You can opt for "web only" and just visit the group pages and look through logged listings to your heart's content.
 
If we move away from Yahoo it seems to me we shouldn't lose the engagement capacity that email lists offer. If we want to keep people posting it appears we should best look for something that offers both functions and is not just a forum page.
 
-Marcus Cassius Julianus
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/25/2015 2:37:21 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96127 From: M. Pompeius Caninus Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Forum

Caninus Cassio sal.

We will continue to send posts to email even after switching over to a forum, whether that is a stand alone forum or an social net package integrated with a content management system.

Been vale.

 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96128 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Forum
Laterensis Cassio S.P.D.

My own forum can implement a mailing list function so users can get the best of both worlds.  The feature is currently not implemented due to limitations on free hosting.  I need better hosting and a domain name to get everything up and running, and that isn't likely to happen any time soon.  If I do get to a point where I can afford to take on monthly payment for hosting, though, I'll be able to get all the features up and running and hopefully have the forum in a state where it'll be ready for an official presentation.

Di te incolumem custodiant!



On Saturday, September 26, 2015 12:22 PM, "'M. Pompeius Caninus' caninus@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  

Caninus Cassio sal.

We will continue to send posts to email even after switching over to a forum, whether that is a stand alone forum or an social net package integrated with a content management system.

Been vale.

 
Marcus Pompeius Caninus
 
 




Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96129 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election

C. Maria Caeca A. Tulliae Scholasticae Omnibusque in foro S.P.D. 

 

Once again, I must interleave my response, and reproduce only those parts of the original to which I wish to respond.

 

Thank you very much for your confidence in me, your message, and your vote. Both of us are qualified, both are friends, and both would serve well, but one is the current darling of some vociferous citizens, and the other is their scapegoat (or one of them).  

 

CMC.  Um, I am no one’s “darling”.  Some of those who you think are currently and temporarily enamored of me are either female or married, and the rest have better taste.  Frankly, I am thoroughly tired of the implication that a specific group of people is “protecting” me (from what, I wonder?), or that I am the tool of a group of politically aligned citizens.  Interestingly, they know, as you apparently do not, that no one owns me or my vote, and that I am no one’s tool.  Yes, people of whom you disapprove have supported me, which was entirely their choice.  I have not asked, publicly or privately, for support from anyone.

 

In addition, your innuendos imply things about me that I consider objectionable.  Do you think so little of me that you think that all someone needs to do is pat my head and I will always support their positions on any issue and always vote as they wish?  Interestingly, the people of whom you disapprove so much know better.  They know, as, it would seem, you do not that I would make an extremely unreliable tool, because at any given moment and without prior warning, I could, and if need be would, turn in their hands and slit their wrists (figuratively, of course). 

 

Oh, perhaps they support me because they think I would be easy to manage or bully, (though I seriously doubt that), or because they think, as I have been strongly led to believe that I am spineless, insipid and as was once told to me “competent to fill only the most menial of scribe positions”.  (well, everyone is entitled to their opinions, and we all have a whole raft of them).  But perhaps, just perhaps, they have, over time, come to respect me, not based on my political stances but on my performance, actions, and words in Nova Roma, and perhaps, just perhaps, some of these people of whom you disapprove so strongly have taken the time and trouble to get to know me, and have come to consider me an honest, honorable person who cares about this organization, and will work for its best interests. 

 

Oh …and fair warning to anyone who think they own me …you don’t. J. You don’t qualify, because you aren’t cats who share my living space.

 

 

 

I agree that more decorum in these matters is desirable.  I have not said a bad word about my friend C. Maria Caeca, nor has she said one about me,

 

CMC. No, Amica, but you have implied things that, if true, would mean that I am entirely without honor, and frankly, I find these innuendos, especially coming from a friend, hurtful, and as public comments of one candidate concerning another, distasteful, at best.  I thought you knew me better.

 

but some of her supporters have managed to revert to the more recent version of Nova Roman politics--even when nothing more than a campaign for such a very brief suffect term is at issue.  One would think I were running for something far more exalted than that in order to have provoked so much effort on their part.  Makes one wonder, doesn't it?  

 

Wonder about *what*? 

 

Vale et valete!

C. Maria Caeca

 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96130 From: Belle Morte Statia Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Sta. Cornelia Aeternia Omnibus in foro SPD

I must say this is incredible to see.. After serving with Caeca on the Praetura I have observed she has always been dedicated to the task. She has demonstrated countlessly time and time again to be fair-handed, dedicated, and above all genuinely devoted to serving Nova Roma in any capacity that she can.

I am fully endorsing C. Maria Caeca and I encourage people to vote for this outstanding beacon to our res republica.

Valete bene,
Statia Cornelia Aeternia

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96131 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-26
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Salve Aeternia, et Salvete omnes!

 

Thank you for your very kind support and your confidence in me.  I appreciate it J  As I said before, my chief concern is not for whom citizens vote, but that they vote, since that is one of the very few civic duties Nova Roma asks that citizens perform.  Voting gives you a voice in who will, or will not, serve you as magistrates, and, as I was once told rather forcefully by my Grandmother as a little girl, “if you don’t bother to vote, then you have forfeited your right to complain about the officials who were elected.”  This, of course, was in reference to macronational elections, but the concept holds true here, as well.  The voting period is nearing its conclusion, so if you haven’t, *please* vote!!!!!

 

Vale et valete bene!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96132 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Praetor election
 
 
In a message dated 9/26/2015 12:51:49 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96133 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
 
 
In a message dated 9/25/2015 12:37:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96134 From: qfabiusmaximus Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Praetor election
 
 
In a message dated 9/25/2015 12:22:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com writes:
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96135 From: Majikpig@gmail Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
This was another forum set up by a citizen on a non-NR topic. That citizen wanted to show us that he could set up the forum for NR as well.
-Vestinus 

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96136 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
Greetings

Most forum software today has an email function that will send the latest postings to all registered members, or a subset.

My forum only runs me about $100 yearly with the domain name

Your servant

Joel
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96137 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Praetor election
Greetings

I wish to publicly apologize to Nova Roma for having mucked into the election. Having been away I realize it was an inappropriate moment to comment. No offense towards any candidate was intended.

Scholastica if I have caused you offense in any way I also apologize. I do not now, or ever did, bear you any ill will. I consider our past interactions closed and will not comment on them again. I never asked for you to be sanctioned and was not informed it had happened.

I say this freely without coercion and not having been asked to by anyone. I realize the election is a serious matter and I tend towards levity at times. I found some of the tone humerus for my own reasons and was commenting on that not trying to sabatoge anyone.

If I can be of service to you in the future you feel free to ask.

Your servant

Joel
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96138 From: yehya_61 Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
Simply an example of a quick forum layout I did on my own free time about another of my interests nothing to go with Nova Roma except as an example of how easy other forums are to set up, organize, and use

Yahoo groups are 25 year old technology
Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96139 From: Glenn Thacker Date: 2015-09-27
Subject: Re: Forum
While it's true that most forum software has some degree of email integration, it can't do what Yahoo groups does out of the box.  Hence the mailing list plugin I'm wanting to get working.  Also, I know that hosting and a domain isn't an incredibly expensive affair, but it's still hard to afford even a modest additional bill when you're already living paycheck to paycheck.

Laterensis



On Sunday, September 27, 2015 12:27 PM, "yehya_61@... [Nova-Roma]" <Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com  
Greetings

Most forum software today has an email function that will send the latest postings to all registered members, or a subset.

My forum only runs me about $100 yearly with the domain name

Your servant

Joel


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96140 From: flavia@... Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Praetor election
A. Tullia Scholastica C. Mariae Caecae S.P.D. 

Much as I detest disappointing those who enjoy observing verbal or other polemics, I have said pretty much all I am going to say on this topic.  Some misunderstandings remain, however, so I must address them as briefly as possible.  

Maria, I wasn't implying that any of your supporters was 'enamored' of you THAT way!  Goodness!  I also know you too well to think that you would respond to a pat on the head as you indicated!  You are, like your belovèd  kitties, much too independent for that!  I also know that you are devoted to NR, and will work for it to the best of your abilities.  

Both of us know about some of those comments about your supposed (and totally imaginary) unsuitability for scribal and other positions.  Those who made them were wrong, very wrong--and you have proven any such persons wrong. It wouldn't be the first time that anyone got a wrong impression of someone else, now would it?  It wouldn't be the first time that someone came to a wrong conclusion based on superficialities or false suppositions, either.  

BTW, I wasn't aware that any cats were sharing your living space… ;-) 

Valé!  



Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96141 From: MajikPiG Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Forum
L. Marius Vestinus omnibus S.P.D.

I prefer forums primarily because of the ability to segment posts into categories and because messages are generally threaded by topic. So, I only have to look at the topics that interest or relate to me, rather than having to sift through a mountain. It especially helps with finding and reading past content, something that is extremely difficult in the Yahoo Group.

In addition, I have already expressed my willingness to host and set up a forum, as have other citizens, so it would not be of any additional cost to NR.

Di vos incolumes custodiant!
L. Marius Vestinus

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96142 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Praetor election

Caeca Scholasticae Sal!

 

Oh, dear, I’m afraid my writing was unclear, so let me apologize and explain.  What I meant to express was that the only “people” who have even a ghost of a chance to “own” me have 4 feet, soft fur, long tails and speak “meow”.  No, I don’t have any living with me at the moment, my apartment management forbids it, (unless I could find a doctor to stop laughing long enough to give me credentials saying that a cat was my service animal).  But, over the years, I have happily been owned by several wonderful cats.  As the saying goes, “dogs have owners; cats have staff”.  Now I have 1 kitty in Rome, my Albina Pulchra, 1 in SL, my Gloriana Maria Rhiannon, 2 stuffed cats that guard my computer, and another that, in fact, you sent me. 

 

Vale et valete!

C. Maria Caeca

Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96143 From: gattarocanadese Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Your Roman Cat
Salve, Caeca!

I plan to give some treats and pets on Saturday to your Roman cat.  I'll let you know how she's doing.

Vale!
Quadratus


To: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
From: Nova-Roma@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:20:07 -0400
Subject: RE: [Nova-Roma] Praetor election

 

Caeca Scholasticae Sal!

 

Oh, dear, I’m afraid my writing was unclear, so let me apologize and explain.  What I meant to express was that the only “people” who have even a ghost of a chance to “own” me have 4 feet, soft fur, long tails and speak “meow”.  No, I don’t have any living with me at the moment, my apartment management forbids it, (unless I could find a doctor to stop laughing long enough to give me credentials saying that a cat was my service animal).  But, over the years, I have happily been owned by several wonderful cats.  As the saying goes, “dogs have owners; cats have staff”.  Now I have 1 kitty in Rome, my Albina Pulchra, 1 in SL, my Gloriana Maria Rhiannon, 2 stuffed cats that guard my computer, and another that, in fact, you sent me. 

 

Vale et valete!

C. Maria Caeca


Group: Nova-Roma Message: 96144 From: cmc Date: 2015-09-28
Subject: Re: Your Roman Cat

Salve Quadrate!

 

Gratias Tibi ago!  Please do give her my love!

 

Vale quam optime, (to both of you!)

Maria